language version - Eiropas Parlaments - Europa
language version - Eiropas Parlaments - Europa
language version - Eiropas Parlaments - Europa
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
ПЪЛЕН ПРОТОКОЛ НА РАЗИСКВАНИЯТА<br />
ACTA LITERAL DE LOS DEBATES<br />
DOSLOVNÝ ZÁZNAM ZE ZASEDÁNÍ<br />
FULDSTÆNDIGT FORHANDLINGSREFERAT<br />
AUSFÜHRLICHE SITZUNGSBERICHTE<br />
ISTUNGI STENOGRAMM<br />
ΠΛΗΡΗ ΠΡΑΚΤΙΚΑ ΤΩΝ ΣΥΖΗΤΗΣΕΩΝ<br />
VERBATIM REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS<br />
COMPTE RENDU IN EXTENSO DES DÉBATS<br />
TUARASCÁIL FOCAL AR FHOCAL NA N-IMEACHTAÍ<br />
RESOCONTO INTEGRALE DELLE DISCUSSIONI<br />
DEBAŠU STENOGRAMMA<br />
2009 - 2014<br />
17.01.2011<br />
POSĖDŽIO STENOGRAMA<br />
AZ ÜLÉSEK SZÓ SZERINTI JEGYZŐKÖNYVE<br />
RAPPORTI VERBATIM TAD-DIBATTITI<br />
VOLLEDIG VERSLAG VAN DE VERGADERINGEN<br />
PEŁNE SPRAWOZDANIE Z OBRAD<br />
RELATO INTEGRAL DOS DEBATES<br />
STENOGRAMA DEZBATERILOR<br />
DOSLOVNÝ ZÁPIS Z ROZPRÁV<br />
DOBESEDNI ZAPISI RAZPRAV<br />
SANATARKAT ISTUNTOSELOSTUKSET<br />
FULLSTÄNDIGT FÖRHANDLINGSREFERAT<br />
Понеделник - Lunes - Pondělí - Mandag - Montag - Esmaspäev - Δευτέρα<br />
Monday - Lundi - Dé Luain - Lunedì - Pirmdiena - Pirmadienis - Hétfő - It-Tnejn<br />
Maandag - Poniedziałek - Segunda-feira - Luni - Pondelok - Ponedeljek - Maanantai - Måndag<br />
Единство в многообразието - Unida en la diversidad - Jednotná v rozmanitosti - Forenet i mangfoldighed - In Vielfalt geeint - Ühinenud mitmekesisuses<br />
Eνωμένη στην πολυμορφία - United in diversity - Unie dans la diversité - Aontaithe san éagsúlacht - Unita nella diversità - Vienoti daudzveidībā<br />
Susivieniję įvairovėje - Egyesülve a sokféleségben - Magħquda fid-diversità - In verscheidenheid verenigd - Zjednoczona w różnorodności - Unida na diversidade<br />
Unită în diversitate - Zjednotení v rozmanitosti - Združena v raznolikosti - Moninaisuudessaan yhtenäinen - Förenade i mångfalden<br />
Неокончателно издание - Edición provisional - Prozatímní vydání - Foreløbig udgave - Vorläufige Ausgabe<br />
Esialgne versioon - Προσωρινή έκδοση - Provisional edition - Edition provisoire - Eagrán Sealadach - Edizione provvisoria<br />
Pagaidu versija - Negalutinė redakcija - Ideiglenes kiadás - Edizzjoni proviżorja - Voorlopige uitgave - Wydanie tymczasowe<br />
Edição provisória - Ediţie provizorie - Predbežné vydanie - Začasna razlicica č - Väliaikainen versio - Preliminär utgåva
BG СЪДЪРЖАНИЕ<br />
1 - Възобновяване на заседанието ............................15<br />
2 - Одобряване на протокола от предишното<br />
заседание: вж протоколите..................................15<br />
3 - Декларация на председателството ......................15<br />
4 - Състав на комисиите и делегациите: вж.<br />
протокола .............................................................16<br />
5 - Изпращане на текстове на споразумения от<br />
Съвета: вж. протоколи ........................................16<br />
6 - Петиции: вж. протоколи......................................16<br />
7 - Действия, предприети вследствие позиции и<br />
резолюции на Парламента: вж. протоколи .......16<br />
8 - Въпроси за устен отговор и писмени декларации<br />
(внасяне): вж. протокола.....................................16<br />
9 - Ред на работа........................................................16<br />
10 - Внасяне на документи: вж. протоколи ............17<br />
11 - Декларация на председателя на Европейския<br />
парламент относно положението в Тунис.........17<br />
12 - Хармонизирани условия за пускането на пазара<br />
на строителните продукти (разискване)............22<br />
13 - Последиците в Европейския съюз от инцидента<br />
със заразените с диоксин фуражи (разискване) 28<br />
14 - Споразумение за партньорство между<br />
Европейския съюз и Република Камерун относно<br />
прилагането на законодателството в областта на<br />
горите - Споразумение между ЕС и<br />
Демократична република Конго относно<br />
прилагане на законодателството в областта на<br />
горите - Споразумения за доброволно<br />
партньорство (FLEGT) (разискване)..................38<br />
15 - Състав на Парламента: вж. протокола.............43<br />
16 - Споразумение за партньорство между<br />
Европейския съюз и Република Камерун относно<br />
прилагането на законодателството в областта на<br />
горите - Споразумение между ЕС и<br />
Демократична република Конго относно<br />
прилагане на законодателството в областта на<br />
горите - Споразумения за доброволно<br />
партньорство (FLEGT) (продължение на<br />
разискването).......................................................43<br />
17 - Междинно споразумение за партньорство между<br />
Европейската общност, от една страна, и<br />
държавите от Тихоокеанския басейн, от друга -<br />
Временно споразумение за партньорство между<br />
ЕО и държавите от Тихоокеанския басейн<br />
(разискване) .........................................................47<br />
18 - Международното осиновяване в Европейския<br />
съюз (разискване) ................................................54<br />
19 - Едноминутни изказвания (член 150 от<br />
Правилника за дейността) ..................................62<br />
20 - Европейски консенсус относно хуманитарната<br />
помощ (кратко представяне) ..............................68<br />
21 - Селското стопанство като сектор от<br />
стратегическо значение за продоволствената<br />
сигурност (кратко представяне).........................70<br />
22 - Дневен ред на следващото заседание: вж.<br />
протокола .............................................................76<br />
23 - Закриване на заседанието .................................76<br />
ES ÍNDICE<br />
1 - Reanudación del período de sesiones .....................15<br />
2 - Aprobación del Acta de la sesión anterior: véase el<br />
Acta ........................................................................15<br />
3 - Declaración de la Presidencia.................................15<br />
4 - Composición de las comisiones y delegaciones:<br />
véase el Acta ......................................................... 16<br />
5 - Transmisión por el Consejo de textos de Acuerdos:<br />
véase el Acta ......................................................... 16<br />
6 - Peticiones: véase el Acta ....................................... 16<br />
7 - Curso dado a las posiciones y resoluciones del<br />
Parlamento: véase el Acta ..................................... 16<br />
8 - Preguntas orales y declaraciones por escrito<br />
(presentación): véase el Acta................................. 16<br />
9 - Orden de los trabajos ............................................. 16<br />
10 - Presentación de documentos: véase el Acta ........ 17<br />
11 - Declaración del Presidente del Parlamento Europeo<br />
sobre la situación en Túnez ................................... 17<br />
12 - Condiciones armonizadas para la comercialización<br />
de productos de construcción (debate) .................. 22<br />
13 - Consecuencias en la Unión Europea del caso de los<br />
piensos contaminados por dioxina (debate) .......... 28<br />
14 - Acuerdo UE-Camerún sobre las leyes forestales -<br />
Acuerdo UE-República del Congo sobre las leyes<br />
forestales - Acuerdos de Asociación Voluntaria<br />
FLEGT (debate) .................................................... 38<br />
15 - Composición del Parlamento: véase el Acta........ 43<br />
16 - Acuerdo UE-Camerún sobre las leyes forestales -<br />
Acuerdo UE-República del Congo sobre las leyes<br />
forestales - Acuerdos de Asociación Voluntaria<br />
FLEGT (continuación del debate)......................... 43<br />
17 - Acuerdo de Asociación Interino entre la CE y los<br />
Estados del Pacífico - Acuerdo de Asociación<br />
Interino entre la CE y los Estados del Pacífico<br />
(debate).................................................................. 47<br />
18 - Adopción internacional en la Unión Europea<br />
(debate).................................................................. 54<br />
19 - Intervenciones de un minuto (artículo 150 del<br />
Reglamento) .......................................................... 62<br />
20 - Consenso europeo sobre la ayuda humanitaria<br />
(breve presentación) .............................................. 68<br />
21 - La agricultura como sector estratégico en el<br />
contexto de la seguridad alimentaria (breve<br />
presentación) ......................................................... 70<br />
22 - Orden del día de la próxima sesión : véase el Acta<br />
............................................................................... 76<br />
23 - Cierre de la sesión ............................................... 76
4 17-01-2011<br />
CS OBSAH<br />
1 - Pokračování zasedání .............................................15<br />
2 - Schválení zápisu z předchozího denního zasedání: viz<br />
zápis........................................................................15<br />
3 - Prohlášení předsednictví.........................................15<br />
4 - Členství ve výborech a delegacích: viz zápis ........16<br />
5 - Texty dohod dodané Radou: viz zápis...................16<br />
6 - Petice: viz zápis ..................................................... 16<br />
7 - Další kroky na základě postojů a usnesení<br />
Parlamentu: viz zápis ............................................16<br />
8 - Otázky k ústnímu zodpovězení a písemná prohlášení<br />
(předložení): viz zápis ........................................... 16<br />
9 - Plán práce ..............................................................16<br />
10 - Předložení dokumentů: viz zápis ......................... 17<br />
11 - Prohlášení předsedy Evropského parlamentu k<br />
situaci v Tunisku ...................................................17<br />
12 - Harmonizované podmínky pro uvádění stavebních<br />
produktů na trh (rozprava).....................................22<br />
13 - Důsledky incidentu s krmivem kontaminovaným<br />
dioxinem pro Evropskou unii (rozprava)...............28<br />
14 - Dohoda EU-Kamerun o právu v oblasti lesnictví -<br />
Dohoda EU-Konžská republika o právu v oblasti<br />
lesnictví - Dobrovolné dohody o partnerství v rámci<br />
FLEGT (rozprava).................................................38<br />
15 - Složení Parlamentu: viz zápis..............................43<br />
16 - Dohoda EU-Kamerun o právu v oblasti lesnictví -<br />
Dohoda EU-Konžská republika o právu v oblasti<br />
lesnictví - Dobrovolné dohody o partnerství v rámci<br />
FLEGT (pokračování rozpravy)............................43<br />
17 - Prozatímní dohoda o partnerství mezi ES a<br />
tichomořskými státy - Prozatímní dohoda o<br />
partnerství mezi ES a tichomořskými státy (rozprava)<br />
...............................................................................47<br />
18 - Mezinárodní adopce v Evropské unii (rozprava).54<br />
19 - Jednominutové projevy (článek 150 jednacího řádu)<br />
...............................................................................62<br />
20 - Provádění Evropského konsensu o humanitární<br />
pomoci (krátké přednesení) ...................................68<br />
21 - Zemědělství jako strategického odvětví v souvislosti<br />
se zajišťováním potravin (krátké přednesení)........70<br />
22 - Pořad jednání příštího zasedání: viz zápis ........... 76<br />
23 - Ukončení zasedání...............................................76<br />
DA INDHOLD<br />
1 - Genoptagelse af sessionen ......................................15<br />
2 - Godkendelse af protokollen fra det foregående møde:<br />
se protokollen.........................................................15<br />
3 - Erklæring fra formanden ........................................15<br />
4 - Udvalgenes og delegationernes sammensætning: se<br />
protokollen ............................................................ 16<br />
5 - Tekster til aftaler sendt af Rådet: se protokollen ... 16<br />
6 - Andragender (jf. protokollen)................................ 16<br />
7 - Meddelelse om Kommissionens reaktion på<br />
Parlamentets udtalelser og beslutninger: se<br />
protokollen ............................................................ 16<br />
8 - Mundtlige forespørgsler og skriftlige erklæringer<br />
(modtagne dokumenter): se protokollen................ 16<br />
9 - Arbejdsplan............................................................ 16<br />
10 - Modtagne dokumenter: se protokollen ................ 17<br />
11 - Erklæring af formanden for <strong>Europa</strong>-Parlamentet om<br />
situationen i Tunesien............................................ 17<br />
12 - Harmoniserede betingelser for markedsføring af<br />
byggevarer (forhandling)....................................... 22<br />
13 - Konsekvenser i EU af sagen om dioxin i dyrefoder<br />
(forhandling) ......................................................... 28<br />
14 - Aftale EU-Cameroun om skovbrugsbestemmelser -<br />
Aftale EU/Republikken Congo om<br />
skovbrugsbestemmelser - FLEGTpartnerskabsaftaler<br />
(forhandling) .......................... 38<br />
15 - Parlamentets sammensætning: se protokollen ..... 43<br />
16 - Aftale EU-Cameroun om skovbrugsbestemmelser -<br />
Aftale EU/Republikken Congo om<br />
skovbrugsbestemmelser - FLEGTpartnerskabsaftaler<br />
(fortsat forhandling) ............... 43<br />
17 - Foreløbig partnerskabsaftale mellem EF og<br />
Stillehavslandene - Foreløbig partnerskabsaftale<br />
mellem EF og Stillehavslandene (forhandling)..... 47<br />
18 - International adoption i Den Europæiske Union<br />
(forhandling) ......................................................... 54<br />
19 - Indlæg af et minuts varighed (forretningsordenens<br />
artikel 150) ............................................................ 62<br />
20 - Europæisk konsensus om humanitær bistand<br />
(kortfattet forelæggelse) ........................................ 68<br />
21 - Landbruget som en strategisk sektor i forbindelse<br />
med fødevaresikkerhed (kortfattet forelæggelse).. 70<br />
22 - Dagsorden for næste møde: se protokollen.......... 76<br />
23 - Hævelse af mødet ................................................ 76
17-01-2011 5<br />
DE INHALT<br />
1 - Wiederaufnahme der Sitzungsperiode....................15<br />
2 - Genehmigung des Protokolls der vorangegangenen<br />
Sitzung: siehe Protokoll..........................................15<br />
3 - Erklärung des Präsidenten ......................................15<br />
4 - Zusammensetzung der Ausschüsse und Delegationen:<br />
siehe Protokoll....................................................... 16<br />
5 - Übermittlung von Abkommenstexten durch den Rat:<br />
siehe Protokoll.......................................................16<br />
6 - Petitionen: siehe Protokoll.....................................16<br />
7 - Weiterbehandlung der Standpunkte und<br />
Entschließungen des <strong>Parlaments</strong>: siehe Protokoll .16<br />
8 - Anfragen zur mündlichen Beantwortung und<br />
schriftliche Erklärungen (Vorlage): siehe Protokoll16<br />
9 - Arbeitsplan ............................................................16<br />
10 - Vorlage von Dokumenten: siehe Protokoll..........17<br />
11 - Erklärung des Präsidenten des Europäischen<br />
<strong>Parlaments</strong> zur Lage in Tunesien ..........................17<br />
12 - Harmonisierte Bedingungen für die Vermarktung<br />
von Bauprodukten (Aussprache) ...........................22<br />
13 - Folgen in der Europäischen Union der Entdeckung<br />
von Dioxin in Futtermitteln (Aussprache).............28<br />
14 - Abkommen EU/Kamerun über das Recht im<br />
Forstsektor - Abkommen EU/Republik Kongo über<br />
das Recht im Forstsektor - Freiwillige FLEGT-<br />
Partnerschaftsabkommen (Aussprache) ................38<br />
15 - Zusammensetzung des <strong>Parlaments</strong>: siehe Protokoll<br />
...............................................................................43<br />
16 - Abkommen EU/Kamerun über das Recht im<br />
Forstsektor - Abkommen EU/Republik Kongo über<br />
das Recht im Forstsektor - Freiwillige FLEGT-<br />
Partnerschaftsabkommen (Fortsetzung der<br />
Aussprache)...........................................................43<br />
17 - Interims-Partnerschaftsabkommen EG/Pazifik-<br />
Staaten - Interims-Partnerschaftsabkommen<br />
zwischen der EG und den Pazifik-Staaten<br />
(Aussprache)..........................................................47<br />
18 - Internationale Adoption in der Europäischen Union<br />
(Aussprache)..........................................................54<br />
19 - Ausführungen von einer Minute (Artikel 150 GO)62<br />
20 - Europäischer Konsens zur humanitäten Hilfe (kurze<br />
Darstellung)...........................................................68<br />
21 - Landwirtschaft als Sektor von strategischer<br />
Bedeutung für die Ernährungssicherheit (kurze<br />
Darstellung)...........................................................70<br />
22 - Tagesordnung der nächsten Sitzung: siehe Protokoll<br />
...............................................................................76<br />
23 - Schluss der Sitzung..............................................76<br />
ET SISUKORD<br />
1 - Istungjärgu jätkamine .............................................15<br />
2 - Eelmise istungi protokolli kinnitamine (vt protokoll)<br />
................................................................................15<br />
3 - Presidentuuri avaldus..............................................15<br />
4 - Parlamendi komisjonide ja delegatsioonide koosseis<br />
(vt protokoll) ......................................................... 16<br />
5 - Nõukogu edastatud kokkulepete tekstid (vt protokoll)<br />
............................................................................... 16<br />
6 - Petitsioonid (vt protokoll)...................................... 16<br />
7 - Parlamendi seisukohtade ja resolutsioonide<br />
vastuvõtmisele järgnev tegevus (vt protokoll) ...... 16<br />
8 - Suuliselt vastatavad küsimused ja kirjalikud<br />
deklaratsioonid (esitamine) (vt protokoll)............. 16<br />
9 - Tööplaan................................................................ 16<br />
10 - Esitatud dokumendid (vt protokoll)..................... 17<br />
11 - Euroopa Parlamendi presidendi sõnavõtt olukorra<br />
kohta Tuneesias..................................................... 17<br />
12 - Ehitustoodete ühtlustatud turustustingimused<br />
(arutelu)................................................................. 22<br />
13 - Sööda dioksiiniga saastumise juhtumi tagajärjed<br />
ELis (arutelu) ........................................................ 28<br />
14 - ELi ja Kameruni vaheline metsaõigusnormide alane<br />
leping - ELi ja Kongo Vabariigi vaheline<br />
metsaõigusnormide alane leping - Vabatahtlikud<br />
FLEGTi partnerluslepingud (arutelu).................... 38<br />
15 - Parlamendi koosseis (vt protokoll) ...................... 43<br />
16 - ELi ja Kameruni vaheline metsaõigusnormide alane<br />
leping - ELi ja Kongo Vabariigi vaheline<br />
metsaõigusnormide alane leping - Vabatahtlikud<br />
FLEGTi partnerluslepingud (arutelu jätkamine) ... 43<br />
17 - EÜ ja Vaikse ookeani piirkonna riikide vaheline<br />
majanduspartnerluse vaheleping - EÜ ja Vaikse<br />
ookeani piirkonna riikide vaheline<br />
majanduspartnerluse vaheleping (arutelu)............. 47<br />
18 - Rahvusvaheline lapsendamine Euroopa Liidus<br />
(arutelu)................................................................. 54<br />
19 - Üheminutilised sõnavõtud (kodukorra artikkel 150)<br />
............................................................................... 62<br />
20 - Humanitaarabi valdkonna Euroopa konsensus<br />
(lühiettekanne)....................................................... 68<br />
21 - Põllumajanduse tunnistamine strateegiliselt tähtsaks<br />
sektoriks toiduga kindlustatuse tagamisel<br />
(lühiettekanne)....................................................... 70<br />
22 - Järgmise istungi päevakord (vt protokoll) ........... 76<br />
23 - Istungi lõpp.......................................................... 76
6 17-01-2011<br />
EL ΠΕΡΙΕΧΟΜΕΝΑ<br />
1 - Επανάληψη της συνόδου ........................................15<br />
2 - Έγκριση των συνοπτικών πρακτικών της<br />
προηγούμενης συνεδρίασης: βλ. Συνοπτικά<br />
Πρακτικά................................................................15<br />
3 - Δήλωση της Προεδρίας ..........................................15<br />
4 - Σύνθεση των επιτροπών και αντιπροσωπειών: βλ.<br />
Συνοπτικά Πρακτικά .............................................16<br />
5 - Διαβίβαση από το Συμβούλιο κειμένων συμφωνιών:<br />
βλ. Συνοπτικά Πρακτικά .......................................16<br />
6 - Αναφορές: βλ. Συνοπτικά Πρακτικά .....................16<br />
7 - Συνέχεια που δόθηκε στις θέσεις και τα ψηφίσματα<br />
του Κοινοβουλίου: βλ. Συνοπτικά πρακτικά.........16<br />
8 - Προφορικές ερωτήσεις και γραπτές δηλώσεις<br />
(κατάθεση): βλ. Συνοπτικά Πρακτικά...................16<br />
9 - Διάταξη των εργασιών...........................................16<br />
10 - Κατάθεση εγγράφων: βλ. Συνοπτικά Πρακτικά ..17<br />
11 - Δήλωση του Προέδρου του Ευρωπαϊκού<br />
Κοινοβουλίου σχετικά με την κατάσταση στην<br />
Τυνησία .................................................................17<br />
12 - Εναρμονισμένοι όροι εμπορίας προϊόντων του<br />
τομέα των δομικών κατασκευών (συζήτηση)........22<br />
13 - Συνέπειες στην Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση από τον<br />
εντοπισμό διοξίνης σε ζωοτροφές (συζήτηση)......28<br />
14 - Συμφωνία ΕΕ-Καμερούν σχετικά με τη δασική<br />
νομοθεσία - Συμφωνία ΕΕ-Δημοκρατίας του Κονγκό<br />
σχετικά με τη δασική νομοθεσία - FLEGT -<br />
Εθελοντικές συμφωνίες εταιρικής σχέσης<br />
(συζήτηση) ............................................................38<br />
15 - Σύνθεση του Κοινοβουλίου: βλ. Συνοπτικά<br />
Πρακτικά...............................................................43<br />
16 - Συμφωνία ΕΕ-Καμερούν σχετικά με τη δασική<br />
νομοθεσία - Συμφωνία ΕΕ-Δημοκρατίας του Κονγκό<br />
σχετικά με τη δασική νομοθεσία - FLEGT -<br />
Εθελοντικές συμφωνίες εταιρικής σχέσης (συνέχεια<br />
της συζήτησης)......................................................43<br />
17 - Ενδιάμεση συμφωνία εταιρικής σχέσης μεταξύ της<br />
ΕΚ και των Κρατών του Ειρηνικού - Ενδιάμεση<br />
συμφωνία εταιρικής σχέσης μεταξύ της ΕΚ και των<br />
Κρατών του Ειρηνικού (συζήτηση) ......................47<br />
18 - Διεθνής υιοθεσία στην Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση<br />
(συζήτηση) ............................................................54<br />
19 - Παρεμβάσεις διάρκειας ενός λεπτού (άρθρο 150 του<br />
Κανονισμού)..........................................................62<br />
20 - Ευρωπαϊκή κοινή αντίληψη για την ανθρωπιστική<br />
βοήθεια (συνοπτική παρουσίαση) .........................68<br />
21 - Η γεωργία ως στρατηγικός τομέας στο πλαίσιο της<br />
επισιτιστικής ασφάλειας (συνοπτική παρουσίαση)70<br />
22 - Ημερήσια διάταξη της επόμενης συνεδρίασης: βλ.<br />
Συνοπτικά Πρακτικά .............................................76<br />
23 - Λήξη της συνεδρίασης.........................................76<br />
EN CONTENTS<br />
1 - Resumption of the session ......................................15<br />
2 - Approval of the minutes of the previous sitting: see<br />
Minutes...................................................................15<br />
3 - Statement by the President .....................................15<br />
4 - Composition of committees and delegations : see<br />
Minutes.................................................................. 16<br />
5 - Texts of agreements forwarded by the Council: see<br />
Minutes.................................................................. 16<br />
6 - Petitions: see Minutes............................................ 16<br />
7 - Action taken on Parliament’s positions and<br />
resolutions: see Minutes........................................ 16<br />
8 - Oral questions and written declarations (submission):<br />
see Minutes ........................................................... 16<br />
9 - Order of business................................................... 16<br />
10 - Documents received: see Minutes ....................... 17<br />
11 - Statement by the President of the European<br />
Parliament on the situation in Tunisia................... 17<br />
12 - Harmonised conditions for the marketing of<br />
construction products (debate) .............................. 22<br />
13 - Consequences in the European Union of the dioxin<br />
animal feed incident (debate) ................................ 28<br />
14 - EU-Cameroon forest law agreement - EU-Republic<br />
of Congo forest law agreement - FLEGT voluntary<br />
partnership agreements (debate)............................ 38<br />
15 - Composition of Parliament : see Minutes............ 43<br />
16 - EU-Cameroon forest law agreement - EU-Republic<br />
of Congo forest law agreement - FLEGT voluntary<br />
partnership agreements (continuation of debate)... 43<br />
17 - Interim Partnership Agreement between the EC and<br />
the Pacific States - Interim Partnership Agreement<br />
between the EC and the Pacific States (debate) .... 47<br />
18 - International adoption in the European Union<br />
(debate).................................................................. 54<br />
19 - One-minute speeches (Rule 150)......................... 62<br />
20 - European Consensus on humanitarian aid (short<br />
presentation).......................................................... 68<br />
21 - Agriculture as a strategic sector in the context of<br />
food security (short presentation).......................... 70<br />
22 - Agenda of the next sitting : see Minutes.............. 76<br />
23 - Closure of the sitting............................................ 76
17-01-2011 7<br />
FR SOMMAIRE<br />
1 - Reprise de la session...............................................15<br />
2 - Approbation du procès-verbal de la séance<br />
précédente: voir procès-verbal ...............................15<br />
3 - Déclaration de la Présidence...................................15<br />
4 - Composition des commissions et des délégations :<br />
voir procès-verbal..................................................16<br />
5 - Transmission par le Conseil de textes d'accords: voir<br />
procès-verbal .........................................................16<br />
6 - Pétitions: voir procès-verbal ..................................16<br />
7 - Suites données aux positions et résolutions du<br />
Parlement: voir procès-verbal ...............................16<br />
8 - Questions orales et déclarations écrites (dépôt): voir<br />
procès-verbal .........................................................16<br />
9 - Ordre des travaux...................................................16<br />
10 - Dépôt de documents: voir procès-verbal .............17<br />
11 - Déclaration du Président du Parlement européen sur<br />
la situation en Tunisie ...........................................17<br />
12 - Conditions harmonisées de commercialisation pour<br />
les produits de construction (débat).......................22<br />
13 - Conséquences dans l'Union européenne de la<br />
contamination d'aliments pour animaux par de la<br />
dioxine (débat).......................................................28<br />
14 - Accord UE-Cameroun sur l’application des<br />
réglementations forestières - Accord UE-République<br />
du Congo sur l'application des réglementations<br />
forestières - Accords de partenariat volontaires<br />
FLEGT (débat) ......................................................38<br />
15 - Composition du Parlement : voir procès-verbal ..43<br />
16 - Accord UE-Cameroun sur l’application des<br />
réglementations forestières - Accord UE-République<br />
du Congo sur l'application des réglementations<br />
forestières - Accords de partenariat volontaires<br />
FLEGT (suite du débat).........................................43<br />
17 - Accord de partenariat intérimaire CE/États du<br />
Pacifique - Accord de partenariat intérimaire entre la<br />
CE et les États du Pacifique (débat) ......................47<br />
18 - L'adoption internationale dans l'Union européenne<br />
(débat) ...................................................................54<br />
19 - Interventions d'une minute (article 150 du<br />
règlement) .............................................................62<br />
20 - Consensus européen sur l’aide humanitaire (brève<br />
présentation)..........................................................68<br />
21 - L'agriculture comme secteur stratégique dans le<br />
cadre de la sécurité alimentaire (brève présentation)<br />
...............................................................................70<br />
22 - Ordre du jour de la prochaine séance : voir procèsverbal.....................................................................76<br />
23 - Levée de la séance ...............................................76<br />
IT INDICE<br />
1 - Ripresa della sessione.............................................15<br />
2 - Approvazione del processo verbale della seduta<br />
precedente: vedasi processo verbale.......................15<br />
3 - Dichiarazione della Presidenza...............................15<br />
4 - Composizione delle commissioni e delle delegazioni<br />
: vedasi processo verbale....................................... 16<br />
5 - Trasmissione di testi di accordo da parte del<br />
Consiglio: vedasi processo verbale ....................... 16<br />
6 - Petizioni: vedasi processo verbale......................... 16<br />
7 - Seguito dato alle posizioni e risoluzioni del<br />
Parlamento: vedasi processo verbale..................... 16<br />
8 - Interrogazioni orali e dichiarazioni scritte<br />
(presentazione): vedasi processo verbale .............. 16<br />
9 - Ordine dei lavori.................................................... 16<br />
10 - Presentazione di documenti: vedasi processo<br />
verbale................................................................... 17<br />
11 - Dichiarazione del Presidente del Parlamento<br />
europeo sulla situazione in Tunisia ....................... 17<br />
12 - Condizioni armonizzate per la commercializzazione<br />
dei prodotti da costruzione (discussione) .............. 22<br />
13 - Conseguenze nell'Unione europea della presenza di<br />
diossina nei mangimi per animali (discussione).... 28<br />
14 - Accordo UE-Camerun sulle normative nel settore<br />
forestale - Accordo UE-Repubblica del Congo sulle<br />
normative nel settore forestale - Accordi volontari di<br />
partenariato FLEGT (discussione) ........................ 38<br />
15 - Composizione del Parlamento: vedasi processo<br />
verbale................................................................... 43<br />
16 - Accordo UE-Camerun sulle normative nel settore<br />
forestale - Accordo UE-Repubblica del Congo sulle<br />
normative nel settore forestale - Accordi volontari di<br />
partenariato FLEGT (seguito della discussione) ... 43<br />
17 - Accordo di partenariato interinale CE/Stati del<br />
Pacifico - Accordo di partenariato interinale tra la<br />
CE e gli Stati del Pacifico (discussione)................ 47<br />
18 - Adozione internazionale nell'Unione europea<br />
(discussione).......................................................... 54<br />
19 - Interventi di un minuto (articolo 150 del<br />
regolamento) ......................................................... 62<br />
20 - Consenso europeo in materia di aiuto umanitario<br />
(breve presentazione) ............................................ 68<br />
21 - Agricoltura come settore strategico per la sicurezza<br />
dell'approvvigionamento alimentare (breve<br />
presentazione) ....................................................... 70<br />
22 - Ordine del giorno della prossima seduta: vedasi<br />
processo verbale.................................................... 76<br />
23 - Chiusura della seduta........................................... 76
8 17-01-2011<br />
LV SATURS<br />
1 - Sesijas atsākšana.....................................................15<br />
2 - Iepriekšējās sēdes protokola apstiprināšana (sk.<br />
protokolu)...............................................................15<br />
3 - Priekšsēdētāja paziņojums......................................15<br />
4 - Komiteju un delegāciju sastāvs (sk. protokolu).....16<br />
5 - Padomes nosūtītie nolīgumu teksti (sk. protokolu) 16<br />
6 - Lūgumraksti (sk. protokolu) ..................................16<br />
7 - Saistībā ar Parlamenta nostājām un rezolūcijām<br />
veiktie pasākumi (sk. protokolu) ...........................16<br />
8 - Jautājumi, uz kuriem jāatbild mutiski, un rakstiskas<br />
deklarācijas (iesniegšana) (sk. protokolu) .............16<br />
9 - Darba kārtība .........................................................16<br />
10 - Dokumentu iesniegšana (sk. protokolu) ..............17<br />
11 - <strong>Eiropas</strong> Parlamenta priekšsēdētāja paziņojums par<br />
stāvokli Tunisijā ....................................................17<br />
12 - Saskaņoti būvizstrādājumu tirdzniecības nosacījumi<br />
(debates) ................................................................22<br />
13 - Dzīvnieku barībā atklātā dioksīna radītās sekas<br />
<strong>Eiropas</strong> Savienībā (debates) ..................................28<br />
14 - ES un Kamerūnas nolīgums par tiesību aktiem<br />
mežsaimniecības jomā - ES un Kongo Republikas<br />
nolīgums par tiesību aktiem mežsaimniecības jomā -<br />
Brīvprātīgie partnerattiecību nolīgumi par meža<br />
tiesību aktu ieviešanu, pārvaldību un kokmateriālu un<br />
koksnes izstrādājumu tirdzniecību (FLEGT)<br />
(debates) ................................................................38<br />
15 - Parlamenta sastāvs (sk. protokolu) ......................43<br />
16 - ES un Kamerūnas nolīgums par tiesību aktiem<br />
mežsaimniecības jomā - ES un Kongo Republikas<br />
nolīgums par tiesību aktiem mežsaimniecības jomā -<br />
Brīvprātīgie partnerattiecību nolīgumi par meža<br />
tiesību aktu ieviešanu, pārvaldību un kokmateriālu un<br />
koksnes izstrādājumu tirdzniecību (FLEGT) (debašu<br />
turpināšana) ...........................................................43<br />
17 - Partnerattiecību pagaidu nolīgums starp <strong>Eiropas</strong><br />
Kopienu un Klusā okeāna valstīm - Partnerattiecību<br />
pagaidu nolīgums starp <strong>Eiropas</strong> Kopienu un Klusā<br />
okeāna valstīm (debates) .......................................47<br />
18 - Starptautiskā adopcija <strong>Eiropas</strong> Savienībā (debates)<br />
...............................................................................54<br />
19 - Vienas minūtes uzstāšanās (Reglamenta 150. pants)<br />
...............................................................................62<br />
20 - <strong>Eiropas</strong> konsenss par humāno palīdzību (īss<br />
izklāsts) .................................................................68<br />
21 - Lauksaimniecības atzīšana par stratēģiski svarīgu<br />
nozari pārtikas nodrošinātībā (īss izklāsts)............70<br />
22 - Nākamās sēdes darba kārtība (sk. protokolu) ......76<br />
23 - Sēdes slēgšana .....................................................76<br />
LT TURINYS<br />
1 - Sesijos atnaujinimas ...............................................15<br />
2 - Ankstesnio posėdžio protokolų tvirtinimas (žr.<br />
protokolą) ...............................................................15<br />
3 - Pirmininko pareiškimas ..........................................15<br />
4 - Komitetų ir delegacijų sudėtis (žr. protokola) ....... 16<br />
