Rudarski radovi br 4 2011 - Institut za rudarstvo i metalurgiju Bor

More documents

Recommendations

Info

MINING AND METALLURGY INSTITUTE BOR YU ISSN: 1451-0162<br />COMMITTEE OF UNDERGROUND EXPLOITATION OF THE MINERAL DEPOSITS UDK: 622<br />UDK: 625.72:681.51(045)=20<br />Abstract<br />Velimir Dutina*, Ljubo Marković*, Miloš Knežević**, Miljan Kovačević*<br />SELECTION OF THE HIGHWAY ROUTE VARIANT BY<br />MULTICRITERION OPTIMIZATION<br />Optimization of complex systems is extremely complex which brings together theoretical and<br />experimental knowledge of experts from multiple disciplines. In order to consider from all aspects<br />the optimization problem of system in construction, diverse considerations are needed as engineering,<br />environmental, economic, social and institutional. The optimization result has a great chance<br />to be accepted as a good compromise between different interests of participants in decision making,<br />and one of the ways to achieve this is to find a compromise solution. The method of multicriterion<br />optimization, i.e. the method of compromise programming and multicriterion compromise<br />ranking of alternative solutions, is used in this work for selection the optimum route of highway.<br />The objectives were defined, a techno-economic analysis of variant solutions was carried out, the<br />criteria were established and, at the end, the obtained compromise solution is shown.<br />Key words: optimization, compromise programming, variants, criteria, compromise solution<br />1. INTRODUCTION<br />The highway Belgrade – South Adriatic<br />is a branch of the Trans-European highway<br />(TEHW) that, on the territory of Serbia and<br />Montenegro, connects the main line of<br />TEHW (from Gdansk to Athens and<br />Istanbul) to the Adriatic Sea. On the territory<br />of Montenegro, from direction of Serbia, the<br />highway route enters near place of Boljare,<br />and then the route of Berane – Andrijevica –<br />Mateševo – Podgorica – Tanki rt and with<br />already built tunnel under the massif of<br />Sozina gets out to the Adriatic coast,<br />respectively the Port of Bar. The preliminary<br />design has done several versions of the<br />certain sections in the corridor of Beolgrade<br />– South Adriatic highway.<br />In this regard, it is necessary to analyze<br />the choice of route options for further<br />development in the main project.<br />This work also considered the technoeconomically<br />evaluated two route variants of<br />the highway corridor through Montenegro<br />on the move to Smokovac (Podgorica) -<br />Uvče containing a great number of viaducts,<br />bridges and tunnels, what significantly<br />affects the project costs. Variant<br />analysis and estimation of costs are intended<br />to assist the investors in decision<br />making on further stages of the project<br />implementation.<br />* University in Pristina, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Kosovska Mitrovica<br />** University of Podgorica, Faculty of Civil Engineering -Podgorica<br />No 4, 2011. 179<br />MINING ENGINEERING
2. TECHNO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS<br />The subject of analysis is to evaluate, • Minimum costs of construction;<br />from technical and economical point of • Minimum maintenance costs of the<br />view, the variants of highway on the move relevant section;<br />from Smokovac (Podgorica) to Uvča, in<br />the variants defined as follows:<br />1. Variant V+V, goes through the<br />route of high variant from (km 0+000 -<br />km 9+500) and to Uvča also goes with<br />the variant called the High variant<br />(L=36.35 km);<br />2. Variant V+N, goes through the<br />route of high variant from (km 0+000<br />- km 9+500), and still continues to the<br />route of Uvča, called the Low variant<br />(40.80 km).<br />Within the scope of this work, the alter-<br />• Minimum exploitation costs of the<br />user;<br />• Maximum safety, security and comfort<br />on the relevant section;<br />• Maximum positive impact on overall<br />development of the area;<br />• Maximum in terms of area and environmental<br />protection in the given<br />area.<br />3. TRAFFIC AND TECHNICAL<br />PARAMETERS ACCORDING TO<br />THE VARIANTS<br />native solutions of route were investigated, The quality of variant solution of the<br />in order to select more favorable solution of highway section to a large extent can be<br />the route, based on comparison and evalua- described by traffic and technical parametion.<br />For basic criteria that should be ter of variant. Some of the most important<br />achieved by the optimum variant of high- parameters are given in Tables 1, 2, 3 and<br />way, and regarding to the complexity of<br />techno-economic requirements, the following<br />objectives are adopted:<br />4.<br />Table 1. Geometrical characteristics of variants<br />Variant<br />Total length<br />[km]<br />Minimum radius<br />[m/no. of usages]<br />Maximum longitudinal<br />slope<br />[% per km]<br />V+V 40.81 450/2 6% - 1.829 km<br />V+N 36.12 450/2 6% - 0.887 km<br />Table 2. Altitude variations<br />Elevations Altitude<br />Variant<br />max min<br />0-200<br />[km/<br />%]<br />200-<br />400<br />[km/%<br />]<br />400-<br />600<br />[km<br />%]<br />600-<br />800<br />[km/<br />%]<br />V+V<br />408<br />13<br />118<br />9<br />5385<br />13%<br />4537<br />11%<br />6125<br />15%<br />4743<br />12%<br />V+N<br />361<br />24<br />118<br />9<br />5385<br />15%<br />4383<br />12%<br />3962<br />11%<br />4116<br />11%<br />800-<br />1000<br />[km/%]<br />3333<br />8%<br />5381<br />15%<br />1000-<br />1200<br />km/%<br />16690<br />41%<br />12897<br />36%<br />No 4, 2011. 180<br />MINING ENGINEERING
