24.02.2013 Views

Rudarski radovi br 4 2011 - Institut za rudarstvo i metalurgiju Bor

Rudarski radovi br 4 2011 - Institut za rudarstvo i metalurgiju Bor

Rudarski radovi br 4 2011 - Institut za rudarstvo i metalurgiju Bor

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MINING AND METALLURGY INSTITUTE BOR YU ISSN: 1451-0162<<strong>br</strong> />

COMMITTEE OF UNDERGROUND EXPLOITATION OF THE MINERAL DEPOSITS UDK: 622<<strong>br</strong> />

UDK: 625.72:681.51(045)=20<<strong>br</strong> />

Abstract<<strong>br</strong> />

Velimir Dutina*, Ljubo Marković*, Miloš Knežević**, Miljan Kovačević*<<strong>br</strong> />

SELECTION OF THE HIGHWAY ROUTE VARIANT BY<<strong>br</strong> />

MULTICRITERION OPTIMIZATION<<strong>br</strong> />

Optimi<strong>za</strong>tion of complex systems is extremely complex which <strong>br</strong>ings together theoretical and<<strong>br</strong> />

experimental knowledge of experts from multiple disciplines. In order to consider from all aspects<<strong>br</strong> />

the optimi<strong>za</strong>tion problem of system in construction, diverse considerations are needed as engineering,<<strong>br</strong> />

environmental, economic, social and institutional. The optimi<strong>za</strong>tion result has a great chance<<strong>br</strong> />

to be accepted as a good compromise between different interests of participants in decision making,<<strong>br</strong> />

and one of the ways to achieve this is to find a compromise solution. The method of multicriterion<<strong>br</strong> />

optimi<strong>za</strong>tion, i.e. the method of compromise programming and multicriterion compromise<<strong>br</strong> />

ranking of alternative solutions, is used in this work for selection the optimum route of highway.<<strong>br</strong> />

The objectives were defined, a techno-economic analysis of variant solutions was carried out, the<<strong>br</strong> />

criteria were established and, at the end, the obtained compromise solution is shown.<<strong>br</strong> />

Key words: optimi<strong>za</strong>tion, compromise programming, variants, criteria, compromise solution<<strong>br</strong> />

1. INTRODUCTION<<strong>br</strong> />

The highway Belgrade – South Adriatic<<strong>br</strong> />

is a <strong>br</strong>anch of the Trans-European highway<<strong>br</strong> />

(TEHW) that, on the territory of Serbia and<<strong>br</strong> />

Montenegro, connects the main line of<<strong>br</strong> />

TEHW (from Gdansk to Athens and<<strong>br</strong> />

Istanbul) to the Adriatic Sea. On the territory<<strong>br</strong> />

of Montenegro, from direction of Serbia, the<<strong>br</strong> />

highway route enters near place of Boljare,<<strong>br</strong> />

and then the route of Berane – Andrijevica –<<strong>br</strong> />

Mateševo – Podgorica – Tanki rt and with<<strong>br</strong> />

already built tunnel under the massif of<<strong>br</strong> />

Sozina gets out to the Adriatic coast,<<strong>br</strong> />

respectively the Port of Bar. The preliminary<<strong>br</strong> />

design has done several versions of the<<strong>br</strong> />

certain sections in the corridor of Beolgrade<<strong>br</strong> />

– South Adriatic highway.<<strong>br</strong> />

In this regard, it is necessary to analyze<<strong>br</strong> />

the choice of route options for further<<strong>br</strong> />

development in the main project.<<strong>br</strong> />

This work also considered the technoeconomically<<strong>br</strong> />

evaluated two route variants of<<strong>br</strong> />

the highway corridor through Montenegro<<strong>br</strong> />

on the move to Smokovac (Podgorica) -<<strong>br</strong> />

Uvče containing a great number of viaducts,<<strong>br</strong> />

<strong>br</strong>idges and tunnels, what significantly<<strong>br</strong> />

affects the project costs. Variant<<strong>br</strong> />

analysis and estimation of costs are intended<<strong>br</strong> />

to assist the investors in decision<<strong>br</strong> />

making on further stages of the project<<strong>br</strong> />

implementation.<<strong>br</strong> />

* University in Pristina, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Kosovska Mitrovica<<strong>br</strong> />

** University of Podgorica, Faculty of Civil Engineering -Podgorica<<strong>br</strong> />

No 4, <strong>2011</strong>. 179<<strong>br</strong> />

MINING ENGINEERING

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!