Rudarski radovi br 4 2011 - Institut za rudarstvo i metalurgiju Bor

More documents

Recommendations

Info

7.<br />8.<br />9.<br />10.<br />11.<br />12.<br />13.<br />14.<br />15.<br />16.<br />17.<br />Land area under the unfavorable<br />influence*<br />The needs for displacement,<br />possibility of material procurement,<br />construction in stages*<br />Number of buildings exposed to<br />pollution in the highway area<br />expressed in points**<br />Length of route near the watercourse**<br />Land are under the unfavorable<br />influence**<br />Length of soil in the cuts and<br />embankments**<br />Assessment of impact on population,<br />health and social factors**<br />Number of buildings in the<br />highway area**<br />Length of route that crosses the<br />protected natural area**<br />Number of cultural and historical<br />monuments on the route of the<br />highway**<br />Length of the route in the cut,<br />embankment and above ground<br />pits**<br />point max 100.00 45.00 100.00 45.00<br />point max 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00<br />point max 90.00 90.00 90.00 90.00<br />point max 85.00 85.00 85.00 85.00<br />point max 80.00 65.00 80.00 65.00<br />point max 80.00 70.00 80.00 70.00<br />point max 85.00 85.00 85.00 85.00<br />point max 85.00 85.00 85.00 85.00<br />point max 95.00 95.00 95.00 95.00<br />point max 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00<br />point max 60.00 50.00 60.00 50.00<br />**favorable variants are rated with higher grades (points)<br />Using the computer program, based on<br />the method of VIKOR (Table 16), the<br />following is obtained:<br />List of alternative: A 1. VV variant, A<br />2. VN variant<br />Table 16. Rang liste po varijantama<br />QR – Minimax strategija Q – Kompromis QS – Vecinska korist<br />R.L.QR R.L.Q i Q(J) R.L.QS<br />A 2 0.044 A 2 0.000 A 2 0.084<br />A 1 0.240 A 1 1.000 A 1 0.734<br />Table 17. Analysis of the preferential stability<br />F(i) WD1 WO(i) WG1 F(i) WD1 WO(i) WG1<br />F 1 0.000 0.170 1,000 F10 0.000 0.016 1,000<br />F 2 0.000 0.160 1,000 F11 0.000 0.016 0.196<br />F 3 0.000 0.164 1,000 F12 0.000 0.012 0.195<br />F 4 0.000 0.240 1,000 F13 0.000 0.014 1,000<br />F 5 0.000 0.022 1,000 F14 0.000 0.012 1,000<br />F 6 0.000 0.029 1,000 F15 0.000 0.012 1,000<br />F 7 0.000 0.044 0.201 F16 0.000 0.012 1,000<br />F 8 0.000 0.051 1,000 F17 0.000 0.012 0.195<br />F 9 0.000 0.014 1,000<br />W0(i) are normalized values of the input-given<br />weight. WD1≤w≤WG1 is the<br />interval weight in which the first alternative<br />remains in its position (stable position).<br />No 4, 2011. 189<br />MINING ENGINEERING
Changing the first position for alternative<br />A 2 can occur if there is a<br />change of weight criteria F7, F11, F12,<br />F17, or if the value of weight to these<br />criteria (Table 17) is respectively<br />higher than 0.201;0.196;0.195;0.195.<br />11. CONCLUSION<br />The need for a compromise solution<br />is more pronounced for solving tasks<br />with conflicting and heterogeneous criteria<br />(opposed and expressed in different<br />units of measure) as it is the case in this<br />paper. The result of VKO has a great<br />chance to be accepted as a good compromise<br />between the different interests<br />of participants in deciding if it is acceptable<br />to the majority in decision-making<br />process, but also that there are no bad<br />criterion indicators that would make<br />«opponents» not to accept it.<br />REFERENCES<br />[1] Faculty of Civil Engineering in<br />Podgorica, Institute of Transport and<br />Traffic Engineering in Belgrade,<br />Study of traffic flows and<br />determining the emergency of<br />bottlenecks in the network of<br />existing roads in the corridor of<br />planned highways and roads<br />reserved for motor vehicles in<br />Montenegro, 1998 (in Serbian)<br />[2] Institute of Transport and Traffic<br />Engineering, Project evaluation<br />version of the highway Belgrade –<br />South Adriatic on the part of<br />Belgrade to Požega, Belgrade,<br />November 1998 (in Serbian)<br />[3] Kuzović Lj., Determining the need<br />and justification for transit traffic<br />separation from city arteries by<br />constructing bypasses, University of<br />Belgrade, Belgrade, 1997 (in<br />Serbian)<br />[4] Kuzović Lj., Evaluation in<br />management with development and<br />exploitation of the road network,<br />University of Belgrade, Belgrade,<br />1994 (in Serbian)<br />[5] Kuzović Lj., Evaluation in<br />optimizing plans and projects of<br />roads, SIT traffic and link of<br />Yugoslavia, Belgrade, 1984 (in<br />Serbian)<br />[6] Louis Berger, Technical<br />Memorandum No. 14 conducted on<br />traffic counts and interviews in the<br />road network of Montenegro,<br />October, 2007<br />[7] M. Maletin, et al., The study of<br />alternative solutions of route of the<br />outside main road tangent (OMRT),<br />University of Belgrade, The Faculty<br />of Civil Engineering, Geotechnical<br />and Roads Institute, Belgrade 1989<br />(in Serbian)<br />[8] Opricović S., Multicriterion<br />optimization systems in construction,<br />The Faculty of Civil Engineering,<br />University of Belgrade, Belgrade,<br />1998 (in Serbian)<br />No 4, 2011. 190<br />MINING ENGINEERING