5 - Tarybos perduoti susitarimų tekstai (žr. protokolą)16<br />
6 - Peticijos (žr. protokolą) ......................................... 16<br />
7 - Veiksmai įgyvendinant Parlamento pozicijas ir<br />
rezoliucijas: žr. protokolą...................................... 16<br />
8 - Klausimai, į kuriuos atsakoma žodžiu, ir rašytiniai<br />
pareiškimai (gauti dokumentai) (žr. protokola)..... 16<br />
9 - Darbų programa..................................................... 16<br />
10 - Pateikti dokumentai (žr.protokolą) ...................... 17<br />
11 - Europos Parlamento Pirmininko pranešimas dėl<br />
padėties Tunise...................................................... 17<br />
12 - Darnios statybos produktų rinkodaros sąlygos<br />
(diskusijos) ............................................................ 22<br />
13 - Dioksino gyvūlių pašare įvykio pasekmės Europos<br />
Sąjungoje (diskusijos) ........................................... 28<br />
14 - ES ir Kamerūno susitarimas dėl miškų teisės aktų -<br />
ES ir Kongo susitarimas dėl miškų teisės aktų -<br />
Miškų teisės aktų vykdymo, miškų valdymo ir<br />
prekybos mediena (angl. FLEGT) savanoriškas<br />
partnerystės susitarimas (diskusijos) ..................... 38<br />
15 - Parlamento sudėtis (žr. protokola)....................... 43<br />
16 - ES ir Kamerūno susitarimas dėl miškų teisės aktų -<br />
ES ir Kongo susitarimas dėl miškų teisės aktų -<br />
Miškų teisės aktų vykdymo, miškų valdymo ir<br />
prekybos mediena (angl. FLEGT) savanoriškas<br />
partnerystės susitarimas (diskusijų tęsinys)........... 43<br />
17 - Europos bendrijos ir Ramiojo vandenyno valstybių<br />
laikinasis partnerystės susitarimas - EB ir Ramiojo<br />
vandenyno valstybių laikinasis partnerystės<br />
susitarimas (diskusijos) ......................................... 47<br />
18 - Tarptautinis įvaikinimas Europos Sąjungoje<br />
(diskusijos) ............................................................ 54<br />
19 - Vienos minutės kalbos (Darbo tvarkos taisyklių 150<br />
straipsnis) .............................................................. 62<br />
20 - Europos konsensuso dėl humanitarinės pagalbos<br />
(trumpas pristatymas)............................................ 68<br />
21 - Žemės ūkio pripažinimas strateginiu sektoriumi<br />
atsižvelgiant į aprūpinimo maistu saugumą (trumpas<br />
pristatymas)........................................................... 70<br />
22 - Kito posėdžio darbotvarkė (žr. protokola)........... 76<br />
23 - Posėdžio pabaiga ................................................. 76
17-01-2011 9<br />
HU TARTALOM<br />
1 - Az ülésszak folytatása ............................................15<br />
2 - Az előző ülés jegyzőkönyvének elfogadása: lásd a<br />
jegyzőkönyvet ........................................................15<br />
3 - Az elnök nyilatkozata .............................................15<br />
4 - A bizottságok és a küldöttségek tagjai: lásd a<br />
jegyzokönyvet .......................................................16<br />
5 - Megállapodások szövegeinek a Tanács általi<br />
továbbítása: lásd a jegyzőkönyvet.........................16<br />
6 - Petíciók: lásd a jegyzőkönyvet ..............................16<br />
7 - A Parlament álláspontjaival és állásfoglalásaival<br />
kapcsolatos további intézkedések: lásd a<br />
jegyzőkönyvet .......................................................16<br />
8 - Szóbeli választ igénylő kérdések és írásbeli<br />
nyilatkozatok (benyújtás): lásd a jegyzokönyvet...16<br />
9 - Ügyrend .................................................................16<br />
10 - Dokumentumok benyújtása: lásd a jegyzőkönyvet17<br />
11 - Az Európai Parlament elnökének a tunéziai<br />
helyzetről szóló nyilatkozata .................................17<br />
12 - Az építési termékek forgalmazására vonatkozó<br />
harmonizált feltételek (vita) ..................................22<br />
13 - A dioxinnal fertőzött takarmány esetének uniós<br />
következményei (vita) ...........................................28<br />
14 - Az EU és Kamerun közötti, az erdészeti<br />
jogszabályokról szóló megállapodás - Az Európai<br />
Unió és a Kongói Köztársaság közötti, az erdészeti<br />
jogszabályokról szóló megállapodás - FLEGT<br />
önkéntes partnerségi megállapodások (vita)..........38<br />
15 - A Parlament tagjai: lásd a jegyzokönyvet............43<br />
16 - Az EU és Kamerun közötti, az erdészeti<br />
jogszabályokról szóló megállapodás - Az Európai<br />
Unió és a Kongói Köztársaság közötti, az erdészeti<br />
jogszabályokról szóló megállapodás - FLEGT<br />
önkéntes partnerségi megállapodások (a vita<br />
folytatása)..............................................................43<br />
17 - Az EK és a csendes-óceáni államok közötti átmeneti<br />
partnerségi megállapodás - Az EK és a csendesóceáni<br />
államok közötti átmeneti partnerségi<br />
megállapodás (vita) ...............................................47<br />
18 - Nemzetközi örökbefogadás az Európai Unióban<br />
(vita) ......................................................................54<br />
19 - Egyperces felszólalások (az eljárási szabályzat 150.<br />
cikke).....................................................................62<br />
20 - A humanitárius segítségnyújtással kapcsolatos<br />
európai konszenzus (rövid ismertetés) ..................68<br />
21 - A mezőgazdaság stratégiai ágazatként történő<br />
elismerése az élelmezésbiztonsággal összefüggésben<br />
(rövid ismertetés)...................................................70<br />
22 - A következő ülésnap napirendje: lásd a<br />
jegyzokönyvet .......................................................76<br />
23 - Az ülés berekesztése............................................76<br />
MT WERREJ<br />
1 - Tkomplija tas-sessjoni ............................................15<br />
2 - Approvazzjoni tal-Minuti tas-seduta ta' qabel: ara l-<br />
Minuti.....................................................................15<br />
3 - Dikjarazzjoni tal-President .....................................15<br />
4 - Kompożizzjoni tal-kumitati u tad-delegazzjonijiet :<br />
ara l-Minuti ........................................................... 16<br />
5 - Testi ta' ftehim imressqa mill-Kunsill: ara l-Minuti16<br />
6 - Petizzjonijiet: ara l-Minuti..................................... 16<br />
7 - Azzjonijiet meħuda skond il-petizzjonjiet u rriżoluzzjonijiet<br />
tal-Parlament: Ara l-Minuti.......... 16<br />
8 - Mistoqsijiet bi tweġiba orali u dikjarazzjonijiet bilmiktub<br />
(tressiq): ara l-Minuti ................................ 16<br />
9 - Ordni tas-seduta..................................................... 16<br />
10 - Dokumenti mressqa: ara l-Minuti........................ 17<br />
11 - Dikjarazzjoni mill-President tal-Parlament<br />
Ewropew dwar is-sitwazzjoni fit-Tuneżija............ 17<br />
12 - Kundizzjonijiet armonizzati għallkummerċjalizzazzjoni<br />
tal-prodotti għall-kostruzzjoni<br />
(dibattitu)............................................................... 22<br />
13 - Il-konsegwenzi fl-UE tal-każ tal-għalf ikkontaminat<br />
bid-diossina fil-Ġermanja (dibattitu)..................... 28<br />
14 - Ftehim UE-Kamerun dwar il-liġi tal-foresti - Ftehim<br />
UE-Repubblika tal-Kongo dwar ir-regolamenti talforesti<br />
- Ftehimiet ta' Sħubija Volontarja FLEGT<br />
(dibattitu)............................................................... 38<br />
15 - Kompożizzjoni tal-Parlament: ara l-Minuti......... 43<br />
16 - Ftehim UE-Kamerun dwar il-liġi tal-foresti - Ftehim<br />
UE-Repubblika tal-Kongo dwar ir-regolamenti talforesti<br />
- Ftehimiet ta' Sħubija Volontarja FLEGT<br />
(tkomplija tad-dibattitu) ........................................ 43<br />
17 - Ftehim Interim ta' Sħubija bejn il-KE u l-Istati tal-<br />
Paċifiku - Ftehim ta' Sħubija Interim bejn il-KE u l-<br />
Istati tal-Paċifiku (dibattitu) .................................. 47<br />
18 - L-adozzjoni internazzjonali fl-Unjoni Ewropea<br />
(dibattitu)............................................................... 54<br />
19 - Diskorsi ta' minuta (Artikolu 150 tar-Regoli ta'<br />
Proċedura) ............................................................. 62<br />
20 - L-implimentazzjoni tal-Konsensus Ewropew dwar<br />
l-għajnuna umanitarja: l-analiżi ta' nofs it-term tal-<br />
Pjan ta' Azzjoni tagħha u t-triq 'il quddiem<br />
(preżentazzjoni qasira) .......................................... 68<br />
21 - L-agrikoltura bħala settur strateġiku fil-kuntest tassigurtà<br />
tal-ikel (preżentazzjoni qasira) .................. 70<br />
22 - L-aġenda tas-seduta li jmiss: ara l-Minuti ........... 76<br />
23 - Għeluq tas-seduta ................................................ 76
10 17-01-2011<br />
NL INHOUD<br />
1 - Hervatting van de zitting ........................................15<br />
2 - Goedkeuring van de notulen van de vorige<br />
vergadering: zie notulen .........................................15<br />
3 - Verklaring van de Voorzitter ..................................15<br />
4 - Samenstelling commissies en delegaties: zie notulen<br />
...............................................................................16<br />
5 - Van de Raad ontvangen verdragsteksten: zie notulen<br />
...............................................................................16<br />
6 - Verzoekschriften: zie notulen ................................16<br />
7 - Aan de standpunten en resoluties van het Parlement<br />
gegeven gevolg: zie notulen ..................................16<br />
8 - Mondelinge vragen en schriftelijke verklaringen<br />
(indiening): zie notulen .........................................16<br />
9 - Regeling van de werkzaamheden ..........................16<br />
10 - Ingekomen stukken: zie notulen ..........................17<br />
11 - Verklaring van de Voorzitter van het Europees<br />
Parlement over de situatie in Tunesië....................17<br />
12 - Geharmoniseerde voorwaarden voor het in de<br />
handel brengen van bouwproducten (debat)..........22<br />
13 - Gevolgen in de Europese Unie van het incident met<br />
dioxine in diervoeder (debat) ................................28<br />
14 - Overeenkomst EU-Kameroen inzake boswetgeving<br />
- Overeenkomst EU-Republiek Congo inzake<br />
boswetgeving - Vrijwillige<br />
partnerschapsovereenkomsten FLEGT (debat) .....38<br />
15 - Samenstelling Parlement: zie notulen..................43<br />
16 - Overeenkomst EU-Kameroen inzake boswetgeving<br />
- Overeenkomst EU-Republiek Congo inzake<br />
boswetgeving - Vrijwillige<br />
partnerschapsovereenkomsten FLEGT (voortzetting<br />
van het debat) ........................................................43<br />
17 - Tussentijdse partnerschapsovereenkomst tussen de<br />
EG en de staten in de Stille Oceaan - Tussentijdse<br />
partnerschapsovereenkomst tussen de EG en de<br />
staten in de Stille Oceaan (debat) ..........................47<br />
18 - Internationale adoptie in de Europese Unie (debat)<br />
...............................................................................54<br />
19 - Spreektijd van één minuut (artikel 150 van het<br />
Reglement) ............................................................62<br />
20 - Europese consensus betreffende humanitaire hulp<br />
(korte presentatie)..................................................68<br />
21 - De landbouw als strategische sector voor de<br />
voedselvoorziening (korte presentatie)..................70<br />
22 - Agenda van de volgende vergadering: zie notulen76<br />
23 - Sluiting van de vergadering ................................. 76<br />
PL SPIS TREŚCI<br />
1 - Wznowienie sesji....................................................15<br />
2 - Zatwierdzenie protokołu z poprzedniego posiedzenia:<br />
patrz protokół .........................................................15<br />
3 - Oświadczenia Przewodniczącego / Przewodniczącej5<br />
4 - Skład komisji i delegacji: Patrz protokól............... 16<br />
5 - Teksty porozumień przekazane przez Radę: patrz<br />
protokół ................................................................. 16<br />
6 - Petycje: patrz protokół........................................... 16<br />
7 - Działania podjęte w związku ze stanowiskami i<br />
rezolucjami Parlamentu: patrz protokół ................ 16<br />
8 - Pytania ustne i oświadczenia pisemne (składanie<br />
dokumentów): Patrz protokól................................ 16<br />
9 - Porządek obrad ...................................................... 16<br />
10 - Składanie dokumentów: patrz protokół ............... 17<br />
11 - Oświadczenie przewodniczącego Parlamentu<br />
Europejskiego na temat sytuacji w Tunezji........... 17<br />
12 - Zharmonizowane warunki wprowadzania do obrotu<br />
wyrobów budowlanych (debata) ........................... 22<br />
13 - Konsekwencje zatrucia pasz dioksynami dla Unii<br />
Europejskiej (debata)............................................. 28<br />
14 - Umowa UE-Kamerun dotycząca prawa leśnego -<br />
Umowa UE-Republika Konga dotycząca prawa<br />
leśnego - Dobrowolne umowy partnerskie w zakresie<br />
egzekwowania prawa, zarządzania i handlu w<br />
dziedzinie leśnictwa (FLEGT) (debata) ................ 38<br />
15 - Skład Parlamentu: Patrz protokól ........................ 43<br />
16 - Umowa UE-Kamerun dotycząca prawa leśnego -<br />
Umowa UE-Republika Konga dotycząca prawa<br />
leśnego - Dobrowolne umowy partnerskie w zakresie<br />
egzekwowania prawa, zarządzania i handlu w<br />
dziedzinie leśnictwa (FLEGT) (ciąg dalszy debat)43<br />
17 - Umowa przejściowa o partnerstwie między WE a<br />
państwami Pacyfiku - Umowa przejściowa o<br />
partnerstwie między WE a państwami Pacyfiku<br />
(debata).................................................................. 47<br />
18 - Adopcja międzynarodowa w Unii Europejskiej<br />
(debata).................................................................. 54<br />
19 - Wystąpienia jednominutowe (art. 150 Regulaminu<br />
PE)......................................................................... 62<br />
20 - Konsensus europejski w sprawie pomocy<br />
humanitarnej (krótka prezentacja)......................... 68<br />
21 - Rolnictwo jako sektor strategiczny w kontekście<br />
bezpieczeństwa żywnościowego (krótka prezentacja)<br />
............................................................................... 70<br />
22 - Porządek obrad następnego posiedzenia: Patrz<br />
protokól ................................................................. 76<br />
23 - Zamknięcie posiedzenia ...................................... 76
17-01-2011 11<br />
PT INDICE<br />
1 - Reinício da sessão...................................................15<br />
2 - Aprovação da acta da sessão anterior: ver Acta......15<br />
3 - Declaração da Presidência ......................................15<br />
4 - Composição das comissões e delegações : Ver Acta<br />
...............................................................................16<br />
5 - Transmissão de textos de acordos pelo Conselho: ver<br />
Acta .......................................................................16<br />
6 - Petições: ver acta ...................................................16<br />
7 - Seguimento dado às posições e resoluções do<br />
Parlamento: ver Acta............................................. 16<br />
8 - Perguntas orais e declarações escritas (entrega): Ver<br />
Acta .......................................................................16<br />
9 - Ordem dos trabalhos..............................................16<br />
10 - Entrega de documentos: ver Acta ........................17<br />
11 - Declaração do Presidente do Parlamento Europeu<br />
sobre a situação na Tunísia....................................17<br />
12 - Condições harmonizadas para a comercialização<br />
dos produtos de construção (debate) .....................22<br />
13 - Consequências na União Europeia do incidente<br />
ocorrido com alimentos para animais contaminados<br />
com dioxinas (debate) ...........................................28<br />
14 - Acordo UE-Camarões relativo à legislação florestal<br />
- Acordo UE-República do Congo relativo à<br />
legislação florestal - FLEGT - Acordos Voluntários<br />
de Parceria (debate)...............................................38<br />
15 - Composição do Parlamento: Ver Acta................. 43<br />
16 - Acordo UE-Camarões relativo à legislação florestal<br />
- Acordo UE-República do Congo relativo à<br />
legislação florestal - FLEGT - Acordos Voluntários<br />
de Parceria (continuação do debate)......................43<br />
17 - Acordo de Parceria Provisório entre a CE e os<br />
Estados do Pacífico - Acordo de Parceria provisório<br />
entre a CE e os Estados do Pacífico (debate) ........47<br />
18 - Adopção internacional na União Europeia (debate)<br />
...............................................................................54<br />
19 - Intervenções de um minuto (Artigo 150.º do<br />
Regimento)............................................................62<br />
20 - Consenso Europeu em matéria de Ajuda<br />
Humanitária (breve apresentação).........................68<br />
21 - A agricultura como um sector estratégico no<br />
contexto da segurança alimentar (breve apresentação)<br />
...............................................................................70<br />
22 - Ordem do dia da próxima sessão: Ver Acta.........76<br />
23 - Encerramento da sessão.......................................76<br />
RO CUPRINS<br />
1 - Reluarea sesiunii.....................................................15<br />
2 - Aprobarea procesului-verbal al şedinţei precedente: a<br />
se vedea procesul-verbal ........................................15<br />
3 - Declaraţia Preşedinţiei............................................15<br />
4 - Componenţa comisiilor şi delegaţiilor: consultaţi<br />
procesul-verbal...................................................... 16<br />
5 - Transmiterea de către Consiliu a textelor acordurilor:<br />
a se vedea procesul-verbal..................................... 16<br />
6 - Petiţii: a se vedea procesul-verbal ......................... 16<br />
7 - Continuări ale avizelor şi rezoluţiilor Parlamentului:<br />
a se vedea procesul-verbal..................................... 16<br />
8 - Întrebări orale şi declaraţii scrise (depunere):<br />
consultaţi procesul-verbal ..................................... 16<br />
9 - Ordinea lucrărilor .................................................. 16<br />
10 - Depunerea documentelor: a se vedea procesulverbal.....................................................................<br />
17<br />
11 - Declarație a Președintelui Parlamentului European<br />
cu privire la situaţia din Tunisia............................ 17<br />
12 - Condiţii armonizate pentru comercializarea<br />
produselor de construcţie (dezbatere).................... 22<br />
13 - Consecinţele în Uniunea Europeană ale incidentului<br />
privind hrana pentru animale contaminată cu dioxină<br />
(dezbatere)............................................................. 28<br />
14 - Acordul UE-Camerun privind legislaţia în domeniul<br />
forestier - Acordul UE-Republica Congo privind<br />
legislaţia în domeniul forestier - Acordurile de<br />
parteneriat voluntar FLEGT (dezbatere) ............... 38<br />
15 - Componenţa Parlamentului: consultaţi procesulverbal.....................................................................<br />
43<br />
16 - Acordul UE-Camerun privind legislaţia în domeniul<br />
forestier - Acordul UE-Republica Congo privind<br />
legislaţia în domeniul forestier - Acordurile de<br />
parteneriat voluntar FLEGT (continuarea dezbaterii)<br />
............................................................................... 43<br />
17 - Acordul interimar de parteneriat între CE și statele<br />
din Pacific - Acordul interimar de parteneriat între<br />
CE şi statele din Pacific (dezbatere)...................... 47<br />
18 - Adopţia internaţională în Uniunea Europeană<br />
(dezbatere)............................................................. 54<br />
19 - Intervenţii cu durata de un minut (articolul 150 din<br />
Regulamentul de procedură al PE)........................ 62<br />
20 - Consensul european privind ajutorul umanitar<br />
(prezentare succintă) ............................................. 68<br />
21 - Agricultura ca sector strategic în contextul<br />
securităţii alimentare (prezentare succintă)........... 70<br />
22 - Ordinea de zi a următoarei şedinţe: consultaţi<br />
procesul-verbal...................................................... 76<br />
23 - Ridicarea şedinţei ................................................ 76
12 17-01-2011<br />
SK OBSAH<br />
1 - Pokračovanie prerušeného zasadania......................15<br />
2 - Schválenie zápisnice z predchádzajúceho rokovania:<br />
pozri zápisnicu........................................................15<br />
3 - Vyhlásenie predsedníctva .......................................15<br />
4 - Zloženie výborov a delegácií: pozri zápisnicu.......16<br />
5 - Texty zmlúv poskytnutých Radou: pozri zápisnicu16<br />
6 - Petície: pozri zápisnicu..........................................16<br />
7 - Kroky podniknuté na základe pozícií a uznesení<br />
Parlamentu: pozri zápisnicu ..................................16<br />
8 - Otázky na ústne zodpovedanie a písomné vyhlásenia<br />
(predložené dokumenty): pozri zápisnicu..............16<br />
9 - Program práce........................................................16<br />
10 - Predložené dokumenty: pozri zápisnicu ..............17<br />
11 - Vyhlásenie predsedu Európskeho parlamentu o<br />
situácii v Tunisku ..................................................17<br />
12 - Harmonizované podmienky uvádzania stavebných<br />
výrobkov na trh (rozprava)....................................22<br />
13 - Dôsledky výskytu dioxínu v krmive pre zvieratá v<br />
Európskej únii (rozprava)...................................... 28<br />
14 - Dohoda medzi EÚ a Kamerunom o práve v lesnom<br />
hospodárstve - Dohoda medzi EÚ a Konžskou<br />
republikou o práve v lesnom hospodárstve -<br />
Dobrovoľné dohody o partnerstve v rámci režimu<br />
FLEGT (rozprava).................................................38<br />
15 - Zloženie Parlamentu: pozri zápisnicu..................43<br />
16 - Dohoda medzi EÚ a Kamerunom o práve v lesnom<br />
hospodárstve - Dohoda medzi EÚ a Konžskou<br />
republikou o práve v lesnom hospodárstve -<br />
Dobrovoľné dohody o partnerstve v rámci režimu<br />
FLEGT (pokračovanie rozpravy) ..........................43<br />
17 - Dočasná dohoda o partnerstve medzi ES a<br />
tichomorskými štátmi - Dočasná dohoda o<br />
partnerstve medzi ES a tichomorskými štátmi<br />
(rozprava) ..............................................................47<br />
18 - Medzištátne osvojenia v Európskej únii (rozprava)<br />
...............................................................................54<br />
19 - Jednominútové vystúpenia (článok 150) .............62<br />
20 - Európsky konsenzus o humanitárnej pomoci<br />
(stručná prezentácia) .............................................68<br />
21 - Poľnohospodárstvo ako strategické odvetvie v<br />
súvislosti s potravinovou bezpečnosťou (stručná<br />
prezentácia) ...........................................................70<br />
22 - Program rokovania na nasledujúci deň: pozri<br />
zápisnicu................................................................76<br />
23 - Skončenie rokovania............................................76<br />
SL VSEBINA<br />
1 - Nadaljevanje zasedanja...........................................15<br />
2 - Sprejetje zapisnika predhodne seje: glej zapisnik...15<br />
3 - Izjava predsedujočega.............................................15<br />
4 - Sestava odborov in delegacij: gl. zapisnik............. 16<br />
5 - Posredovanje besedil sporazumov s strani Sveta: gl.<br />
zapisnik ................................................................. 16<br />
6 - Peticije: glej zapisnik............................................. 16<br />
7 - Nadaljnje obravnavanje stališč in resolucij<br />
Parlamenta: glej zapisnik ...................................... 16<br />
8 - Vprašanja za ustni odgovor in pisne izjave<br />
(predložitev): gl. zapisnik...................................... 16<br />
9 - Razpored dela ........................................................ 16<br />
10 - Predložitev dokumentov: glej zapisnik................ 17<br />
11 - Izjava predsednika Evropskega parlamenta o<br />
razmerah v Tuniziji ............................................... 17<br />
12 - Določitev usklajenih pogojev za trženje gradbenih<br />
proizvodov (razprava) ........................................... 22<br />
13 - Posledice odkritja dioksina v živalski krmi za<br />
Evropsko unijo (razprava)..................................... 28<br />
14 - Sporazum med Evropsko unijo in Kamerunom o<br />
zakonodaji na področju gozdov - Sporazum med<br />
Evropsko unijo in Republiko Kongo o zakonodaji na<br />
področju gozdov - Prostovoljni partnerski sporazumi<br />
FLEGT (razprava)................................................. 38<br />
15 - Sestava Parlamenta: gl. zapisnik.......................... 43<br />
16 - Sporazum med Evropsko unijo in Kamerunom o<br />
zakonodaji na področju gozdov - Sporazum med<br />
Evropsko unijo in Republiko Kongo o zakonodaji na<br />
področju gozdov - Prostovoljni partnerski sporazumi<br />
FLEGT (nadaljevanje razprave)............................ 43<br />
17 - Začasni sporazum o partnerstvu med ES in<br />
pacifiškimi državami - Začasni sporazum o<br />
partnerstvu med ES in pacifiškimi državami<br />
(razprava) .............................................................. 47<br />
18 - Mednarodne posvojitve v Evropski uniji (razprava)<br />
............................................................................... 54<br />
19 - Enominutni govori (člen 150 poslovnika EP)...... 62<br />
20 - Evropsko soglasje o humanitarni pomoči (kratka<br />
predstavitev).......................................................... 68<br />
21 - Kmetijstvo kot strateški sektor v okviru prehranske<br />
varnosti (kratka predstavitev)................................ 70<br />
22 - Dnevni red naslednje seje: gl. zapisnik................ 76<br />
23 - Zaključek seje...................................................... 76
17-01-2011 13<br />
FI SISÄLTÖ<br />
1 - Istuntokauden uudelleen avaaminen.......................15<br />
2 - Edellisen istunnon pöytäkirjan hyväksyminen: ks.<br />
pöytäkirja................................................................15<br />
3 - Puhemiehen julkilausuma.......................................15<br />
4 - Valiokuntien ja valtuuskuntien kokoonpano: ks.<br />
pöytäkirja...............................................................16<br />
5 - Neuvoston toimittamat sopimustekstit: ks. pöytäkirja<br />
...............................................................................16<br />
6 - Vetoomukset: ks. pöytäkirja ..................................16<br />
7 - Parlamentin kantojen ja päätöslauselmien johdosta<br />
toteutetut toimet: ks. pöytäkirja.............................16<br />
8 - Suulliset kysymykset ja kirjalliset kannanotot<br />
(vastaanotetut asiakirjat): ks. pöytäkirja................16<br />
9 - Käsittelyjärjestys ...................................................16<br />
10 - Vastaanotetut asiakirjat: ks. pöytäkirja................17<br />
11 - Euroopan parlamentin puhemiehen julkilausuma<br />
Tunisian tilanteesta................................................17<br />
12 - Rakennustuotteiden kaupan pitämistä koskevien<br />
ehtojen yhdenmukaistaminen (keskustelu)............22<br />
13 - Dioksiinia sisältävän eläinrehun tapaus ja sen<br />
vaikutukset Euroopan unionissa (keskustelu)........28<br />
14 - EU:n ja Kamerunin metsälainsäädäntösopimus -<br />
EU:n ja Kongon tasavallan<br />
metsälainsäädäntösopimus - Vapaaehtoiset FLEGTkumppanuussopimukset<br />
(keskustelu)....................38<br />
15 - Parlamentin kokoonpano: ks. pöytäkirja..............43<br />
16 - EU:n ja Kamerunin metsälainsäädäntösopimus -<br />
EU:n ja Kongon tasavallan<br />
metsälainsäädäntösopimus - Vapaaehtoiset FLEGTkumppanuussopimukset<br />
(jatkoa keskustelulle) .....43<br />
17 - EY:n ja Tyynenmeren valtioiden välinen<br />
väliaikainen kumppanuussopimus - EY:n ja<br />
Tyynenmeren valtioiden väliaikainen<br />
kumppanuussopimus (keskustelu).........................47<br />
18 - Kansainvälinen adoptio Euroopan unionissa<br />
(keskustelu) ...........................................................54<br />
19 - Minuutin puheenvuorot (työjärjestyksen 150 artikla)<br />
...............................................................................62<br />
20 - Yhteisön humanitaarista apua koskeva konsensus<br />
(lyhyt esittely) .......................................................68<br />
21 - Maatalouden tunnustaminen strategiseksi alaksi<br />
elintarviketurvan yhteydessä (lyhyt esittely).........70<br />
22 - Seuraavan istunnon esityslista: ks. pöytäkirja .....76<br />
23 - Istunnon päättäminen...........................................76<br />
SV INNEHÅLL<br />
1 - Återupptagande av sessionen..................................15<br />
2 - Justering av protokollet från föregående<br />
sammanträde: se protokollet...................................15<br />
3 - Uttalande av talmannen ..........................................15<br />
4 - Utskottens och delegationernas sammansättning: se<br />
protokollet ............................................................. 16<br />
5 - Avtalstexter översända av rådet: se protokollet..... 16<br />
6 - Framställningar: se protokollet.............................. 16<br />
7 - Kommissionens åtgärder till följd av parlamentets<br />
åtgärder och resolutioner: se protokollet ............... 16<br />
8 - Muntliga frågor och skriftliga förklaringar<br />
(ingivande): se protokollet .................................... 16<br />
9 - Arbetsplan ............................................................. 16<br />
10 - Inkomna dokument: se protokollet ...................... 17<br />
11 - Uttalande av <strong>Europa</strong>parlamentets talman om<br />
situationen i Tunisien ............................................ 17<br />
12 - Harmoniserade villkor för utsläppande av<br />
byggprodukter på marknaden (debatt)................... 22<br />
13 - Konsekvenserna i EU av incidenten med dioxin i<br />
djurfoder i Tyskland (debatt)................................. 28<br />
14 - Avtal EU/Kamerun om skogslagstiftningen - Avtal<br />
EU/Republiken Kongo om skogslagstiftningen -<br />
Frivilliga Flegt-partnerskapsavtal (debatt) ............ 38<br />
15 - Parlamentets sammansättning: se protokollet...... 43<br />
16 - Avtal EU/Kamerun om skogslagstiftningen - Avtal<br />
EU/Republiken Kongo om skogslagstiftningen -<br />
Frivilliga Flegt-partnerskapsavtal (fortsättning på<br />
debatten)................................................................ 43<br />
17 - Interimsavtal om partnerskap mellan EG och<br />
Stillahavsstaterna - Interimsavtal om partnerskap<br />
mellan EG och Stillahavsstaterna (debatt) ............ 47<br />
18 - Internationella adoptioner i Europeiska unionen<br />
(debatt) .................................................................. 54<br />
19 - Anföranden på en minut (artikel 150 i<br />
arbetsordningen).................................................... 62<br />
20 - Europeiska samförståndet om humanitärt bistånd<br />
(kortfattad redogörelse)......................................... 68<br />
21 - Jordbruket som en strategisk sektor inom ramen för<br />
livsmedelsförsörjning (kortfattad redogörelse) ..... 70<br />
22 - Föredragningslista för nästa sammanträde: se<br />
protokollet ............................................................. 76<br />
23 - Avslutande av sammanträdet............................... 76
14 17-01-2011
1-001<br />
1-002<br />
ПОНЕДЕЛНИК 17 ЯНУАРИ 2011 Г.<br />
LUNES 17 DE ENERO DE 2011<br />
PONDĚLÍ 17. LEDNA 2011<br />
MANDAG DEN 17. JANUAR 2011<br />
MONTAG, 17. JANUAR 2011<br />
ESMASPÄEV, 17. JAANUAR 2011<br />
ΔΕΥΤΕΡΑ 17 ΙΑΝΟΥΑΡΙΟΥ 2011<br />
MONDAY, 17 JANUARY 2011<br />
LUNDI 17 JANVIER 2011<br />
LUNEDI' 17 GENNAIO 2011<br />
PIRMDIENA, 2011. GADA 17. JANVĀRIS<br />
PRZEWODNICZY: JERZY BUZEK<br />
Przewodniczący<br />
1-003<br />
1 - Wznowienie sesji<br />
1-004<br />
Przewodniczący. − Ogłaszam wznowienie sesji<br />
Parlamentu Europejskiego przerwanej w czwartek, 16.<br />
grudnia 2010 r.<br />
(Posiedzenie zostało otwarte o godz. 17.00)<br />
1-005<br />
2 - Zatwierdzenie protokołu z poprzedniego<br />
posiedzenia: patrz protokół<br />
1-006<br />
3 - Oświadczenia Przewodniczącego /<br />
Przewodniczącej<br />
1-007<br />
Przewodniczący. − Mam kilka uwag wstępnych. Jest to<br />
5 krótkich punktów.<br />
Dnia 27 stycznia mija 66. rocznica wyzwolenia<br />
niemieckiego nazistowskiego obozu koncentracyjnego i<br />
zagłady Auschwitz-Birkenau. Każdego roku w tym dniu<br />
czcimy pamięć ponad miliona zamordowanych tam<br />
ludzi. Daje nam to siłę do wspólnego budowania<br />
pokojowej przyszłości zjednoczonej Europy, która nie<br />
będzie znała w przyszłości takich koszmarów.<br />
Druga informacja: dnia 13 stycznia naród litewski<br />
obchodził 20. rocznicę krwawej niedzieli, kiedy to armia<br />
sowiecka dokonała próby obalenia demokratycznie<br />
wybranego rządu niepodległej Litwy. Litwini obronili<br />
swoją wolność i są dziś równoprawnymi członkami<br />
2011 M. SAUSIO 17 D., PIRMADIENIS<br />
2011. JANUÁR 17., HÉTFŐ<br />
IT-TNEJN, 17 TA' JANNAR 2011<br />
MAANDAG 17 JANUARI 2011<br />
PONIEDZIAŁEK, 17 STYCZNIA 2011<br />
SEGUNDA-FEIRA, 17 DE JANEIRO DE 2011<br />
LUNI 17 IANUARIE 2011<br />
PONDELOK 17. JANUÁRA 2011<br />
PONEDELJEK, 17. JANUAR 2011<br />
MAANANTAI 17. TAMMIKUUTA 2011<br />
MÅNDAGEN DEN 17 JANUARI 2011<br />
wspólnoty euroatlantyckiej. Wspominając tę ważną dla<br />
Europy rocznicę, solidaryzujemy się dzisiaj z<br />
Białorusinami, także naszymi sąsiadami, którzy<br />
oczekują jeszcze, by wolność i demokracja zagościły w<br />
ich kraju.<br />
Kolejna informacja: dnia 23 grudnia 2010 roku Unia<br />
Europejska przystąpiła do Konwencji Praw Osób<br />
Niepełnosprawnych Organizacji Narodów<br />
Zjednoczonych. Konwencja ta, wraz ze strategią w<br />
sprawie niepełnosprawności przygotowaną przez<br />
Komisję Europejską, pozwoli do 2020 roku zapewnić<br />
równość praw obywatelskich, politycznych i<br />
gospodarczych blisko 80 milionom obywateli Unii,<br />
którzy mają różnego rodzaju niepełnosprawności.<br />
Informacja czwarta: chciałbym także przypomnieć, że<br />
jesteśmy poważnie zaniepokojeni zniknięciem<br />
chińskiego adwokata pana Gao Zhishenga. Według<br />
najnowszych informacji jest on źle traktowany i<br />
poddawany torturom. Parlament Europejski kilkakrotnie<br />
już zajmował się sprawą pana Zhishenga. Dziś pragnę<br />
wezwać władze chińskie do ujawnienia miejsca jego<br />
pobytu i stanu zdrowia.<br />
Ostatnia informacja: od czasu naszego ostatniego<br />
spotkania przed świętami zakończyła się prezydencja<br />
belgijska, a przewodnictwo w Radzie Unii Europejskiej<br />
przejęły Węgry. Będziemy na temat obydwu prezydencji<br />
rozmawiali na tej sesji Parlamentu. W tym czasie<br />
mieliśmy też do czynienia z ważnymi wydarzeniami<br />
politycznymi: wybory na Białorusi, ostatnie wypadki w<br />
Tunezji. Obydwa te punkty są w porządku obrad naszej<br />
sesji plenarnej. Pragnę też przypomnieć, że w ostatnich<br />
tygodniach świat dotknęło kilka poważnych klęsk<br />
żywiołowych. Łączymy się w bólu z rodzinami ich ofiar<br />
i przekazujemy im, a także rządom tych krajów, nasze<br />
kondolencje.
