Rudarski radovi br 4 2011 - Institut za rudarstvo i metalurgiju Bor

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Fig. 2. Distribution of responses for goals 3,4,5 and 6<br />Table 14. Difficulties of goals and criterion functions<br />Goal W Indicators<br />Minimum costs of construction<br />Minimum costs of maintenance<br />Minimum costs of exploitation<br />Minimum costs of of<br />traffic accidents (maximum<br />security and safety)<br />Maximum positive impact<br />on the development<br />of the area<br />0.17<br />0.16<br />0.164<br />0.24<br />0.146<br />The route in<br />spatial conflict<br />with the adopted<br />SP<br />Preservation of<br />existing settlements<br />and encouragement<br />of<br />urban planning<br />Preservation of<br />agricultural and<br />forest areas<br />The reality of<br />performance<br />No 4, 2011. 187<br />MINING ENGINEERING<br />W<br />rel<br />Crit. F. Wrel fi Wi<br />Total construction<br />costs in<br />Euro<br />Construction<br />costs in<br />Euro/year<br />Exploitation<br />costs in<br />Euro/year<br />Costs of traffic<br />accidents in<br />Euro/year<br />Compliance<br />with SP<br />Preservation and<br />promotion rating<br />of the future<br />urban planning<br />Land area under<br />unfavorable<br />influence<br />The needs for<br />displacement,<br />possibility of<br />material procurement,construction<br />in<br />stages<br />1 0.17<br />2 0.16<br />3 0.164<br />4 0.24<br />0.15 5 0.022<br />0.20 6 0.029<br />0.30 7 0.044<br />0.35 8 0.051
Minimum spatial ecological<br />consequences<br />0.12<br />Minimum air<br />pollution<br />Minimum water<br />pollution<br />Minimum loss<br />and soil pollution<br />Minimum impact<br />on the biotic<br />factor<br />Minimum impact<br />on population,<br />health and social<br />factors<br />Minimum noise<br />and vibration<br />Minimum contact<br />with the<br />protected natural<br />areas<br />Minimum negative<br />impact on<br />the cultural and<br />historical monuments<br />Minimum impact<br />on landscape<br />Number of<br />buildings exposed<br />to pollution<br />in the<br />highway area<br />expressed in<br />points<br />Length of the<br />route near the<br />watercourse<br />Land area under<br />unfavorable<br />influence<br />*favorable variants are graded with higher grades (points )<br />Tabela 15.<br />Length of the<br />route in the cuts<br />and embankments<br />Assessment of<br />impact on population,<br />health<br />and social factors<br />Number of<br />buildings in the<br />highway area<br />Length of route<br />that crosses the<br />protected natural<br />area<br />Number of<br />cultural and<br />historical<br />monuments on<br />the route of the<br />highway<br />Length of route<br />in the cut, embankment,<br />above-ground khole<br />Criterion function Unit Ext Variant W Variant VN * f i<br />0.12 9 0.014<br />0.13 10 0.016<br />0.13 11 0.016<br />0.10 12 0.012<br />0.12 13 0.014<br />0.10 14 0.012<br />0.10 15 0.012<br />0.10 16 0.012<br />0.10 17 0.012<br />1. Total costs of building in Euro € min 649056603.60 639725443.00 639725443.00 649056603.00<br />2. Costs of maintenance €/yr. min 1403036.00 1246085.00 1246085.00 1403036.00<br />3. Costs of exploitation €/yr. min 28869724.00 26139172.00 26139172.00 28869724.00<br />4.<br />5.<br />6.<br />Costs of traffic accidents in<br />Euro/year<br />Compliance with the Spatial<br />Plan*<br />Preservation and promotion<br />rating of the future urban<br />planning*<br />No 4, 2011. 188<br />MINING ENGINEERING<br />− f i<br />€/yr. min 261692.00 231627.00 231627.00 261692.00<br />point max 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00<br />point max 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
Page 2 and 3:
INSTITUT ZA RUDARSTVO I METALURGIJU
Page 4 and 5:
SADR@AJ CONTENS M. Bugari
Page 6 and 7:
Page 8 and 9:
vršeno je sve do 1987. god. a kona
Page 10 and 11:
MINING AND METALLURGY INSTITUTE BOR
Page 12 and 13:
Based on realized geological drilli
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
istočno od đerdapske navlake lež
Page 18 and 19:
GEOLOŠKE KARAKTERISTIKE LEŽI
