Proceedings - Teaching and Learning Centre - Simon Fraser ...
Proceedings - Teaching and Learning Centre - Simon Fraser ...
Proceedings - Teaching and Learning Centre - Simon Fraser ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Fraser</strong> River Action Plan 3rd Research Workshop<br />
Summary<br />
Resident Fish Condition <strong>and</strong> Contaminants Assessment<br />
B.A. Raymond <strong>and</strong> D.P. Shaw<br />
Environment Canada<br />
The <strong>Fraser</strong> River Action Plan is assessing the condition of resident fish in the <strong>Fraser</strong> basin, based on health <strong>and</strong><br />
contaminant levels of mountain whitefish <strong>and</strong> peamouth chub. The health of resident fish populations is<br />
important as an indicator of ecosystem health, <strong>and</strong> as a factor that can affect human health. Resident fish spend<br />
their entire lifespan in the river <strong>and</strong> reflect more local conditions than migrants such as salmon.<br />
Mountain whitefish were selected for this study because previous studies indicated that they accumulate<br />
contaminants to higher levels than other species sampled, <strong>and</strong> research is being conducted on their life history in<br />
the upper <strong>Fraser</strong> River. Peamouth chub are widely distributed <strong>and</strong> abundant in the <strong>Fraser</strong> River, are the target of<br />
fish condition research in the upper <strong>Fraser</strong> River, <strong>and</strong> have been used in the Environmental Effects Monitoring<br />
Program for pulp <strong>and</strong> paper mills on the <strong>Fraser</strong> River.<br />
Mountain whitefish <strong>and</strong> peamouth chub were collected by beach seining between July <strong>and</strong> November, 1994,<br />
from eleven reaches (Figure 1). All fish were examined in the field for external <strong>and</strong> internal abnormalities <strong>and</strong><br />
tissue samples were collected for histological assessment. The health assessment index (HAI) of Goede <strong>and</strong><br />
Barton (1990) 1 was incorporated because it is being widely applied in environmental studies. This study was an<br />
opportunity to link the HAI to other variables, such as contaminant levels <strong>and</strong> histology.<br />
Preliminary results for the HAI indicated that:<br />
• A high incidence of HAI abnormalities occurred in peamouth chub <strong>and</strong> mountain whitefish;<br />
• HAIs were significantly different among reaches;<br />
• HAIs were not correlated with histological abnormalities (i.e., HAI abnormalities may not be signs of<br />
“disease”);<br />
• HAIs appeared to be unaffected by age (fish ages were significantly different among reaches);<br />
• HAI was highest in the Nechako where contaminant <strong>and</strong> MFO levels were low; <strong>and</strong>,<br />
• Factors other than contaminant exposure appeared to account for variability in the HAI.<br />
HAI information gaps included:<br />
• Cause-effect studies to determine causes of variability in the HAI <strong>and</strong> allowed application of this<br />
technique to environmental management;<br />
• Assessment of user variability (planned for 1996-7); <strong>and</strong>,<br />
• Assessment of histological data quality (underway).<br />
Analyses for contaminant exposure included MFO activity in liver; trace metals, PCBs, organochlorine<br />
pesticides, chlorophenolics, dioxins <strong>and</strong> furans in muscle <strong>and</strong> liver; <strong>and</strong> PAH metabolites, chlorophenolics <strong>and</strong><br />
resin acids in bile.<br />
Preliminary results for the contaminants indicated that:<br />
• Contaminant levels in fish varied among reaches <strong>and</strong> species;<br />
• Contaminant levels were generally low, near or below detection limits <strong>and</strong> guidelines (where guidelines<br />
exist);<br />
• TCDD <strong>and</strong> TCDF levels were highest in the Thompson system;<br />
Page 221