Rudarski radovi br 4 2011 - Institut za rudarstvo i metalurgiju Bor
Rudarski radovi br 4 2011 - Institut za rudarstvo i metalurgiju Bor
Rudarski radovi br 4 2011 - Institut za rudarstvo i metalurgiju Bor
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
MINING AND METALLURGY INSTITUTE BOR YU ISSN: 1451-0162<<strong>br</strong> />
COMMITTEE OF UNDERGROUND EXPLOITATION OF THE MINERAL DEPOSITS UDK: 622<<strong>br</strong> />
UDK: 625.72:681.51(045)=20<<strong>br</strong> />
Abstract<<strong>br</strong> />
Velimir Dutina*, Ljubo Marković*, Miloš Knežević**, Miljan Kovačević*<<strong>br</strong> />
SELECTION OF THE HIGHWAY ROUTE VARIANT BY<<strong>br</strong> />
MULTICRITERION OPTIMIZATION<<strong>br</strong> />
Optimi<strong>za</strong>tion of complex systems is extremely complex which <strong>br</strong>ings together theoretical and<<strong>br</strong> />
experimental knowledge of experts from multiple disciplines. In order to consider from all aspects<<strong>br</strong> />
the optimi<strong>za</strong>tion problem of system in construction, diverse considerations are needed as engineering,<<strong>br</strong> />
environmental, economic, social and institutional. The optimi<strong>za</strong>tion result has a great chance<<strong>br</strong> />
to be accepted as a good compromise between different interests of participants in decision making,<<strong>br</strong> />
and one of the ways to achieve this is to find a compromise solution. The method of multicriterion<<strong>br</strong> />
optimi<strong>za</strong>tion, i.e. the method of compromise programming and multicriterion compromise<<strong>br</strong> />
ranking of alternative solutions, is used in this work for selection the optimum route of highway.<<strong>br</strong> />
The objectives were defined, a techno-economic analysis of variant solutions was carried out, the<<strong>br</strong> />
criteria were established and, at the end, the obtained compromise solution is shown.<<strong>br</strong> />
Key words: optimi<strong>za</strong>tion, compromise programming, variants, criteria, compromise solution<<strong>br</strong> />
1. INTRODUCTION<<strong>br</strong> />
The highway Belgrade – South Adriatic<<strong>br</strong> />
is a <strong>br</strong>anch of the Trans-European highway<<strong>br</strong> />
(TEHW) that, on the territory of Serbia and<<strong>br</strong> />
Montenegro, connects the main line of<<strong>br</strong> />
TEHW (from Gdansk to Athens and<<strong>br</strong> />
Istanbul) to the Adriatic Sea. On the territory<<strong>br</strong> />
of Montenegro, from direction of Serbia, the<<strong>br</strong> />
highway route enters near place of Boljare,<<strong>br</strong> />
and then the route of Berane – Andrijevica –<<strong>br</strong> />
Mateševo – Podgorica – Tanki rt and with<<strong>br</strong> />
already built tunnel under the massif of<<strong>br</strong> />
Sozina gets out to the Adriatic coast,<<strong>br</strong> />
respectively the Port of Bar. The preliminary<<strong>br</strong> />
design has done several versions of the<<strong>br</strong> />
certain sections in the corridor of Beolgrade<<strong>br</strong> />
– South Adriatic highway.<<strong>br</strong> />
In this regard, it is necessary to analyze<<strong>br</strong> />
the choice of route options for further<<strong>br</strong> />
development in the main project.<<strong>br</strong> />
This work also considered the technoeconomically<<strong>br</strong> />
evaluated two route variants of<<strong>br</strong> />
the highway corridor through Montenegro<<strong>br</strong> />
on the move to Smokovac (Podgorica) -<<strong>br</strong> />
Uvče containing a great number of viaducts,<<strong>br</strong> />
<strong>br</strong>idges and tunnels, what significantly<<strong>br</strong> />
affects the project costs. Variant<<strong>br</strong> />
analysis and estimation of costs are intended<<strong>br</strong> />
to assist the investors in decision<<strong>br</strong> />
making on further stages of the project<<strong>br</strong> />
implementation.<<strong>br</strong> />
* University in Pristina, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Kosovska Mitrovica<<strong>br</strong> />
** University of Podgorica, Faculty of Civil Engineering -Podgorica<<strong>br</strong> />
No 4, <strong>2011</strong>. 179<<strong>br</strong> />
MINING ENGINEERING