16 17-01-2011<br />
1-008<br />
4 - Skład komisji i delegacji: Patrz protokól<br />
1-009<br />
5 - Teksty porozumień przekazane przez<br />
Radę: patrz protokół<br />
1-010<br />
6 - Petycje: patrz protokół<br />
1-011<br />
7 - Działania podjęte w związku ze<br />
stanowiskami i rezolucjami Parlamentu:<br />
patrz protokół<br />
1-012<br />
8 - Pytania ustne i oświadczenia pisemne<br />
(składanie dokumentów): Patrz protokól<br />
1-013<br />
9 - Porządek obrad<br />
1-014<br />
Przewodniczący. − Rozdany został końcowy projekt<br />
porządku dziennego sporządzony zgodnie z art. 137<br />
Regulaminu przez Konferencję Przewodniczących na<br />
posiedzeniu w czwartek, 13 stycznia 2011 r.<br />
Zaproponowano następujące zmiany.<br />
1-015<br />
Potito Salatto (PPE). – Signor Presidente, onorevoli<br />
colleghi, colgo l'occasione dell'ordine dei lavori per<br />
chiederle formalmente che l'Alto Rappresentante<br />
Catherine Ashton venga in Aula nel Parlamento a<br />
riferire sugli atti compiuti o che compirà per ciò che<br />
avviene per i cristiani nel mondo. Vorremmo che venisse<br />
qui con una sua relazione in modo che il Parlamento<br />
possa essere informato in maniera dettagliata su tutto.<br />
1-016<br />
Przewodniczący. − Przepraszam Pana bardzo, Kolego.<br />
Mamy na ten temat oficjalną debatę w środę o godz.<br />
15.00.<br />
1-017<br />
Νικόλαος Χουντής (GUE/NGL). – Κύριε Πρόεδρε,<br />
επικαλούμαι το άρθρο 173 περί εφαρμογής του<br />
Κανονισμού, για να επισημάνω ότι παραβιάζεται το<br />
άρθρο 116, διότι είναι η τρίτη συνεχής συνεδρίαση της<br />
Ολομέλειας του Ευρωπαϊκού Κοινοβουλίου που στην<br />
ημερήσια διάταξη δεν περιλαμβάνεται το θέμα<br />
«Ερωτήσεις προς το Συμβούλιο», όπως προβλέπει το<br />
άρθρο 116. Σας παρακαλώ να μου εξηγήσετε γιατί<br />
γίνεται αυτό, πού οφείλεται και, σε κάθε περίπτωση, σας<br />
παρακαλώ να υπερασπισθείτε το δικαίωμα του<br />
Ευρωπαϊκού Κοινοβουλίου και των βουλευτών να<br />
ασκούν κοινοβουλευτικό έλεγχο και στο Συμβούλιο.<br />
1-018<br />
Przewodniczący. − Decyzję w tej sprawie podejmiemy<br />
w najbliższym czasie. Sprawa dotyczy traktatu<br />
lizbońskiego i nowych relacji pomiędzy Parlamentem<br />
Europejskim a Radą. Jesteśmy teraz dwuizbowym<br />
parlamentem w Unii Europejskiej. Na równej stopie<br />
Parlament Europejski i Rada stanowią prawo. Zmieniły<br />
się relacje w Unii, ale ja bym proponował, żeby nie<br />
ciągnąć tej dyskusji, bo sprawa będzie w najbliższym<br />
czasie wyjaśniona. Bardzo dziękuję Panu za zwrócenie<br />
uwagi. Sprawa będzie wyjaśniona w najbliższym czasie.<br />
1-019<br />
Bernd Posselt (PPE). – Herr Präsident, was ich fraglich<br />
finde, ist, dass man im Hinblick auf mögliche künftige<br />
Änderungen einfach ohne jede Grundlage ein<br />
parlamentarisches Recht – nämlich die Fragestunde –<br />
streicht. Die Entscheidung ist – wie Sie selbst sagen –<br />
noch nicht gefallen. Und da sie noch nicht gefallen ist,<br />
müsste man die Fragestunde so lange durchführen, bis<br />
eine Entscheidung gefallen ist, und nicht in<br />
vorauseilendem Gehorsam schon eine Entscheidung<br />
exekutieren, die noch gar nicht gefallen ist. Ich sage<br />
Ihnen ganz ehrlich: Ich halte es für falsch, denn in den<br />
Fragen der Außenpolitik und der Erweiterungspolitik ist<br />
der Rat keine andere Kammer, sondern ein Organ, das<br />
wir natürlich parlamentarisch kontrollieren müssen!<br />
(Beifall)<br />
1-020<br />
Przewodniczący. − Dziękuję kolegom za uwagi w tej<br />
sprawie. Chciałbym Państwa zapewnić, że na najbliższej<br />
Konferencji Przewodniczących, gdzie jak Państwo<br />
wiecie, ustalane są porządki obrad, a więc w najbliższy<br />
czwartek, poruszę tę sprawę – żebyśmy ustalili, jak to<br />
będzie wyglądało w przyszłości. Konferencja<br />
Przewodniczących jest odpowiedzialna za porządek<br />
obrad i w najbliższy czwartek będziemy o tym<br />
rozmawiać. Dziękuję bardzo.<br />
Przechodzimy do porządku obrad.<br />
Poniedziałek<br />
Grupa Zielonych/Wolne Przymierze Europejskie<br />
wniosła, aby debata na temat sytuacji w Tunezji<br />
zakończona została rezolucją, czego nie planowaliśmy.<br />
A zatem jest propozycja, aby była w tej sprawie<br />
rezolucja. Rozumiem, że kolega Cohn-Bendit chce się<br />
wypowiedzieć na temat tego wniosku.<br />
1-021<br />
Daniel Cohn-Bendit (Verts/ALE). – Monsieur le<br />
Président, vous êtes au courant que les événements en<br />
Tunisie se sont précipités et d'ailleurs nous pouvons<br />
nous féliciter que M. Ben Ali ait quitté le pays. La<br />
situation de ces prochaines semaines va donc être très<br />
tendue en Tunisie. Je trouve que ce Parlement doit, dans<br />
une courte résolution, demander des choses très précises<br />
au Conseil et à la Commission. Vous savez qu'il y aura<br />
peut-être des élections d'ici six à huit semaines, nous<br />
n'avons donc pas le temps d'attendre février.<br />
Il faut que l'Union européenne agisse, il faut que nous<br />
agissions maintenant, et la base de notre action doit être<br />
une résolution que nous devrions voter jeudi à midi. Je
17-01-2011 17<br />
comprends que, vu la situation, c'est avec grand<br />
enthousiasme que cette assemblée va enfin pouvoir voter<br />
une résolution sur la Tunisie.<br />
1-022<br />
Francesco Enrico Speroni (EFD). – Signor Presidente,<br />
onorevoli colleghi, non credo che la risoluzione muterà<br />
la situazione in Tunisia, ed è per questo che sono contro.<br />
1-023<br />
(Parlament odrzucił wniosek)<br />
Czwartek<br />
1-024<br />
Przewodniczący. − W sprawie debat - na podstawie art.<br />
122 Regulaminu Konfederacyjna Grupa Zjednoczonej<br />
Lewicy Europejskiej/Nordycka Zielona Lewica złożyła<br />
wniosek o usunięcie z porządku obrad debaty w sprawie<br />
Brazylii: ekstradycja Cesare'a Battistiego. Pan Tavares<br />
chciałby przedstawić ten wniosek. Bardzo proszę.<br />
1-025<br />
Rui Tavares (GUE/NGL). – Mr President, some<br />
colleagues took the initiative of putting an urgency<br />
resolution on the agenda on Brazil’s refusal to extradite<br />
Cesare Battisti to Italy. I understand their motives, but as<br />
I shall demonstrate, this is not at present a human rights<br />
case. It is not an urgent case and it is not even a ‘breach<br />
of the Rule of Law’ case. Furthermore, it comes at a<br />
terrible moment when Brazil is facing the worst natural<br />
disaster in its history.<br />
Cesare Battisti is in prison. He is awaiting the decision<br />
of the Brazilian Supreme Court and the Supreme Court<br />
is currently not in session during the southern<br />
hemisphere’s summer holiday. There is no reason to<br />
believe that there will not be an independent decision. I<br />
expressed my solidarity with the families of the victims<br />
in this case, and rest assured I have no sympathy with<br />
political violence either from the right or the left, but we<br />
should use the urgencies to debate Southern Sudan, the<br />
case of Buchtar Tabuni in Indonesia, or the Palestinian<br />
man shot dead in his bed.<br />
Is the Parliament going to allocate to President Dilma<br />
Rousseff, just after her groundbreaking election and for<br />
no sound formal reason, the kind of debate that we<br />
usually reserve for people like Mugabe? I would ask you<br />
to remove Brazil from the urgencies on the agenda.<br />
1-026<br />
Mario Mauro (PPE). – Signor Presidente, onorevoli<br />
colleghi, intanto intendo – a nome del mio gruppo e<br />
credo di tutto il Parlamento – sottolineare con forza la<br />
vicinanza che abbiamo nei confronti del popolo e del<br />
governo brasiliano per il lutto gravissimo collegato alle<br />
alluvioni di questi giorni: centinaia di persone che hanno<br />
perso la vita e a cui facciamo sentire la nostra vicinanza.<br />
Allo stesso tempo ribadisco a nome dei proponenti – e,<br />
mi auguro, di tutto il Parlamento – la nostra ferma<br />
intenzione di dibattere questo tema, perché l'istanza di<br />
giustizia non si è ancora compiuta, perché la vicenda di<br />
Cesare Battisti merita di essere ulteriormente giudicata<br />
dal Parlamento europeo che deve far sentire la sua voce<br />
in sede internazionale.<br />
1-027<br />
Judith Sargentini (Verts/ALE). – Voorzitter, ik wil het<br />
verzoek van de heer Tavares ondersteunen, omdat dit<br />
geen urgente zaak is – de heer Battisti zit in de<br />
gevangenis en er is geen reden om aan te nemen dat hij<br />
daar op korte termijn vrijkomt; mijns inziens zouden wij<br />
ons niet moeten mengen in individuele zaken van<br />
mensen die nog voor het gerecht staan.<br />
1-028<br />
10 - Składanie dokumentów: patrz protokół<br />
1-029<br />
11 - Oświadczenie przewodniczącego<br />
Parlamentu Europejskiego na temat sytuacji<br />
w Tunezji<br />
1-030<br />
Jerzy Buzek, President. − Szanowne Koleżanki i<br />
Koledzy! Z wielkimi obawami, ale i nadziejami<br />
obserwowaliśmy w ostatnich tygodniach wydarzenia,<br />
które mają miejsce w Tunezji. Pokojowe demonstracje<br />
w obronie słusznych postulatów zmieniły się w krwawe<br />
starcia - nad czym ubolewamy - gdy tunezyjskie władze<br />
zwróciły się przeciw swoim obywatelom. Dziś chylimy<br />
głowy przed ofiarami tych wydarzeń. Nasze głębokie<br />
współczucie kierujemy do tych wszystkich, którzy<br />
stracili swoich najbliższych. Szczególnie wspominamy<br />
pierwszą ofiarę starć – młodego Mohammeda Bouazizi.<br />
Ten tragiczny gest na trwałe zapisał się jako symbol fali<br />
demokratycznego odruchu tunezyjskiego społeczeństwa.<br />
Uczcijmy minutą ciszy pamięć tunezyjskich przyjaciół.<br />
Proszę o powstanie z miejsc.<br />
(minuta ciszy)<br />
Dziękuję bardzo. Drogie Koleżanki i Koledzy!<br />
„Jaśminowa rewolucja” trwa. Pod wieloma względami<br />
jest to prawdziwie historyczny czas. Chcę wyrazić<br />
głębokie uznanie dla odwagi i determinacji obywateli<br />
Tunezji. To oni są źródłem tych zmian. Jest to jednak<br />
dopiero początek długiej drogi. Jako Europejczycy<br />
dzielimy aspiracje Tunezyjczyków, chcemy im<br />
towarzyszyć w drodze ku ich pełnej realizacji.<br />
Europejczycy są szczególnie wyczuleni na<br />
sprawiedliwość społeczną, równość szans, wolność<br />
słowa, demokracji i prawdziwy pluralizm, kształtowanie<br />
własnej politycznej przyszłości. Dlatego nie<br />
pozostajemy dziś obojętni. Wzywamy, by zmiany te<br />
miały równocześnie pokojowy charakter. Muszą<br />
prowadzić do sprawiedliwości i rządów prawa. Mamy<br />
także fundamentalne postulaty. Po pierwsze, uwolnienie<br />
wszystkich arbitralnie aresztowanych. Po drugie,<br />
przeprowadzenie niezależnych śledztw wobec<br />
poważnych zarzutów korupcji, a także przypadków<br />
śmierci, nadużycia siły. Po trzecie, przejrzyste,<br />
prawdziwie demokratyczne wybory prezydenckie i<br />
parlamentarne, monitorowane przez lokalnych i<br />
zagranicznych obserwatorów i po czwarte, wspieramy
18 17-01-2011<br />
starania stworzenia rządu jedności narodowej, który<br />
reprezentowałby wszystkich Tunezyjczyków.<br />
Unię Europejską i Tunezję łączy długoletnie<br />
partnerstwo, to są nasi sąsiedzi zza Morza<br />
Śródziemnego. To partnerstwo musi służyć przede<br />
wszystkim naszym obywatelom, Tunezyjczykom i<br />
Europejczykom. Nasze partnerstwo, jeśli ma pozostać<br />
wiarygodnym i znaczącym, musi wspierać<br />
Tunezyjczyków w ich drodze ku głębokim przemianom.<br />
Musimy pomóc Tunezji odnieść sukces. Drogie<br />
Koleżanki i Koledzy! Bądźmy po stronie<br />
Tunezyjczyków.<br />
1-031<br />
Štefan Füle, Member of the Commission. − Mr<br />
President, the recent popular uprising in Tunisia is<br />
unprecedented in the modern history of the country. On<br />
17 December 2010, a young university graduate set<br />
himself on fire out of sheer desperation after police<br />
seized the fruit and vegetables that he was selling for a<br />
living. Less than a month later, nationwide protests have<br />
brought about the definitive departure of President Ben<br />
Ali.<br />
The European Union has condemned the violence of the<br />
repression during the last days of the regime. As I speak,<br />
the security situation remains precarious. Looting and<br />
violence are still being reported. Tunisia remains in a<br />
very delicate phase, although the first news about the<br />
formation of a national unity government is just coming<br />
in.<br />
Despite some uncertainty, the message of the Tunisian<br />
people is loud and clear: Tunisia wants to be a stable<br />
democracy that fully respects fundamental rights and<br />
freedoms. It wants free and fair, inclusive elections. The<br />
people want to write a new page in their history and we<br />
want to support them in that endeavour. Respect for the<br />
Constitution and the steps being taken, as we speak, to<br />
bring together a national solidarity government are<br />
moves in the right direction.<br />
Of course, this is only a start. The European Union has<br />
never ceased to remind Tunisia of its international<br />
obligations in the field of human rights and fundamental<br />
freedoms. Ever since the start of my term of office –<br />
since my hearing before this House in fact – I have<br />
repeated that enhanced status clearly means enhanced<br />
commitments in all areas of our relationship, including<br />
fundamental freedoms and human rights.<br />
I have stressed in all meetings with the Tunisian<br />
authorities, on behalf of the European Commission, that<br />
they had to deliver on their democratic and human rights<br />
commitments. At the very first session of negotiations<br />
on the action plan for statut avancé, I insisted<br />
personally, in an unprecedented and extremely clear<br />
way, that any use of the new Article 61a of the Penal<br />
Code would be seen by us as incompatible with statut<br />
avancé and with our shared values.<br />
And, by the way, if there were still sceptics on both sides<br />
who thought that these values were shared only in<br />
theory, they should listen again and again to the voice of<br />
the Tunisian street over the last days and weeks. What<br />
was this if not a solemn demand for democracy and for<br />
more economic justice?<br />
As Catherine Ashton and I stated this morning, the<br />
European Union stands ready to support a truly inclusive<br />
electoral process with appropriate guarantees. We hope<br />
its modalities can be announced as soon as possible,<br />
once the government of national unity has been shaped<br />
and starts its work. We are ready to provide immediate<br />
assistance in preparing and organising the electoral<br />
process, as well as lasting support for a genuine<br />
democratic transition.<br />
We are also working on a broader package to assist – as<br />
soon as the situation stabilises – with, inter alia,<br />
economic development, close attention to the social<br />
problems faced by Tunisia’s youth, and consolidating<br />
the rule of law and the judiciary.<br />
We will, of course, continue consulting closely with this<br />
House and with the Member States on this process.<br />
The European Neighbourhood Policy is based on<br />
essential values shared by the European Union and its<br />
partners: democracy, human rights and an open market<br />
economy, with a view to building together a shared area<br />
of democracy, stability and prosperity. The Commission<br />
has always stressed that these values were an essential<br />
component of our neighbourhood policy, towards both<br />
our southern and our eastern neighbours.<br />
With its strong middle class, high level of education,<br />
closeness to Europe and overall moderation, Tunisia is<br />
well placed to take the leap towards democracy that<br />
people have now asked for with such force and courage,<br />
and I think everyone should agree that the European<br />
Union also has a strong interest in a democratic,<br />
prosperous and stable Tunisia. We have a long-standing<br />
and robust relationship with Tunisia and close links<br />
between our peoples and our business communities. It is<br />
my ambition, and that of the Vice-President of the<br />
Commission/ High Representative of the Union for<br />
Foreign and Security Policy, that we should now<br />
strengthen our bilateral relations on the basis of new<br />
commitments by our partners on governance, respect for<br />
the rule of law and for fundamental freedoms, and<br />
economic and social reforms.<br />
We will do our utmost to help the Tunisian people to<br />
turn their aspirations into reality.<br />
1-032<br />
José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, en nombre<br />
del Grupo PPE. – Señor Presidente, los recientes<br />
acontecimientos de Túnez deberían invitarnos a<br />
reflexionar con sentido de la responsabilidad sobre, al<br />
menos, dos aspectos. En primer lugar, sobre el hecho de<br />
si las políticas de apoyo al statu quo en países ayunos de<br />
libertades democráticas contribuye realmente a la
17-01-2011 19<br />
estabilidad, en este caso, en nuestro entorno más<br />
próximo.<br />
Y en segundo lugar, señor Presidente, sobre el hecho<br />
relativo a si la desaparición de la escena política del<br />
señor Ben Ali es una condición suficiente para<br />
garantizar el alumbramiento de una verdadera transición<br />
democrática.<br />
Desde mi punto de vista, señor Presidente, la respuesta a<br />
estas dos preguntas es negativa. Por eso, señor Füle, se<br />
impone una profunda reflexión acerca de por qué la<br />
política de vecindad, en el espíritu del Proceso de<br />
Barcelona, no ha producido los efectos de<br />
democratización que estaban previstos y cómo<br />
podríamos o deberíamos corregir el tiro.<br />
En segundo lugar, la experiencia nos demuestra ―y hay<br />
muchos casos― que, cuando se produce un vacío de<br />
poder, los partidos más radicalizados, más extremistas,<br />
sustituyen el proceso, lo secuestran y quieren dar al<br />
traste con él.<br />
Señor Presidente, solamente en defensa de la libertad, el<br />
extremismo no es un vicio; solamente en defensa de la<br />
justicia, la moderación no es una virtud. Por ese<br />
imperativo ético, la Unión Europea tiene que movilizar<br />
todos sus esfuerzos para contribuir a que este proceso no<br />
descarrile.<br />
Celebro la declaración del señor Füle en el sentido de<br />
prestar asistencia electoral a Túnez, pero creo que es<br />
más importante todavía dar un paso más y acompañarlo<br />
con una misión de observación electoral de la Unión<br />
Europea. Y no solamente por este imperativo ético que<br />
está inscrito en el código genético de la Unión Europea,<br />
sino también, señor Presidente, por nuestro propio<br />
interés: porque de nada sirve viajar en primera clase si<br />
en clase turista hay un pasajero que viaja con una bomba<br />
en el maletín.<br />
1-033<br />
Pier Antonio Panzeri, a nome del gruppo S&D. –<br />
Signor Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, condividiamo le<br />
preoccupazioni per quanto sta avvenendo in Tunisia ed<br />
esprimiamo il nostro cordoglio per le tante persone che<br />
hanno perso la vita durante le manifestazioni.<br />
La fase nuova e confusa che si è aperta dopo la fuga<br />
dell'ex presidente Ben Ali ora deve portare all'obiettivo<br />
che da più parti è stato sollecitato: l'avvio di riforme<br />
economiche e sociali in grado di rispondere alle<br />
aspettative di larghissima parte della popolazione e<br />
l'allargamento degli spazi di democrazia, perché siano<br />
sempre più coinvolte la società civile e le diverse forze<br />
di opposizione nell'azione pubblica e nel governo.<br />
È evidente che ogni paese ha il diritto a scegliersi la<br />
propria strada, ma noi siamo interessati al fatto che<br />
queste riforme si realizzino e che i cambiamenti siano<br />
effettivi e non un semplice maquillage. Ma ciò che sta<br />
avvenendo in Tunisia in questi giorni interroga tutti noi,<br />
interroga l'<strong>Europa</strong> con i suoi ritardi e i suoi errori.<br />
Nel 1995, a Barcellona, l'Unione europea lanciò il<br />
programma di partenariato con il Mediterraneo, che<br />
doveva comprendere una cooperazione economica,<br />
politica, militare, persino sociale e umana, ma nemmeno<br />
nei due obiettivi chiave si è realizzato. Per l'economia,<br />
c'è stato un drastico ridimensionamento dei progetti<br />
regionali e infrastrutturali perché i finanziamenti degli<br />
Stati europei non sono arrivati, quelli della Commissione<br />
restano in standby. La promessa di zona di libero<br />
scambio non esiste, ma il fallimento più evidente è sul<br />
piano politico, del quale occorre piena consapevolezza,<br />
Commissario.<br />
L'Unione per il Mediterraneo lanciata nel 2008 è rimasta<br />
una cosa di facciata. Il vertice che doveva tenersi nel<br />
novembre 2010 è stato rinviato sine die. Il problema è<br />
che i diversi governi europei non hanno e non vedono<br />
l'interesse per una vera cooperazione, preferiscono<br />
mantenere i rapporti con regimi discutibili, arroccati<br />
nella difesa delle ricchezze nazionali che controllano<br />
senza democrazia, mentre milioni di giovani vivono<br />
senza prospettive, se non quelle di un'emigrazione<br />
sempre più difficile.<br />
Non c'è da meravigliarsi, quindi, se sotto la spinta della<br />
crisi economica e sociale le manifestazioni in Tunisia si<br />
sono trasformate in uno tsunami capace di abbattersi<br />
pesantemente sulla struttura di potere esistente. Non<br />
regge più il realismo politico dell'<strong>Europa</strong> per paura del<br />
fondamentalismo islamico, così come forse è l'ora di<br />
mandare definitivamente in archivio una concezione<br />
tardo-coloniale che tende a riemergere ogni tanto nei<br />
rapporti con i paesi nordafricani.<br />
Ecco, proprio partendo da Barcellona serve una nuova<br />
visione europea verso il proprio Sud, verso il<br />
Mediterraneo, con maggiore credibilità rispetto al<br />
passato. Ciò significa – e glielo chiedo, Commissario,<br />
con forza – una profonda revisione delle politiche di<br />
partenariato e di vicinato sin qui seguite: non possiamo<br />
nascondere che sia la Commissione, sia il Consiglio<br />
erano persino pronti a discutere con la Tunisia l'accordo<br />
per lo statuto avanzato. Sulla base di quali criteri si<br />
riteneva possibile tutto questo ancora deve essere<br />
spiegato.<br />
Serve un cambio di linea, un cambio di passo e ciò può<br />
essere fatto – lo diciamo a Commissione e Consiglio –<br />
associando con maggiore convinzione questo<br />
Parlamento all'elaborazione e all'applicazione di una<br />
nuova idea di partenariato verso i paesi della sponda<br />
mediterranea. Tutto ciò non è solo nell'interesse di questi<br />
paesi, ma è soprattutto nell'interesse dell'<strong>Europa</strong>.<br />
Molti dei problemi che l'<strong>Europa</strong> mostra di avere possono<br />
essere affrontati e risolti solo attraverso un rapporto<br />
produttivo e virtuoso con tutti i paesi del Maghreb. La<br />
strada è stretta, ma è l'unica da percorrere, quella di<br />
sostenere riforme economiche e democratiche e, nello<br />
stesso tempo, mettere in campo tutti gli antidoti<br />
necessari contro il fondamentalismo e il terrorismo.
20 17-01-2011<br />
C'è da augurarsi che questa drammatica e amara lezione<br />
che proviene dalla Tunisia possa servire a tutti noi per<br />
avere maggiore consapevolezza di ciò che è utile fare, di<br />
ciò che è utile cambiare nell'azione europea.<br />
1-034<br />
Marietje Schaake, on behalf of the ALDE Group. – Mr<br />
President, I would like to congratulate the Tunisian<br />
people for their bravery, courage and persistence in<br />
speaking up for opportunities and freedom, and I hope<br />
all can refrain from using violence and that there will be<br />
free and fair elections soon.<br />
Citizens spoke out against an oppressive regime which<br />
has used bullets and killed its youth. Only weak<br />
governments go to such lengths to preserve their<br />
artificially obtained corrupt power and wealth. Regimes<br />
derive their legitimacy from providing for the well-being<br />
of their citizens, not from closing universities and access<br />
to information and free communications.<br />
With regard to access to information, the Tunisian<br />
opposition used the internet, and the internet is<br />
becoming more and more important for peaceful<br />
opposition across the world. I learned about the uprising<br />
by the citizens’ movement in Tunisia through the<br />
internet and eyewitness accounts that were posted there,<br />
but it took about a month of the struggle before<br />
mainstream media and political leaders woke up to the<br />
realities of the street.<br />
In the same week – last week – the French Minister for<br />
Foreign Affairs offered help to the Tunisian Government<br />
in the form of riot police and assistance in policing.<br />
What is the Commission’s reaction to that offer, and<br />
where was the help for citizens in support of their rights?<br />
(Applause)<br />
The confrontation between the Tunisian Government<br />
and its people took place on the virtual highways of the<br />
internet as much as on the streets. The Tunisian<br />
Government was known for being among the most<br />
advanced in the use of filtering and censoring software,<br />
and over the past month it spared no efforts to repress<br />
people through these technologies. Repressive regimes<br />
across the world continue to use technologies to silence<br />
free speech.<br />
Today is Martin Luther King Day and it was Martin<br />
Luther King who said that a time comes when silence<br />
becomes betrayal. Commissioner Füle, that time has<br />
arrived. The United States has lost significantly in terms<br />
of credibility in its fight for leadership in internet<br />
freedom.<br />
The EU has a struggle ahead, about which we will speak<br />
tonight in relation to the upcoming Hungarian laws. But<br />
the young, freedom-loving generation across the world<br />
is looking to the symbolic example that Tunisia has<br />
given and is looking to the EU for support, and there is<br />
no reason why we should not lead in defending people’s<br />
freedoms, including on the internet.<br />
1-035<br />
Daniel Cohn-Bendit, au nom du groupe Verts/ALE. –<br />
Monsieur le Président, chers collègues, j'avoue que<br />
j'aurais aimé que ce Parlement soit à la hauteur de la<br />
fierté des Tunisiens qui ont su abattre le dictateur Ben<br />
Ali.<br />
Chers collègues, le dictateur est tombé, mais la dictature,<br />
la structure de la dictature existe toujours en Tunisie. Et<br />
aujourd'hui, il faut faire très attention. Des<br />
gouvernements européens, la majorité de ce Parlement<br />
ont, pendant des années, soutenu la structure de la<br />
dictature, et le dictateur tunisien. Encore la semaine<br />
dernière, la majorité des groupes refusait un débat sur la<br />
Tunisie et refusait une condamnation de Ben Ali.<br />
Ce qu'a fait la ministre des affaires étrangères française<br />
n'est que le dernier exemple de la complicité de<br />
l'Occident. Et pourquoi ? Pour la peur, parce qu'on avait<br />
peur de l'islamisme. On a raison d'avoir peur de la<br />
dictature de l'islamisme, mais qu'ont-ils à voir avec cela<br />
ces jeunes, ces Tunisiens qui n'avaient rien d'islamistes,<br />
qui se battaient pour la liberté? Et M. Bouazizi qui s'est<br />
immolé, c'est le Jan Palach de la Tunisie et quand Jan<br />
Palach s'est immolé, tout ce Parlement était derrière lui.<br />
Nous ne sommes même pas capables d'être derrière<br />
M. Bouazizi, voilà la vérité de ce Parlement.<br />
Maintenant il s'agit que la Commission agisse. Il s'agit<br />
simplement de dire une chose, de dire aux Tunisiens<br />
qu'une élection démocratique dans un pays qui vient de<br />
sortir de la dictature ne se fait pas en deux mois. Il n'y a<br />
pas une base de démocratie. La liberté d'expression, les<br />
médias, les radios, la télévision n'existent pas. Il n'existe<br />
qu'une imprimerie d'état.<br />
C'est pour cela que je demande à la Commission qu'elle<br />
prenne l'argent de l'accord d'association et qu'elle mette<br />
cet argent au service de la liberté d'expression en Tunisie<br />
et non pas au service d'organisations gouvernementales<br />
tunisiennes.<br />
Deuxièmement, le gouvernement de transition n'est pas<br />
un gouvernement d'unité nationale. Pourquoi? Parce que<br />
la majorité de ceux qui se sont battus ou de ceux qui sont<br />
en exil ne sont pas encore rentrés, ne sont pas reconnus,<br />
donc il faudra du temps pour que des forces<br />
démocratiques – non pas des forces qui avaient été<br />
"reconnues" par Ben Ali –, mais des forces réellement<br />
démocratiques, puissent se développer.<br />
L'Union européenne doit démonter que, pour nous, ce<br />
qui se passe en Tunisie, c'est la clé de la compréhension<br />
et de l'espoir pour tous les pays arabes. Démocratie et<br />
Islam veulent aller de pair et si nous sommes capables<br />
de soutenir la démocratie tunisienne en train de naître,<br />
nous verrons qu'en Égypte, en Jordanie, en Syrie, et<br />
partout, le peuple et les peuples vont s'élever contre leurs<br />
dictateurs.<br />
Nous avons une responsabilité, nous tous ici, parce<br />
qu'enfin des Tunisiens, donc une partie du monde arabe,<br />
nous montrent que l'espoir de liberté qu'on a vu en 89
17-01-2011 21<br />
dans les pays de l'Est, ce même espoir est aujourd'hui en<br />
train de naître dans un pays comme la Tunisie, demain<br />
en Algérie, après-demain en Égypte et en Jordanie.<br />
Donc c'est pour cela qu'il est inimaginable que ce<br />
Parlement reste assis et dise: "Ah oui, peut-être, on ne<br />
sait pas". On ne savait pas en 89 ce qu'allait devenir la<br />
Pologne. On ne savait pas avec Gorbatchev ce qu'allait<br />
devenir la Russie. Si à chaque fois que les peuples<br />
demandent la liberté, on leur demande une assurance,<br />
qu'ils nous disent que c'est sûr que ça ira dans une<br />
direction, on ne soutiendra jamais la liberté et c'est pour<br />
cela que je demande à la Commission: "Bougez, donnez,<br />
montrez aux Tunisiens que maintenant la realpolitik,<br />
c'est la politique de soutien à la démocratie et non plus à<br />
la structure de la dictature".<br />
(Applaudissements)<br />
1-036<br />
Charles Tannock, on behalf of the ECR Group. – Mr<br />
President, the upheaval in Tunisia is undoubtedly a<br />
reflection of people’s frustration at the country’s<br />
political stagnation and its relative economic stagnation.<br />
The flagrant corruption and wealth of the ruling family<br />
elite contrasted sharply with the high levels of poverty<br />
and unemployment among ordinary people.<br />
Former President Ben Ali paid the supreme price for<br />
failing to meet the expectations and aspirations of his<br />
people, but I do not agree with some assessments,<br />
particularly in the Green Group, that his government was<br />
one of the most repressive in the Arab world. Tunisia<br />
has been an example, in some ways, of a modern,<br />
secular and progressive Arab country. For example,<br />
polygamy and veils were banned and foreign direct<br />
investment and tourism were encouraged.<br />
Tunisia has managed to resist the efforts of violent<br />
Jihadis to undermine the integrity of its secular society.<br />
It is therefore essential that Tunisia’s political leaders –<br />
the new leaders that will now emerge – protect that<br />
legacy, because Salafist extremists will undoubtedly try<br />
to take advantage of the chaos and turmoil that will<br />
advance their dangerous agenda, which obviously also<br />
threatens European political objectives, including<br />
foreign policy objectives.<br />
Tunisia’s new political leadership also needs to<br />
understand that poor governance and gross inequality<br />
offer a fertile breeding ground for violent radicalism. I<br />
am encouraged that the interim leadership has promised<br />
substantial reforms because embarking on such a path<br />
will greatly strengthen Tunisia’s relationship with the<br />
European Union. In the meantime, my group calls for<br />
maximum restraint by the security forces and for the<br />
arrest and trial of the ancien regime’s presidential guard<br />
leadership responsible for the shooting, in the last few<br />
days, of innocent bystanders, in a futile attempt to<br />
destabilise the country. I congratulate the army on its<br />
professionalism in protecting the Republic’s institutions.<br />
We in the EU must give the new Tunisian government<br />
of unity every assistance and also afford every assistance<br />
to EU citizens, including British citizens, who are<br />
stranded, having been in Tunisia on a holiday.<br />
1-037<br />
Marie-Christine Vergiat, au nom du groupe<br />
GUE/NGL. – Monsieur le Président, chers collègues,<br />
c'est avec une certaine fierté et beaucoup d'émotion que<br />
j'interviens aujourd'hui dans cet hémicycle au nom de<br />
mon groupe, la Gauche unitaire européenne/Gauche<br />
verte nordique.<br />
En effet, nous avons été très peu nombreux – peu<br />
nombreuses même, dirais-je – sur ces bancs à dénoncer<br />
les dérives du régime tunisien et ce qu'il faisait subir à<br />
ceux et celles qui osaient, envers et contre tout, le<br />
critiquer et dénoncer ses pratiques et notamment la<br />
torture des défenseurs des droits de l'homme.<br />
Il a fallu qu'un jeune homme de 26 ans s'immole par le<br />
feu pour que le peuple tunisien se lève, pour qu'il n'ait<br />
plus peur, car il se sentait bien seul. L'espoir de liberté y<br />
est né. Il a fallu plus de cinquante morts pour que<br />
l'Union européenne ose un timide communiqué dans<br />
lequel elle appelait à la retenue dans l'usage de la force<br />
sans mettre en cause en quoi que ce soit le sacro-saint<br />
partenariat de l'Union européenne avec la Tunisie, sans<br />
condamner les violences, Monsieur Füle, jusqu'à samedi.<br />
Et le moins que l'on puisse dire, c'est que le régime<br />
tunisien ne vous a guère entendu depuis votre<br />
nomination.<br />
Ces mots de "retenue dans l'usage de la force" me sont<br />
restés en travers de la gorge. Le Parlement européen a<br />
été muet, hormis un timide communiqué de la délégation<br />
Maghreb. Ce n'est que samedi que vous vous êtes<br />
exprimé, Monsieur le Président, et aujourd'hui la<br />
majorité du Parlement européen a refusé une résolution<br />
écrite. Les instances européennes savent pourtant être<br />
plus véhémentes envers d'autres régimes. La Française<br />
que je suis sait quelles sont les responsabilités du<br />
gouvernement français et je ne reviendrai pas sur les<br />
propos de notre ministre des affaires étrangères.<br />
Visiblement, pour certains, le temps des colonies n'est<br />
pas encore révolu mais espérons que tout ceci fait partie<br />
du passé.<br />
Grâce au courage du peuple tunisien, en quelques jours<br />
le miracle tunisien, si cher à certains ici, s'est effondré et<br />
a montré son vrai visage. Aujourd'hui, la responsabilité<br />
de l'Union européenne est effectivement grande pour<br />
accompagner sans ingérence le peuple tunisien dans sa<br />
transition démocratique. L'Union européenne doit suivre<br />
le processus électoral, veiller à ce qu'une commission<br />
d'enquête indépendante fasse toute la lumière sur ce qui<br />
s'est passé, sur les violences et la corruption. Le peuple<br />
tunisien ne doit plus être spolié, les biens et les avoirs<br />
des familles Ben ali et Trabelsi doivent non seulement<br />
être surveillés, mais gelés.<br />
L'Union européenne a failli. Un long chemin devra être<br />
parcouru pour que les Tunisiens reprennent confiance.
