24.02.2013 Views

Rudarski radovi br 4 2011 - Institut za rudarstvo i metalurgiju Bor

Rudarski radovi br 4 2011 - Institut za rudarstvo i metalurgiju Bor

Rudarski radovi br 4 2011 - Institut za rudarstvo i metalurgiju Bor

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

and measures of their control can have a<<strong>br</strong> />

great influence to safety of employees and<<strong>br</strong> />

Risk<<strong>br</strong> />

tolerability<<strong>br</strong> />

criteria<<strong>br</strong> />

Risk analysis<<strong>br</strong> />

Risk calculation<<strong>br</strong> />

Risk assesment<<strong>br</strong> />

Frequency<<strong>br</strong> />

analysis<<strong>br</strong> />

to cost-effectiveness and purport of work<<strong>br</strong> />

in general.<<strong>br</strong> />

Diagram 1. General model of risk determination and control[12 ]<<strong>br</strong> />

Diagram 1 of risk management uses iterative<<strong>br</strong> />

loops to present a review of risk<<strong>br</strong> />

analysis results in relation to risk tolerability<<strong>br</strong> />

criteria, as an integral part of safety<<strong>br</strong> />

management process. If it results in intolerable<<strong>br</strong> />

risk, the new loop is created for<<strong>br</strong> />

implementation the risk reduction measures<<strong>br</strong> />

and updates the risk analysis, so that<<strong>br</strong> />

it would reflect the changes.<<strong>br</strong> />

There are two possible outcomes of<<strong>br</strong> />

"risk assessment": tolerable and intolerable.<<strong>br</strong> />

This is based on the approach which ensures<<strong>br</strong> />

appreciation of explicit criteria of risk<<strong>br</strong> />

tolerability, as the first phase, followed by<<strong>br</strong> />

an ALARP assessment. For this reason, the<<strong>br</strong> />

above diagram includes "further risk reduc-<<strong>br</strong> />

Risk analysis<<strong>br</strong> />

planning<<strong>br</strong> />

Definition system<<strong>br</strong> />

Ha<strong>za</strong>rd<<strong>br</strong> />

identification<<strong>br</strong> />

Risk picture<<strong>br</strong> />

Risk<<strong>br</strong> />

assessment<<strong>br</strong> />

Further risk<<strong>br</strong> />

reduction measures<<strong>br</strong> />

Consequence<<strong>br</strong> />

analysis<<strong>br</strong> />

Acceptable<<strong>br</strong> />

Intolerable<<strong>br</strong> />

Risk<<strong>br</strong> />

reduction<<strong>br</strong> />

measures<<strong>br</strong> />

tion measures", in case of tolerable risk<<strong>br</strong> />

levels.<<strong>br</strong> />

9. CONCLUSION<<strong>br</strong> />

This paper aims to draw attention to<<strong>br</strong> />

the issue of risk and ha<strong>za</strong>rd management<<strong>br</strong> />

in the coal mines. The focus of this research<<strong>br</strong> />

was the environment of the Brown<<strong>br</strong> />

Coal Mine Kakanj, with its specificities<<strong>br</strong> />

and experiences, based on the analysis of<<strong>br</strong> />

recorded incidents. In order to conduct an<<strong>br</strong> />

analysis of specific risks of any kind, in<<strong>br</strong> />

any given field, we need to conduct a general<<strong>br</strong> />

theoretic research of design, methodology<<strong>br</strong> />

and system frame of risk management.<<strong>br</strong> />

The assumed requirements in risk<<strong>br</strong> />

No 4, <strong>2011</strong>. 129<<strong>br</strong> />

MINING ENGINEERING

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!