24.02.2013 Views

Proceedings - Teaching and Learning Centre - Simon Fraser ...

Proceedings - Teaching and Learning Centre - Simon Fraser ...

Proceedings - Teaching and Learning Centre - Simon Fraser ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Fraser</strong> River Action Plan 3rd Research Workshop<br />

of adults were detected in the lower Nechako <strong>and</strong> Willow rivers in mid-October. Many of these fish were<br />

close to spawning. Five such fish were radio-tagged in the lower Nechako <strong>and</strong> eight fish near spawning<br />

(males running milt) were radio-tagged in the mainstem <strong>Fraser</strong>. These radio-tagged fish were followed until<br />

freeze-up (late November). Two of the Nechako fish made micro-movements (a few 100 m) but stayed in<br />

the aggregation area. Three Nechako fish moved downstream in the <strong>Fraser</strong> where they stayed for several<br />

days <strong>and</strong> then moved downstream in fits <strong>and</strong> starts (e.g., they would hold position for a few days <strong>and</strong> then<br />

suddenly move 15 km, stop <strong>and</strong> hold position again, <strong>and</strong> then suddenly make another spurt of movement).<br />

The maximum tracked downstream movement of these Nechako fish was 50 km. The radio-tagged <strong>Fraser</strong><br />

fish showed a similar pattern of movement: hold for a few days, then move 10 - 20 km downstream <strong>and</strong> hold<br />

again. All of the radio-tagged fish that moved, moved downstream. It is not clear if this was a spawning<br />

migration or if the tags were too large <strong>and</strong> the fish were slowly losing ground.<br />

For adults, it was not clear how much mixing there was between the major tributaries <strong>and</strong> the main river.<br />

There was a scale signature (a false annulus) that was only found in mainstem fish. However, not all fish<br />

sampled in the mainstem showed this scale mark. So far, the data suggest some fish move from the<br />

tributaries into the main river <strong>and</strong> some stay in the tributaries. We took tissue samples (adipose fin clips)<br />

from all adult fish <strong>and</strong> are using single locus probes to ascertain if there are genetically different stocks in<br />

this area.<br />

Another problem with adults that is being examined is the presence of two “forms” of mountain whitefish in<br />

the area: a long-nosed “pinocchio” form <strong>and</strong> a normal form. The pattern of head growth in the two forms<br />

starts to diverge at about 80 mm <strong>and</strong> becomes more exaggerated with size. It looks like a foraging<br />

polymorphism <strong>and</strong> we collected paired samples (collected at the same site <strong>and</strong> same time) of both types.<br />

These are being examined for both trophic <strong>and</strong> genetic differences.<br />

Other Species<br />

During the course of collecting whitefish data, information was also collected on the movements of redside<br />

shiners, squawfish, peamouth chub <strong>and</strong> suckers. The general pattern of movement that appeared in these<br />

animals was a spawning movement into tributaries in the spring, use of the lower reaches of tributaries by yo-y,<br />

movement into the main river in September, <strong>and</strong> then movement to a winter refuge (deeper water?) in<br />

October.<br />

Page 214

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!