22 17-01-2011<br />
Aujourd'hui, certes, les choses sont encore difficiles et il<br />
peut y avoir valeur d'exemple pour le Maghreb dans ce<br />
qui se passe là-bas. Nous savons que des soulèvements<br />
identiques peuvent avoir lieu dans tous ces pays où les<br />
Occidentaux font toujours passer leurs propres intérêts<br />
avant ceux des peuples concernés. Des hommes se sont<br />
déjà immolés en Algérie, en Égypte et en Mauritanie. Il<br />
est temps de passer des discours aux actes en matière de<br />
démocratie et de droits de l'homme. Il est temps de<br />
refonder les partenariats de l'Union européenne avec les<br />
pays du Sud et de construire enfin ceux-ci sur l'exigence<br />
démocratique, le respect des droits de l'homme et<br />
l'égalité, sinon l'Union européenne fera effectivement le<br />
lit des intégristes.<br />
1-038<br />
Gerard Batten, on behalf of the EFD Group. – Mr<br />
President, you made some remarks at the beginning of<br />
the debate about free and fair elections and good<br />
representative government and you asked us to support<br />
the people of Tunisia.<br />
No democrat could disagree. People will tolerate a lot<br />
from incompetent, corrupt governments, but push them<br />
too far and they will rebel. It is a doctrine of internal<br />
security services that any population is only three days<br />
away from riots and civil unrest when the food supplies<br />
run out.<br />
Are there any parallels to be drawn between what is<br />
happening in Tunisia and the European Union? The EU<br />
gives undemocratic and incompetent government. It has<br />
a political class that is increasingly detached from the<br />
wishes of its people. There is high youth unemployment<br />
in many countries in Europe as a direct result of EU<br />
policies. There are already riots and civil unrest in<br />
Greece due to its purely ideological commitment to the<br />
European single currency. Countries like Spain, Portugal<br />
and Ireland may soon follow Greece as their economies<br />
become untenable in the straitjacket of the euro.<br />
Do not think that it cannot happen in European<br />
countries. When governments become the enemies of<br />
their own people then the people will eventually rebel.<br />
I agree with what you said in your introduction but let us<br />
see those principles applied in Europe as well as in other<br />
countries of the world.<br />
1-039<br />
Przewodniczący. − Tym samym zamykamy punkt<br />
porządku obrad.<br />
1-040<br />
12 - Zharmonizowane warunki<br />
wprowadzania do obrotu wyrobów<br />
budowlanych (debata)<br />
1-041<br />
Przewodniczący. − Kolejnym punktem porządku<br />
dziennego jest zalecenie do drugiego czytania<br />
sporządzone w imieniu Komisji Rynku Wewnętrznego i<br />
Ochrony Konsumentów w sprawie stanowiska Rady w<br />
pierwszym czytaniu w sprawie przyjęcia rozporządzenia<br />
Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady ustanawiającego<br />
zharmonizowane warunki wprowadzania do obrotu<br />
wyrobów budowlanych i uchylającego dyrektywę Rady<br />
89/106/EWG (10753/3/2010 - C7-0267/2010 -<br />
2008/0098(COD)) (sprawozdawczyni: Catherine Stihler)<br />
(A7-0343/2010)<br />
1-042<br />
Catherine Stihler, rapporteur. − Mr President, it is a<br />
good way to start the New Year with this debate and<br />
tomorrow’s vote on the deal concluded under the<br />
Belgian Presidency on this important report on<br />
construction products.<br />
I would like to start by thanking all colleagues who<br />
made this possible for their hard work, their<br />
thoughtfulness and commitment to making this proposal<br />
a reality. I would also like to put on record my thanks to<br />
the IMCO Secretariat and to the Belgian Presidency, in<br />
particular to Mr Vertessen and Mr Haerynck for all their<br />
dedicated work.<br />
As I said in my report quoting the poet Robert Frost -<br />
‘Good fences make good neighbours’ (with an implied<br />
question mark). It is important that we maintain the<br />
momentum to complete the internal market and break<br />
down barriers to trade. As Mario Monti in his report on<br />
the Single Market acknowledges, ‘Europe is still in a<br />
phase of “market construction” that requires breaking<br />
down barriers to cross border activity, cutting dead wood<br />
of national administrative and technical barriers and<br />
overcoming corporate resistance’.<br />
With this proposal we have attempted to make the single<br />
market work more effectively, we have attempted to<br />
have clearer and more transparent systems in place so<br />
that products placed on the market are of the highest<br />
standards and that the construction industry has a fairer<br />
market place to trade within.<br />
Currently the construction industry is facing the<br />
economic challenges caused by the global financial<br />
meltdown of 2008 and exacerbated by the slow<br />
economic recovery we face across the EU. We should<br />
never forget what an important sector the construction<br />
industry is – 12 million EU citizens are directly<br />
employed in the sector and 26 million EU citizens are<br />
dependent on it – that is 38 million people reliant on the<br />
sector. For economic growth construction is essential for<br />
jobs and employment.<br />
It is also one of the most dangerous sectors to work<br />
within. Taking Germany, whose safety record is second<br />
to none, one construction worker in 5000 will suffer a<br />
fatal accident during their lifetime. The health and safety<br />
of those who work at the coalface of construction should<br />
always be remembered and it is important to have<br />
acknowledgement of this in the report.<br />
It was with this in mind that we successfully managed<br />
on both sides to come to some agreement on the issue of<br />
labelling hazardous substances, so that the report was in<br />
line with REACH but also helps those who work with
17-01-2011 23<br />
products which in the past have led to chronic conditions<br />
and death – conditions such as asbestos-related<br />
mesotheliomia and, to an extent, chronic obstructive<br />
pulmonary disease caused by working conditions and by<br />
inhaling dust.<br />
The proper labelling of hazardous substances can help<br />
those with these lung conditions and illustrates how<br />
interlinked our work here is. I am proud of the fact that<br />
this report was conducted and concluded under the<br />
European Year of the Lung. Lung health is so often<br />
neglected and I was delighted that in this Parliament we<br />
recognised its importance.<br />
I would also like to briefly comment on SMEs. In<br />
Parliament we are urged to ‘think small first’ and this<br />
should carry throughout our work. This is why we have<br />
managed to create a second stream for smaller<br />
corporations to place their products on the internal<br />
market and the system should make it cheaper and more<br />
practical for SMEs to reach a larger market place which<br />
can only increase their trading potential.<br />
On the separate issue over transparency concerning who<br />
serves on technical bodies and how they work, I think<br />
that we have moved the bodies which approve products<br />
further than was originally foreseen. The transparency<br />
over processes and the approval of products can only<br />
help break down the walls and barriers which exist in the<br />
European Union today. This should help companies in<br />
the EU, and in particular the special conditions set for<br />
micro-enterprises are also helpful in these tough<br />
economic conditions.<br />
In the European Union we should always strive for<br />
better regulation. Along with my shadow rapporteurs, I<br />
have modified the sections of the report which are no<br />
longer relevant or which were so unclear that no one was<br />
able to follow them or ensure their application. For an<br />
industry such as the construction sector it is imperative<br />
that the rules are clear and I look forward to seeing the<br />
difference these particular changes will make.<br />
The scale is huge and the challenges many, but today<br />
these new rules which will come into force through<br />
Member States in the next 24 months will help the<br />
construction sector as we attempt to create economic<br />
growth and, through this, jobs.<br />
1-043<br />
Antonio Tajani, Vicepresidente della Commissione. −<br />
Signor Presidente, onorevoli deputati, innanzitutto<br />
desidero ringraziare il Presidente che ci fa l'onore di<br />
presiedere un dibattito su un argomento così importante<br />
per la politica industriale e del mercato interno e<br />
desidero altresì ringraziare l'on. Stihler, relatore, che ha<br />
lavorato in modo approfondito su questa proposta e ci<br />
ha, grazie al suo impegno, permesso di raggiungere un<br />
accordo in seconda lettura.<br />
Voglio inoltre ringraziare vivamente tutti i relatori<br />
ombra e il presidente della commissione per il mercato<br />
interno, l'on. Harbour. I vostri sforzi collettivi sono stati<br />
determinanti per giungere ad una svolta durante i<br />
negoziati tra le Istituzioni in merito a questo dossier<br />
estremamente tecnico.<br />
La Commissione accoglie con favore il compromesso in<br />
seconda lettura da parte del Parlamento e del Consiglio;<br />
a prescindere dagli aspetti di natura tecnica, si tratta di<br />
un dossier di grande importanza. L'adozione del<br />
regolamento sui prodotti da costruzione rappresenta un<br />
passo di inestimabile rilievo per l'intero settore europeo<br />
della costruzione. I prodotti della costruzione<br />
rappresentano il 3% del PIL a livello europeo e in<br />
termini di occupazione le attività legate al settore della<br />
costruzione ricoprono il 6,5% del PIL a livello europeo e<br />
il 7,5% in termini occupazionali: nell'insieme questo<br />
porta il settore della costruzione a rivestire un peso del<br />
10% nell'ambito dell'economia europea, come ha<br />
ricordato nel corso del suo intervento la relatrice.<br />
Inoltre, l'adozione del regolamento sui prodotti da<br />
costruzione costituisce un passo in avanti importante<br />
nell'ambito della semplificazione e di una migliore<br />
legislazione e consolida nello stesso tempo il mercato<br />
interno per i prodotti di costruzione. Questo è stato<br />
anche il primo caso di applicazione pratica dei principi<br />
sanciti nell'ambito dello "Small business act". In effetti,<br />
alle imprese europee, specialmente alle più piccole,<br />
finalmente la normativa comunitaria offrirà strumenti<br />
abilitanti anziché l'esatto contrario, ossia moduli da<br />
compilare, trafile burocratiche e obblighi aggiuntivi.<br />
Non posso che essere soddisfatto di questo risultato, in<br />
modo particolare per le soluzioni apportate alle tre<br />
questioni considerate in precedenza più complicate: in<br />
primo luogo, per quanto riguarda la questione inerente le<br />
sostanze pericolose, la Commissione preparerà un<br />
rapporto su questo punto importante, informando il<br />
Parlamento e presentando, se del caso, le eventuali<br />
proposte legislative successive.<br />
In secondo luogo, il trattamento speciale riservato alle<br />
microimprese, da sempre ritenute fondamentali al fine di<br />
salvaguardare i principi dello "Small business act". Il<br />
risultato conseguito soddisfa questo criterio, mantenendo<br />
la possibilità di procedure semplificate per le<br />
microimprese.<br />
Infine, in varie parti del testo si riconosce la necessità di<br />
ridurre gli obblighi amministrativi delle imprese e quelli<br />
legati ai testi, non solo introducendo procedure<br />
semplificate per quel che riguarda la marcatura CE, ma<br />
anche mantenendo facoltativo l'uso delle valutazioni<br />
tecniche europee.<br />
Tuttavia, come indicato nella dichiarazione della<br />
Commissione allegata alla posizione del Consiglio in<br />
prima lettura, occorrerà verificare che le soluzioni scelte<br />
siano veramente le migliori per affrontare le necessità<br />
reali. In particolare, dovremo evitare di sottoporre le<br />
imprese, soprattutto le più piccole, ad obblighi<br />
amministrativi ingiustificati o comunque non necessari.<br />
È nostra intenzione monitorare attentamente questo<br />
aspetto e inserire le nostre conclusioni nella relazione al
24 17-01-2011<br />
Parlamento europeo e al Consiglio da elaborare dopo<br />
cinque anni dall'entrata in vigore del presente<br />
regolamento.<br />
Desidero inoltre puntualizzare che la Commissione<br />
intende collaborare da vicino con il Parlamento europeo<br />
e, naturalmente, con il Consiglio, in merito all'attuazione<br />
di questo regolamento. A tale proposito ho chiesto ai<br />
miei servizi – che ringrazio per il contributo che danno<br />
sempre all'attività legislativa della Commissione – di<br />
preparare una road map sull'implementazione, che ho<br />
intenzione di inviarvi non appena sarà possibile. Ciò<br />
riguarda in particolar modo i cosiddetti aspetti di<br />
comitatologia. Il Parlamento è un partner chiave della<br />
Commissione, e posso assicurarvi che intendo<br />
continuare a collaborare da vicino anche per quel che<br />
riguarda la fase successiva dell'adozione. D'altronde, 14<br />
anni passati in quest'Aula non sono trascorsi in vano.<br />
Infine, la Commissione ha ritenuto necessario presentare<br />
una dichiarazione riguardante la deroga all'accordo<br />
comune tra le istituzioni, relativa al termine per<br />
presentare obiezione nei confronti degli atti delegati. La<br />
Commissione tiene a sottolineare che il principio<br />
stabilito nel progetto di intesa comune prevede un<br />
termine per la presentazione delle obiezioni di due mesi,<br />
prorogabile per altri due.<br />
Nel caso in questione, la Commissione ritiene che non<br />
sussistano circostanze particolari che possano<br />
giustificare una deroga a tale principio. La Commissione<br />
si rammarica del fatto che il principio concordato nel<br />
progetto di intesa comune non sia stato rispettato e nella<br />
sua dichiarazione sottolinea che il caso dei prodotti di<br />
costruzione non può costituire un precedente.<br />
Ringrazio il Parlamento – anche attraverso il suo<br />
Presidente, che ringrazio ancora per aver partecipato a<br />
questo dibattito – dell'interesse con il quale ha esaminato<br />
questa proposta di semplificazione. Per concludere,<br />
vorrei mettere in risalto i vantaggi che ci aspettiamo da<br />
questa nuova normativa, nonché quelli risultanti per i<br />
produttori e gli utilizzatori dei prodotti da costruzione,<br />
come pure per le amministrazioni nazionali.<br />
Confermiamo anche la disponibilità della Commissione<br />
ad adempiere agli obblighi previsti dal testo del<br />
regolamento, in particolare ad elaborare le relazioni che<br />
le sono state richieste.<br />
Grazie ancora Signor Presidente, grazie agli onorevoli<br />
parlamentari per l'impegno e per la cooperazione<br />
dimostrata.<br />
1-044<br />
Andreas Schwab, im Namen der PPE-Fraktion. – Herr<br />
Präsident, Herr Vizepräsident, liebe Kolleginnen und<br />
Kollegen! Auch von meiner Seite möchte ich zunächst<br />
ein herzliches Dankeschön an all diejenigen richten, die<br />
am Zustandekommen dieser Verordnung in zweiter<br />
Lesung aktiv mitgewirkt haben. Denn diese Verordnung<br />
– wie der Name es schon sagt – bringt eine<br />
Verbesserung im Verhältnis zur bestehenden Richtlinie.<br />
Das Baupolizeirecht ist ja in der Vergangenheit ein<br />
Stück weit Kernbereich nationaler Eigenständigkeit<br />
gewesen. Dass es uns gelungen ist, hier mit einer<br />
Verordnung den europäischen Binnenmarkt nach vorne<br />
zu bringen, ist sehr positiv.<br />
Zweitens enthält die Verordnung gerade für die<br />
mittelständische Wirtschaft, für kleine und mittlere<br />
Unternehmen, eine Reihe von wichtigen<br />
Erleichterungen, die ihnen das Wirtschaften und den<br />
Umgang im europäischen Binnenmarkt erleichtern<br />
werden. Und letztlich sind natürlich auch die<br />
Verbraucher Nutznießer dieser Verordnung, weil die<br />
Sicherheit und Zuverlässigkeit von Bauprodukten durch<br />
diese Verordnung erheblich verbessert wird.<br />
Ich darf auch für unseren Schattenberichterstatter, Herrn<br />
Professor Mayer, sprechen, der heute leider wegen<br />
Wahlkreisterminen noch in seinem Wahlkreis ist. Er hat<br />
mich gebeten, darauf hinzuweisen, dass es sich bei<br />
dieser Verordnung am Ende in zweiter Lesung um einen<br />
Kompromiss handelt, um einen guten Kompromiss, aus<br />
seiner Sicht aber doch noch einige Punkte zur<br />
Nacharbeit notwendig sind. Ich bin sehr dankbar, dass<br />
Herr Vizepräsident Tajani darauf hingewiesen hat, dass<br />
das Parlament auch bei diesen im Nachgang noch<br />
fälligen Arbeiten eingebunden sein wird. Für ihn als<br />
Schattenberichterstatter reicht es nicht aus, dass das<br />
Verhalten der Hersteller von Bauprodukten und der<br />
Vertrieb ihrer Produkte allein geregelt werden, sondern<br />
die hier vorliegende Verordnung muss durch ein<br />
Regelwerk ergänzt werden, das die Grundsätze und die<br />
praktischen Regeln für die Verwendung und den Einbau<br />
von Bauprodukten ebenfalls festlegt. In diesem<br />
Zusammenhang sollte nach seiner Meinung die<br />
Kommission erwägen, der europäischen Normungsinstitution<br />
CEN ein Mandat zur Vorlage eines<br />
vereinheitlichten europäischen Regelwerks zu geben.<br />
Des Weiteren möchte er darauf hinweisen, dass die<br />
Kommission beobachten soll, ob die neue Bauprodukteverordnung<br />
zu einer ausreichenden Harmonisierung in<br />
allen Bereichen und nicht zu weiteren Sicherheitsproblemen<br />
und zu unfairem Wettbewerb führen wird.<br />
Aber nach den Ausführungen von Kommissar Tajani bin<br />
ich sicher, dass wir dies auch gemeinsam erreichen<br />
werden.<br />
1-045<br />
ΠΡΟΕΔΡΙΑ: ΡΟΔΗ ΚΡΑΤΣΑ-<br />
ΤΣΑΓΚΑΡΟΠΟΥΛΟΥ<br />
Αντιπρόεδρος<br />
1-046<br />
Evelyne Gebhardt, im Namen der S&D-Fraktion. –<br />
Frau Präsidentin, liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen! Ich<br />
möchte meinen ganz herzlichen Dank der<br />
Berichterstatterin Catherine Stihler aussprechen, die in<br />
diesem hochtechnischen Bereich eine sehr wichtige<br />
Arbeit geleistet hat.<br />
Denn es ist nicht nur ein technischer Bericht, es ist auch<br />
ein hochpolitischer Bericht, der uns vorliegt, ein Bericht,<br />
in dem auch hohe politische Standards respektiert
17-01-2011 25<br />
werden mussten. Es ging darum, die Belange der<br />
Wirtschaft, der Sicherheit und des Arbeitsschutzes<br />
miteinander in Einklang zu bringen. Und das ist der<br />
Berichterstatterin aus Sicht des Europäischen <strong>Parlaments</strong><br />
und der Sozialdemokratinnen und Sozialdemokraten<br />
hervorragend gelungen.<br />
Die Belange der Wirtschaft zu respektieren und zu<br />
sehen, wo ihre Probleme in diesem Bereich der<br />
Bauprodukte sind, war eine wesentliche Sache. Es ging<br />
auch darum, die Balance zwischen den großen<br />
Unternehmen und den kleinen und mittleren<br />
Unternehmen zu finden. Wir fanden es richtig, dass die<br />
Kommission vorgeschlagen hat, dass kleine<br />
Unternehmen weniger Regeln brauchen. Aber das<br />
bedeutet nicht – und darauf bezieht sich die Verbesserung,<br />
die gegenüber dem Vorschlag der<br />
Kommission gemacht wurde –, dass es weniger<br />
Sicherheit geben darf. Und die Standards müssen auch<br />
wirklich auf hohem Niveau sein. Und es ist uns<br />
gelungen, das in diesem Bereich umzusetzen.<br />
Es ist natürlich auch wichtig, die Sicherheit in den<br />
Vordergrund zu stellen, die für die Verbraucher und die<br />
Verbraucherinnen von ganz besonders großer<br />
Wichtigkeit ist. Denn wo ein Bauprodukt hergestellt und<br />
eingebaut wird, muss dafür gesorgt werden, dass die<br />
Benutzer dieses Produktes am Ende genau so sicher sind<br />
wie diejenigen, die vorher damit gearbeitet haben.<br />
Der dritte Punkt, der für uns Sozialdemokratinnen und<br />
Sozialdemokraten ganz besonders wichtig war, ist die<br />
Verbesserung des Arbeitsschutzes und dass dieser<br />
expressis verbis auch noch einmal hineingeschrieben<br />
wurde. Darauf hat Frau Stihler in ihren Ausführungen<br />
auch großen Wert gelegt. Denn es geht auch darum, dass<br />
bei diesen Bauprodukten häufig mit gefährlichen<br />
Substanzen und Stoffen gearbeitet wird. Dass in diesem<br />
Bereich dafür gesorgt wird, dass der höchstmögliche<br />
Schutz wirklich erreicht wird, ist von außerordentlicher<br />
Wichtigkeit. An diesen Schutz muss dann auch später –<br />
und daran müssen wir wohl noch arbeiten, Herr Tajani –<br />
bei der Entsorgung solcher Produkte, wenn sie nicht<br />
mehr gebraucht werden, gedacht werden.<br />
Ich bedanke mich noch einmal ganz herzlich bei der<br />
Berichterstatterin, die wirklich hervorragende Arbeit<br />
geleistet hat.<br />
1-047<br />
Heide Rühle, im Namen der Verts/ALE-Fraktion. – Frau<br />
Präsidentin, auch mein Dank gilt Frau Stihler und allen<br />
Schattenberichterstattern. Ich glaube, wir haben in dieser<br />
zweiten Lesung einen guten Kompromiss hinbekommen,<br />
auch wenn – wie immer bei Kompromissen – natürlich<br />
nicht alle Seiten zufrieden sind.<br />
Ich möchte ausdrücklich die Anmerkungen von Herrn<br />
Prof. Meyer aufgreifen, die Herr Schwab zum Ausdruck<br />
gebracht hat. Ich glaube, bei der Kennzeichnung müssen<br />
wir noch nacharbeiten. Wir haben jetzt eine gute<br />
Harmonisierung der Bauprodukte, d.h. der Erstellung der<br />
Bauprodukte. Aber wo wir nacharbeiten müssen, ist<br />
beim Einbau, bei der Verwendung der Bauprodukte.<br />
Eine Möglichkeit ist es, dass die Kommission hier im<br />
Bereich der Eurocodes weiterarbeitet und es dann hier<br />
auch ein Mandat im Bereich der Eurocodes gibt, um zu<br />
einer Weiterentwicklung zu kommen.<br />
Die andere Möglichkeit ist, dass wir zu einer<br />
Harmonisierung des Verwendungsbereichs und des<br />
Anwendungsbereichs kommen, damit wir hier nicht<br />
wieder zurückfallen auf die nationale Ebene und eine<br />
Europäisierung nur im Bereich der Produkte selbst<br />
haben, aber nicht im Verwendungsbereich. Hier müssen<br />
wir nacharbeiten, und da hat die Kommission auch<br />
unsere volle Unterstützung, wenn sie zu weiteren<br />
Maßnahmen kommt.<br />
Ich möchte noch einen weiteren Punkt erwähnen, der<br />
wichtig war bei der Auseinandersetzung, ob wir<br />
zustimmen oder nicht. Es gab in den Verhandlungen<br />
leider einen Fehler der belgischen Ratspräsidentschaft.<br />
Die belgische Ratspräsidentschaft hat in der zweiten<br />
Lesung nach der ersten Lesung neue Bereiche eingeführt<br />
– Artikel 8.3 und Artikel 8.6 – ohne dass das Parlament<br />
seine volle Zustimmung gegeben hat. Nun hat die<br />
ungarische Ratspräsidentschaft dies in einem Brief<br />
aufgegriffen. Allerdings glaube ich nicht, dass die<br />
ungarische Ratspräsidentschaft den Konflikt wirklich<br />
verstanden hat. Ich möchte noch einmal darauf<br />
hinweisen, dass ich erwarte, dass der Rat künftig, wenn<br />
er in der zweiten Lesung neue Punkte einbringt, wirklich<br />
auf das Parlament zugeht und versucht, mit dem<br />
Parlament einen guten Kompromiss zu erzielen.<br />
Dennoch sind wir angesichts des Ergebnisses der<br />
Meinung, dass es keinen Sinn hat, wegen eines solchen<br />
Formfehlers diesen Kompromiss abzulehnen. Wir<br />
stimmen diesem Kompromiss zu, weil wir glauben, dass<br />
das ein wichtiger Schritt zu einer weiteren<br />
Harmonisierung des Sektors ist, und der Sektor hat eine<br />
große wirtschaftliche Bedeutung. Deshalb also unsere<br />
Zustimmung zu dieser zweiten Lesung.<br />
1-048<br />
Emma McClarkin, on behalf of the ECR Group. –<br />
Madam President, I would like to thank Mrs Stihler for<br />
her hard work. It has been a very long road.<br />
In Europe today, the construction sector directly<br />
employs 12 million EU citizens. In addition,<br />
approximately 92% of the manufacturers of construction<br />
materials are small and medium-sized enterprises – this<br />
amounts to over 65 000 individual businesses. Clearly,<br />
the construction sector is vital for the European<br />
economy, and we have a responsibility to the industry to<br />
help support it, especially after the economic crisis.<br />
There are many aspects of this report which produced<br />
something of a stalemate between many of us, such as<br />
the nature of EU legislation. It is not perfect, it is a<br />
compromise. Key issues included the declaration of<br />
performance or CE marking, where a successful<br />
agreement was made to ensure micro-enterprises do not<br />
face the same burdens as larger companies. On tackling
26 17-01-2011<br />
and identifying hazardous substances in construction<br />
products, we managed to broker a compromise ensuring<br />
no conflict with existing REACH regulations.<br />
I hope that this second-reading agreement will have real<br />
results and will encourage the free movement of<br />
construction products, improve standards across the EU<br />
and promote the recycling of construction products in<br />
future whilst, most importantly, not increasing<br />
bureaucratic burdens on businesses or confusing<br />
consumers.<br />
1-049<br />
Lara Comi (PPE). – Signora Presidente, onorevoli<br />
colleghi, accolgo con favore il compromesso raggiunto<br />
in relazione ad alcuni punti specifici che giudico di<br />
vitale importanza, in vista di un'efficace realizzazione<br />
degli obiettivi che con tale proposta legislativa ci<br />
proponiamo di raggiungere.<br />
Mi riferisco alla conservazione delle norme sulle<br />
procedure semplificate, volte sicuramente ad alleggerire<br />
gli oneri e a ridurre i costi sostenuti dalle imprese, specie<br />
per quanto riguarda le piccole e medie imprese. Ritengo<br />
infatti indispensabile, nel quadro di una congiuntura<br />
economica negativa come quella attuale, riconoscere<br />
l'importanza del ruolo rivestito dalle piccole e medie<br />
imprese, che costituiscono uno dei pilastri fondamentali<br />
su cui poggia la nostra economia.<br />
Inoltre, attraverso l'introduzione di meccanismi<br />
procedurali semplificati e in particolar modo con la<br />
riduzione dei tempi per l'immissione di nuovi prodotti<br />
sul mercato, la nuova regolamentazione favorisce<br />
sicuramente l'innovazione. Al tempo stesso, tutela i<br />
consumatori, ponendoli in condizione di beneficiare più<br />
tempestivamente di prodotti dal carattere innovativo<br />
senza perciò rinunciare alle garanzie di qualità e<br />
sicurezza che devono essere assicurate dal marchio CE.<br />
A mio avviso, quindi, l'accordo raggiunto rappresenta un<br />
ottimo compromesso capace di realizzare il giusto<br />
bilanciamento tra le esigenze dei produttori e quelle dei<br />
consumatori e di garantire così il corretto funzionamento<br />
del mercato in un settore che è veramente il traino della<br />
nostra economia europea.<br />
1-050<br />
Συλβάνα Ράπτη (S&D). – Κυρία Πρόεδρε, ευχαριστώ<br />
πάρα πολύ την κυρία Stihler για την εξαιρετική δουλειά<br />
που έκανε. Μιλήσαμε όλοι για ένα τεχνικό θέμα. Και<br />
ευτυχώς η κυρία Gebhardt, εκ μέρους της Σοσιαλιστικής<br />
Ομάδας, υπογράμμισε ότι το θέμα δεν είναι μόνο<br />
τεχνικό, αλλά είναι και άκρως πολιτικό και οικονομικό.<br />
Γνωρίζουμε όλοι ότι η οικοδομή είναι βασικός πυλώνας<br />
της οικονομίας. Γνωρίζουμε όλοι ότι οι μικρομεσαίες<br />
επιχειρήσεις είναι η σπονδυλική στήλη της οικονομίας<br />
μας, μιας οικονομίας στο πλαίσιο της Ευρωπαϊκής<br />
Ένωσης που βρίσκεται σε εξαιρετικά δύσκολη<br />
κατάσταση. Άρα λοιπόν, η έκθεση της κυρίας Stihler<br />
είχε μία έντονη πολιτική σημασία. Και τα κατάφερε<br />
περίφημα!<br />
Καταφέραμε και πετύχαμε ένα συμβιβασμό, ένα καλό<br />
συμβιβασμό για όλους. Καταφέραμε να βρούμε την<br />
ισορροπία εκείνη που θα μας δώσει απλές διαδικασίες,<br />
τις οποίες θα μπορούν να εφαρμόσουν χωρίς εκπτώσεις<br />
στην ποιότητα οι μικρομεσαίες επιχειρήσεις, και,<br />
ταυτοχρόνως, το μέγιστο δυνατό καλό αποτέλεσμα.<br />
Καταφέραμε να χτυπήσουμε την υπόθεση των<br />
επικίνδυνων ουσιών. Όλοι θυμόμαστε - και οι<br />
παλαιότεροι εμού εδώ θυμούνται πάρα πολύ καλά - την<br />
υπόθεση της μόλυνσης με αμίαντο του κτηρίου<br />
Berlaymont, που είχε κλείσει για πέντε ή έξι χρόνια. Για<br />
φανταστείτε τι θα γινόταν σε ολόκληρες πολιτείες μέσα<br />
στην Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση εάν δεν θα μπορούσαμε να<br />
χειριστούμε το θέμα των επικίνδυνων ουσιών.<br />
Έχουμε, τέλος, μπροστά μας ακόμη το θέμα της<br />
ασφάλειας και της διαφάνειας. Και εδώ νομίζω ότι τα<br />
κατάφερε περίφημα η κυρία Stihler στην έκθεσή της και<br />
στο συμβιβασμό που επιτεύχθηκε.<br />
Κλείνοντας, κυρία Πρόεδρε, θα ήθελα να ευχηθώ, όσο<br />
καλά τα καταφέραμε στην οικοδομή, άλλο τόσο καλά να<br />
μπορέσουμε να τα καταφέρουμε στην οικοδόμηση της<br />
ευρωπαϊκής Πολιτείας.<br />
1-051<br />
Malcolm Harbour (ECR). – Madam President, as chair<br />
of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer<br />
Protection, I want to associate myself very much with<br />
many of the remarks – in fact all the remarks, I think –<br />
that people have made on the work that Catherine Stihler<br />
has done. I think that taking over a complex dossier for a<br />
second reading and coming into our committee to do that<br />
has been a tough task which she has done extremely<br />
well.<br />
I would remark that it shows the importance of the<br />
second-reading procedure in this House, because we<br />
have been able to make significant improvements to the<br />
text of the position that we received from the Council.<br />
As Mrs Rühle in particular pointed out, we had some<br />
disagreements with them. We have a letter from the<br />
Hungarian Presidency on some of the detailed issues<br />
which will be published with the Minutes.<br />
I just want to make two concluding remarks in endorsing<br />
this agreement. The first is to say to you, Commissioner,<br />
in thanking you for your work with us, that we need to<br />
work very closely with you on the implementation of<br />
this proposal. As you pointed out, there are important<br />
aspects of comitology here and my committee is<br />
absolutely behind the need to follow up these proposals<br />
very seriously.<br />
Secondly, I think that this is an absolutely crucial sector<br />
and we do need to keep it under review, as many<br />
colleagues have said, to make sure that there are in effect<br />
no market barriers put in place that are going to stop it<br />
contributing vitally to the European economy.<br />
1-052<br />
Zuzana Roithová (PPE). – Já jsem velice spokojená s<br />
textem stavební směrnice, který dojednali zpravodajové
17-01-2011 27<br />
se vstřícnými komisaři Tajanim a Barnierem, pro dnešní<br />
druhé čtení. Díky tomu by se trh se stavebními výrobky<br />
měl zjednodušit. Sjednotí se nadšení, zjednoduší<br />
dokumentace a zruší různé zbytečné byrokratické<br />
praktiky. Zvláště vítám, že konečně zvítězil i názor, že<br />
budování staveb je poskytování stavebních služeb, a<br />
nikoli uvádění výrobků na trh, a že stavební činnost<br />
zahrnuje i případné nesériově vyrobené komponenty<br />
zabudované do staveb. Také firmy v České republice<br />
tuto malou reformu opravdu ocení, protože stará<br />
směrnice jim zvyšovala náklady, aniž by to mělo vliv na<br />
lepší kvalitu. Můj výbor IMCO se sjednotil a text přijal<br />
jednoznačně, a to i pokud jde o zjednodušení pro<br />
mikropodniky. A já věřím, že zítra tak učiní celý<br />
Parlament. Bude to další důkaz o zlepšování právního<br />
prostřední v Evropské unii směrem, který podporuje<br />
jednotný trh.<br />
1-053<br />
Anja Weisgerber (PPE). – Frau Präsidentin! Die<br />
Einigung hat mich nicht in allen Punkten überzeugt, aber<br />
ich weiß, dass die neue Verordnung im Vergleich zur<br />
derzeitigen Rechtslage eine deutliche Verbesserung<br />
darstellt. Denn erstmals bekommen wir eine einheitlich<br />
europäische technische Sprache für Leistungen von<br />
Bauprodukten und gestraffte und vereinfachte<br />
Verfahren. Wir haben den europäischen Binnenmarkt<br />
vorangebracht und damit den Firmen, aber durch<br />
einheitliche Sicherheitsanforderungen auch den<br />
Verbrauchern genutzt. Grundsätzlich halte ich<br />
Erleichterungen für Kleinstunternehmen von bürokratischen<br />
Vorschriften für wichtig und sinnvoll. Aber<br />
man muss auch berücksichtigen, dass aufseiten der<br />
Anwender auch Kleinstunternehmen tätig sind, die<br />
Bauprodukte verarbeiten, und diese müssen ebenso<br />
geschützt werden.<br />
Daher freue ich mich, dass mein Vorschlag in der<br />
Einigung angenommen wurde. Danach gelten für<br />
Kleinstunternehmen bei der Bewertung von Leistungsmerkmalen<br />
der Bauprodukte vereinfachte Verfahren.<br />
Wenden sie allerdings solch ein Verfahren an, so müssen<br />
sie die Gleichwertigkeit der angewandten Verfahren mit<br />
dem eigentlich europaweit vorgesehenen Verfahren<br />
nachweisen. Nur so gewährleisten wir, dass die Angaben<br />
zu Leistungsmerkmalen auch exakt und zuverlässig sind<br />
und dass auch die Sicherheit von Gebäuden in ganz<br />
<strong>Europa</strong> gewährleistet ist.<br />
1-054<br />
Antonio Tajani, Vicepresidente della Commissione. −<br />
Signor Presidente, onorevoli deputati, condivido le<br />
parole del presidente Harbour quando sottolinea<br />
l'importanza del testo che stiamo discutendo e che sarà<br />
approvato grazie a questo accordo dall'Assemblea,<br />
perché si tratta di una nuova normativa che darà<br />
importanti segnali al mercato ma, nello stesso tempo,<br />
fisserà delle buone regole, permettendo alle piccole e<br />
medie imprese di potersi sviluppare, soprattutto in<br />
questa fase finale della crisi, dove noi dobbiamo fare di<br />
tutto perché le piccole e medie imprese possano creare<br />
nuova occupazione e possano svilupparsi. Questo è<br />
l'obiettivo della Commissione europea, condiviso<br />
dall'impegno forte del Parlamento europeo, proprio<br />
grazie anche all'implementazione e allo sviluppo dello<br />
"Small business act".<br />
Semplificazione per le piccole e medie imprese, quindi<br />
riduzione degli impegni burocratici, ma, nel disegnare<br />
queste regole per la liberalizzazione del mercato e per lo<br />
sviluppo del mercato – come ha sostenuto nel corso del<br />
suo intervento anche l'on. Gebhardt – c'è un forte<br />
segnale che riguarda anche la sicurezza, sicurezza che<br />
riveste grande importanza per i lavoratori che operano<br />
nel settore delle costruzioni, ma anche per i consumatori.<br />
Mi pare che questo testo vada nella giusta direzione,<br />
fermo restando che è intenzione della Commissione non<br />
concludere con l'approvazione della norma frutto<br />
dell'accordo e del compromesso tra Consiglio e<br />
Parlamento: vogliamo continuare a lavorare nei prossimi<br />
anni e confermo questo impegno anche al presidente<br />
Harbour – che ha sottolineato la necessità di andare<br />
avanti – di dar vita ad una road map<br />
sull'implementazione che vi invierò appena possibile.<br />
Molti parlamentari nel corso di questo dibattito sono<br />
intervenuti sul tema dell'armonizzazione nel settore delle<br />
costruzioni, in modo particolare per quanto riguarda la<br />
sicurezza. Sono assolutamente cosciente e consapevole<br />
del problema e sono lieto di avere elaborato con il CEN<br />
gli Eurocodici, che sono norme armonizzate che<br />
riguardano proprio la sicurezza delle costruzioni. La<br />
Commissione, come sapete, sta preparando in questo<br />
momento una comunicazione sul tema della<br />
standardizzazione, che sarà presentata nel giro di poche<br />
settimane all'attenzione del Parlamento e del Consiglio,<br />
quindi signor Presidente, onorevoli deputati, credo che<br />
oggi e domani si compia un importante passo in avanti.<br />
Ripeto, non si tratta soltanto – e voglio ringraziare la<br />
relatrice per la pazienza avuta nell'operare su norme<br />
tecniche che però rappresentano la fotografia di un forte<br />
impegno politico – di norme tecniche, ma dietro ai<br />
tecnicismi si nasconde una scelta economica importante<br />
a favore delle piccole e medie imprese, che sono quelle<br />
che potranno creare nuovi posti di lavoro nei prossimi<br />
anni, e a favore di mezzo miliardo di cittadini europei.<br />
1-055<br />
Catherine Stihler, rapporteur. − Madam President,<br />
thank you to all colleagues who have taken the time to<br />
speak this afternoon and evening.<br />
I think Commissioner Tajani’s comments about<br />
partnership working, the roadmap and the issue of<br />
Eurocodes, which Mrs Rühle and (I think) Mr Schwab<br />
also mentioned, are important and that we take forward<br />
the good cooperation that we have had. It is a<br />
compromise that we have reached and there are some<br />
things colleagues might have liked in this compromise<br />
that we did not manage to get in, but Parliament<br />
managed to secure 75% of the amendments that we<br />
thought were important within this text, and that is no<br />
mean feat.
