Proceedings - Teaching and Learning Centre - Simon Fraser ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Fraser River Action Plan 3rd Research Workshop techniques were all used to improve the capture success of mature peamouth chub. The greatest numbers of peamouth were caught in eddy pools along the margins of the river using sinking, monofilament gillnets (50 mm mesh). Despite substantial sampling effort, numbers of mature male/female fish captured in the exposure zones were again limited. Capture success was strongly hindered by high, turbid water levels and large amounts of suspended debris which fouled the gillnets. Conclusions Overall, there were few differences in whole organism and physiological parameters between fish collected from the reference and near-field zones. Limited sample sizes for mature male and female fish made it difficult to confidently compare characteristics between zones. However, a graphical approach comparing the spatial position of individual near-field fish relative to the 95% confidence ellipse of reference fish did not show substantial deviations in the parameters of exposed chub. As in the fall survey, immature peamouth chub from the near-field zones had induced EROD activity (1.5- to 4.1-fold) relative to reference fish, indicating exposure to mill effluent. No steroid hormone differences (circulating levels or in vitro production) were observed between reference and exposed fish. Comparisons between spring and fall reference fish indicated that sexually mature fish collected in the spring were significantly larger and older than fish collected during the fall survey. These results further supported the hypothesis that chub collected during the fall were probably borderline in terms of size and age of maturity. As in the fall, instream concentrations of conductivity, chloride, sodium and suphate were predictably higher downstream of the mill diffusers during the spring survey. Chloride data indicated that effluent concentrations were approximately 0.08-0.6% downstream of mill A and approximately 0.03-0.4% downstream of mill B. The chemistry data, along with MFO data, indicated that the fish sampled during the spring survey were exposed to mill effluent. Concurrent to the field surveys, laboratory effluent exposure tests were conducted to determine whether effluents from the Fraser River mills (Prince George and Quesnel mills) were capable of inducing MFO activity in exposed rainbow trout. Fish were exposed to 100% effluent for a total of four days. Hepatic EROD activity in exposed trout were induced 6.7-fold with mill A effluent, 8-fold with mill B effluent, 14.5-fold with mill C effluent and 3.1-fold with mill D effluent relative to reference fish. Similar exposure tests were conducted in the field at the mill A site using peamouth chub from the reference zone. Male and female chub were exposed to river water (collected upstream of diffuser) or 50% whole effluent from mill A for five days. After the exposure period MFO activity and circulating levels of testosterone were measured. Unfortunately, problems related to fish survival occurred (fungal infection) affecting the sample size, exposure time and power of the test. No differences were observed in EROD activity or plasma concentrations of testosterone between exposed and reference fish. Confidence in the results were influenced by high withintreatment variability and reduced exposure time. However, the on-site test represented a useful approach for assessing the potential of effluents to affect resident fish species, especially in situations where the capture success of exposed fish is poor. Despite the limited field data, there was evidence which suggested that effluent from mills A and B were capable of eliciting physiological responses in laboratory and resident fish species (immature chub). However, the success of using peamouth chub for monitoring the upper Fraser River is uncertain. First, peamouth chub is larger than many cyprinid/cottid species and its capacity for large-scale movement is unknown. Although likely to be less mobile relative to larger species such as mountain whitefish or squawfish, the degree of mobility of peamouth chub needs to be assessed. Second, the success of using peamouth chub as a sentinel monitoring species is strongly influenced by the ability to capture mature chub within the near-field zones. Unless capture success improves, use of peamouth chub as a sentinel species will be restricted to far-field zones, or mills located further downstream of Prince George where peamouth chub are more abundant. Page 22
Fraser River Action Plan 3rd Research Workshop Figure 1: Location of the designated reference zone for collecting fish during the field surveys on the upper Fraser River, Prince George, B.C. Page 23
Page 2 and 3: PROCEEDINGS 3rd RESEARCH WORKSHOP F
Page 4 and 5: TABLE OF CONTENTS Participants ....
Page 6 and 7: Development of a Citizen’s Monito
Page 8 and 9: Fraser River Action Plan 3rd Resear
Page 26 and 27: SESSION 1 PULP MILL EFFLUENT ISSUES
Page 30 and 31: Page 4 - t 91 8 .--- i I -_-___ Fra
Page 45: Fraser River Action Plan 3rd Resear
Page 97 and 98:
Fraser River Action Plan 3rd Resear
Page 99:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 148:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 155:
Page 160 and 161:
SESSION 4 AGRICULTURAL ISSUES
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176:
Page 192 and 193:
SESSION 5 BIOLOGICAL INDICATORS
Page 194 and 195:
Page 197:
Page 202:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239:
SESSION 6 ESTUARY ISSUES
Page 242 and 243:
Page 248 and 249:
Fraser River Action Plan The Use of
Page 250 and 251:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 260 and 261:
Page 269 and 270:
Fraser River Action Plan Concluding
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289 and 290:
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
Page 295:
show all

Proceedings - Teaching and Learning Centre - Simon Fraser ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?