Rudarski radovi br 4 2011 - Institut za rudarstvo i metalurgiju Bor
Rudarski radovi br 4 2011 - Institut za rudarstvo i metalurgiju Bor
Rudarski radovi br 4 2011 - Institut za rudarstvo i metalurgiju Bor
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Table 4.[11] Risk criteria according to tolerability<<strong>br</strong> />
Risk class Interpretation<<strong>br</strong> />
IR Intolerable risk<<strong>br</strong> />
UR<<strong>br</strong> />
Undesirable risk, acceptable only if risk reduction is impracticable<<strong>br</strong> />
or if of the costs of improvement are high<<strong>br</strong> />
TR<<strong>br</strong> />
Tolerable risk if the costs of risk reduction higher than the profit<<strong>br</strong> />
NR Negligible risk<<strong>br</strong> />
Tolerable risk is represented by green<<strong>br</strong> />
in Tables 5 and 6, while yellow represents<<strong>br</strong> />
the ALARP region. Red represents the<<strong>br</strong> />
region of intolerable risk and reengineering<<strong>br</strong> />
as the next step in the treatment<<strong>br</strong> />
of risks classified in this category.<<strong>br</strong> />
Table 5. Table 6.<<strong>br</strong> />
Region marked yellow is the region of risk<<strong>br</strong> />
management, as the main task of entire<<strong>br</strong> />
process. Risks marked green are in the<<strong>br</strong> />
region of tolerable risk. However, in our<<strong>br</strong> />
case, they can be further analyzed, depending<<strong>br</strong> />
on their frequency.<<strong>br</strong> />
Degree of severity Degree of severity<<strong>br</strong> />
Degree of<<strong>br</strong> />
IV III II I Degree of<<strong>br</strong> />
probabil-<<strong>br</strong> />
IV III II I<<strong>br</strong> />
probability<<strong>br</strong> />
ity Negligible Marginal Critical Catastrophic<<strong>br</strong> />
Negligible Marginal Critical Catastrophic<<strong>br</strong> />
A-very<<strong>br</strong> />
unlikely<<strong>br</strong> />
UR IR IR IR<<strong>br</strong> />
A-very<<strong>br</strong> />
unlikely<<strong>br</strong> />
I-A<<strong>br</strong> />
B-unlikely TR UR IR IR B-unlikely I-B<<strong>br</strong> />
C-seldom TR TR UR IR C-seldom 2xI-C<<strong>br</strong> />
Doccasional<<strong>br</strong> />
NR TR TR UR<<strong>br</strong> />
Doccasional<<strong>br</strong> />
2xIII-D<<strong>br</strong> />
E-likely NR NR TR TR E-likely IV-E II-E<<strong>br</strong> />
F-frequent NR NR NR TR F-frequent III-F<<strong>br</strong> />
8. SYSTEMATIC AND OPERATIVE<<strong>br</strong> />
MEASURES OF REDUCTION,<<strong>br</strong> />
TRANSFER AND MITIGATION<<strong>br</strong> />
OF RISK<<strong>br</strong> />
After the phase of identification and<<strong>br</strong> />
assessment of risk, its reduction is approached<<strong>br</strong> />
as a phase with almost unlimited<<strong>br</strong> />
range of possibilities. The optimum approach<<strong>br</strong> />
can usually be selected during the<<strong>br</strong> />
problem analysis phase itself, but compromise<<strong>br</strong> />
is often required due to economic,<<strong>br</strong> />
technical and time requirements of its implementation.<<strong>br</strong> />
In general, the simplest<<strong>br</strong> />
method is selected which reduces risk to<<strong>br</strong> />
an acceptable level.<<strong>br</strong> />
Reduction of risk aims to correct the<<strong>br</strong> />
influence of individual risks to acceptable<<strong>br</strong> />
or as low as possible measure. Reliability<<strong>br</strong> />
of risk analysis is an important precondition<<strong>br</strong> />
of proper risk identification and<<strong>br</strong> />
evaluation. If high reliability of risk assessment<<strong>br</strong> />
was not reached, it is necessary<<strong>br</strong> />
to undertake the additional monitoring and<<strong>br</strong> />
wide range of occupational safety measures.<<strong>br</strong> />
A level of residual risk is determined<<strong>br</strong> />
based on a series of criteria. Strictly set<<strong>br</strong> />
limits, i.e. low level of risk tolerability,<<strong>br</strong> />
can <strong>br</strong>ing into question the costeffectiveness<<strong>br</strong> />
of production process.<<strong>br</strong> />
Proper determination of tolerable risks<<strong>br</strong> />
No 4, <strong>2011</strong>. 128<<strong>br</strong> />
MINING ENGINEERING