28 17-01-2011<br />
There is something that struck me throughout this<br />
debate. The construction sector is so vitally important to<br />
our economies for future growth, for jobs, that I would<br />
like to ask the President whether we can make sure there<br />
is an annual debate in this House on the construction<br />
sector, to take forward the cooperation that the<br />
Commissioner has offered to us and to make sure that<br />
we always place the importance on the construction<br />
sector that this House should do, given that 38 million<br />
people rely on the construction sector for their jobs.<br />
So, thank you, Madam President, thank you,<br />
Commissioner, and I look forward to the weeks, months<br />
and years ahead because the construction debate will<br />
continue in the Committee on the Internal Market and<br />
Consumer Protection and I for one will certainly be<br />
following it.<br />
1-056<br />
Πρόεδρος. – Η συζήτηση έληξε.<br />
Η ψηφοφορία θα διεξαχθεί την Τρίτη 18 Ιανουαρίου<br />
2011.<br />
Γραπτές δηλώσεις (άρθρο 149)<br />
1-057<br />
George Becali (NI), în scris. – Vreau să o felicit pe<br />
doamna raportor pentru conţinutul raportului său.<br />
Construcţiile reprezintă un domeniu în egală măsură<br />
sensibil şi important al economiei europene şi avem<br />
nevoie de armonizare. Spun sensibil nu doar din<br />
perspectiva modului în care acest sector a reacţionat la<br />
criză, ci mai ales din cea a numărului mare de lucrători,<br />
12 milioane, şi de IMM-ri, circa 65 000. Susţin puternic<br />
ideea că trebuie să recunoaştem pentru construcţii<br />
necesitatea unui nivel ridicat de siguranţă şi de sănătate a<br />
muncii. Mă refer în mod egal şi clar la accidentele de<br />
muncă, destul de frecvente, dar şi la substanţele<br />
periculoase utilizate în proces. În încheiere, adaug un<br />
singur lucru: piaţa unică în domeniul construcţiilor are<br />
nevoie de sprijin potrivit importanţei şi specificităţii<br />
sale, dar şi pentru aspectele sensibile de care vorbeam la<br />
începutul intervenţiei mele.<br />
1-058<br />
13 - Συνέπειες στην Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση από<br />
τον εντοπισμό διοξίνης σε ζωοτροφές<br />
(συζήτηση)<br />
1-059<br />
Πρόεδρος. – Το επόμενο σημείο είναι η δήλωση της<br />
Επιτροπής σχετικά με τις συνέπειες στην Ευρωπαϊκή<br />
Ένωση από τον εντοπισμό διοξίνης σε ζωοτροφές.<br />
1-060<br />
John Dalli, Member of the Commission. − Madam<br />
President, as you are well aware, the New Year started<br />
with a serious incident of dioxin contamination of<br />
animal feed in Germany. The Commission services have<br />
been monitoring developments closely and in full<br />
cooperation with the competent German authorities.<br />
I have already started considering possible measures<br />
which will ensure that our high-level food and feed<br />
safety system will become even more efficient. But let<br />
me start with the facts of the incident first: the incident<br />
came to light when a compound feed manufacturer<br />
notified the German competent authorities on 22<br />
December 2010 after having received the analytical<br />
result from a laboratory that a sample was found to be<br />
non-compliant with EU legislation after self-controlled<br />
tests.<br />
Between the middle of November and middle of<br />
December of last year a biodiesel manufacturer<br />
delivered seven consignments of fatty acids intended for<br />
technical purposes to a feed fat manufacturer who also<br />
produces fats for technical use. This latter company was<br />
at the same time a registered feed fat manufacturer;<br />
apparently blending of feed grade fat and technical fat<br />
took place. Four of these consignments delivered in the<br />
second half of November were later found to be<br />
contaminated with dioxins. The other three delivered to<br />
feed mills in the first half of December 2010 were not<br />
contaminated.<br />
However, until this was verified and for purely<br />
precautionary reasons, all consignments were regarded<br />
and treated as potentially contaminated. A total of<br />
almost 2 300 tonnes of potentially contaminated feed fat<br />
was delivered to 25 feed manufacturers in Germany. No<br />
deliveries of feed fat were made outside of Germany.<br />
Between 100 000 and 200 000 tonnes of feed containing<br />
2% to 10% of the potentially contaminated fat were<br />
delivered to about 4 800 farms in Germany. As a strictly<br />
precautionary measure all farms were blocked; their<br />
commercial activities suspended; there were laying hen,<br />
fattening poultry, goose, pig, dairy cattle, bovine and<br />
rabbit farms. Some deliveries of potentially<br />
contaminated feed for breeding hens were also made to<br />
France and Denmark.<br />
No food of animal origin from the blocked farms can be<br />
placed on the market until the farms are unblocked. This<br />
can only happen after it is ensured through analytical<br />
results and investigations that the farms are not<br />
contaminated at levels above those provided by the EU<br />
law. Currently, of these 4 800 farms that were originally<br />
blocked, 939 farms – mostly poultry and pig<br />
establishments – remain blocked. It appears that no<br />
contaminated food was traded or exported from<br />
Germany since the incident was notified, with a few<br />
exceptions.<br />
In the end, analytical results showed that the products<br />
were compliant with EU legislation. This is an example<br />
of the effectiveness of the EU’s traceability system and<br />
we will continue to be vigilant in this respect.<br />
The fortunate element of this incident is that the<br />
observed levels of dioxin in food where EU limits were<br />
exceeded have not been very high, which means that no<br />
immediate health risk for the consumer is expected as a
17-01-2011 29<br />
result of the consumption, if any, of the contaminated<br />
products during a short period of time.<br />
What has the Commission done to help manage the<br />
incident? My services have been in constant contact with<br />
the German authorities and they immediately<br />
disseminated all information to Member States through<br />
the Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed. They have<br />
also been in touch with the competent authorities in third<br />
countries, providing a clear picture of the incident to our<br />
trade partners. Moreover, Commission officials met with<br />
stakeholders in the fats and oils industries to explore<br />
ways of further strengthening the monitoring of dioxin<br />
in feed.<br />
I personally contacted the German Federal Minister for<br />
Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection, Ilse Aigner,<br />
on 6 January, and we exchanged views on what needs to<br />
be done to avoid similar contamination and incidents in<br />
the future. Today, I again contacted the German<br />
Minister, as I was concerned by the recent news from<br />
last weekend that a feed manufacturer did not provide a<br />
full list of farms which received potentially<br />
contaminated feed, and provided incorrect information<br />
as regards the use of contaminated feed fat in compound<br />
feed, resulting in an additional blocking of several<br />
hundred farms.<br />
This concerns a very serious infringement of EU food<br />
safety provisions. Let me say it clearly: the German<br />
authorities are fully engaged in dealing with this<br />
contamination and are doing their best to deal with it<br />
urgently and decisively.<br />
I am informed that they are making available additional<br />
capacity for testing so that this is done and finished in<br />
the shortest possible time. However, it is important that<br />
the wider implications for the approach towards the<br />
safety of animal feed at EU level are also urgently<br />
addressed. For this reason, a team from the Food and<br />
Veterinary Office will visit Germany next week to assist<br />
the German authorities and to inform our overall<br />
knowledge and understanding of how this contamination<br />
happened and how it can be avoided in the future. The<br />
German authorities are informed and have agreed to this<br />
visit. I know that we can count on the full cooperation of<br />
our German colleagues.<br />
This incident will also be discussed during the<br />
Agricultural Council which will take place in Brussels<br />
next Monday 24 January. As I have already mentioned,<br />
we are reflecting on measures including legislative ones.<br />
The incident has highlighted the necessity to ensure the<br />
effectiveness of national control systems which underpin<br />
the confidence of all EU Member States and third<br />
countries in our food and feed safety measures. In order<br />
to address this issue, I am exploring the possibility of<br />
establishing a strict segregation of the production of fats<br />
and oils intended for feed and food purposes from the<br />
production of fats and oils for technical uses, and I am<br />
considering the possibility of legal requirements on<br />
reinforced controls on dioxins at different stages of the<br />
feed chains.<br />
I am confident that these measures when endorsed and<br />
adopted will bring the necessary improvements to our<br />
already solid food and feed safety systems.<br />
1-061<br />
Albert Deß, im Namen der PPE-Fraktion. – Frau<br />
Präsidentin, Herr Kommissar! Vielen Dank, Herr<br />
Kommissar, für die sachliche Darstellung dieses Dioxin-<br />
Skandals in Deutschland. Mich macht es wütend, auch<br />
als Landwirt, dass wir uns immer wieder mit solchen<br />
Skandalen befassen müssen, bei denen die Ursache<br />
anscheinend in Schlamperei, aber auch in krimineller<br />
Energie liegt. Wir können noch so viele Gesetze und<br />
Verordnungen auf den Weg bringen – wir haben in<br />
<strong>Europa</strong> mit die strengsten Gesetze zur Produktion von<br />
Lebens- und Nahrungsmitteln, wir haben die niedrigsten<br />
Grenzwerte bei Inhaltsstoffen, die die Gesundheit<br />
unserer Verbraucher gefährden könnten –, und trotzdem<br />
sind wir vor solchen Gefahren nicht gefeit.<br />
Deshalb muss es auch eine Forderung sein – und dafür<br />
sind auch die Mitgliedstaaten zuständig –, dass dann,<br />
wenn die Staatsanwaltschaft feststellt, dass kriminelle<br />
Energie im Spiel ist, das Strafmaß massiv erhöht werden<br />
muss. Solche Leute dürfen nicht mit Geldstrafen<br />
davonkommen, hier sind Haftstrafen nwk1. Sie müssen<br />
weggesperrt werden, damit sie solches Unheil nicht<br />
mehr anrichten können.<br />
Ich bin sehr froh, Herr Kommissar, dass Sie den<br />
deutschen Behörden bescheinigt haben – das war auch<br />
mein Eindruck in Deutschland –, dass hier die<br />
entsprechenden Maßnahmen nacheinander ergriffen<br />
worden sind. Es wird in Deutschland zum Teil ein<br />
politisches Theater veranstaltet, das der Sache nicht<br />
gerecht wird. Wir müssen uns alle zusammensetzen und<br />
die strengen Bestimmungen, die wir haben, dort noch<br />
ergänzen, wo es notwendig ist.<br />
Sie haben eine Sache angesprochen, bei der Sie unsere<br />
vollste Unterstützung haben. Auch ich bin dafür – und<br />
ich spreche auch im Namen meiner Fraktion –, dass wir<br />
bei der Produktion von Lebensmitteln und anderen<br />
Produkten eine strenge Trennung einführen, damit<br />
solche Vermischungen nicht erfolgen können. Unsere<br />
Unterstützung haben Sie, Herr Kommissar, wenn es<br />
darum geht, unsere Vorschriften und unsere<br />
Verordnungen noch zu verbessern, damit solche<br />
Skandale in Zukunft noch besser verhindert werden<br />
können.<br />
1-062<br />
Ulrike Rodust, im Namen der S&D-Fraktion. – Frau<br />
Präsidentin! Herr Kommissar, ich bin etwas erstaunt<br />
über Ihre Ausführungen. Ich nehme die Presse –<br />
zumindest in Deutschland – etwas anders wahr. Auch<br />
mich macht es unglaublich wütend, dass es immer<br />
wieder Skandale im Bereich der Lebensmittelsicherheit<br />
gibt. Wir dürfen das nicht zulassen. Mir ist bewusst, dass<br />
Verordnungen und Gesetze allein nicht verhindern<br />
können, dass es kriminelle Machenschaften in diesem
30 17-01-2011<br />
Bereich gibt. Aber wir müssen alles daransetzen, damit<br />
es den Verantwortlichen so schwer wie möglich gemacht<br />
wird. Die Kommission muss die Mitgliedstaaten<br />
auffordern, ihr Strafmaß in diesem Bereich dringend zu<br />
überprüfen. Ein mutwilliger und fahrlässiger Umgang<br />
mit Lebensmitteln und Futtermitteln darf nicht mit<br />
banalen Strafen vergolten werden. Oft ist es doch nur so,<br />
dass Geldstrafen im Vergleich zu dem Gewinn so<br />
niedrig sind, dass sie aus der Portokasse bezahlt werden.<br />
Ganz wichtig ist es außerdem, die Anzahl der staatlichen<br />
Kontrolleure zu erhöhen. Das aktuelle Beispiel in<br />
Deutschland zeigt sehr gut, dass das Prinzip der<br />
Eigenkontrolle große Mängel hat. Ich weise darauf hin,<br />
dass es notwendig ist, dass das Verursacherprinzip in der<br />
gesamten Kette konsequent greift – vom Futtertrog bis<br />
zum Teller. Denn im Futtertrog fängt die Sicherheit<br />
unserer Lebensmittel bereits an.<br />
Es dürfen nicht Unschuldige das kriminelle Verhalten<br />
anderer ausbaden. Bis jetzt ist nicht geklärt, wer für die<br />
Verluste der Landwirte aufgrund des Dioxin-Skandals<br />
aufkommen wird. Die in die Insolvenz gegangenen<br />
Verursacher bestimmt nicht, denn da ist gar kein Geld zu<br />
holen. Das kann nicht sein! Hier sollte über einen<br />
europäischen Topf nachgedacht werden, in den die<br />
Futtermittelhersteller alle einzahlen müssen. Die immer<br />
wieder auftretenden Probleme bei der Lebensmittelsicherheit<br />
machen eines immer wieder deutlich: Wir<br />
müssen für die ganze Prozesskette, sowohl Lebens- als<br />
auch Futtermittel, die komplette Rückverfolgbarkeit<br />
sicherstellen. Hier sind die EU-Verordnung und die<br />
nationalen Gesetze nachzubessern.<br />
1-063<br />
Corinne Lepage, au nom du groupe ALDE. – Madame<br />
la Présidente, Monsieur le Commissaire, nous avons<br />
connu quatre incidents de ce type en dix ans en Europe.<br />
S'il faut se féliciter que notre système d'alerte ait<br />
convenablement fonctionné, la survenance de ce type<br />
d'incident est absolument inacceptable. La santé des<br />
consommateurs européens ne peut pas être la variable<br />
d'ajustement d'un système qui privilégie la réduction des<br />
coûts et qui, effectivement, est un encouragement<br />
indirect lorsque les sanctions sont aussi faibles qu'elles<br />
le sont.<br />
Et pourtant, Monsieur le Commissaire, nous avons<br />
besoin, et vous le savez mieux que quiconque, d'avoir la<br />
confiance de nos concitoyens. Dès lors, quelles actions<br />
envisagez-vous? Vous avez parlé, et je m'en réjouis, il y<br />
a un instant, d'obliger à séparer l'usage de la préparation<br />
des graisses industrielles et des graisses destinées à<br />
l'alimentation. Cela doit être une obligation, Monsieur le<br />
Commissaire, et non pas une simple faculté dans le<br />
processus de fabrication, pour que nous ayons beaucoup<br />
plus de certitudes.<br />
Deuxièmement, il est tout à fait anormal que<br />
l'insolvabilité puisse être ainsi organisée. Quelles actions<br />
peut-on mettre en place, Monsieur le Commissaire, pour<br />
garantir que de tels actes ne restent pas impunis car la<br />
responsabilité est encore le meilleur gardien de la<br />
sécurité?<br />
Et, enfin, en dernier lieu, quelles actions envisagez-vous<br />
de mettre en place pour améliorer la surveillance établie<br />
par les États? Il s'est quand même passé près de trois<br />
semaines entre le moment où ont été livrées ces graisses<br />
et le moment où l'alerte a été donnée. Ce n'est bien<br />
entendu pas du tout la faute de la Commission, mais,<br />
simplement, cela pose problème aux consommateurs<br />
dans l'intervalle. Pensez-vous que nous pouvons<br />
améliorer la situation sur ce point, Monsieur le<br />
Commissaire?<br />
1-064<br />
Martin Häusling, im Namen der Verts/ALE-Fraktion. –<br />
Frau Präsidentin, Herr Kommissar, liebe Kolleginnen<br />
und Kollegen! Man muss feststellen, dass das Vertrauen<br />
der Verbraucher wieder einmal ganz erheblich gestört ist<br />
und die Verbraucher sich natürlich fragen: Was machen<br />
die nationalen Behörden und was macht die EU, um<br />
diesen Giftmischern das Handwerk zu legen? Im<br />
Gegensatz zum Herrn Kommissar glaube ich, dass es<br />
nicht etwa ein Zwischenfall oder ein dummer Zufall war.<br />
Ich glaube, dass mittlerweile ein System dahintersteckt,<br />
dass bestimmte Unternehmen mit dem Verschnitt von<br />
Stoffen, die eigentlich nicht in die Futtermittel gehören,<br />
Millionensummen verdienen und sich letztendlich aus<br />
der Haftung stehlen und Bauern und Verbraucher die<br />
Betroffenen sind.<br />
Ich glaube, an diesem Punkt müssen wir ansetzen, und<br />
man muss sich natürlich auch fragen: Setzt die Kontrolle<br />
an der falschen Stelle an? Es gibt in Deutschland ein<br />
Handvoll Unternehmen, die im Futtermittelbereich mit<br />
Fett arbeiten. Warum setzt man da nicht gezielt in der<br />
Kontrolle an? Warum verlässt man sich auf<br />
Eigenkontrollen und bekommt eher zufällig Werte<br />
geliefert, denen man dann vonseiten der staatlichen<br />
Kontrolle hinterherlaufen muss? Das heißt, wir brauchen<br />
europaweit eine risikobasierte Überwachung, und da<br />
geht die Frage an Sie, Herr Kommissar: Was macht die<br />
EFSA an dieser Stelle? Ist dies ein deutscher Fall, oder<br />
gibt es in <strong>Europa</strong> weitere Fälle, die vielleicht nur nicht<br />
entdeckt sind?<br />
Wir brauchen – ich glaube, darüber herrscht<br />
Einvernehmen – eine Positivliste, was eigentlich in die<br />
Futtermittel hineingehört? Wir brauchen strenge<br />
Zulassungsregeln für die Betriebe, und wir brauchen<br />
eine Haftungspflicht und eine Trennung der<br />
Warenströme. Aber ich glaube, wir brauchen auch – und<br />
das muss man an dieser Stelle wieder sagen – ein<br />
grundsätzliches Umsteuern in vielen Bereichen der<br />
Politik. Denn schlussendlich sollte das Futter der Tiere<br />
vom Acker kommen und nicht aus Industriebetrieben.<br />
Die Bauern müssen wissen, womit sie ihre Tiere füttern,<br />
und die Verbraucher müssen auch wissen, woher das<br />
Futter kommt. Das müssen wir gewährleisten. Da<br />
können und müssen wir bei der Agrarreform ansetzen,<br />
dass wir hier wieder etwas zurückdrehen. Denn<br />
letztendlich trägt die ganze Landwirtschaft den Schaden,
17-01-2011 31<br />
den einige kriminelle Panscher hier anrichten, und das<br />
müssen wir grundsätzlich verhindern!<br />
1-065<br />
James Nicholson, on behalf of the ECR Group. –<br />
Madam President, I sympathise totally with the position<br />
that many German farmers find themselves in at the<br />
present time.<br />
I had this experience about two years ago in Northern<br />
Ireland when we went through a very similar exercise.<br />
The people who really suffered in this were the farmers<br />
who were not actually involved in any way at all. I think<br />
the word ‘criminal’ has been mentioned here and there<br />
are those with criminal intent who have been involved in<br />
this. We have to ask why they do it, and whether they<br />
are doing it to make a lot of extra money, as Mr<br />
Häusling says. If they are, they should be prosecuted for<br />
it.<br />
But we should make it very clear that it is not those who<br />
are producing food that are responsible. It is the<br />
providers of the feed to those who are producing the<br />
food that are responsible. We must take action against<br />
these people to make sure that it does not happen and to<br />
restore consumer confidence. I can well understand why<br />
consumer confidence should be shaken at this moment.<br />
As someone said, this has happened before and it should<br />
not be allowed to happen again. Let us not simply go<br />
wholesale and bring in new legislation. Let us<br />
implement what we have.<br />
1-066<br />
Sabine Wils, im Namen der GUE/NGL-Fraktion. – Frau<br />
Präsidentin! Mahlen, mischen, mogeln – das sind die<br />
drei goldenen „M“ der Futtermittelindustrie in<br />
Deutschland. Seit 1999 gab es allein in Deutschland fünf<br />
Dioxin-Skandale. Futtermittelhersteller und Lebensmittelkonzerne<br />
scheren sich dort offensichtlich nicht um<br />
EU-Richtlinien und nationale Gesetze, wenn es darum<br />
geht, mit billigen Lebensmitteln große Gewinne zu<br />
machen. Der Wettbewerb um Niedrigstpreise im<br />
Lebensmittelmarkt ist hart in Deutschland. Das Futter<br />
für die Massentierhaltung soll daher möglichst billig<br />
sein. Staatliche Kontrollen finden bei den Futter- und<br />
Lebensmittelproduzenten kaum statt. Der Staat hat<br />
zunehmend auf die Eigenkontrolle der Hersteller gesetzt<br />
und qualifiziertes Personal eingespart. Unter diesen<br />
Bedingungen konnten jetzt mit Dioxin kontaminierte<br />
technische Fettabfälle aus der Biodieselherstellung in die<br />
Futter- und Lebensmittelkette gelangen.<br />
Der aktuelle Dioxin-Skandal hätte verhindert werden<br />
können, wenn das Fett auf Dioxine untersucht worden<br />
wäre, bevor es in das Futter gemischt wurde. Dann wäre<br />
die Belastung rechtzeitig aufgefallen. Jetzt werden<br />
wieder unzählige Verbraucherinnen und Verbraucher<br />
zusätzlich mit Dioxinen belastet. 80 % des Dioxins, das<br />
wir aufnehmen, kommt über tierische Lebensmittel –<br />
also über Fleisch, Milch und Eier – in unseren Körper.<br />
Foodwatch fordert zu Recht, dass Futtermittelhersteller<br />
verpflichtet werden müssen, jede Charge einer<br />
Futtermittelzutat auf Dioxine und PCB zu testen, bevor<br />
sie das Futter mischen. Es darf keine einzige Zutat in das<br />
Futter gelangen, die nicht die Grenzwerte einhält.<br />
Hochbelastete Chargen müssen nachweisbar vernichtet<br />
werden. Nur so können weitere Panschereien und<br />
Verdünnungen von Schadstoffen verhindert werden.<br />
Auch die Labore müssen verpflichtet werden,<br />
Grenzwertüberschreitungen bei den staatlichen<br />
Aufsichtsbehörden zu melden. Für Fleisch muss eine<br />
Kennzeichnungspflicht zur Rückverfolgbarkeit<br />
eingeführt werden. Die aktuellen und die bisherigen<br />
Lebensmittelskandale in Deutschland haben gezeigt,<br />
dass staatliche Routinekontrollen bei den Futtermittelherstellern<br />
und den Tierproduzenten unabdingbar<br />
sind. Wie wollen Sie das durchsetzen, Herr Kommissar?<br />
1-067<br />
Peter Liese (PPE). – Frau Präsidentin, Herr Kommissar,<br />
liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen! Verbraucher und<br />
Landwirte müssen vor verantwortungslosen Futtermittel-<br />
und Futterfett-Panschern besser geschützt werden. Ihnen<br />
muss europaweit das Handwerk gelegt werden. Eine<br />
Kollegin sprach gerade nur über Deutschland, aber wir<br />
hatten leider Dioxin-Skandale und ähnliche Skandale in<br />
der Vergangenheit auch in anderen Mitgliedstaaten.<br />
Zunächst hat der Staatsanwalt das Wort, denn hier geht<br />
es um kriminelle Handlungen. Ich hoffe, dass die<br />
deutschen Staatsanwälte und die vielleicht noch<br />
involvierten Organisationen aus anderen Ländern – es<br />
wird ja auch von den Niederlanden als einem Teil der<br />
Kette gesprochen – schneller arbeiten als die<br />
Staatsanwälte in Irland. Dort sind nämlich erst jetzt die<br />
Verantwortlichen für einen Skandal im Jahr 2008<br />
verurteilt worden. Da müssen wir insgesamt schneller<br />
werden.<br />
Ich bitte darum, diesen Skandal – es ist ein Skandal – ins<br />
richtige Verhältnis zu setzen. Die Werte waren maximal<br />
vierfach erhöht. Das ist schlimm, und wir haben aus<br />
guten Gründen einen Vorsorgewert, der nicht<br />
überschritten werden darf. Aber der Vorsorgewert ist<br />
bewusst so gewählt, dass wir erst bei hundertfacher<br />
Überschreitung in die Bereiche kommen, wo im<br />
Tierversuch langfristig Schäden festgestellt wurden. Es<br />
geht also nicht um akute Gefahren, es geht um Vorsorge.<br />
Bei dem Skandal in Belgien 1999 waren die Werte 700mal<br />
so hoch wie der jetzige EU-Grenzwert. Außerdem<br />
haben wir die Dioxinbelastung in der Umwelt seit 1990<br />
durch Maßnahmen der EU – z.B. die Chemikaliengesetzgebung,<br />
verbesserte Standards bei<br />
Müllverbrennungsanlagen usw. – auf ein Zehntel<br />
reduziert. Trotzdem brauchen wir in der<br />
Nahrungsmittelkette Maßnahmen, die europaweit<br />
ergriffen werden müssen. Wir brauchen Dioxin-<br />
Monitoring, wir brauchen eine Trennung der Fette, ich<br />
meine, wir brauchen ein EU-weites Reinheitsgebot für<br />
Futtermittel, und wir brauchen eine bessere Absicherung<br />
der Landwirte, die nichts dafür können, dass es in der<br />
Futtermittelkette immer wieder zu solchen<br />
Schlampereien und kriminellen Machenschaften kommt.<br />
1-068
32 17-01-2011<br />
Capoulas Santos, em nome do Grupo S&D – Senhora<br />
Presidente, nunca é demais repetir que a <strong>Europa</strong> dispõe<br />
de normas mais exigentes do que as que existem em<br />
qualquer outra parte do Mundo no que diz respeito à<br />
qualidade dos produtos alimentares e esta imagem não<br />
pode ser posta em causa. Exigem-no os nossos<br />
consumidores, os mercados para onde exportamos e os<br />
nossos produtores, que fazem um grande esforço em<br />
trabalho e investimento para as respeitar.<br />
Se a contaminação, recentemente ocorrida na Alemanha,<br />
tivesse acontecido em muitas outras partes do mundo,<br />
nunca sequer provavelmente teríamos tido conhecimento<br />
dela. Mas não. Aconteceu na União Europeia. E o que se<br />
passou na Alemanha é inaceitável e deve ser, não só<br />
cabalmente esclarecido, assim como rapidamente<br />
responsabilizados os autores daquilo que parece tratar-se<br />
de um crime e não de um acidente.<br />
Não parece estar ainda totalmente esclarecida a origem<br />
da contaminação e isto causa-me grande estranheza. Não<br />
está claramente definida qual a responsabilidade das<br />
autoridades alemãs sobre eventuais falhas no controlo.<br />
Parece que o conhecimento se deveu a uma<br />
comunicação da empresa e não a um controlo das<br />
autoridades.<br />
Não estão apurados os responsáveis e a gravidade desta<br />
situação exige um esclarecimento objectivo por parte da<br />
Comissão.<br />
1-069<br />
Britta Reimers (ALDE). – Frau Präsidentin, Herr<br />
Kommissar, liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen! Bei dem<br />
jetzigen Dioxin-Vorfall geht es um mehr als nur um<br />
einen Skandal. Hier wird den Menschen <strong>Europa</strong>s ihr<br />
Spiegelbild offenbart. Wie lange schon beklagen wir,<br />
dass in der Landwirtschaft ein extremer Preis- und<br />
Überlebenskampf tobt, angeheizt durch das unersättliche<br />
Verlangen nach immer billigeren Lebensmitteln.<br />
Dieser Kampf ist längst kein einfaches Kräftemessen<br />
mehr, sondern es ist mehr. Und dabei greifen Einzelne<br />
zunehmend häufiger zu immer kriminelleren Mitteln und<br />
Methoden. Hierbei jedoch werden wir alle nur verlieren.<br />
Wir können noch mehr Gesetze und Richtlinien erlassen,<br />
wir können noch mehr Kontrollen mit noch mehr Kosten<br />
durchführen, wir können noch härtere Strafen verhängen<br />
– nichts davon wird gegen die kriminelle Energie eines<br />
solch harten Existenzkampfs ankommen.<br />
Wir müssen endlich die Ursache dieses Übels angehen.<br />
Das Immer-mehr- und Immer-billiger-Wollen, muss<br />
endlich sein Ende finden. Als Landwirtin habe ich die<br />
Ohnmacht gegenüber solchen kriminellen<br />
Machenschaften Einzelner – wie in diesem Fall – nun<br />
direkt vor der Haustür erlebt. Ich habe mit meinen<br />
Berufskollegen gezittert, wer denn nun als nächstes an<br />
der Reihe ist und unschuldig in diesen Sog gezogen<br />
wird.<br />
Deswegen frage ich die Kommission: Was wollen Sie<br />
und ihre Kollegen tun, damit Lebensmittel wieder mehr<br />
Wert erhalten? Ich begrüße Ihre Vorschläge, aber Sie<br />
werden das Hauptproblem nicht lösen.<br />
1-070<br />
Bart Staes (Verts/ALE). – Voorzitter, collega's,<br />
mijnheer de commissaris, dit schandaal geeft me een<br />
echt een déjà-vu-gevoel, want de crisis verloopt<br />
inderdaad bijna identiek als twaalf jaar geleden in<br />
België. Al te veel incidenten toonden de afgelopen tien<br />
jaar aan dat er in de sector van de oliën en de vetten in<br />
de diervoedersector nogal wat actoren rondlopen die<br />
vanuit een gewetenloze hebzucht en op criminele wijze<br />
bereid zijn fraude te plegen, fraude ten nadele van het<br />
inkomen van boeren en boerinnen, fraude ten nadele van<br />
de gezondheid van consumenten. Dat is onaanvaardbaar.<br />
Vandaar dat er dus inderdaad nood is aan een soort<br />
stresstest voor de bestaande wetgeving. Ik hoop dat de<br />
landbouwraad daarop zal ingaan.<br />
Maar er is ook nood aan controle en toezicht. Binnen de<br />
sector is er nogal wat autocontrole. Welnu, op iedere<br />
vorm van autocontrole moeten strengere extra controles<br />
door de nationale overheden worden uitgevoerd. Dat<br />
moet gebeuren in een goede ratio. Ten tweede vind ik<br />
ook dat er meer controle moet komen van het Food &<br />
Veterinary Office in Ierland. Er moet meer controle op<br />
de controle komen. Ik heb gelezen dat er in de afgelopen<br />
tien jaar maar drie missies hebben plaatsgevonden door<br />
het FVO. Dat is te weinig, dat aantal moet omhoog.<br />
Commissaris, wilt u het FVO instructies geven om het<br />
aantal missies ter zake van dioxineproblemen op te<br />
voeren.<br />
1-071<br />
Jaroslav Paška, za skupinu EFD. – Európska únia si za<br />
dlhé roky svojho pôsobenia vytvorila nesmierne bohatú<br />
štruktúru rozličných nariadení a predpisov, ktoré majú<br />
u verejnosti vzbudiť dojem, že Únia dbá o čistotu a<br />
kvalitu našich potravín. Na posilnenie tohto dojmu<br />
zamestnala množstvo všelijakých odborníkov,<br />
kontrolórov, veterinárov a úradníkov a vybudovala<br />
bohaté inštitucionálne zázemie garantujúce akúsi<br />
európsku kvalitu potravín.<br />
No vážení, dnes vidíme, ako to funguje. Európa je<br />
zaplavená ťažko kontaminovanými potravinami a naša<br />
byrokratická mašinéria zjavne nevie, čo s tým. Pre<br />
pochopenie vážnosti situácie si najskôr pripomeňme, čo<br />
nám to kšeftári s potravinami naservírovali.<br />
Vedecká komunita považuje dioxín za najjedovatejšie<br />
chemikálie, ktoré kedy človek vyprodukoval. Sú<br />
karcinogénom najvyššieho stupňa, ale spôsobujú aj<br />
zníženie bunkovej a hormonálnej imunity, zvýšenú<br />
náchylnosť na infekcie, zníženú plodnosť, zvýšenú<br />
potratovosť, dysfunkciu vaječníkov, poruchy pôrodu,<br />
zvýšenú úmrtnosť plodov, poruchy vývoja centrálnej<br />
nervovej sústavy, patologické zmeny steroidných<br />
hormónov a receptorov atď.<br />
Nerozkladajú sa. Hromadia sa v tkanivách živých<br />
organizmov a Svetová zdravotnícka organizácia uvádza,<br />
že ak sa do priameho obehu dostane dioxín s veľkosťou
17-01-2011 33<br />
jedného zrnka ryže, zodpovedá to množstvu ročného<br />
limitu pre milión ľudí.<br />
Dnes sa dodatočne dozvedáme, že nemecká spoločnosť<br />
Harles and Jentzsch obohacovala dioxínmi krmivá pre<br />
zvieratá a od marca 2010 dodala na trh až tri tisíc ton<br />
dioxínmi znečisteného tuku. Podľa súčasných zistení<br />
putovali kontaminované vajcia do Holandska, Veľkej<br />
Británie, mäso do Francúzska a Dánska.<br />
Pýtam sa preto, pán komisár, ako je možné, že podnik,<br />
ktorý dodáva kŕmne zmesi tisícom farmárov, nie je<br />
evidovaný v predpísanom systéme kontroly? Aká je<br />
súčinnosť štátnych inštitúcií v Nemecku, keď sa podniku<br />
umožní vyrábať kŕmne zmesi bez toho, aby bol súčasne<br />
zaevidovaný do systému kontroly? Ako prebiehali<br />
veterinárne kontroly na farmách, keď veterinárni<br />
kontrolóri od marca 2010 do decembra minulého roku<br />
nezistili kontamináciu krmiva? A vážení, ako to je s<br />
likvidáciou týchto potravín? Hovoríme o likvidovaných<br />
vajciach a likvidovanom mäse a čo...<br />
(Rečník bol prerušený predsedajúcou)<br />
1-072<br />
VORSITZ: SILVANA KOCH-MEHRIN<br />
Vizepräsidentin<br />
1-073<br />
Janusz Wojciechowski (ECR). – Pani Przewodnicząca!<br />
Mamy do czynienia ze skandalem, ale skandal to za<br />
mało powiedziane. To jest wielkie zagrożenie życia i<br />
zdrowia dla tysięcy ludzi. Liczę na to, że winni zostaną<br />
ustaleni i właściwie ukarani, ale ta sprawa niech będzie<br />
też powodem do refleksji nad modelem rolnictwa, jaki<br />
nam się wytworzył w Unii Europejskiej. Rolnictwo stało<br />
się przemysłem. Już nie mamy hodowli zwierząt, tylko<br />
produkcję mięsa, mamy wielkie fermy, mamy przemysł<br />
paszowy i zwierzęta karmione paszami, i to z<br />
dioksynami, paszami genetycznie modyfikowanymi,<br />
niezbadanymi do końca, i ten model rolnictwa się nie<br />
sprawdza. To jest model, który nie gwarantuje<br />
bezpieczeństwa żywnościowego.<br />
Wyjściem jest większy szacunek i respekt do takich<br />
gospodarstw, jakie mamy jeszcze w Europie, w Polsce i<br />
w innych krajach – opartych na własnej produkcji pasz.<br />
Powinniśmy to popierać.<br />
1-074<br />
Kartika Tamara Liotard (GUE/NGL). – Commissie,<br />
al in maart 2010 wist het verantwoordelijk bedrijf dat het<br />
producten verkocht met gevaarlijk hoge<br />
dioxineconcentraties. Hoe kan het dat dat bij geen enkele<br />
overheidscontrole is gebleken, zodat er toen al<br />
maatregelen hadden kunnen worden genomen? Zijn de<br />
huidige mechanismen voor controle op onze<br />
voedselveiligheid eigenlijk wel voldoende? Blijkbaar<br />
niet, want dan had deze dioxinecrisis kunnen worden<br />
voorkomen.<br />
Voedselschandalen volgen elkaar op. Niet alleen<br />
dioxinecrises, maar denk ook aan de kloonproducten die<br />
vorig jaar ongezien in onze winkels terechtkwamen.<br />
Regels zijn er genoeg, maar de controle op<br />
voedselveiligheid moet beter en frequenter worden<br />
uitgevoerd en bovendien moeten de uitkomsten van deze<br />
controles openbaar worden. Het gaat hier om de<br />
veiligheid van ons voedsel en om de gezondheid van<br />
onze burgers.<br />
Bovendien roep ik de Commissie op om de gedupeerde<br />
boeren die zonder het te weten hun eigen vee<br />
vergiftigden, te steunen bij schadeclaims tegen de<br />
verantwoordelijke bedrijven.<br />
1-075<br />
John Stuart Agnew (EFD). – Madam President, I<br />
would like to declare an interest: I am a British egg<br />
producer.<br />
The dioxin contamination appears to be a consequence<br />
of the failure to adhere to the more rigorous processing<br />
standards needed for animal feed, as opposed to the less<br />
demanding process used to convert rapeseed to biofuel.<br />
The EU’s enthusiasm for biofuels can therefore have<br />
unintended consequences. In my view, however, this is<br />
not a matter for the EU. It will not be solved by – and<br />
certainly does not need – extra regulation. The Germans<br />
have identified a problem, they have told us about it and<br />
they are taking the necessary steps.<br />
In the UK we have a comprehensive assurance scheme<br />
called the Lion Code. It covers both animal feed<br />
production in the mill and egg production on the farm,<br />
thus ensuring that incidents like this are highly unlikely.<br />
So, if any of you are insistent on top quality eggs, ‘ask<br />
for the Lion’ and British producers will be delighted to<br />
supply you.<br />
1-076<br />
Michel Dantin (PPE). – Madame la Présidente,<br />
Monsieur le Commissaire, je crois qu'il faut d'abord<br />
nous réjouir, car si nous parlons aujourd'hui d'une crise,<br />
c'est parce que notre système a quand même fonctionné.<br />
Nous possédons le système de protection du<br />
consommateur qui se situe au niveau le plus élevé au<br />
monde. Il faut que les consommateurs aient cela à<br />
l'esprit actuellement. Mais le système n'a pas fonctionné<br />
correctement et, avant d'en inventer un autre, je crois<br />
qu'il faut effectivement examiner avec attention<br />
complètement les raisons qui ont conduit à un tel retard<br />
dans la découverte du problème et nous interroger sur les<br />
causes de ce retard.<br />
Mais il faut aussi – me semble-t-il – que nous nous<br />
interrogions sur le pourquoi, au-delà de la dénonciation<br />
de l'acte criminel. Je crois que nous avons engagé le<br />
monde agricole et agroalimentaire dans une course aux<br />
bas coûts, dans une course aux prix les plus bas en<br />
matière de fourniture et nous ne sommes plus à l'abri de<br />
ce genre de déviation avec des comportements qui ne<br />
sont pas qualifiables.<br />
Alors, Monsieur le Commissaire, envisagez-vous un<br />
renforcement des pénalités pour de tels actes? Ma<br />
deuxième question concerne la façon dont nous
34 17-01-2011<br />
apporterons un soutien immédiat – je dis bien<br />
immédiat – aux éleveurs concernés. Car les marges sont<br />
tellement faibles que, si certains n'obtiennent pas des<br />
soutiens très vite, voire des avances sur des sommes qui<br />
leur seront dues un jour, ces éleveurs auront disparu le<br />
jour où la procédure aura abouti suivant une vitesse que<br />
je qualifierais "de normale".<br />
1-077<br />
Franz Obermayr (NI). – Frau Präsidentin! Darf ich die<br />
Frage an meinen Vorredner richten? Er hat gesagt, dass<br />
das System grundsätzlich funktioniert. Mich würde<br />
interessieren, ob er weiß, dass nicht das System<br />
aufgedeckt hat, sondern es Verbraucher waren, die hier<br />
zum Aufdecken beigetragen haben.<br />
Zum Zweiten möchte ich meinen Vorredner hinsichtlich<br />
seines Informationsstandes fragen, ob er auch weiß, dass<br />
es Studien gibt, wonach die Bürger sehr wohl gerne<br />
bereit sind, etwas mehr zu zahlen, wenn sie die<br />
Gewissheit hätten, dass die Produkte aus artgerechter<br />
Haltung kommen und qualitativ hochwertig sind.<br />
1-078<br />
Michel Dantin (PPE). – Madame la Présidente, je pense<br />
que le collègue qui a posé une question avait plus un<br />
commentaire à faire sur une situation qu'une question à<br />
me poser. Évidemment, nous savons que le système a<br />
dérapé. Mais je voudrais souligner, vis-à-vis du<br />
consommateur européen, la sévérité de notre système de<br />
protection. Nous ne pouvons pas laisser dire sans arrêt<br />
que rien n'est fait, alors que nous avons le standard le<br />
plus haut au monde.<br />
1-079<br />
Paolo De Castro (S&D). – Signor Presidente, Signor<br />
Commissario, onorevoli colleghi, ringrazio anch'io<br />
innanzitutto il Commissario John Dalli per essere venuto<br />
oggi in Aula a riferire su questo caso che allarma i<br />
consumatori europei.<br />
La prossima settimana anche la commissione<br />
agricoltura, che mi onoro di presiedere, approfondirà<br />
ulteriormente il dibattito sulle conseguenze di questo<br />
grave episodio. Nonostante l'<strong>Europa</strong> sia molto<br />
impegnata sul fronte della sicurezza alimentare, sono<br />
necessari ulteriori sforzi in tema di trasparenza e<br />
controlli per evitare altri casi di contaminazione<br />
alimentare.<br />
Ricordo che nell'ultimo anno il Parlamento ha approvato<br />
una relazione di iniziativa sulla qualità dei prodotti<br />
agricoli e soprattutto quest'Aula ha approvato in prima<br />
lettura il regolamento sulle informazioni alimentari ai<br />
consumatori, che ha introdotto l'indicazione obbligatoria<br />
in etichetta del luogo di provenienza per i prodotti<br />
agricoli. Un'importante novità che purtroppo, però, ha<br />
avuto una battuta d'arresto l'8 dicembre in Consiglio<br />
Salute. Noi in seconda lettura tenteremo di reintrodurla,<br />
perché si tratta di un importante traguardo di tutela e<br />
trasparenza per i consumatori europei.<br />
Il Parlamento quindi si muove nella giusta direzione,<br />
dimostrando di stare dalla parte dei consumatori.<br />
Auspichiamo anche da parte del Consiglio e della<br />
Commissione un atteggiamento analogo.<br />
1-080<br />
Marit Paulsen (ALDE). – Fru talman, herr<br />
kommissionsledamot! Jag måste hålla med det som flera<br />
av kollegerna redan påpekat, nämligen att den nuvarande<br />
lagstiftningen till stor del fungerar. Det är inte där<br />
problemet ligger. Problemet ligger istället i efterlevnad,<br />
kontroll och sanktionssystem. Sanktionssystemen har vi<br />
på EU-nivå inte rätt att lägga oss i, och vi måste komma<br />
ihåg att om vi skriver lagar utan att det samtidigt finns<br />
sanktionssystem så skriver vi väldigt många lagar rent ut<br />
sagt i vatten, knappast ens på papper. Det fungerar inte.<br />
Men kommissionsledamoten tog upp någonting som är<br />
oerhört viktigt. Jag var föredragande för den förordning<br />
som ligger till grund för foderkontrollerna.<br />
Kommissionsledamoten tog upp frågan om den strikta<br />
åtskillnaden av råvaror för foderindustrin och för<br />
tekniska ändamål, i detta fall fett.<br />
Mitt förslag för tio år sedan var att alla produkter av<br />
tveksamt ursprung skulle färgas. För ärligt talat jag<br />
tycker väldigt, väldigt synd om de bönder som gång på<br />
gång ska drabbas av gift i fodret utan att de kan göra<br />
något.<br />
1-081<br />
Licia Ronzulli (PPE). – Signor Presidente, onorevoli<br />
colleghi, ho voluto essere uno dei firmatari di questa<br />
interrogazione perché ritengo sia fondamentale, dopo<br />
l'incidente avvenuto nelle scorse settimane, aprire un<br />
dibattito sulla sicurezza alimentare.<br />
Quanto sono veramente sani e nutrienti i prodotti che<br />
ogni giorno milioni di cittadini europei consumano?<br />
Siamo realmente certi che i prodotti presenti sulle nostre<br />
tavole sono sicuri? La qualità delle materie prime è<br />
fondamentale per garantire la genuinità del prodotto<br />
finale; un controllo costante, dal campo alla tavola, è<br />
l'unico mezzo per evitare la contaminazione dei prodotti<br />
alimentari e per individuare immediatamente i potenziali<br />
rischi.<br />
Il nuovo incidente tedesco conferma la necessità di<br />
rendere obbligatoria in tutti i prodotti, anche quelli<br />
trasformati, l'indicazione di origine in etichetta, come ha<br />
già sottolineato il collega De Castro. Dobbiamo tutelare<br />
il diritto del consumatore a conoscere la provenienza di<br />
ogni prodotto che sta acquistando e la sicurezza<br />
alimentare dei nostri prodotti può essere garantita<br />
soltanto con una condivisione di responsabilità di tutti<br />
gli operatori.<br />
È vero, già oggi la legislazione europea prevede controlli<br />
e procedure per garantire che il cibo che arriva sulla<br />
nostra tavola sia idoneo al consumo e i rischi di<br />
contaminazione siano ridotti al minimo, ma il nostro<br />
obiettivo deve ora essere quello di contribuire<br />
quotidianamente al miglioramento della qualità degli<br />
stessi.