Page 20 and 21:
Sl. 4. Teren u domenu ležišta gli
Page 22 and 23:
Ispitivanje granulometrijskog sasta
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
literature data, semi-detailed polu
Page 28 and 29:
GEOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF
Page 30 and 31:
Fig. 4. Field in the domain of clay
Page 32 and 33:
Testing of grain-size distribution
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Ova ankerna smeša će biti koriš
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
This anchor mixture will be used in
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Tabela 2. Rezultati ispitivanja kam
Page 46 and 47:
Sl. 4. Određivanje odnosa vlažnos
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Table 2. Test results of stone aggr
Page 52 and 53:
Structural characteristics Det
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
305 -100 Sl. 1. Izgled za
Page 58 and 59:
Nakon zapunjavanja preostalog prost
Page 60 and 61:
10 7 BRANA 1 LEGENDA
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
305 -100 Fig. 1. View of
Page 66 and 67:
Fig. 3. Review of the present appea
Page 68 and 69:
4. CONCLUSION Fig. 4. Disposit
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Dobivanje uglja iznad raskršća ot
Page 74 and 75:
matematičkom modelu, a međusobne<
Page 76 and 77:
4. ZAKLJUČAK Proračunom dobi
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
this stage is carried out alternate
Page 82 and 83:
Rearranging the expression for the<
Page 84 and 85:
4. CONCLUSION Calculation of t
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Tabela 1. Pregled polaznih tehno ek
Page 90 and 91:
5. ZAKLJUČAK Bilansne rezerve
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Table 1. Summary of initial techno-
Page 96 and 97:
5. CONCLUSION Balance reserves
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
odmah iza valjka, kome je jedan deo
Page 102 and 103:
Sl.3. Tehnološka šema laboratorij
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
further testing, the laboratory pla
Page 108 and 109:
Fig. 3. Technological scheme of lab
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Međutim, na početku ćemo pojasni
Page 114 and 115:
4.1.2. Klasifikacija po posljedicam
Page 116 and 117:
ed Štaba službe spasavanja, zato<
Page 118 and 119:
Tabela 3.[8] Vjerovatnost Ovim
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
usiness policy of the company and o
Page 128 and 129:
Table 1. NATURAL (workpla
Page 130 and 131:
will occur from exposure to hazard
Page 132 and 133:
ing to the overall economy. However
Page 134 and 135:
and measures of their control can h
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Tabela 1. Rudne rezerve u ležišti
Page 140 and 141:
Tabela 3. Proizvodnja pratećih pro
Page 142 and 143: Tabela 6. Prosečne neto zarade<br
Page 144 and 145: MINING AND METALLURGY INSTITUTE BOR
Page 146 and 147: Table 1. Ore reserves in the active
Page 148 and 149: Table 3. Production of accompanying
Page 150 and 151: The average net wages have a tenden
Page 152 and 153: INSTITUT ZA RUDARSTVO I METALURGIJU
Page 154 and 155: i izražava mogućnost da element t
Page 156 and 157: i p ( RZ t ) RZ = ma
Page 158 and 159: 8. Iskop jama za temeije samce 1 2
Page 160 and 161: Pokazani postupak zatim analogno If it is not possible t
Page 170 and 171: Rz3 = Rz2+ t3 [ ] Rz3 = 3
Page 172 and 173: The difference in computation betwe
Page 174 and 175: INSTITUT ZA RUDARSTVO I METALURGIJU
Page 176 and 177: Tabela 4. Zastupljenost objekata na
Page 178 and 179: 8. TROŠKOVI SAOBRAĆAJNIH NEZ
Page 180 and 181: 11. KRITERIJUMI VREDNOVANJA I 
Page 182 and 183: Tabela 15. Vrednosti kriterijumskih
Page 186 and 187: Table 3. Slopes of level Varia
Page 188 and 189: 7. EXPLOITATION COSTS Exploita
Page 190 and 191: • changes in natural look of terr
Page 194 and 195: 7. 8. 9. 10. 11
Page 196 and 197: INSTITUT B O INSTITU
Page 199: JP PEU RESAVICA ЈП ПЕУ Р
Page 202: INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE AUTHORS M
show all

Rudarski radovi br 4 2011 - Institut za rudarstvo i metalurgiju Bor

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?