Page 2 and 3:
INSTITUT ZA RUDARSTVO I METALURGIJU
Page 4 and 5:
SADR@AJ CONTENS M. Bugari
Page 6 and 7:
Page 8 and 9:
vršeno je sve do 1987. god. a kona
Page 10 and 11:
MINING AND METALLURGY INSTITUTE BOR
Page 12 and 13:
Based on realized geological drilli
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
istočno od đerdapske navlake lež
Page 18 and 19:
GEOLOŠKE KARAKTERISTIKE LEŽI
Page 20 and 21:
Sl. 4. Teren u domenu ležišta gli
Page 22 and 23:
Ispitivanje granulometrijskog sasta
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
literature data, semi-detailed polu
Page 28 and 29:
GEOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF
Page 30 and 31:
Fig. 4. Field in the domain of clay
Page 32 and 33:
Testing of grain-size distribution
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Ova ankerna smeša će biti koriš
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
This anchor mixture will be used in
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Tabela 2. Rezultati ispitivanja kam
Page 46 and 47:
Sl. 4. Određivanje odnosa vlažnos
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Table 2. Test results of stone aggr
Page 52 and 53:
Structural characteristics Det
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
305 -100 Sl. 1. Izgled za
Page 58 and 59:
Nakon zapunjavanja preostalog prost
Page 60 and 61:
10 7 BRANA 1 LEGENDA
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
305 -100 Fig. 1. View of
Page 66 and 67:
Fig. 3. Review of the present appea
Page 68 and 69:
4. CONCLUSION Fig. 4. Disposit
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Dobivanje uglja iznad raskršća ot
Page 74 and 75:
matematičkom modelu, a međusobne<
Page 76 and 77:
4. ZAKLJUČAK Proračunom dobi
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
this stage is carried out alternate
Page 82 and 83:
Rearranging the expression for the<
Page 84 and 85:
4. CONCLUSION Calculation of t
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Tabela 1. Pregled polaznih tehno ek
Page 90 and 91:
5. ZAKLJUČAK Bilansne rezerve
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Table 1. Summary of initial techno-
Page 96 and 97:
5. CONCLUSION Balance reserves
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
odmah iza valjka, kome je jedan deo
Page 102 and 103:
Sl.3. Tehnološka šema laboratorij
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
further testing, the laboratory pla
Page 108 and 109:
Fig. 3. Technological scheme of lab
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Međutim, na početku ćemo pojasni
Page 114 and 115:
4.1.2. Klasifikacija po posljedicam
Page 116 and 117:
ed Štaba službe spasavanja, zato<
Page 118 and 119:
Tabela 3.[8] Vjerovatnost Ovim
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
usiness policy of the company and o
Page 128 and 129:
Table 1. NATURAL (workpla
Page 130 and 131:
will occur from exposure to hazard
Page 132 and 133:
ing to the overall economy. However
Page 134 and 135: and measures of their control can h
Page 136 and 137: INSTITUT ZA RUDARSTVO I METALURGIJU
Page 138 and 139: Tabela 1. Rudne rezerve u ležišti
Page 140 and 141: Tabela 3. Proizvodnja pratećih pro
Page 142 and 143: Tabela 6. Prosečne neto zarade<br
Page 144 and 145: MINING AND METALLURGY INSTITUTE BOR
Page 146 and 147: Table 1. Ore reserves in the active
Page 148 and 149: Table 3. Production of accompanying
Page 150 and 151: The average net wages have a tenden
Page 154 and 155: i izražava mogućnost da element t
Page 156 and 157: i p ( RZ t ) RZ = ma
Page 158 and 159: 8. Iskop jama za temeije samce 1 2
Page 160 and 161: Pokazani postupak zatim analogno If it is not possible t
Page 170 and 171: Rz3 = Rz2+ t3 [ ] Rz3 = 3
Page 172 and 173: The difference in computation betwe
Page 176 and 177: Tabela 4. Zastupljenost objekata na
Page 178 and 179: 8. TROŠKOVI SAOBRAĆAJNIH NEZ
Page 180 and 181: 11. KRITERIJUMI VREDNOVANJA I 
Page 182 and 183: Tabela 15. Vrednosti kriterijumskih
Page 186 and 187: Table 3. Slopes of level Varia
Page 188 and 189: 7. EXPLOITATION COSTS Exploita
Page 190 and 191: • changes in natural look of terr
Page 192 and 193: Fig. 2. Distribution of responses f
Page 194 and 195: 7. 8. 9. 10. 11
Page 196 and 197: INSTITUT B O INSTITU
Page 199: JP PEU RESAVICA ЈП ПЕУ Р
Page 202: INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE AUTHORS M
show all

Rudarski radovi br 4 2011 - Institut za rudarstvo i metalurgiju Bor

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?