17-01-2011 35<br />
Sottolineo con orgoglio che domani il parlamento<br />
italiano approverà una legge che estende l'indicazione<br />
del marchio di origine obbligatorio a tutti i prodotti<br />
alimentari oggi privi dello stesso. Finalmente sapremo la<br />
provenienza di prodotti quali carni suine, anche il latte a<br />
lunga conservazione, la frutta, la verdura e alcune bibite<br />
come l'aranciata.<br />
Spero che l'<strong>Europa</strong> prenda spunto da questa legge, io mi<br />
impegnerò attivamente per garantire una più ampia<br />
trasparenza, informazione e tutela dei diritti del<br />
consumatore, strumenti che ritengo fondamentali per<br />
favorire un'alimentazione sana e genuina.<br />
1-082<br />
Marita Ulvskog (S&D). – Fru talman! Den viktiga<br />
frågan nu den är hur vi undviker nya skandaler, nya<br />
risksituationer. Det är bra att kommissionsledamoten<br />
åker till Tyskland och det är självklart att jordbruksrådet<br />
måste diskutera saken. Det hade varit en skandal i sig<br />
om de inte hade gjort det. Det behöver fortfarande göras<br />
saker på det här området. Ja, vi behöver kraftfulla<br />
sanktioner som medlemsländerna förstår att de måste<br />
besluta om.<br />
Framförallt behöver vi ett slut på självkontrollen. För<br />
andra branscher och företag är det fullkomligt självklart<br />
att det är oberoende myndigheter som ska övervaka att<br />
regelverken efterlevs. Men det gäller alltså inte i den<br />
bransch som handlar om att producera födoämnen som<br />
vi människor lever på.<br />
Att skylla på stordrift, lågpriskonkurrens och annat går<br />
helt inte. Som konsumenter vill vi inte äta giftig mat. Vi<br />
måste se till att konsumenterna får veta när de faktiskt<br />
gör det och att de får reda på att de inte ska behöva göra<br />
det.<br />
1-083<br />
Antonyia Parvanova (ALDE). – Madam President, the<br />
December contamination in Germany which we are<br />
discussing today and the blatant breach observed in our<br />
food safety chain not only seriously put at risk the health<br />
of thousands of consumers, but also revealed remaining<br />
weaknesses in our food traceability system. It is indeed<br />
more than worrying that the German authorities, and the<br />
Commission itself, were not able to guarantee that none<br />
of the contaminated raw products, such as eggs, entered<br />
the food chain by being included as ingredients in<br />
processed food.<br />
Traceability is quite often seen as a burden for the food<br />
industry, but it appears crucial when it comes to an<br />
emergency situation such as the one discussed today and<br />
should be considered as a prerequisite in protecting<br />
consumers’ health and safety. I would therefore like to<br />
put two questions to the Commission.<br />
Firstly, can it now be certain and confirm that none of<br />
the contaminated eggs or any single product affected<br />
entered the food chain via their utilisation in processed<br />
foods?<br />
Secondly, does it intend to reinforce traceability and<br />
information measures in order to guarantee an optimal<br />
protection of consumers in future food crises with health<br />
implications?<br />
1-084<br />
Elisabeth Köstinger (PPE). – Frau Präsidentin, sehr<br />
geehrter Herr Kommissar! Die europäischen<br />
Konsumentinnen und Konsumenten sind durch den<br />
deutschen Dioxin-Skandal verunsichert und fordern zu<br />
Recht höchste Sicherheit und lückenlose<br />
Nachvollziehbarkeit in der Lebensmittelerzeugung.<br />
Letztendlich wurde durch fahrlässiges Verhalten von<br />
Futtermittelkonzernen das internationale Ansehen der<br />
Landwirtschaft beschädigt. Die Kommission ist<br />
dringlichst aufgefordert, das Vertrauen in die<br />
europäische Qualitätsproduktion in der Landwirtschaft,<br />
die höchste Standards erfüllt, wiederherzustellen.<br />
Die lückenlose Ermittlung der Verantwortlichen und die<br />
Schadensbegrenzung im deutschen Dioxin-Skandal sind<br />
nur der Anfang. Es müssen rasche und umfassende<br />
Maßnahmen getroffen werden, um solche Praktiken der<br />
Futtermittelhersteller zukünftig zu verhindern. Die<br />
Futtermittelkette ist keine Müllentsorgungsstelle und<br />
Industrieabfallprodukte haben im Tierfutter nichts<br />
verloren. Ich plädiere für schärfere und EU-weit<br />
einheitliche Regeln, vor allem beim Transport. Bereits<br />
eine Verunreinigung von Futtermitteln ist nicht zu<br />
akzeptieren. Unabdingbar ist aber vor allem die<br />
lückenlose und umfassende Kontrolle solcher Konzerne.<br />
Kein Landwirt, der mehrmals jährlich überprüft wird,<br />
kann die derzeit vorherrschende Kontrollpraxis von<br />
Futtermittelkonzernen verstehen. Trotzdem ist<br />
anzumerken, dass der gerade diskutierte Fall durch eine<br />
Eigenanzeige ins Rollen gebracht wurde und die<br />
zuständigen Behörden richtig reagiert haben.<br />
Vor allem gilt es aber, das Augenmerk auf die zu<br />
Unrecht geschädigten Bauern zu richten. Diese brauchen<br />
dringend Unterstützung, denn der entstandene Schaden<br />
darf auf keinen Fall auf sie abgewälzt werden. Tausende<br />
Existenzen sind derzeit bedroht. Am vergangenen<br />
Freitag brach der Erzeugerpreis im Schweinemastbereich<br />
um 23 Cent je Kilogramm ein. Bereits zum<br />
Jahreswechsel hatten die Mäster einen Rückgang von<br />
13 Cent zu verkraften. Verschärft wird die Lage<br />
dadurch, dass in den vergangenen Wochen die<br />
Futterkosten stark gestiegen sind. Hier sind rasche<br />
Lösungen gefordert. Das Vertrauen der Konsumenten in<br />
landwirtschaftliche Produkte darf auf keinen Fall<br />
aufgrund von Profitgier und Fahrlässigkeit verspielt<br />
werden.<br />
1-085<br />
Catherine Stihler (S&D). – Madam President, as we<br />
have heard, dioxin is a dangerous chemical which is<br />
known to cause cancer, and in this instance it entered the<br />
food chain when chemicals meant for use in biofuels<br />
were accidentally used in animal feed.<br />
Some test results from the Agriculture Ministry in<br />
Schleswig-Holstein have shown that the fat in the feed<br />
contained 77 times the approved amount of dioxin. The<br />
Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed is designed to<br />
protect European consumers from exactly these types of
36 17-01-2011<br />
contamination. By the time the alarm was raised,<br />
contaminated products were all over Germany and other<br />
parts of the EU, even in UK quiches, which were<br />
removed from supermarket shelves as a precautionary<br />
measure.<br />
This is not the first dioxin scare. We have had problems<br />
with mozzarella from Italy, pork products in Ireland and<br />
cattle products in Northern Ireland. What we want to<br />
know from the Commission is why this rapid alert<br />
system has again failed to protect consumers, and what<br />
the Commission is going to do to put it right.<br />
1-086<br />
Σπύρος Δανέλλης (S&D). – Κύριε Επίτροπε, δώδεκα<br />
χρόνια μετά το σκάνδαλο διοξινών στις βελγικές<br />
ζωοτροφές, εντοπίστηκαν τώρα διοξίνες σε ζωοτροφές<br />
στη Γερμανία, χώρα με παράδοση στην πειθαρχία και<br />
τους αξιόπιστους θεσμούς. Αυτό σημαίνει ότι το<br />
σύστημα ελέγχων δεν είναι επαρκώς αυστηρό,<br />
στοχευμένο, διαφανές και αντικειμενικό και δεν<br />
συνοδεύεται από επαρκή αντικίνητρα και κυρώσεις. Τα<br />
κενά αυτά πρέπει να καλυφθούν με σοβαρότητα και<br />
ευθύνη έναντι του καταναλωτή, ιδιαίτερα, σε μία εποχή<br />
που η οικονομική κρίση ευνοεί την εξεύρεση αθέμιτων<br />
λύσεων για μείωση του κόστους παραγωγής. Δεν είναι<br />
δυνατόν να περιμένουμε ότι, ιδιαίτερα σε αντίξοες<br />
οικονομικές συνθήκες, τα προβλήματα θα<br />
αυτορρυθμίζονται στη βάση ενός συστήματος ηθικών<br />
αξιών. Και βέβαια, οι καταναλωτές πρέπει να έχουν<br />
άμεση και πλήρη πληροφόρηση για τον κίνδυνο στον<br />
οποίο εκτίθενται.<br />
Η Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση υπερηφανεύεται ότι έχει θεσπίσει<br />
αυστηρούς όρους για τη διασφάλιση της δημόσιας<br />
υγείας, της προστασίας του περιβάλλοντος, της ευζωίας<br />
των ζώων. Θα πρέπει όμως και να διασφαλίσει την<br />
απαρέγκλιτη εφαρμογή τους εάν δεν θέλει η πολιτική<br />
της να περιορισθεί απλώς σε...<br />
(Η Πρόεδρος αφαιρεί το λόγο από τον ομιλητή.)<br />
1-087<br />
Franz Obermayr (NI). – Frau Präsidentin! Vorab: Für<br />
mich ist es keine Fahrlässigkeit, sondern vorsätzlich<br />
kriminell. Was brauchen wir? Wir brauchen ein paar<br />
wichtige Punkte: eine zwingende EU-weite<br />
Kennzeichnungspflicht. Aber nicht nur der<br />
Schlachtungsort, sondern auch der Herkunftsort muss<br />
vermerkt sein. Die Verbraucher werden gegenwärtig<br />
bewusst getäuscht. Die Studien zeigen ganz klar, dass<br />
die Leute gerne Geld ausgeben würden. Nur wollen sie<br />
die Kette, woher das Produkt kommt und woher es auch<br />
wirklich stammt, lückenlos nachvollziehen.<br />
Zweitens: Wir brauchen strengere Kontrollen.<br />
Schließlich waren es eben doch keine Lebensmittelkontrolleure<br />
und auch keine EU-Agentur für<br />
Lebensmittelsicherheit, die die Feststellung getroffen<br />
haben, sondern das Unternehmen selbst.<br />
Drittens brauchen wir eine klare Trennung von<br />
Nahrungsmittelfetten und einer Fettherstellung für<br />
technische Zwecke. Ich halte es da sehr mit Pythagoras,<br />
der es wieder einmal sehr treffend formuliert hat: „Denn<br />
alles, was der Mensch den Tieren antut, kommt letztlich<br />
wieder auf den Menschen zurück.“<br />
1-088<br />
Mairead McGuinness (PPE). – Madam President, in<br />
Ireland two years ago, in December 2008, we had a<br />
problem. I wonder what the Commission has done in the<br />
two years to avoid this current crisis.<br />
I have a specific question: Member State authorities are<br />
crying out for guidelines from the Directorate-General<br />
for Health and Consumers. On the feed hygiene<br />
regulations, they want guidance and a workshop. Will<br />
you please make a commitment tonight to give them<br />
what they are requesting?<br />
I have three other points to make. We need very clearly<br />
to identify the high-risk products, the high-risk<br />
processors and the location and names of the high-risk<br />
producers, and at the very least we need total<br />
segregation of products that are destined for the animal<br />
feed chain and thus for the food chain. It is not rocket<br />
science.<br />
We also need, as others have said, controls along the<br />
way so that we detect those who continue to try and<br />
break the rules to make money. Cutting costs is about<br />
cutting corners. The problem is that it costs Europe<br />
billions; it takes away consumer confidence and ......<br />
(The President cut the speaker off)<br />
1-089<br />
Karin Kadenbach (S&D). – Frau Präsidentin, Herr<br />
Kommissar! Ich bin keine Agrar-Romantikerin, d.h. ich<br />
glaube nicht an die Werbesprüche von den glücklichen<br />
Hühnern und den glücklichen Schweinen, weil ich<br />
tagtäglich etwas anderes erlebe.<br />
Aber ich glaube trotzdem, dass die Verbraucherinnen<br />
und Verbraucher in <strong>Europa</strong> ein Anrecht darauf haben,<br />
Lebensmittel vorzufinden, die sicher sind. Daher die<br />
erste große Forderung: Wir brauchen strenge Kontrollen,<br />
und wir brauchen strenge Strafen. Wir brauchen aber<br />
auch – ich glaube, das hat die heutige Diskussion klar<br />
gezeigt – eine andere Agrarstruktur in <strong>Europa</strong>. Heute<br />
sitzt Kommissar Dalli vor uns, der für die Gesundheit<br />
zuständig ist, und ein bisschen ist er heute derjenige, der<br />
zum Handkuss kommt. Wir müssen auch in Richtung<br />
Agrarreform gerade aus diesem Skandal heraus lernen<br />
und in <strong>Europa</strong> für eine Struktur in der Agrarwirtschaft<br />
sorgen, die auf der einen Seite die Bedürfnisse der<br />
Landwirtschaft und der Landwirte erfüllt, auf der<br />
anderen Seite aber auch die Sicherheit der<br />
Verbraucherinnen und Verbraucher gewährleistet.<br />
Ich würde darum ersuchen, dass wir aus diesem Skandal<br />
wirklich lernen.<br />
1-090<br />
Richard Ashworth (ECR). – Madam President, we<br />
have had a number of incidents like this over the years. I<br />
would have thought that by now the importance of
17-01-2011 37<br />
traceability and quality assurance would be well<br />
understood and that the structures and regulations ought<br />
to be in place to prevent incidents like this.<br />
This raises a number of very serious concerns. Firstly, it<br />
is extremely damaging to consumer confidence in the<br />
food industry and, secondly, it is always the farmers who<br />
are the innocent parties. It is always the farmers who<br />
suffer a disproportionate effect when compared to the<br />
consequences for the food-processing industry.<br />
I am reasonably satisfied that the German authorities,<br />
and the Commissioner and his team, took reasonable,<br />
appropriate and swift action when they were aware that<br />
there was a problem. Nevertheless, a number of very<br />
serious questions arise – questions about the behaviour<br />
of some sectors of the processing industry where,<br />
clearly, more needs to be done by way of prevention,<br />
more needs to be done by way of punitive powers where<br />
the consequence of this action …<br />
(The President cut the speaker off)<br />
1-091<br />
João Ferreira (GUE/NGL). – Senhora Presidente,<br />
Senhor Comissário, a descoberta de produtos<br />
contaminados com dioxinas e a sua disseminação por<br />
diversos circuitos de comercialização constitui um facto<br />
da maior gravidade.<br />
Sem prejuízo de se apurarem cabalmente as<br />
responsabilidades e as consequências deste facto e de se<br />
rastrear o destino dos produtos contaminados, este<br />
incidente convoca-nos a uma reflexão mais profunda<br />
sobre o falhanço de todo o quadro regulamentar<br />
existente.<br />
Aqui está um exemplo das consequências de uma<br />
política agrícola comum orientada para o mercado, que<br />
promove modelos de produção intensiva de cariz<br />
exportador, que favorece a grande agro-indústria e que<br />
aniquila a pequena e média agricultura e a agricultura<br />
familiar. Que inviabiliza em vez de promover, como<br />
seria necessário, a produção e o consumo locais<br />
susceptíveis de garantir uma muito maior<br />
rastreabilidade.<br />
Aqui está mais um exemplo de como também por razões<br />
de saúde pública e de segurança e qualidade alimentar se<br />
impõe uma profunda modificação da actual Política<br />
Agrícola Comum.<br />
1-092<br />
Marc Tarabella (S&D). – Madame la Présidente,<br />
Monsieur le Commissaire, on peut faire état d'un certain<br />
ras-le-bol par rapport à ces crises à répétition, dont une<br />
en Belgique en 1999, très similaire à la crise actuelle et<br />
qui fut une crise à grand échelle.<br />
Très clairement, nous avons les mesures les plus strictes<br />
au monde. Je ne crois pas qu'il convienne de les alourdir.<br />
Il faut simplement les faire mieux fonctionner. Et,<br />
probablement, l'une des premières mesures à adopter<br />
serait le renforcement des sanctions infligées à ces<br />
criminels, car il ne s'agit évidemment pas de la<br />
maladresse d'un lampiste, mais plutôt d'un crime<br />
organisé par des criminels en col blanc, qui veulent<br />
maximiser leur profit.<br />
Deuxièmement, une autre priorité pourrait, semble-t-il,<br />
être de renforcer et de mieux cibler les contrôles en<br />
fonction des risques. Troisièmement, comme<br />
Catherine Stihler l'a dit, le système Rapex, rapid<br />
exchange, qui est normalement de nature à fonctionner<br />
pour que tous les États membres soient avertis d'un<br />
risque potentiel, a probablement manifesté certaines<br />
faiblesses à cet égard.<br />
J'aurais voulu votre opinion à ce sujet, Monsieur le<br />
Commissaire.<br />
1-093<br />
Peter Jahr (PPE). – Frau Präsidentin! Die deutsche<br />
Futtermittelindustrie hat ein gutes System der<br />
Selbstkontrolle. Dieses System funktioniert allerdings<br />
nicht bei krimineller Energie und bei kriminellen<br />
Machenschaften. Wer vorsätzlich oder illegal verbotene<br />
Mittel in Futtermittel beimischt, entzieht sich auch<br />
vorsätzlich dieser Selbstkontrolle.<br />
Für mich gibt es da in Ergänzung zu meinen Kollegen<br />
noch drei wichtige Hauptschlussfolgerungen: Erstens<br />
brauchen wir mehr staatliche Kontrolle. Zweitens<br />
brauchen wir eine lückenlose Meldepflicht von<br />
Futtermitteltestergebnissen, die auch bei entsprechenden<br />
Kontrollen vorgehalten werden müssen. Drittens<br />
brauchen wir für die, die kriminell werden, härtere<br />
Strafen. Das ist kein Kavaliersdelikt, das ist mit Vorsatz<br />
gemacht worden.<br />
Zum Schluss müsste ich noch einmal daran erinnern,<br />
dass in diesem Futtermittelskandal die Landwirte die<br />
Hauptleidtragenden sind, die zurzeit ihre Produkte<br />
überhaupt nicht bzw. nur mit großem Wertverlust<br />
verkaufen können.<br />
1-094<br />
John Dalli, Membru tal-Kummissjoni. − Jiena meta<br />
nisma' dawn il-kummenti, illi għalihom nirringrazzja lil<br />
dawk kollha li ħadu sehem f'dan id-dibattitu, ma jistax<br />
ikun ma nirriflettix fuq il-kritika li jkollna, mhux fuq<br />
hekk biss, imma fuq kważi kull ħaġa li nagħmlu bħala<br />
Ewropa, dwar il-burokrazija żejda illi aħna nimponu fuq<br />
kulħadd meta nagħmlu regolamenti u meta aħna nesiġu<br />
ċerti kontrolli. Ikollna konsumaturi, ikollna imprendituri,<br />
ikollna negozjanti, kulħadd igerger illi qegħdin nimponu<br />
ħafna xkiel biex l-affarijiet jimxu sewwa.<br />
Però meta jinqalgħu każi bħal dan tad-diossina, naraw,<br />
kif qed nisimgħu llum, kemm fil-fatt hemm bżonn illi<br />
jkollna ċerti kontrolli kif għandna in place bħalissa,<br />
kemm huma importanti u kemm jeħtieġ illi nkunu<br />
assidwi fil-mod kif nistgħu aħna nimplimentawhom.<br />
Bħala konsumatur niddejjaq ħafna illi niġi ffaċċjat<br />
b'sitwazzjoni bħal din, illi, bħalkom il-konsumaturi u<br />
bħall-konsumaturi kollha li għandna fl-Ewropa, jheddu<br />
l-konfidenza li għandna fis-safety tal-prodotti Ewropej.<br />
U nirrabja meta nagħraf li dan ikun qed jiġri minħabba
38 17-01-2011<br />
nies li jkunu kisru l-liġi għax iridu jiksru l-liġi, u mhux<br />
xi żball ordinarju.<br />
Fil-fatt, kif għadu kemm qal l-aħħar kelliem li tkellem<br />
illum, ebda sistema ma taħdem fejn hemm il-kriminalità.<br />
Fejn ikollok nies li jridu jiksru l-liġi, ma tistax ikollok<br />
sistema perfetta illi se tiggarantixxi li kollox se jmur<br />
ħarir, li kollox se jmur tajjeb. U għalhekk l-importanti hu<br />
illi nagħmlu minn kollox biex nassiguraw illi għandna xxibka<br />
minsuġa tajjeb, b'toqob mill-aktar irqaq illi<br />
minnhom dawn il-kriminali ma jistgħux jgħaddu.<br />
Jiena, l-esperjenza tiegħi, ilni nagħmel leġiżlazzjoni<br />
f'pajjiżi mill-1987, ili mat-23 sena nagħmel<br />
leġiżlazzjonijiet u, kulmeta nagħmel liġi, dejjem nara li<br />
l-problema kbira mhux il-klawżoli li se tagħmel fil-liġi,<br />
però biex tipprova taħseb kif dik il-liġi se tiġi miksura u<br />
għalhekk x'tista' tagħmel biex tikkontrolla biex ma<br />
tinkisirx. U jiena naħseb issa li aħna qegħdin fil-fatt f'din<br />
il-fażi tar-realtà. Aħna ma rridux illi jerġgħu jiġru dawn<br />
l-affarijiet u rridu nagħmlu minn kollox biex naraw li ssistema<br />
tagħna hija waħda li almenu min se jipprova<br />
jiskappa, min se jipprova ma jaħdimx skont ir-regoli li<br />
għandna u li aħna nagħmlu bejnietna lkoll, naqbduh u<br />
naqbduh mill-aktar fis.<br />
Nistgħu naġixxu meta aħna nkunu nafu b'dak li qed jiġri,<br />
ma tistax taġixxi fl-injoranza ta' dak li qed jiġri. U<br />
għalhekk kumment, pereżempju fuq ir-Rapid Alert<br />
System, jiena ma ngħidx li r-Rapid Alert System ma<br />
ħadmitx - ir-Rapid Alert System ħadmet tajjeb għax issekonda<br />
li konna nafu bl-affarijiet, kulħadd kien<br />
informat b'dak li qed jiġri. Dik hija r-Rapid Alert System,<br />
u b'dak il-mod ħadmet ħafna.<br />
U rridu naraw ukoll li nsaħħu kemm jista' jkun irregolamenti<br />
u r-regolamentazzjoni li għandna. Jien<br />
naqbel, pereżempju, ukoll ma' Ms McGuinness li qalet<br />
dwar l-importanza li nagħtu lill-guidelines u li nesiġu li<br />
dawk l-elementi fil-katina tal-ikel fejn hemm ir-riskju,<br />
nagħmlu l-akbar kontrolli fuq dawn ir-riskji. U għal dan<br />
il-għan, pereżempju, waħda mill-affarijiet li qegħdin<br />
nipprovaw, jew li ser nissuġġerixxu hija li ma nibqgħux<br />
biss f'ċerti elementi ta' riskju, naċċettaw sempliċi<br />
reġistrazzjoni ta' kumpaniji, bħal pereżempju l-feed<br />
mills, imma li jkun hemm approvazzjoni wara li jkunu<br />
saru ċerta due diligence exercises fuq l-applikant kif<br />
ikun.<br />
Irridu wkoll nassiguraw li dak li ġara fil-fatt qiegħed taħt<br />
kontroll. Jiena mal-awtoritajiet kompetenti fil-Ġermanja<br />
qiegħed f'kuntatt kontinwu u jiena sodisfatt li qegħdin<br />
jagħmlu dak kollu li hu possibbli biex, mhux biss<br />
jikkontjenu s-sitwazzjoni kollha malajr kemm jista' jkun,<br />
biex inkunu nafu l-informazzjoni kollha u sħiħa tassitwazzjoni<br />
kemm jista' jkun malajr, però li jieħdu wkoll<br />
azzjoni.<br />
U jiena infurmat pereżempju li dak il-prodottur ta' feed<br />
mill li ta informazzjoni qarrieqa, għaliex kien qal li<br />
ssupplixxa biss għaxar farms meta fil-fatt kien<br />
issupplixxa disa' mija, dan diġà qiegħed taħt proċeduri li<br />
ttieħdu mill-prosekuzzjoni ġewwa l-Ġermanja, għaliex<br />
din kienet informazzjoni ħażina li setgħet ġabet ħafna<br />
konsegwenzi. Aħna wkoll nistgħu nassiguraw li lprodotti<br />
li marru barra mill-Ġermanja, bħal, pereżempju,<br />
bajd, li kien intiż biex ikun jista' jiġi użat ukoll għallmanifattura<br />
tal-ikel, ġie użat fil-manifattura tal-ikel, però<br />
billi kien ukoll imħallat imbagħad ma' prodotti oħrajn li<br />
ma kinux Ġermaniżi, meta ġew ittestjati dawn ilprodotti,<br />
instab li l-livell tad-diossina kien baxx ħafna.<br />
U rrid nagħmel hawnhekk l-aħħar kumment, għax il-ħin<br />
għadda: fil-fatt naqbel ukoll jien li kemm jista' jkun<br />
ikollna sanzjonijiet mill-aktar ħorox kontra min jabbuża.<br />
Wieħed irid jifhem però li dan it-tip ta' miżuri mhumiex<br />
xi ħaġa li nistgħu nagħmluhom aħna bħala<br />
Kummissjoni, jew nistgħu nimponuhom aħna bħala<br />
Kummissjoni, imma huma affarijiet li l-Istati Membri<br />
jridu kemm jista' jkun jinfurzawhom fil-pajjiż tagħhom.<br />
1-095<br />
Die Präsidentin. − Die Aussprache ist geschlossen.<br />
1-096<br />
14 - Abkommen EU/Kamerun über das<br />
Recht im Forstsektor - Abkommen<br />
EU/Republik Kongo über das Recht im<br />
Forstsektor - Freiwillige FLEGT-<br />
Partnerschaftsabkommen (Aussprache)<br />
1-097<br />
Die Präsidentin. − Als nächster Punkt folgt die<br />
Gemeinsame Aussprache<br />
– Forstrecht (Kamerun, Republik Kongo)<br />
– Abkommen EU/Kamerun über das Recht im<br />
Forstsektor<br />
Empfehlung von Yannick Jadot im Namen des<br />
Ausschusses für internationalen Handel (A7-0371/2010)<br />
Empfehlung zu dem Vorschlag für einen Beschluss des<br />
Rates über den Abschluss eines freiwilligen<br />
Partnerschaftsabkommens zwischen der Europäischen<br />
Union und der Republik Kamerun über Rechtsdurchsetzung,<br />
Politikgestaltung und Handel im<br />
Forstsektor sowie über die Einfuhr von Holzprodukten<br />
in die Europäische Union (FLEGT)<br />
[12796/2010 - C7-0339/2010 - 2010/0217(NLE)]<br />
– Abkommen EU/Republik Kongo über das<br />
Recht im Forstsektor<br />
Empfehlung von Yannick Jadot im Namen des<br />
Ausschusses für internationalen Handel (A7-0370/2010)<br />
Empfehlung zu dem Vorschlag für einen Beschluss des<br />
Rates über den Abschluss eines freiwilligen<br />
Partnerschaftsabkommens zwischen der Europäischen<br />
Union und der Republik Kongo über Rechtsdurchsetzung,<br />
Politikgestaltung und Handel im<br />
Forstsektor sowie über die Einfuhr von Holzprodukten<br />
in die Europäische Union (FLEGT)<br />
[10028/2010 - C7-0170/2010 - 2010/0062(NLE)]<br />
– Anfrage zur mündlichen Beantwortung<br />
[2010/3015(RSP)] an die Kommission über FLEGT -<br />
Freiwillige Partnerschaftsabkommen mit Kongo und<br />
Kamerun und weitere geplante freiwillige
17-01-2011 39<br />
Partnerschaftsabkommen von Yannick Jadot, Catherine<br />
Bearder, David Martin, Joe Higgins, Daniel Caspary (O-<br />
0202/2010 - B7-0802/2010) im Namen der<br />
Fraktion der Grünen / Freie Europäische Allianz<br />
Fraktion der Allianz der Liberalen und Demokraten für<br />
<strong>Europa</strong><br />
Fraktion der Progressiven Allianz der Sozialisten und<br />
Demokraten im Europäischen Parlament<br />
Konföderale Fraktion der Vereinigten Europäischen<br />
Linken/Nordische Grüne Linke<br />
Fraktion der Europäischen Volkspartei<br />
(Christdemokraten)<br />
1-098<br />
Yannick Jadot, rapporteur. − Madame la Présidente,<br />
Monsieur le Commissaire, chers collègues, je voudrais<br />
déjà exprimer à tous mes collègues mes remerciements<br />
pour le travail que nous avons mené en commun sur<br />
cette question, qui a permis que l'ensemble des groupes<br />
politiques de ce Parlement ait une position commune et<br />
soit amené à poser une question orale et à rédiger une<br />
résolution qui accompagne les accords de partenariat<br />
volontaire.<br />
Le sujet est d'importance. Vous le savez tous, la forêt<br />
recule. Toutes les deux secondes dans le monde, c'est<br />
l'équivalent d'un terrain de football qui est détruit, c'est<br />
en un an l'équivalent du territoire de la Grèce qui est<br />
déforesté et c'est évidemment dramatique. C'est<br />
dramatique du point de vue de la diversité: ce sont<br />
quelques milliers d'espèces végétales et animales qui<br />
sont mises en danger alors que les forêts les plus<br />
touchées – les forêts tropicales – comprennent la moitié<br />
de la biodiversité terrestre. C'est évidemment dramatique<br />
aussi du point de vue des changements climatiques: la<br />
déforestation contribue à hauteur de 20 % à l'effet de<br />
serre. Enfin, la déforestation met en danger quelques<br />
centaines de millions de personnes qui, soit vivent dans<br />
les forêts, soit vivent de la forêt.<br />
L'exploitation et l'industrie forestières figurent parmi les<br />
principales causes de la déforestation, en particulier,<br />
dans la zone qui nous intéresse aujourd'hui: le bassin du<br />
Congo. On estime que 20 à 40 % du bois coupé et<br />
échangé dans le monde est du bois illégal. La question<br />
que nous évoquons aujourd'hui est donc évidemment<br />
essentielle.<br />
Ces accords de partenariat volontaire ont été approuvés<br />
dans le cadre de la procédure d'approbation au sein de la<br />
commission du commerce international. Cette procédure<br />
permet, grâce au traité de Lisbonne, au Parlement<br />
européen de s'exprimer mais, en même temps, il peut<br />
uniquement dire oui ou non. C'est donc pour cela que ce<br />
débat est extrêmement important, parce qu'il nous<br />
permet de rentrer davantage dans le détail et qu'il vous<br />
permet, Monsieur le Commissaire, en tant que<br />
représentant la Commission, de répondre aux questions<br />
que vous adresse le Parlement.<br />
Ces accords sont importants, ils permettent d'assurer la<br />
traçabilité du bois. Ils mettent aussi en place des<br />
procédures de vérification indépendantes, et<br />
accompagnent les politiques et la gouvernance<br />
forestières dans les pays concernés. Aujourd'hui, nous<br />
parlons du Congo Brazzaville et du Cameroun.<br />
Mais déjà un premier point avant de rentrer dans ces<br />
accords et dans les questions du Parlement: il faut bien<br />
faire la différence entre le bois légal et le bois durable.<br />
Évidemment, nous traitons ici de la légalité du bois mais<br />
qui dit légalité du bois ne dit pas durabilité de<br />
l'exploitation forestière.<br />
Donc, la première question générale que je poserais à la<br />
Commission est: comment la Commission s'engage-telle<br />
à assurer la cohérence globale autour de la question<br />
des forêts – l'année 2011 est l'année internationale des<br />
forêts – en prenant en compte ce qui a été dit à Nagoya,<br />
en prenant en compte ce qui a aussi été décidé à Cancun,<br />
notamment sur le mécanisme REDD-plus et en tenant<br />
compte également des accords commerciaux négociés<br />
qui parfois, en libéralisant le commerce du bois,<br />
participent à la déforestation?<br />
Ensuite, nous attendons toujours une réponse de la<br />
Commission européenne sur la question des<br />
agrocarburants et des changements indirects d'affectation<br />
des sols. Vous savez que le Parlement vous a demandé<br />
d'intégrer ces enjeux dans les critères d'évaluation de<br />
durabilité des agrocarburants.<br />
Concernant plus spécifiquement les accords de<br />
partenariat volontaire, il y a beaucoup d'éléments<br />
positifs: nous avons fortement apprécié le travail de<br />
négociation et, notamment, d'association des acteurs de<br />
la société civile au Cameroun et en République du<br />
Congo; on sait que ce n'est pas facile et de ce point de<br />
vue là, il apparaît que ces accords de partenariat<br />
volontaire sont un succès.<br />
Mais, comme je le disais tout à l'heure, un certain<br />
nombre de questions et de demandes demeurent:<br />
Monsieur le Commissaire, êtes-vous prêt à venir, par<br />
exemple, tous les six mois ou six mois après la signature<br />
d'un accord, nous rendre compte de la mise en œuvre de<br />
l'accord? Parce qu'il est évident que, entre la qualité de<br />
la négociation et la mise en œuvre, il peut y avoir une<br />
grande différence. Nous souhaiterions donc que vous<br />
veniez nous dire si les acteurs, notamment les acteurs de<br />
la société civile, continuent à être associés à la mise en<br />
œuvre. Dans des pays où il n'est pas toujours facile de se<br />
plaindre, notamment quand il y a de la corruption, est-ce<br />
qu'il est prévu des mécanismes de plaintes – notamment<br />
indépendants – qui permettraient à ces acteurs de la<br />
société civile de dénoncer une mauvaise mise en œuvre,<br />
de dire que leur parole n'est plus écoutée? De la même<br />
façon, nous souhaiterions que vous fassiez régulièrement<br />
rapport sur les impacts de la mise en œuvre de ces<br />
accords, pour que vous nous disiez où nous en sommes,<br />
à la fois en termes de cohérence globale de l'action de la<br />
Commission sur les forêts, et en termes de mise en<br />
œuvre spécifique sur la question de la légalité du bois.<br />
Enfin un dernier élément: vous prétendez que, dans ces<br />
accords, il n'y a pas de budget. Or, il va évidemment
40 17-01-2011<br />
falloir des budgets pour accompagner ces politiques,<br />
donc pouvez-vous clarifier la question budgétaire autour<br />
de ces accords de partenariat volontaire?<br />
1-099<br />
Catherine Bearder, author. − Madam President, the<br />
tropical rainforests in Cameroon and the Congo are<br />
precious and we must welcome this voluntary agreement<br />
to address the sustainability of the harvesting of the<br />
timber that they contain.<br />
The forests belong not only to the people of these<br />
countries but they are part of the ecosystem of the<br />
planet, they are key to the life-sustaining systems and<br />
they contain billions of tons of carbon.<br />
Halting deforestation is one of the ways that we should<br />
be tackling climate change, and governments around the<br />
globe have been trying to do this for years. These two<br />
countries should be congratulated for their courage and<br />
foresight in signing up to these voluntary agreements<br />
with the EU.<br />
However, regulating and enforcing these agreements<br />
will prove a challenge. Heaven knows, building in<br />
sustainable management of our own continent’s<br />
resources is hard enough. But the will is there and for<br />
that we should be very pleased. Careful management can<br />
bring down illegal and unsustainably imported timber.<br />
At the moment the amount of timber that is illegally<br />
harvested and imported into the EU constitutes almost<br />
one fifth of the timber products on our markets, despite<br />
Parliament and others trying to tackle this. Enforcement<br />
will be made easier with the involvement of local people<br />
and civil society in these countries, and we must ensure<br />
that their right to be heard and involved is maintained<br />
and listened to. After all, they have the most to lose if<br />
their forests are removed.<br />
The widespread removal of tropical timber is driven by<br />
an insatiable appetite for products to grace our homes.<br />
We should value this resource better and take greater<br />
care of the resource that not only sustains a whole host<br />
of plant and animal species but is slow-growing and<br />
takes many years to reach maturity.<br />
We must take care not to undermine our own efforts to<br />
fight deforestation and climate change by<br />
simultaneously providing the largest market for illegal<br />
timber products in the world.<br />
The result of these agreements may mean that tropical<br />
timber reaches a higher price, and that is something that<br />
we should not object to. It is not only a limited resource,<br />
but it is the only thing that local people have to sell.<br />
They know the true value of their resource and with this<br />
agreement, so will we.<br />
These people are our eyes and ears in the forest and we<br />
need their help to enforce the agreements. They need us<br />
