24.02.2013 Views

Optimality

Optimality

Optimality

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

314 D. Bhattacharya and A. K. Basu<br />

Throughout the paper the following notation is used: φy(µ, σ 2 ) represents the normal<br />

density with mean µ and variance σ 2 ; the symbol ‘=⇒’ denotes convergence<br />

in distribution, and the symbol ‘→’ denotes convergence in Pθ0,n probability.<br />

Now let the sequence of statistical experiments En ={Xn,An, Pθ,n}n≥1 be a<br />

locally asymptotically mixture of normals (LAMN) at θ0∈ Θ. For the definition of<br />

a LAMN experiment the reader is referred to Bhattacharya and Roussas [6]. Then<br />

there exist random variables Zn and Wn (Wn > 0 a.s.) such that<br />

(2.1)<br />

and<br />

(2.2)<br />

Λn(θ0, θn) = log dPθ0+δnh,n<br />

dPθ0,n<br />

− hZn + 1<br />

2 h2 Wn→ 0,<br />

(Zn, Wn)⇒(Z, W) under Pθ0,n,<br />

where Z = W 1/2 G, G and W are independently distributed, W > 0 a.s. and<br />

G∼N(0,1). Moreover, the distribution of W does not depend on the parameter h<br />

(Le Cam and Yang [13]).<br />

The following examples illustrate the different quantities appearing in equations<br />

(2.1) and (2.2) and in the subsequent derivations.<br />

Example 2.1 (An explosive autoregressive process of first order). Let the<br />

random variables Xj, j = 1,2, . . . satisfy a first order autoregressive model defined<br />

by<br />

(2.3) Xj = θXj−1 + ɛj, X0 = 0,|θ| > 1,<br />

where ɛj’s are i.i.d. N(0,1) random variables. We consider the explosive case where<br />

|θ| > 1. For this model we can write<br />

fj(θ) = f(xj|x1, . . . , xj−1;θ) ∝ e<br />

1 2<br />

− 2<br />

(xj−θxj−1)<br />

.<br />

Let θ0 be the true value of θ. It can be shown that for the model described in<br />

(2.3) we can select the sequence of norming constants δn = (θ2 0−1) θn so that (2.1) and<br />

0<br />

(2.2) hold. Clearly δn→ 0 as n→∞. We can also obtain Wn(θ0), Zn(θ0) and their<br />

asymptotic distributions, as n→∞, as follows:<br />

Wn(θ0) = (θ2 0− 1) 2<br />

θ 2n<br />

0<br />

Gn(θ0) = (<br />

n�<br />

j=1<br />

n�<br />

j=1<br />

X 2 1 − 2<br />

j−1) (<br />

X 2 j−1⇒ W as n→∞, where W∼ χ 2 1 and<br />

n�<br />

n�<br />

Xj−1ɛj) = (<br />

j=1<br />

where G∼N(0,1) and ˆ θn is the m.l.e. of θ. Also<br />

Zn(θ0) = W 1<br />

2<br />

θ n 0<br />

j=1<br />

n (θ0)Gn(θ0) = (θ2 n�<br />

0− 1)<br />

(<br />

where W is independent of G. It also holds that<br />

j=1<br />

(Zn(θ0), Wn(θ0))⇒(Z, W).<br />

X 2 j−1) 1<br />

2 ( ˆ θn− θ)⇒G,<br />

Xj−1ɛj)⇒W 1<br />

2 G = Z,<br />

Hence Z|W∼ N(0, W). In general Z is a mixture of normal distributions with W<br />

as the mixing variable.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!