Page 2 and 3:
INSTITUT ZA RUDARSTVO I METALURGIJU
Page 4 and 5:
SADR@AJ CONTENS M. Bugari
Page 6 and 7:
Page 8 and 9:
vršeno je sve do 1987. god. a kona
Page 10 and 11:
MINING AND METALLURGY INSTITUTE BOR
Page 12 and 13:
Based on realized geological drilli
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
istočno od đerdapske navlake lež
Page 18 and 19:
GEOLOŠKE KARAKTERISTIKE LEŽI
Page 20 and 21:
Sl. 4. Teren u domenu ležišta gli
Page 22 and 23:
Ispitivanje granulometrijskog sasta
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
literature data, semi-detailed polu
Page 28 and 29:
GEOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF
Page 30 and 31:
Fig. 4. Field in the domain of clay
Page 32 and 33:
Testing of grain-size distribution
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Ova ankerna smeša će biti koriš
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
This anchor mixture will be used in
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Tabela 2. Rezultati ispitivanja kam
Page 46 and 47:
Sl. 4. Određivanje odnosa vlažnos
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Table 2. Test results of stone aggr
Page 52 and 53:
Structural characteristics Det
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
305 -100 Sl. 1. Izgled za
Page 58 and 59:
Nakon zapunjavanja preostalog prost
Page 60 and 61:
10 7 BRANA 1 LEGENDA
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
305 -100 Fig. 1. View of
Page 66 and 67:
Fig. 3. Review of the present appea
Page 68 and 69:
4. CONCLUSION Fig. 4. Disposit
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Dobivanje uglja iznad raskršća ot
Page 74 and 75:
matematičkom modelu, a međusobne<
Page 76 and 77:
4. ZAKLJUČAK Proračunom dobi
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
this stage is carried out alternate
Page 82 and 83:
Rearranging the expression for the<
Page 84 and 85:
4. CONCLUSION Calculation of t
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Tabela 1. Pregled polaznih tehno ek
Page 90 and 91:
5. ZAKLJUČAK Bilansne rezerve
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Table 1. Summary of initial techno-
Page 96 and 97:
5. CONCLUSION Balance reserves
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
odmah iza valjka, kome je jedan deo
Page 102 and 103:
Sl.3. Tehnološka šema laboratorij
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
further testing, the laboratory pla
Page 108 and 109:
Fig. 3. Technological scheme of lab
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Međutim, na početku ćemo pojasni
Page 114 and 115:
4.1.2. Klasifikacija po posljedicam
Page 116 and 117:
ed Štaba službe spasavanja, zato<
Page 118 and 119:
Tabela 3.[8] Vjerovatnost Ovim
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
usiness policy of the company and o
Page 128 and 129:
Table 1. NATURAL (workpla
Page 130 and 131:
will occur from exposure to hazard
Page 132 and 133:
ing to the overall economy. However
Page 134 and 135:
and measures of their control can h
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Tabela 1. Rudne rezerve u ležišti
Page 140 and 141:
Tabela 3. Proizvodnja pratećih pro
Page 142 and 143:
Tabela 6. Prosečne neto zarade<br
Page 144 and 145: MINING AND METALLURGY INSTITUTE BOR
Page 146 and 147: Table 1. Ore reserves in the active
Page 148 and 149: Table 3. Production of accompanying
Page 150 and 151: The average net wages have a tenden
Page 152 and 153: INSTITUT ZA RUDARSTVO I METALURGIJU
Page 154 and 155: i izražava mogućnost da element t
Page 156 and 157: i p ( RZ t ) RZ = ma
Page 158 and 159: 8. Iskop jama za temeije samce 1 2
Page 160 and 161: Pokazani postupak zatim analogno If it is not possible t
Page 170 and 171: Rz3 = Rz2+ t3 [ ] Rz3 = 3
Page 172 and 173: The difference in computation betwe
Page 174 and 175: INSTITUT ZA RUDARSTVO I METALURGIJU
Page 176 and 177: Tabela 4. Zastupljenost objekata na
Page 178 and 179: 8. TROŠKOVI SAOBRAĆAJNIH NEZ
Page 180 and 181: 11. KRITERIJUMI VREDNOVANJA I 
Page 182 and 183: Tabela 15. Vrednosti kriterijumskih
Page 186 and 187: Table 3. Slopes of level Varia
Page 188 and 189: 7. EXPLOITATION COSTS Exploita
Page 190 and 191: • changes in natural look of terr
Page 192 and 193: Fig. 2. Distribution of responses f
Page 196 and 197: INSTITUT B O INSTITU
Page 199: JP PEU RESAVICA ЈП ПЕУ Р
Page 202: INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE AUTHORS M
show all

Rudarski radovi br 4 2011 - Institut za rudarstvo i metalurgiju Bor

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?