to support their ability to voice any concerns. These<br />
agreements are a two-way process and we look to you,<br />
Commissioner, to be able to enforce it.<br />
The VPAs (Voluntary Partnership Agreements) are good<br />
for the planet, good for our partner countries and good<br />
for the EU. We must ensure that the agreements work<br />
and that any breaches are monitored and addressed.<br />
Then we must look to other countries in Africa, Asia and<br />
South America to sign up to similar agreements as soon<br />
as possible and I look forward to working with you and<br />
the Commission to achieve this.<br />
1-100<br />
David Martin, author. − Madam President, let me begin<br />
by thanking Yannick Jadot for his exemplary<br />
cooperation with his shadows. We all worked extremely<br />
well on this report and I am delighted – as he has said –<br />
that we managed to reach a broad consensus.<br />
The agreements with Congo and Cameroon, taken<br />
together with Ghana, means that some of Africa’s most<br />
vulnerable forests are now covered by Voluntary<br />
Partnership Agreements. The existence of these<br />
agreements, as the two previous speakers have said, is to<br />
be warmly welcomed. They provide a mechanism for<br />
tackling the massive illegal trade in timber. They<br />
provide an opportunity for the better management of a<br />
vital natural resource and, hopefully, they will bring<br />
greater transparency and help us tackle corruption in the<br />
forest sector, which unfortunately in Africa is endemic at<br />
the moment.<br />
But, while welcoming these agreements, I nevertheless<br />
share with the rapporteur a number of concerns. I would<br />
just like to express three this evening.<br />
First and foremost, the danger – it is not the intention,<br />
but there is a danger – of agreeing such a framework is<br />
that it is seen as providing a framework for large-scale<br />
exploitation of our forests, leading to the opposite of the<br />
purpose of the agreement, namely further degradation<br />
and further deforestation, thus contributing to the very<br />
destruction of the global environment we are trying to<br />
avoid. What we want is an agreement that contributes to<br />
the conservation and sustainable management of our<br />
biodiversity resources. I agree with the rapporteur that<br />
this means that the Commission has to constantly<br />
monitor the situation and report back regularly on how<br />
the agreement is progressing.<br />
Secondly, indigenous people, who are so often the<br />
victims of environmental exploitation, should benefit<br />
from this agreement. The promise in the Voluntary<br />
Partnership Agreement by the Congolese Government to<br />
promote a law ensuring that the rights of indigenous<br />
people are promoted and respected must be delivered<br />
upon. Again I urge the Commission, in their contact with<br />
the Government, to continually press for the delivery of<br />
this promise until it is there on the statute book in the<br />
Congo.<br />
Thirdly, we must ensure – and I agree with Catherine<br />
Bearder who mentioned this – that appropriate funds are
17-01-2011 41<br />
available to properly implement this Agreement. No<br />
matter how good an agreement is on paper, without the<br />
resources to carry it out, it is a meaningless piece of<br />
paper. As has been indicated, there are no financial<br />
packages attached to the Agreement itself. It is up to us<br />
– both the Commission to propose, and Parliament and<br />
Council to put into the budget appropriate budgetary<br />
facilities – to make this Agreement work. That means<br />
we need to have money to verify the legality of timber<br />
coming into the European Union, we need money to<br />
train, equip and give the technical expertise to those<br />
operating in the African countries we have VPAs with,<br />
and we also need resources to carry out the monitoring<br />
that I have already mentioned.<br />
So we need to make sure, in the coming months, that we<br />
deliver the financial framework to make a success of<br />
these agreements. I repeat that these are good<br />
agreements but, like all agreements, they will depend on<br />
the goodwill and vigilance of individuals – the nongovernment<br />
organisations, the Member States, the<br />
Congolese and Cameroon Governments – to deliver on<br />
their promises to make sure these agreements work in<br />
practice. They should lead to better management of our<br />
forests and better management of vital global resources<br />
but, if wrongly handled, they could take us in the<br />
opposite direction. We look to the Commission to keep a<br />
beady eye on the progress that is being made.<br />
1-101<br />
Joe Higgins, author. − Madam President, we agree with<br />
the general approach of Yannick Jadot to this issue. I<br />
welcome any agreement that guarantees protection of the<br />
rainforests of our planet, if such agreements also<br />
advance the protection of the indigenous people of the<br />
forest and give a better life to the majority of the people<br />
in the countries concerned.<br />
It must be said at the start that both the Republic of<br />
Congo and Cameroon have highly repressive<br />
governments. Cameroon is very high in the Corruption<br />
Index kept by Transparency International, and in the<br />
Republic of Congo there has been horrific exploitation<br />
of some sections of the population, notably the pygmy<br />
people, although a new law has just been passed and<br />
people will wait to see what this does to protect<br />
indigenous people.<br />
The logging industry in these countries is implicated in<br />
corruption and in the exploitation of workers and the<br />
deforestation involved is a huge threat to the livelihoods<br />
of the indigenous people. It is for this reason that the<br />
original resolution of the European United Left Group<br />
calls for the logging industry to be in public ownership<br />
and under democratic control, crucially involving<br />
workers in the industry and the indigenous communities<br />
in the forests affected by logging.<br />
The Left’s resolution also points out that illegal logging<br />
is related to poverty levels in the countries concerned. It<br />
can provide an income for individuals and their families<br />
who would otherwise go hungry, and therefore ending<br />
illegal logging is also linked to ending the poverty and<br />
deprivation of many communities in the relevant<br />
countries.<br />
This will not be done by the corrupt local elites, nor by<br />
European multinational corporations whose key<br />
motivation is private profit, but by the forestry workers<br />
and the indigenous peoples themselves taking<br />
democratic ownership of their resources. In this sense,<br />
the people of sub-Saharan Africa can take inspiration<br />
from their brothers and sisters in Tunisia in their heroic<br />
struggle against a corrupt dictatorship over the past<br />
weeks.<br />
1-102<br />
Daniel Caspary, Verfasser. − Frau Präsidentin! Meine<br />
geschätzten Kollegen mehrerer Exportländer von<br />
tropischem Hartholz haben begonnen, freiwillige<br />
Partnerschaftsabkommen mit der EU im Rahmen des<br />
FLEGT-Aktionsplans zu unterzeichnen. Die<br />
Europäische Union wird die Reformen für eine<br />
verantwortungsvolle Forstverwaltung und für einen<br />
Kapazitätsausbau unterstützen, insbesondere die<br />
Einführung von Herkunftssicherungs- und Legalitätsnachweissystemen<br />
für Holzprodukte.<br />
Was mir besonders wichtig ist: Wenn es der<br />
Verbesserung der Transparenz und der Verhinderung<br />
von Umweltschäden bei forstwirtschaftlichen<br />
Tätigkeiten hilft, dann ist es gut, dass die Partner die<br />
Verpflichtung eingehen, geltende Rechtsvorschriften zu<br />
ändern und zu verbessern. Ausdrücklich begrüße ich<br />
auch, dass sich die Europäische Union verpflichtet hat,<br />
beim Aufbau von Kapazitäten in den holzerzeugenden<br />
Ländern Unterstützung zu leisten, vor allem bei der<br />
Einführung von Herkunftssicherungs- und Legalitätsnachweissystemen<br />
für Holz und Holzprodukte.<br />
Zwei weitere Punkte möchte ich nennen: Die<br />
freiwilligen Partnerschaftsabkommen werden von der<br />
Idee getragen, dem Handel mit illegal geschlagenem<br />
Holz und daraus hergestellten Erzeugnissen gemeinsam<br />
ein Ende zu setzen und einen Beitrag dazu zu leisten, der<br />
Entwaldung, der Waldschädigung und deren Folgen in<br />
Gestalt von CO2-Emissionen sowie dem Verlust der<br />
biologischen Vielfalt weltweit Einhalt zu gebieten.<br />
Eine weitere großflächige Ausbeutung der tropischen<br />
und anderer besonders artenreicher Wälder mit hoher<br />
Kohlenstoffspeicherkapazität ist nicht zu verantworten<br />
und kann zu einer weiteren Entwaldung und<br />
Waldschädigung führen und somit weltweit verheerende<br />
Folgen für die Umwelt haben.<br />
Deshalb sind diese Abkommen ein kleiner, aber ein<br />
guter Schritt in die richtige Richtung. Ich teile<br />
ausdrücklich die angesprochenen Punkte meiner<br />
Vorredner, danke dem Berichterstatter für die gute<br />
Zusammenarbeit und würde mich freuen, wenn wir mit<br />
diesen Abkommen wirklich vorankommen könnten, um<br />
unsere Welt ein Stück besser zu machen.<br />
1-103<br />
Andris Piebalgs, Member of the Commission. − Madam<br />
President, I would like to start by thanking the
42 17-01-2011<br />
rapporteur, Mr Jadot, for his support for the Voluntary<br />
Partnership Agreements on Forest Law Enforcement,<br />
Governance and Trade with Congo and Cameroon. I<br />
hope this House will follow the recommendations for<br />
consent to conclude these two agreements. This would<br />
also encourage the parliaments in both Cameroon and<br />
Congo to complete their consideration.<br />
It is important that both the European Union and our<br />
partner countries endorse the VPAs, since illegal logging<br />
is a problem for all. I know that illegal logging is just the<br />
visible tip of the iceberg. Basically we are talking about<br />
starting to work together for sustainable management of<br />
forestry resources. And, to answer one of the<br />
rapporteur’s suggestions immediately, I could say that,<br />
yes, I am ready to come here every six months, as<br />
Parliament calls me, to monitor the implementation of<br />
these agreements.<br />
It is true that this is a commitment. There are risks but<br />
this is the only way, in my opinion, to achieve really<br />
sustainable management of this resource, because if we<br />
do not do this, we will not manage to be successful<br />
through declarations alone.<br />
For our partner countries there is a lot of commitment,<br />
but I believe that one important factor is the loss that<br />
results from illegal logging. Each year, USD 10-15<br />
billion is lost in revenue. Illegal logging also has<br />
extremely negative consequences for indigenous<br />
peoples, for biodiversity and in terms of climate change.<br />
At the same time, it is also important to emphasise that<br />
the EU is one of the biggest markets for tropical wood.<br />
This means that our approach is extremely important in<br />
how the whole issue is being addressed. Of the tropical<br />
wood arriving in the EU, 20% comes from illegal<br />
sources, so we have an obligation to ensure that we<br />
source only legal wood.<br />
The climate change issue is another concern for<br />
everyone, and the protection of forests needs to start<br />
somewhere. It is very simple to say that we need to pay<br />
to protect forests: it is a simple formula, but applying it<br />
requires a lot of commitment from both sides.<br />
I shall try to answer a couple of questions that have been<br />
put to me. On enforcement and implementation, the<br />
VPA establishes a joint committee to monitor<br />
implementation of the agreement. It will also establish<br />
an independent audit to analyse the legality assurance<br />
system and its effectiveness and efficiency. There is also<br />
an annual reporting mechanism, and the annual report<br />
will be made public and will definitely be available to<br />
the European Parliament.<br />
Moreover, in preparation for the VPAs, we have<br />
involved civil society and indigenous peoples. Until now<br />
they had been completely left out of the process, so we<br />
have agreed, under the new agreements, to set up multistakeholder<br />
committees to monitor, or guide, the<br />
implementation process where indigenous people are<br />
involved.<br />
In addition, the VPAs include a complaints mechanism,<br />
and the independent auditor will have access to, and will<br />
rely on, information from a wide array of sources,<br />
including civil society and communities.<br />
There is a definite cost in terms of resources. Between<br />
2002 and 2008, the EU contributed EUR 544 million to<br />
forestry in general in the developing world, some of it<br />
directed to FLEGT work in individual countries. The<br />
Commission has so far spent a further EUR 35 million to<br />
support FLEGT more generally, and we will spend<br />
EUR 35 million more between 2011 and 2013. I would<br />
emphasis, too, that Member States also make fiscal<br />
contributions.<br />
We have also dedicated human resources to the<br />
implementation of FLEGT. I have seven civil servants<br />
dealing with this, and they are working closely with the<br />
European Forest Institute and national forest authorities.<br />
An additional effort has been made in the form of the<br />
Illegal Timber Regulation, adopted in 2010 as a key<br />
element of the FLEGT action plan, and this will<br />
complement the VPA approach. It will discourage<br />
unregulated, unsustainable exploitation of forests.<br />
The recent agreement in Cancún on action to reduce<br />
emissions due to deforestation and forest degradation<br />
(known as ‘REDD’) will facilitate further Commission<br />
support for developing countries. Our future work on<br />
forest governance through VPAs will be helped by the<br />
fact that REDD makes provision for governance and for<br />
observance of the rights of indigenous peoples and<br />
members of local communities.<br />
I take note of the human rights situation in partner<br />
countries. I agree with the draft motion for a resolution<br />
that the Commission should continue to focus on these<br />
issues. I can assure you that we keep human rights issues<br />
at the centre of our political dialogue with the partner<br />
countries, and I can assure you that the fight against<br />
corruption is one of the issues we address when dealing<br />
with the partner countries.<br />
But I would emphasise one particular point that<br />
represents encouragement for the whole process: the fact<br />
that partner countries feel engaged. Without real<br />
engagement from our partner countries, given all the<br />
weaknesses at administrative level, we cannot protect<br />
forests more effectively.<br />
I know that this is the start of the process, but it is a start<br />
being made by both sides, and I am always ready to<br />
come to Parliament to report on how the implementation<br />
is going. However, with FLEGT we are definitely not<br />
taking a wrong step. It is a step in the right direction: we<br />
are not increasing the risk. Perhaps we are not providing<br />
entirely sufficient solutions, but at least it is a decent<br />
step that we can be proud of.
17-01-2011 43<br />
1-104<br />
IN THE CHAIR: Diana WALLIS<br />
Vice-President<br />
1-105<br />
15 - Composition of Parliament : see<br />
Minutes<br />
1-106<br />
16 - EU-Cameroon forest law agreement -<br />
EU-Republic of Congo forest law agreement<br />
- FLEGT voluntary partnership agreements<br />
(continuation of debate)<br />
1-107<br />
President. − We now return to the debate.<br />
1-108<br />
Eva Joly, rapporteure pour avis de la commission du<br />
développement. − Madame la Présidente, Monsieur le<br />
Commissaire, chers collègues, ces accords de partenariat<br />
entre l'Union européenne, le Cameroun et le Congo<br />
devraient être en principe une bonne nouvelle pour ces<br />
populations, une bonne nouvelle pour la biodiversité.<br />
Mais ce n'est qu'une étape d'un long processus que le<br />
Parlement européen suivra avec vigilance.<br />
Si nous voulons que cet accord permette la mise en place<br />
d'un commerce du bois réglementé, transparent,<br />
respectueux de l'environnement, au bénéfice des<br />
populations locales et non plus de quelques groupes plus<br />
ou moins légaux, l'Union européenne doit faire en sorte<br />
que les droits des populations locales et indigènes soient<br />
pleinement respectés et que leur participation aux<br />
consultations soit effective. Elle doit aider au<br />
renforcement des capacités des acteurs, à la lutte contre<br />
la corruption, à la mise en place d'une véritable<br />
gouvernance forestière.<br />
Les accords ne doivent pas être un prétexte pour<br />
perpétuer le pillage des ressources naturelles des pays en<br />
développement, mais bien permettre un rééquilibrage<br />
des relations entre l'Union européenne et ces pays.<br />
1-109<br />
Christofer Fjellner, för PPE-gruppen. – Fru talman!<br />
Dessa s.k. Flegt-avtal som vi ska rösta om i morgon<br />
rörande Kongo och Kamerun är viktiga europeiska<br />
verktyg, eller vapen, i kampen mot illegal<br />
skogsavverkning. Därför välkomnar jag dem.<br />
Den illegala skogsavverkningen är ett väldigt stort<br />
problem, så väl miljömässigt som ekonomiskt och<br />
socialt. Det är samtidigt viktigt att komma ihåg att det<br />
sällan är själva sjukdomen, i detta fall den illegala<br />
avverkningen, som skapar förutsättningar för handeln<br />
med illegalt timmer. Den är snarare ett symptom och en<br />
följd av många andra sjukdomar som i många fall är<br />
ännu allvarligare – fattigdom, avsaknad av äganderätt,<br />
korruption och i vissa fall krig.<br />
Problemen är som störst i några av världens allra<br />
fattigaste länder. Därför är jag väldigt glad över att<br />
kommissionen tagit fasta på det när man utformat och<br />
förhandlat fram avtalen. Man har så att säga bytt<br />
frihandel i utbyte mot att de berörda länderna gör<br />
reformer för att stärka äganderätten, bekämpar<br />
korruption och se till att införa en vettig<br />
skogslagstiftning.<br />
Att man skjuter in sig på grundorsakerna snarare än<br />
symptomen är det som talar mest för att det vi gör<br />
imorgon är ett steg i rätt riktning. Samtidigt är det viktigt<br />
att komma ihåg, framför allt inför kommande<br />
förhandlingar med andra länder, att när vi bekämpar<br />
handeln med illegalt avverkat timmer så får vi inte<br />
hindra fattiga länder från att exportera en av sina mest<br />
värdefulla råvaror. Vi får inte göra det svårare för dem<br />
att använda det här fantastiska naturmaterialet som trä<br />
är. Det goda inte blir det bästas fiende.<br />
Jag vill påminna om att mitt land Sverige en gång i tiden<br />
blev rikt just genom att exportera timmer. Den<br />
möjligheten får vi inte förhindra för dagens fattiga<br />
länder. När ni nu går vidare och förhandlar fram avtal<br />
hoppas jag att ni fortsätter kampen mot just illegalt<br />
avverkat timmer och inte mot handeln med trä.<br />
1-110<br />
George Sabin Cutaş, în numele grupului S&D. –<br />
Comisia Europeană a început procesul încheierii unor<br />
acorduri de parteneriat voluntare cu ţări care exportă<br />
lemn în Uniunea Europeană. În acest context, consider<br />
că este importantă elaborarea unei structuri de<br />
participare activă a comunităţilor locale, atât pentru<br />
monitorizarea punerii în aplicare a acordului, cât şi<br />
pentru ameliorarea cadrului de guvernanţă din sectorul<br />
forestier şi, nu în ultimul rând, cu scopul de a evita, pe<br />
cât posibil, corupţia.<br />
Implicarea societăţii civile în procesul de elaborare a<br />
acordului cu Camerun reprezintă un semnal pozitiv în<br />
acest sens. Totodată, măsuri concrete sunt necesare<br />
pentru continuarea acestui tip de dialog în toate ţările<br />
semnatare. Trebuie urmărită, de asemenea, clădirea unei<br />
industrii a lemnului durabile din punct de vedere social<br />
şi de mediu, inclusiv prin reducerea despăduririi şi a<br />
degradării forestiere în aceste ţări. Acordurile trebuie să<br />
respecte angajamentele internaţionale ale Uniunii<br />
Europene în ceea ce priveşte mediul şi dezvoltarea<br />
durabilă.<br />
1-111<br />
Chris Davies, on behalf of the ALDE Group. – Madam<br />
President, we are debating Voluntary Partnership<br />
Agreements. These are lovely words, they are good<br />
words: they represent a European Union that is not<br />
trying to impose its will upon developing nations but is<br />
trying to lend a helping hand to achieve common goals.<br />
Yet the practicalities of an agreement with a state the<br />
size of Congo create all sorts of daunting problems.<br />
The size of the state alone is something akin to that of<br />
Europe; the governance for much of that state is nonexistent;<br />
corruption levels are quite extraordinary –<br />
Transparency International puts the Republic of Congo<br />
almost bottom of its league table.
44 17-01-2011<br />
Then there is the number of staff we have working to<br />
ensure that this agreement delivers on its goals – just a<br />
handful of people; the profits of illegal logging are<br />
absolutely vast and perhaps greater than anything we can<br />
offer by way of compensation; and the markets for<br />
illegal wood are in countries like China, which may not<br />
be paying anything like the attention that we pay, and<br />
the respect that should be paid, to maintaining forests.<br />
All these problems suggest that voluntary partnerships,<br />
however good our intentions, will have difficulty<br />
delivering the goals. So what assurances can the<br />
Commission give us that every possible step will be<br />
taken to ensure that our high ambitions here will truly be<br />
realised, and that we can all have confidence that these<br />
voluntary partnership agreements, as we make them in<br />
future, will deliver on the goals we have set?<br />
1-112<br />
Anna Rosbach, for EFD-Gruppen. – Fru formand!<br />
Jordens skove er verdens lunger, og vi skal gøre alt,<br />
hvad vi kan, for at beskytte dem. I en tid med en hurtigt<br />
voksende verdensbefolkning og dermed et generelt<br />
voksende behov for ressourcer, udflyttende<br />
arbejdspladser til fjerne verdensdele og en økonomisk<br />
krise ser jeg hellere, at vi i EU bruger mere europæisk<br />
træ, end at vi importerer eksotisk træ fra lande, hvor det<br />
er svært at kontrollere ulovlig skovhugst, og hvor vi<br />
tilligemed ikke kan styre korruptionen.<br />
Når vi fjerner tropiske skove, forringer vi biodiversiteten<br />
i områderne og er med til at udrydde en lang række<br />
truede dyrearter og ændre klimaet. Og det er helt<br />
unødvendigt! Især når der eksisterer glimrende<br />
alternativer. For hvis vi igen lærer at rejse mere skov i<br />
<strong>Europa</strong> og bruger mere europæisk træ, vil disse<br />
problemer forsvinde. Hvorfor skal vore haveborde være<br />
af regnskovstræ, eller hvorfor er eksotiske parketgulve<br />
smartere end gulve af EU-træ?<br />
Men når det er sagt, og da jeg ikke kan stoppe EUborgernes<br />
brug af eksotisk og tropisk træ, er det vigtigt,<br />
at de her foreliggende aftaler bliver vedtaget. Det er<br />
vigtigt, at vi er med til at sikre en bedre kontrol med de<br />
træprodukter og det træ, vi importerer. Vi skal forsøge at<br />
sikre os mod korruption, hvilket er ekstremt svært, hvad<br />
aftalerne da også bærer præg af. Derfor har jeg heller<br />
ingen illusion om, at vi hermed får udryddet al illegal<br />
skovhugst i hverken Cameroun eller Congo - desværre!<br />
Jeg havde hellere set bindende aftaler i stedet for<br />
frivillige. Men det er klart, at det er bedre med frivillige<br />
aftaler end slet ingen aftaler, og derfor støtter jeg dem.<br />
Generelt håber jeg dog at se flere initiativer til<br />
beskyttelse af verdens skove, især når det gælder EU's<br />
aftaler med lande fra problematiske dele af verden.<br />
1-113<br />
Andreas Mölzer (NI). – Frau Präsidentin! Das<br />
Partnerschaftsabkommen mit Kamerun im Forstsektor<br />
ist meines Erachtens zwar löblich und kommt im<br />
Internationalen Jahr der Wälder der EU auch aus<br />
Imagegründen sehr gelegen. Aber ob das Abkommen<br />
das Papier wert ist, auf dem es unterschrieben wird,<br />
muss leider bezweifelt werden.<br />
Immerhin steht Korruption in Kamerun auf der<br />
Tagesordnung. Umweltorganisationen werfen dem Staat<br />
vor, dass der Regierung Umweltverbrechen der<br />
Forstindustrie sehr wohl bewusst sind, Korruption aber<br />
die Kontrolle und die Strafverfolgung verhindert.<br />
Immerhin sollen ausländische Firmen mehr als 60 % der<br />
Holzgewinnung und Holzverarbeitung und drei Viertel<br />
des Holzexports kontrollieren. Nur wenn sichergestellt<br />
ist, dass sich ausländische Firmen nicht länger an<br />
einheimischen Firmen, denen das Forst- und Umwelt-<br />
Know-how völlig fehlt, abputzen, und wenn Kamerun<br />
die Korruption in den Griff bekommt, hat ein solches<br />
Abkommen Sinn. Bei aller Sorge über die Vernichtung<br />
der Regenwälder darf diese nicht als Vorwand dienen, in<br />
<strong>Europa</strong> den Waldbesitzern die Nutzung der Wälder zu<br />
versagen, denn die meisten EU-Länder weisen eine<br />
vorbildhafte Waldbewirtschaftung auf.<br />
1-114<br />
Filip Kaczmarek (PPE). – Pani Przewodnicząca!<br />
Miesiąc temu wraz z delegacją Komisji Rozwoju byłem<br />
w Republice Konga, gdzie rozmawialiśmy również o<br />
inicjatywie FLEGT z przedstawicielami władz,<br />
ekspertami i organizacjami pozarządowymi.<br />
Przemysł drzewny jest branżą bardzo ważną dla tego<br />
kraju. Jest drugim źródłem dochodów eksportowych po<br />
ropie naftowej. Warto przypomnieć, że to, co się dzieje z<br />
dochodami z ropy naftowej i z ich wykorzystaniem nie<br />
jest dla nas do końca przejrzyste i jasne, albo<br />
przynajmniej informacje są przekazywane z dużym<br />
opóźnieniem. Jednocześnie rząd Republiki Konga<br />
wyraża troskę o przyszłość obszarów leśnych i planuje<br />
dużą akcję zalesiania. Oczywiście nie wiemy jeszcze,<br />
czy ten program zalesiania się powiedzie, ale na pewno<br />
warto życzyć rządowi Konga, aby tak się stało. Dlatego<br />
też takie ważne jest, aby wzmocnić legalny obrót<br />
drewnem. Równie istotne jest to, aby FLEGT<br />
funkcjonował w krajach sąsiednich, dlatego że inaczej,<br />
np. wskutek przemytu, porozumienie może się okazać w<br />
praktyce nieskuteczne.<br />
Nie wiemy też jeszcze, czy standardy, które promujemy<br />
w zakresie legalnego handlu drewnem staną się<br />
obowiązujące i funkcjonujące globalnie – niektórzy<br />
mówcy zwracali już na ten problem uwagę. Tak czy<br />
inaczej musimy się starać, aby ten system okazał się<br />
skuteczny. Musimy też pomóc w wywieraniu presji na<br />
innych importerów (spoza Europy), aby stopniowo<br />
eliminować nielegalny handel drewnem.<br />
Inicjatywa FLEGT ma znaczenie zarówno dla<br />
ograniczenia ubóstwa, jak i dla ochrony środowiska,<br />
powstrzymywania zjawisk wylesiania oraz rozwoju<br />
zróżnicowanej gospodarki w wielu krajach. W<br />
przypadku Republiki Konga idzie to w parze z inną<br />
potrzebą, a mianowicie z potrzebą rozwoju rolnictwa i<br />
zmniejszenia importu żywności. Dzięki FLEGT<br />
światowy handel drewnem może stać się bardziej
17-01-2011 45<br />
sprawiedliwy, bardziej zróżnicowany i bardziej<br />
przyjazny środowisku. Mamy nadzieję, że tak się stanie.<br />
1-115<br />
Κρίτων Αρσένης (S&D). – Κύριε Επίτροπε, τα<br />
συγχαρητήρια μου για την ουσιαστική ολοκλήρωση των<br />
διαπραγματεύσεων για τις δύο αυτές συμφωνίες. Θα<br />
ήθελα όμως να εκφράσω την ανησυχία μου γιατί έχουν<br />
παγώσει οι διαπραγματεύσεις FLEGT με την Ινδονησία<br />
και τη Μαλαισία.<br />
Κύριε Επίτροπε, έχετε στα χέρια σας, ως Επιτροπή, ένα<br />
σημαντικό εργαλείο: τον κανονισμό για την ξυλεία.<br />
Αυτός ο κανονισμός εξαιρεί τις χώρες με τις οποίες έχει<br />
συναφθεί συμφωνία FLEGT από τις διαδικασίες που<br />
προβλέπει ο κανονισμός. Είναι ένα σημαντικό εργαλείο<br />
για να δώσουμε νέα δυναμική στις διαπραγματεύσεις.<br />
Χρειάζεται πράγματι να ολοκληρώσουμε τις συμφωνίες<br />
FLEGT με όλες τις χώρες που έχουν σημαντικά τροπικά<br />
δάση είτε στην Ασία είτε στη Λατινική Αμερική, αλλά<br />
και με τους μεγάλους μεταπράτες της ξυλείας, όπως το<br />
Βιετνάμ, η Καμπότζη, το Λάος, η Κίνα και τόσες άλλες<br />
χώρες.<br />
Αυτές οι χώρες ακολουθούν τη δική τους πορεία·<br />
θεσπίζουν τις δικές τους διαδικασίες για να<br />
εκσυγχρονιστούν και να μπορούν να παρακολουθούν τη<br />
νόμιμη υλοτόμηση. Το ερώτημα είναι: εμείς κάνουμε<br />
ό,τι χρειάζεται; Τα 27 κράτη μέλη παίρνουν τις<br />
κανονιστικές αποφάσεις για την εισαγωγή ξυλείας από<br />
χώρες FLEGT;<br />
Τέλος, για τον κανονισμό της ξυλείας απαιτείται μία<br />
σειρά κατ’ εξουσιοδότηση πράξεων. Έχουμε δύο χρόνια<br />
μέχρι την πλήρη εφαρμογή του κανονισμού. Η Επιτροπή<br />
πρέπει να επισπεύσει τις διαδικασίες, να προχωρήσει<br />
στις κατ’ εξουσιοδότηση πράξεις για να γνωρίζουν οι<br />
χώρες τις λεπτομέρειες στις οποίες πρέπει να<br />
προσαρμοσθούν.<br />
1-116<br />
Seán Kelly (PPE). – A Uachtaráin, gan dabht ar bith is<br />
ceist i bhfad níos tábhachtaí é seo ná an phoiblíocht a<br />
gheobhaidh sé.<br />
1-117<br />
One of the great scandals of the 20 th century was the<br />
continuous and systematic chopping down of forests,<br />
especially in the Third World, done not by individuals<br />
who knew no better and cannot be faulted, but by big<br />
greedy businesses and corrupt governments. That is why<br />
this agreement is to be welcomed wholeheartedly and I<br />
hope it will be implemented, because if it is not, it will<br />
not be worth the paper it is written on.<br />
On the broader front, we also have to ensure that other<br />
policies of the European Union do not contribute to<br />
continued deforestation. I am referring to the proposed<br />
agreement on Mercosur which many people feel will<br />
encourage farmers to chop down the forests in those<br />
countries so that they can export agricultural products<br />
into Europe.<br />
So we have to be vigilant.<br />
1-118<br />
Go raibh maith agat.<br />
1-119<br />
João Ferreira (GUE/NGL). – Senhora Presidente, a<br />
exploração de madeira ilegal em países da África<br />
Central, como os Camarões e o Congo, constitui uma<br />
ameaça à integridade de recursos de que depende a<br />
existência e o modo de vida das comunidades locais e<br />
das populações indígenas. Uma ameaça a um<br />
ecossistema repositório de uma enorme biodiversidade e<br />
com uma importância muito grande na regulação dos<br />
ciclos biogeoquímicos.<br />
Perante o avanço da destruição da floresta tropical nesta<br />
região – alimentado, é bom não o esquecermos, pela<br />
procura de operadores e importadores dos países<br />
industrializados, particularmente da União Europeia – a<br />
solução não pode ser legalizar o que hoje é ilegal, ou<br />
seja, a exploração insustentável da floresta, legitimando<br />
de alguma forma a usurpação da terra às comunidades<br />
locais e a ocupação de extensas áreas de floresta por<br />
empresas madeireiras, como vem sucedendo.<br />
A política de cooperação e de ajuda ao desenvolvimento<br />
da União Europeia tem aqui um papel muito importante,<br />
apoiando uma diversificação da economia destes países<br />
e invertendo um modelo assente na dependência elevada<br />
da exploração e exportação de um número reduzido de<br />
matérias-primas para os países industrializados.<br />
1-120<br />
Paul Rübig (PPE). – Frau Präsidentin! Ich glaube, dass<br />
das Thema Holz uns in Zukunft noch weit intensiver<br />
beschäftigen wird. Deshalb ist es für das Abkommen<br />
wichtig, dass man dem Bereich Forschung eine<br />
dementsprechende Unterstützung gibt und vor allem<br />
auch im Bereich der Aus- und Weiterbildung schaut,<br />
dass die kleinen und mittleren Betriebe in Kamerun und<br />
im Kongo die Möglichkeit bekommen, sich ökologisch<br />
in diesem Bereich entsprechend weiterzuentwickeln.<br />
Deshalb freut es mich, dass diese Diskussion stattfindet.<br />
Es ist für uns alle wichtig, dass der Bedarf an Holz auch<br />
in Zukunft sichergestellt ist.<br />
1-121<br />
Franz Obermayr (NI). – Frau Präsidentin! 40 % der<br />
Fläche Kameruns sind von Wald bedeckt. Noch, müssen<br />
wir sagen, denn Kamerun ist zwar der größte<br />
Tropenholzexporteur Afrikas, aber in keinem anderen<br />
Land werden die Wälder so massiv abgeholzt.<br />
Experten schätzen, dass in 10 bis 15 Jahren die<br />
ökologisch wertvollen Baumarten aus dem Kongo-<br />
Becken verschwunden sein werden, wenn die<br />
Abholzung so weiter geht. Was ist zu tun? Wesentlich<br />
für den Schutz der Tropenwälder Kameruns ist vor allem<br />
die Bekämpfung der Korruption, sowohl auf<br />
Beamtenebene, aber auch bei den privaten Pächtern,<br />
weiterhin eine wirksame Strafverfolgung und natürlich<br />
eine nachhaltige Fortwirtschaft. Wo viel gefällt wird,<br />
muss auch etwas nachwachsen. Und ganz wesentlich ist<br />
eine bessere Ausbildung der Holzarbeit, um frühe<br />
Schäden beim Abholzen zu vermeiden.
46 17-01-2011<br />
Vor allem sind die europäischen Unternehmen in die<br />
Pflicht zu nehmen, denn rund 80 % des Ertrags werden<br />
nach <strong>Europa</strong> verschifft. Hier muss die EU auch<br />
entsprechend ansetzen, um direkt durchzugreifen.<br />
Freiwilligkeit ist gut, doch in diesem Zusammenhang<br />
kommen wir mit ihr auf keinen guten Grund und auf<br />
keinen grünen Zweig. Wir müssen die Unternehmen in<br />
die Pflicht nehmen!<br />
1-122<br />
Andris Piebalgs, Member of the Commission. − Madam<br />
President, the debate definitely went beyond the scope of<br />
this Voluntary Partnership Agreement. It is not only<br />
trade that affects forests: the forest is an energy resource<br />
for these countries, and population growth also has an<br />
impact on the forest.<br />
So I would like to emphasise again that this is a first step<br />
in addressing just one of the areas of concern. I know<br />
that it is not a solution, but you have to start somewhere<br />
in addressing the issues.<br />
Also, I would not like to discourage you with regard to<br />
the level of commitment of the countries concerned. I<br />
know that dealing with these countries is sometimes not<br />
simple, but they are countries with a difficult history.<br />
They got their independence 50 years ago, and not<br />
exactly in the same circumstances as some of our<br />
countries got independence, so things take time. It takes<br />
time to establish state institutions capable of fighting<br />
corruption or establishing the management of resources,<br />
and they are on the right track. In Africa, in particular,<br />
they have economic growth even in times of crisis, and<br />
this means they are getting stronger and getting better.<br />
I realise this is just one indicator, but overall there has<br />
been encouraging news, and the only way we can<br />
improve the process is by working together. That is<br />
where we come in with sustainable forest management:<br />
we are talking about Congo-Brazzaville (the Republic of<br />
the Congo) and Cameroon today, but we are also<br />
working with the Democratic Republic of the Congo and<br />
with Indonesia. We are still negotiating but we have<br />
high hopes of a positive conclusion.<br />
So I would say that the risks here are minimal.<br />
Commitment is the starting point and I look on this<br />
process as a very positive one.<br />
We should also consider the global commitment to fight<br />
climate change. Cancún gave some assurances that other<br />
parts of the world also take things seriously in that<br />
regard. We are not the only ones who would like the<br />
world to be fair and sustainable, and other parts of the<br />
world will learn from us.<br />
Let us take, for example, energy efficiency drives. We<br />
made a start, and other parts of the world have followed.<br />
The same applies to resource efficiency. If we can use<br />
less timber, then other parts of the world will definitely<br />
learn from our example. I believe there are a lot of ways<br />
in which we can lead.<br />
Last but not least, I would like, once again, to guarantee<br />
that the Commission will conduct monitoring, not only<br />
by my own staff but also through the EU delegations and<br />
the Member State delegations that we have. This is one<br />
of the processes in which we share our efforts with the<br />
Member States. The Commission does not simply work<br />
alone and, in many respects, Member States’ experience<br />
has been particularly crucial in concluding this voluntary<br />
partnership agreement.<br />
I would ask this House really very much to deal with this<br />
consent process because I believe it is a healthy process,<br />
it goes in the right direction and at the same time does<br />
not provide the answers on all the issues that you have<br />
raised today.<br />
1-123<br />
Yannick Jadot, rapporteur. − Madame la Présidente,<br />
Monsieur le Commissaire, une nouvelle fois merci aux<br />
collègues qui sont intervenus. Je crois que nous sommes<br />
à peu près tous intervenus dans le même sens: rappeler<br />
ce point essentiel à travers l'APV, qui est le lien entre le<br />
développement, l'environnement et le renforcement de la<br />
société civile.<br />
Je crois qu'aujourd'hui, s'il y a un levier sur lequel on<br />
peut construire un développement durable dans ces pays,<br />
notamment les pays africains, c'est évidemment le<br />
renforcement de la société civile. Tant que, dans ces<br />
pays-là, le seul ou le principal élément de démocratie, ce<br />
sera le vote pour le président, on le voit bien – l'histoire<br />
de la Côte d'Ivoire nous le rappelle malheureusement –<br />
on n'avancera pas suffisamment.<br />
Donc, le renforcement de la société civile, le fait qu'elle<br />
soit partie prenante permanente dans la mise en œuvre<br />
de ces accords, dans le suivi de l'exploitation forestière,<br />
dans la discussion sur les conditions de cette exploitation<br />
forestière et sur le partage des revenus liés à cette<br />
exploitation forestière, est essentiel.<br />
C'est à travers ce renforcement de la société civile aussi<br />
qu'on répond le mieux à l'argument qui nous est présenté<br />
souvent sur la question de la Chine. Pourquoi faudrait-il<br />
répondre aux critères d'une coopération forte avec<br />
l'Europe, des critères sociaux, démocratiques,<br />
environnementaux, alors que la Chine nous offre un<br />
boulevard en matière de corruption ou de pillage? Eh<br />
bien le renforcement, justement, de cette société civile,<br />
est le meilleur rempart à ce système que tente<br />
notamment d'imposer la Chine dans les pays du Sud.<br />
Et puis, vous l'avez dit, Monsieur le Commissaire,<br />
l'Europe est un grand marché pour les bois tropicaux,<br />
mais c'est aussi – et c'est essentiel pour tous les<br />
exploitants, pour toute l'industrie – un marché stable et<br />
rémunérateur et cela, c'est très important aussi comme<br />
levier dans ces pays.<br />
Merci de votre souhait de travailler avec le Parlement<br />
européen. Nous sommes très heureux de cette<br />
collaboration à venir.<br />
1-124
17-01-2011 47<br />
President. − The debate is closed.<br />
The vote will take place on Wednesday (19 January<br />
2011).<br />
1-125<br />
17 - Interim Partnership Agreement<br />
between the EC and the Pacific States -<br />
Interim Partnership Agreement between the<br />
EC and the Pacific States (debate)<br />
1-126<br />
President. − The next item is the joint debate on<br />
– the report by David Martin, on behalf of the<br />
Committee on International Trade, on the<br />
recommendation on the draft Council decision on the<br />
conclusion of the Interim Partnership Agreement<br />
between the European Community, of the one part, and<br />
the Pacific States, of the other part (05078/2010 – C7-<br />
0036/2010 – 2008/0250(NLE)) (A7-0365/2010),<br />
– the oral question to the Commission on Interim<br />
Partnership Agreement between the European<br />
Community, of the one part, and the Pacific States, of<br />
the other part, by Vital Moreira, David Martin, on behalf<br />
of the Committee on International Trade (O-0212/2010 -<br />
B7-0807/2010).<br />
1-127<br />
David Martin, rapporteur. − Mr President, firstly I<br />
would like to say that I know that, for good reasons,<br />
Commissioner De Gucht cannot be with us this evening.<br />
I would like to thank him for taking the trouble to call<br />
me last week and explain why he is unable to be here,<br />
and I would like to thank him and his team at DG Trade<br />
for their cooperation, and in particular Martin Dihm for<br />
all his assistance.<br />
I have tried, in my role as rapporteur, to follow on from<br />
the good work of the previous rapporteur, my former<br />
colleague Glyn Ford. I am fortunate that the adoption of<br />
Glyn’s resolution in 2009 meant that Parliament already<br />
had a clear position on the EC-Pacific Interim Economic<br />
Partnership Agreement. Parliament’s formal position<br />
then is the one that I have tried to follow in my report<br />
and question today.<br />
I would like to thank Donatella Pribaz, who was the<br />
committee administrator responsible. This turned out to<br />
be her last report for the committee before her<br />
promotion, so I would like to wish her well in her new<br />
job and thank her for making my task here easier.<br />
Finally, in terms of acknowledgements, I would also like<br />
to welcome the presence here of the Ambassador for<br />
Papua New Guinea and to thank him and his staff for<br />
their close collaboration. The insights they provided<br />
allowed me to make specific input to the report.<br />
Firstly, I would like to make a few general remarks on<br />
the agreement and the regional context. Secondly, I plan<br />
to discuss three specific aspects of the EPA which I<br />
believe it is important to highlight: namely Aid for<br />
Trade, the Fijian political situation and fisheries.<br />
Thirdly, I will comment on the future of EC-Pacific<br />
trading relations.<br />
In terms of the background and regional integration, this<br />
interim – or goods only – EPA has been negotiated with<br />
two Pacific states – Papua New Guinea and Fiji. These<br />
are the two Pacific island states that have the highest<br />
levels of trade with the EU and have key exports<br />
destined for the EU market: tuna and sugar respectively.<br />
The EPA gives Papua New Guinea and Fiji duty-free<br />
and quota-free access to the EU market in return for the<br />
gradual liberalisation of their markets over a 15-year<br />
period. Papua New Guinea has committed to liberalising<br />
88% of EU imports on the date of application of this<br />
agreement, and Fiji will liberalise 87% over a 15-year<br />
period.<br />
The remaining 12 Pacific states either enjoy duty-free<br />
and quota-free access through the Everything But Arms<br />
scheme or, because of their low level of trade with the<br />
EU, have very little interest in an interim EPA.<br />
Nevertheless, I believe it is important that, as we move<br />
towards a full EPA, we should pursue our objective of<br />
regional integration and continue to press for a full EPA<br />
involving all the Pacific states.<br />
In terms of the content of the resolution, Parliament has<br />
to consent to this agreement before it can be ratified. We<br />
will vote on Wednesday – as you have indicated,<br />
Madam President – on two different reports, firstly on<br />
consent, which I am recommending that we give, and<br />
secondly on the accompanying motion for a resolution.<br />
There are other issues in the motion for a resolution but,<br />
as I have said, I want to comment particularly on three.<br />
First, regarding Aid for Trade, funding for<br />
implementation is crucial to achieving the agreement’s<br />
objectives of economic diversification and poverty<br />
alleviation. It is important that a fair and equitable share<br />
of the EUR 2 billion set aside in the 2007 Aid for Trade<br />
Strategy is directed towards the Pacific region. It is also<br />
important to highlight that this interim EPA was<br />
conceived as a short-term measure to safeguard the<br />
Pacific’s trade preferences following the World Trade<br />
Organisation (WTO) ruling.<br />
Bearing that in mind, it should not be seen as a sign of<br />
EU acceptance of the political regime in Fiji. I would<br />
urge the Fijian Government to make moves towards<br />
democracy. I hope that the necessary reforms can take<br />
place to allow financial support for the Fijian sugar<br />
industry to be allocated.<br />
On fishing, the fisheries sector plays a key role in Papua<br />
New Guinea’s economy and – importantly – provides<br />
employment and income to its citizens. In the three tuna<br />
processing plants which export to the EU there are 5700<br />
employees, the majority of whom are women. This is a<br />
country where it is sometimes difficult to find good<br />
employment for women.
48 17-01-2011<br />
I support the purpose of the flexible rules of origin in<br />
this agreement, namely to develop the processing<br />
industry, but it is essential that the industry develops in a<br />
sustainable manner. Environmental considerations are<br />
paramount and I have asked, in my report, for the<br />
Commission to monitor this aspect and to report back<br />
regularly to Parliament on compliance with the<br />
regulation on illegal, unreported, and unregulated<br />
fishing.<br />
I appreciate that there are some concerns in this House –<br />
and specifically in the Committee on Fisheries – about<br />
the potential impact of Papua New Guinea’s tuna<br />
imports on the EU industry. However, when we look at<br />
the latest figures, we can see that during the period<br />
2003-2009, imports made up around only 2% of total<br />
preserved and prepared fish imports and around only 3%<br />
of preserved and prepared tuna imports. I do not believe<br />
that this low level of imports will threaten the domestic<br />
EU industry, especially if we take into account the<br />
limited capacity of the Pacific states’ fishing fleets and<br />
the limited on-land processing capacity.<br />
Nevertheless, it is of course right that we should<br />
continue to monitor the situation and that, if there are<br />
any unexpected increases in fishing products coming<br />
from Papua New Guinea, the Commission should take<br />
appropriate action. As I mentioned earlier, I hope that<br />
the Pacific states can agree a comprehensive regional<br />
EPA.<br />
In my report I have recommended the inclusion of<br />
several points of substance in future negotiations, which<br />
I hope the Commission will take into account. These<br />
include intellectual property. Too often we talk about<br />
intellectual property from one side only, but I hope that<br />
we will look at intellectual property in terms of<br />
including traditional knowledge. I also hope we will add<br />
transparency in government procurement as well as<br />
provision for issuing working visas of up to 24 months.<br />
As we move towards a full EPA, I hope the Commission<br />
will involve all the Pacific states but, in the meantime,<br />
let us press ahead and get the interim EPA with PNG<br />
and Fiji on the books and working as a demonstration of<br />
what we can achieve in the future.<br />
1-128<br />
PRESIDENZA DELL'ON. GIANNI PITTELLA<br />
Vicepresidente<br />
1-129<br />
Andris Piebalgs, Member of the Commission. − Mr<br />
President, I would like to thank the rapporteur for his<br />
report and particularly for his positive attitude on<br />
consent to the interim Economic Partnership Agreement<br />
with the Pacific states of Papua New Guinea and Fiji. I<br />
hope that this House will follow his advice.<br />
Consent by the European Parliament – for the first time<br />
on a trade agreement under the Lisbon Treaty – has<br />
important political significance because this is a trade<br />
agreement with a long-term development focus and<br />
because of the momentum it will provide to ongoing<br />
negotiations on the comprehensive EPA with the Pacific<br />
region.<br />
Back in 2007, the immediate purpose of the interim<br />
agreement was to secure continued access to the EU<br />
market for those countries in the Pacific region which<br />
most depend on it, given the impending expiry of the<br />
Cotonou trade regime. The Commission’s commitment<br />
to concluding negotiations on a comprehensive EPA<br />
with the Pacific region as a whole remains unchanged<br />
and we are currently engaged in negotiations with our<br />
Pacific partners.<br />
We can go forward only if we accept the special nature<br />
of the Pacific region and tailor the EPA accordingly. We<br />
are talking about small and remote island states which<br />
differ greatly in their economic situation, development<br />
needs and relations with the EU. Some countries have<br />
‘least developed country’ status and are therefore<br />
covered by the EU’s Everything But Arms trade regime;<br />
some have little, if any, trade with the Union. We are<br />
therefore open to entering into the trade relationships<br />
that best suit the Pacific region as a whole, and the<br />
ongoing negotiations will inform the ultimate choices.<br />
Whatever approach we opt for, it is absolutely crucial to<br />
ensure that any agreement will indeed contribute to the<br />
development of the countries concerned. That is why<br />
there is also financial assistance to enhance trade<br />
capacity. That is why we will allow partner countries in<br />
the developing world to exclude more sensitive products<br />
from the trade agreements: something that we would not<br />
allow other countries to do. In this context, I have duly<br />
taken note of the concerns expressed about the<br />
derogation in the interim EPA from the standard rules of<br />
origin for fisheries products.<br />
It is precisely for development reasons that we granted<br />
this derogation and we did so on the basis of our<br />
informed judgment that Papua New Guinea’s small<br />
market share makes it unlikely that its tuna exports could<br />
damage the interests of the EU industry. The European<br />
Union and Papua New Guinea have applied these rules<br />
provisionally since 2008 and, whereas export figures<br />
have fluctuated, no upward trend has been detected. Let<br />
me also reassure you that the Commission does not<br />
intend to offer similar arrangements to any other region.<br />
The Commission will, in any event, closely monitor the<br />
implementation of the derogation and will report to<br />
Parliament on the basis of a study which will be<br />
prepared before the end of 2011.<br />
Some of you were also present in September last year<br />
when the current elected Prime Minister addressed the<br />
INTA Committee. He expressed the readiness of his<br />
government to grant EU vessels and investors access to<br />
Papua New Guinea’s waters. We take this oral<br />
declaration very seriously and we will continue to<br />
engage with our partners till it comes to fruition.<br />
Parliament’s consent will allow us to launch the<br />
implementation mechanisms provided for the agreement;
17-01-2011 49<br />
one of these is the Trade Committee, which could be<br />
convened this spring and which provides a platform for<br />
raising all the issues relating to mutual obligations under<br />
the interim EPA. Your vote is therefore crucial to<br />
helping us move forward on this and other important<br />
issues.<br />
With regard to Fiji, the country did sign the interim EPA<br />
but it does not apply it provisionally. This makes Papua<br />
New Guinea currently the only country provisionally<br />
applying the EU-Pacific interim EPA. Fiji continues, for<br />
the time being, to have access to the EU market under<br />
the Market Access Regulation, since the Council has not<br />
adopted trade sanctions. As you are aware, the EU<br />
decided to suspend development aid to Fiji because of<br />
the political situation in the country. Resumption of aid<br />
would presuppose progress in governance in Fiji and, in<br />
particular, a return to democratic principles of<br />
government, but at the moment there is no tangible<br />
progress in Fiji in this regard.<br />
The EPA we have discussed today is only an interim<br />
arrangement to ensure that access to the EU market is<br />
not lost. The Commission is fully committed to continue<br />
negotiations on a comprehensive EPA with the Pacific<br />
region.<br />
1-130<br />
Carmen Fraga Estévez, ponente de opinión de la<br />
Comisión de Pesca. − Señor Presidente, señor<br />
Comisario, la exención a las normas de origen parte de<br />
un gravísimo error de cálculo que ha hecho la Comisión<br />
sobre su impacto, no solo en el sector atunero<br />
comunitario, que es muy serio, sino en la propia zona del<br />
Pacífico ―a la que se pretende ayudar―, cuando los<br />
beneficiarios reales son casi exclusivamente las voraces<br />
flotas de China y el Sudeste Asiático y su industria de<br />
transformación.<br />
La DG Comercio ha establecido esta exención<br />
basándose en que Papúa Nueva Guinea no tiene<br />
capacidad pesquera para explotar sus recursos. Sin<br />
embargo, según los datos más recientes de la Western<br />
and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission, hay 41<br />
cerqueros con pabellón de Papúa Nueva Guinea<br />
operando en la zona, con un total de capturas que en el<br />
año 2009 se elevó a casi medio millón de toneladas y, de<br />
ellas, más de 75 000 (entre semitransformados y<br />
transformados) acabaron en la Unión Europea, lo que<br />
sitúa a Papúa Nueva Guinea entre los seis principales<br />
exportadores a la Unión Europea. No es cierto, por tanto,<br />
como dicen ustedes, que para desarrollar el sector<br />
pesquero de Papúa Nueva Guinea fuera necesario dar<br />
entrada libre a otras flotas.<br />
En ningún caso la Unión Europea puede falsear sus<br />
compromisos con el desarrollo sostenible. No obstante,<br />
estamos viendo como, al amparo de esta exención y a fin<br />
de dar entrada a los inversores asiáticos, Papúa Nueva<br />
guinea ha enmendado su legislación para que no sea<br />
posible presentar denuncias por daños medioambientales<br />
y ha puesto en marcha una normativa de in<strong>version</strong>es que<br />
permite contratar a trabajadores locales y a mano de obra<br />
barata procedente de Asia con las peores garantías<br />
laborales que quepa imaginar.<br />
Si a ello añadimos que Papúa Nueva Guinea lidera ―en<br />
la organización regional de pesca que he citado antes―<br />
una negativa rotunda a cualquier norma internacional de<br />
gestión y control de la pesca el resultado es que, mientra<br />
que la DG Asuntos Marítimos y Pesca pone toda la<br />
carne en el asador para luchar contra la pesca ilegal,<br />
otros le abren las puertas. Yo, señor Comisario, vengo<br />
ahora mismo de la Western and Central Pacific Fisheries<br />
Commission y sé muy bien la posición que ha mantenido<br />
Papúa Nueva Guinea. Por eso, me mantengo en la<br />
posición de la Comisión de Pesca de pedir que se<br />
suspenda la exención en la revisión del acuerdo del que<br />
estamos hablando.<br />
1-131<br />
Laima Liucija Andrikienė, on behalf of the PPE<br />
Group. – Mr President, as shadow rapporteur for the<br />
PPE Group, I would like to start by saying that we<br />
welcome the increasing role of the EU as a trading<br />
power in every region of the world, including the Pacific<br />
region.<br />
The agreement, as it is now, is not a perfect one, not<br />
least because it is not a comprehensive EPA, but only an<br />
interim one. We hope that the Commission will be in a<br />
position to negotiate, in due time, a comprehensive EPA<br />
including a larger number of countries in the region.<br />
Secondly, the current agreement concerns only a small<br />
part of EU trade, since the share of EU trade accounted<br />
for by the whole of the Pacific region is just 0.06%, and<br />
yet some areas have caused us concern, most notably on<br />
the issue of the derogation from the rules of origin for<br />
fishery products.<br />
In our resolution we raise our concern that a number of<br />
countries, such as the Philippines, Thailand, China, the<br />
United States, Australia and others, will be able to take<br />
advantage of this derogation and potentially export large<br />
quantities of processed fisheries products to the EU,<br />
potentially harming the interests of the EU fish<br />
processing and canning industry.<br />
We therefore encourage the Commission to act on<br />
Parliament’s request for it to conduct an impact<br />
assessment study and, in the event that the assessment<br />
demonstrates a destabilising effect on the EU’s fish<br />
processing and canning industry, for it to initiate the<br />
procedure leading to suspension of the exceptional<br />
arrangements in this agreement regarding rules of origin.<br />
1-132<br />
George Sabin Cutaş, în numele grupului S&D. –<br />
Actualul acord interimar de parteneriat încheiat în<br />
noiembrie 2007 de Comisia Europeană şi statele Papua-<br />
Noua Guinee şi Fiji a fost aspru criticat de către<br />
societatea civilă şi de către politicienii din regiunea<br />
Pacificului. Aceştia au subliniat consecinţele negative pe<br />
care acordul le-a avut asupra nivelului de solidaritate<br />
interregională şi a dorinţei politice de integrare<br />
economică în regiune.
50 17-01-2011<br />
Aceasta din urmă a fost divizată în grupuri care au<br />
negociat în mod individual şi sub presiuni obţinerea unui<br />
acord intermediar cu Comisia Europeană. Totodată, se<br />
crede că acordarea statutului de produs originar,<br />
derogare de la plata taxelor vamale în Uniune pentru<br />
produsele piscicole de provenienţă din Papua Noua<br />
Guinee şi Fiji a condus la crearea unui centru de<br />
procesare a acestor produse, inclusiv a unor produse<br />
neoriginare, de către firme din statele vecine, cu scopul<br />
de a profita de avantajele derogării.<br />
Acest proces ar avea efecte nefaste asupra industriei,<br />
lucrătorilor şi veniturilor locale, ţinând cont de faptul că<br />
industria piscicolă este una dintre cele mai importante<br />
generatoare de locuri de muncă în aceste ţări. De<br />
asemenea, el ar reprezenta o concurenţă neloială pentru<br />
produsele europene. Prin urmare, este posibil ca acordul<br />
să fi avut efecte contrare celor dorite.<br />
Astfel, Comisia Europeană trebuie să se asigure că<br />
viitorul acord de parteneriat va contribui atât la<br />
dezvoltarea unei industrii piscicole locale sustenabile,<br />
creatoare de locuri de muncă, cât şi la o integrare<br />
regională mai strânsă, spre exemplu, prin negocierea<br />
viitorului acord cu regiunea Pacificului în întregimea sa.<br />
1-133<br />
Isabella Lövin, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group. – Mr<br />
President, one of the objectives of the EPAs is to<br />
promote regional integration. What we have seen so far<br />
is that this is not happening. On the contrary, in the case<br />
of the Pacific, the EU is undermining unity by offering<br />
interim agreements to some ACP countries, with special<br />
conditions attached.<br />
The derogation from the rules of origin for fish<br />
processed in Papua New Guinea and Fiji is an example<br />
of this. I believe that this derogation is potentially<br />
hazardous and that it must be thoroughly evaluated in<br />
2011, as already agreed.<br />
I say this because it is important to have facts when<br />
discussing this matter. What are the effects on global<br />
fish stocks, on employment and on the environment in<br />
Papua New Guinea? What are the social conditions of<br />
the workers? All this must be fully and transparently<br />
assessed, and then the derogation may or may not be<br />
abolished on that basis, and not on the basis of<br />
complaints from the Spanish fishing industry which,<br />
itself, fishes in Papua New Guinea but never lands fish<br />
there – and, by the way, does not pay customs duty when<br />
it sells the fish as European on the European market.<br />
1-134<br />
Elie Hoarau, au nom du groupe GUE/NGL. – Monsieur<br />
le Président, Monsieur le Commissaire, je pense qu'il est<br />
quelque peu abusif de dénommer les accords de<br />
partenariat économique intérimaires "accords Pacifique",<br />
puisque, sur les quinze États ACP de la zone, seuls deux<br />
d'entre eux sont signataires.<br />
À l'évidence, ces accords prennent davantage la forme<br />
d'accords bilatéraux que de véritables accords régionaux,<br />
accords bilatéraux qui s'écartent des objectifs affichés<br />
des APE, à savoir l'intégration régionale. Comment ne<br />
pas voir là l'illustration de ce que dénoncent, dans le<br />
Pacifique comme en Afrique, les acteurs de la société<br />
civile, à savoir qu'un certain nombre de pays ACP ont<br />
été contraints de signer des accords individuels parce<br />
que la Commission n'a pas su faire des APE un véritable<br />
instrument de partenariat de développement?<br />
Ces fortes pressions exercées par les négociateurs<br />
européens sur les États ACP ont été dénoncées par les<br />
pays ACP eux-mêmes à l'occasion de la 92 e session du<br />
Conseil des ministres d'Afrique, des Caraïbes et du<br />
Pacifique, qui s'est tenue à Bruxelles du 8 au<br />
12 novembre 2010. La réalité tragique des APE, accords<br />
négociés par la Commission européenne, est telle qu'ils<br />
sont un échec avant même leur entrée en vigueur. Un<br />
échec tel que nombre de pays ACP demandent aux États<br />
membres de l'Union européenne d'examiner la<br />
possibilité de réviser le mandat de négociation donné à<br />
la Commission européenne en juin 2002.<br />
1-135<br />
Andreas Mölzer (NI). – Herr Präsident! Im<br />
Zusammenwirken mit der derzeitigen Marktsituation<br />
führt die Reform der EU-Zuckermarktordnung dazu,<br />
dass der EU-Zuckerpreis unter dem internationalen Preis<br />
liegt.<br />
Die langjährigen Abnahmeverträge mit den<br />
Zuckerrohproduzenten in Afrika, der Karibik oder dem<br />
Pazifik werden bei dieser Preissituation wohl nur sehr<br />
schwer haltbar sein. Dass die Bauern in den AKP-<br />
Staaten ihre Ware lieber zu höheren Preisen auf dem<br />
Weltmarkt verkaufen, statt sie günstig in der EU zu<br />
vertreiben, mag bei den Schwierigkeiten rund um die<br />
neuen AKP-Abkommen eine Rolle gespielt haben.<br />
Wenn nun dieser Anreiz wegfällt und gleichzeitig eine<br />
Meistbegünstigungsklausel in Kauf genommen werden<br />
muss und zudem noch die Staatseinnahmen mit dem<br />
Wegfall der Zolleinnahmen sinken, ist es ja kein<br />
Wunder, dass die AKP-Staaten so zögerlich waren.<br />
In diesem Zusammenhang wird sicherlich ein<br />
Augenmerk auf die Fischerei gelegt werden müssen, und<br />
zwar nicht nur, ob Papua-Neuguinea und Fidschi<br />
anderen Handelspartnern Zugang zu ihren<br />
Fischereigewässern gewährt haben. Vielleicht sollte man<br />
auch aufklären, ob die Vorwürfe stimmen, dass sich<br />
etwa die spanische Fischereiflotte aufgrund der EU-<br />
Einschränkungen und der Fangquoten in den Pazifik<br />
verlagert hat und dort unter fremder Flagge fischt.<br />
1-136<br />
Francisco José Millán Mon (PPE). – Señor Presidente,<br />
yo también quiero expresar mi preocupación por el<br />
impacto de este acuerdo en el sector pesquero del atún<br />
en conserva, muy importante en España y en especial en<br />
Galicia, mi circunscripción.<br />
Este impacto negativo obedece, como se ha dicho, a una<br />
concesión sin precedentes y mal fundamentada: la<br />
exención de las normas de origen en los productos<br />
transformados de la pesca, cuando así se solicite, por no<br />
disponer de materia prima autóctona suficiente.
17-01-2011 51<br />
Pues bien, es lo primero que ha hecho Papúa Nueva<br />
Guinea, y la exención ya se está aplicando. Papúa Nueva<br />
Guinea se convierte así en una gran plataforma de<br />
transformación y exportación de atún proveniente de los<br />
grandes competidores de la industria europea, es decir,<br />
Filipinas, Tailandia, China y los Estados Unidos.<br />
Realmente, ellos son los grandes beneficiarios del<br />
acuerdo.<br />
Se estima que la producción de atún se elevará<br />
finalmente a cuatrocientas mil toneladas al año, dirigidas<br />
al mercado europeo, que consume actualmente un total<br />
de unas setecientas diez mil. El impacto será muy grave,<br />
ya que los precios del atún procedente de Papúa Nueva<br />
Guinea son un tercio más baratos que los europeos, por<br />
los bajos salarios y los inexistentes estándares<br />
medioambientales.<br />
En mi tierra, en Galicia, se considera una competencia<br />
imbatible, que tendrá graves consecuencias en el<br />
empleo. Deseo que el estudio de impacto que anuncia la<br />
Comisión Europea tenga el mayor rigor posible y tenga<br />
en cuenta las consecuencias, a corto y medio plazo, de<br />
esa exención de las normas de origen.<br />
Espero que ponga fin, cuanto antes, a la aplicación de<br />
esta exención. Es una medida excepcional y transitoria.<br />
Sin embargo, parece que en Papúa Nueva Guinea la<br />
consideran permanente. De lo contrario, no se harían<br />
esas in<strong>version</strong>es. Espero, además, que esta exención no<br />
vuelva a recogerse en otros acuerdos, y tampoco en el<br />
acuerdo definitivo. Pero, en la actualidad, ya hay un<br />
problema con el acuerdo provisional y debe subsanarse.<br />
1-137<br />
Josefa Andrés Barea (S&D). – Señor Presidente, el<br />
Acuerdo de Asociación con Papúa Nueva Guinea y Fiyi<br />
conlleva, como se está diciendo aquí, una exención a las<br />
normas de origen. Afecta, sobre todo, al atún, como ha<br />
dicho el ponente. ¿Qué queremos con este acuerdo?<br />
Queremos el desarrollo del sector pesquero y la<br />
superación de la pobreza en estos archipiélagos, esto es,<br />
la ayuda al desarrollo.<br />
¿Pero qué efectos negativos tiene que terceros países se<br />
beneficien de este trato preferencial?<br />
Estamos escuchando aquí las denuncias que se están<br />
produciendo. Queremos una situación equilibrada. La<br />
Comisión nos acaba de decir que hay análisis claros. Sin<br />
embargo, la opinión que aquí se expresa es que no es así.<br />
En 2008 se dijo que no existía ningún tipo de distorsión<br />
y se nos anunció un informe de impacto.<br />
Queremos una situación equilibrada. Queremos una<br />
revisión, consulta y controles. Queremos saber si este<br />
acuerdo sirve para la ayuda al desarrollo de este<br />
archipiélago. Y también queremos saber si se cumplen<br />
las medidas sanitarias ―algo muy importante para los<br />
productos que se importan―, la gestión sostenible de la<br />
pesca, la lucha contra la pesca ilegal ―elemento<br />
fundamental― y un elemento también muy importante<br />
que nos mostraría la forma de trabajar de estos terceros<br />
países que pueden estar radicados en Papúa Nueva<br />
Guinea, como es el cumplimiento de las normas<br />
internacionales de trabajo.<br />
Queremos dar sostenimiento a este acuerdo, queremos<br />
ayudar al cumplimiento de este acuerdo, pero también<br />
queremos que este acuerdo sirva para el desarrollo de<br />
Papúa Nueva Guinea y de Fiyi y que no perjudique a la<br />
industria española.<br />
1-138<br />
Alain Cadec (PPE). – Monsieur le Président, Monsieur<br />
le Commissaire, chers collègues, je tiens à attirer votre<br />
attention sur la dérogation aux règles d'origine accordée<br />
à la Papouasie-Nouvelle-Guinée, concernant les produits<br />
de la pêche transformés, notamment les conserves de<br />
thon, qui me semble extrêmement dangereuse.<br />
Ce pays ACP bénéficie d'un accès préférentiel au<br />
marché européen, c'est-à-dire d'une exonération totale<br />
des droits de douane sur les conserves de thon qu'il<br />
exporte sur notre marché. Je ne mets pas en doute la<br />
politique de développement que l'accord met en œuvre.<br />
En revanche, la dérogation aux règles d'origine sur les<br />
conserves de thon est totalement inacceptable.<br />
Cette dérogation permet aux opérateurs extérieurs de<br />
s'implanter en Papouasie-Nouvelle-Guinée et elle ne<br />
profite donc que très peu à l'emploi et à la population<br />
locale. Il faut permettre l'aide au développement, mais<br />
une aide juste et efficace, qui profite aux régions<br />
concernées.<br />
Les importations communautaires de thon sont passées<br />
de 9 200 à 16 200 tonnes de 2008 à 2009. Elles ont<br />
doublé en un an seulement. Ce phénomène ne peut que<br />
s'aggraver si cette dérogation est maintenue. De plus, ces<br />
produits ne respectent pas les mêmes normes sociales,<br />
sanitaires et de préservation de la ressource que les<br />
normes imposées aux produits européens. Il est<br />
notamment impossible de vérifier l'origine des captures.<br />
Chers collègues, la Commission européenne n'a-t-elle<br />
pas pris le temps de lire mon rapport sur l'origine des<br />
importations des produits de la pêche et de l'aquaculture<br />
dans l'Union européenne?<br />
En tous les cas, si c'est le cas, c'est à désespérer. Nous ne<br />
pouvons pas de la sorte sacrifier les emplois européens<br />
et la qualité des produits vendus sur le marché européen.<br />
Je ne veux pas qu'une situation destructrice pour<br />
l'industrie de la transformation européenne se mette en<br />
place durablement.<br />
1-139<br />
Ulrike Rodust (S&D). – Herr Präsident, Herr<br />
Kommissar, meine lieben Kolleginnen und Kollegen!<br />
Für mich als Koordinatorin des Fischereiausschusses ist<br />
in diesem Übergangsabkommen besonders der Aspekt<br />
der Fischerei interessant. Hier gab es im Vorfeld einige<br />
Kontroversen hinsichtlich der Lockerung der<br />
Ursprungsregelung für Papua-Neuguinea. Ich unterstütze<br />
die Auffassung der Kommission, durch diese Lockerung<br />
die Wirtschaft eines der ärmsten Länder unserer Erde
52 17-01-2011<br />
anzukurbeln. Das darf auch – davon bin ich fest<br />
überzeugt – uns Fischereipolitikern nicht egal sein. Ich<br />
verstehe gleichzeitig die Sorgen der europäischen<br />
Industrie, kann mir aber, ehrlich gesagt, nicht vorstellen,<br />
dass die gewährten Erleichterungen dazu führen, dass<br />
Papua-Neuguinea eine ernstzunehmende Konkurrenz für<br />
unsere Konservenindustrie wird.<br />
Aber wir müssen wachsam sein, denn es ist natürlich<br />
niemandem geholfen, wenn wir unsere halbe<br />
Konservenindustrie in den Pazifikraum verlagern. Ich<br />
muss aber dazu sagen, dass uns in der Diskussion über<br />
dieses Abkommen sehr widersprüchliche Informationen<br />
hinsichtlich der Frage vorlagen, in welchem Umfang in<br />
Papua-Neuguinea investiert wird und welche Staaten<br />
indirekt von der Lockerung der Ursprungsregelung<br />
profitieren. Ich bitte deshalb die Kommission dringend,<br />
die Anwendung dieser Ausnahmeregelung genau zu<br />
überwachen und dem Parlament rechtzeitig über die<br />
Auswirkungen auf die Entwicklung in Papua-Neuguinea<br />
und die Auswirkungen auf die europäische<br />
Konservenindustrie Bericht zu erstatten. Wenn diese<br />
Regelung nicht die gewünschten Ergebnisse vor Ort<br />
erzielt und nicht vertretbaren Schaden für europäische<br />
Firmen bedeutet, müssen wir bei der Verhandlung des<br />
endgültigen Abkommens neu entscheiden. Halten Sie<br />
uns bitte auf dem Laufenden!<br />
1-140<br />
Pablo Zalba Bidegain (PPE). – Señor Presidente, en<br />
primer lugar, me gustaría aclarar que estoy a favor de<br />
estrechar vínculos comerciales entre la Unión Europea y<br />
Papúa Nueva Guinea que favorezcan el desarrollo de<br />
esta región, pero que favorezcan un desarrollo<br />
sostenible.<br />
Creo sinceramente que este acuerdo, tal y como lo<br />
hemos planteado actualmente, no es un buen acuerdo.<br />
Estoy absolutamente en contra de una cláusula del<br />
mismo que considero injusta: la exención a las normas<br />
de origen, porque no solo pone en peligro el desarrollo<br />
sostenible de Papúa Nueva Guinea sino que, como bien<br />
hemos escuchado aquí, pone en peligro toda una<br />
industria europea, la industria conservera. Esta<br />
concesión debería ser absolutamente excepcional, y no<br />
debería haberse aplicado en el caso de Papúa Nueva<br />
Guinea. Además, no olvidemos el serio precedente que<br />
esta medida está sentando, y sentará, en futuras<br />
negociaciones de la Unión Europea.<br />
En mi opinión, hubiese sido necesaria una resolución<br />
mucho más clara y contundente al respecto que indicase<br />
categóricamente que, en la próxima revisión del<br />
Acuerdo de Asociación Interino, se suspenda<br />
definitivamente la exención a las normas de origen. Por<br />
tanto, quiero pedir a la Comisión que tenga en cuenta las<br />
dramáticas consecuencias que esta concesión va a tener,<br />
primero, en la industria conservera europea y, segundo,<br />
en la sostenibilidad del medio ambiente y en los recursos<br />
naturales de Papúa Nueva Guinea, y el precedente tan<br />
negativo que sienta para futuras negociaciones. Por<br />
mucho que la Comisión haya reconocido que no será un<br />
precedente, la presión estará ahí. Por tanto, pido a la<br />
Comisión que decida poner fin, cuanto antes, a la<br />
exención a las normas de origen.<br />
1-141<br />
Mairead McGuinness (PPE). – Mr President, I actually<br />
came down to participate in the next debate but I have<br />
been watching this debate from my office and I am<br />
concerned, like others who have spoken in the debate<br />
here, about the idea of flexibility on rules of origin.<br />
In the last seven days there was a programme on British<br />
television, part of a whole Channel Four series about the<br />
fishing industry, in which, I am afraid, the European<br />
Union’s fisheries policy came in for severe criticism,<br />
and we are getting lots of e-mails from concerned<br />
citizens.<br />
This specific issue did not arise, but I would just like to<br />
stand up and support those colleagues who have<br />
expressed huge concern about a proposal that is<br />
supposed to be positive as a development tool, but in<br />
fact could be quite negative, not just from a European<br />
perspective, but also for the very countries we are trying<br />
to assist.<br />
1-142<br />
Andris Piebalgs, Member of the Commission. − Mr<br />
President, this was an extremely interesting debate.<br />
There is poverty in the world. We need to deal with it.<br />
One way would be the transfer of financial resources,<br />
but it is much better to give the people the opportunity to<br />
make a decent living from the work they do. The three<br />
tuna processing facilities in Papua New Guinea which<br />
are authorised to export tuna to the EU employ around<br />
5 700 people, most of whom are women. Jobs are at<br />
stake in Papua New Guinea, which is one of the most<br />
poverty-stricken countries.<br />
When it proposes derogations, the Commission takes<br />
due account of the risks involved and looks to create<br />
safeguards. The Commission takes the view that it is<br />
highly unlikely that Papua New Guinea’s exports will<br />
cause any serious disruption to the EU’s fishing and<br />
canning industry given the low volume of trade between<br />
Papua New Guinea and the EU, and Papua New<br />
Guinea’s low market-share in the EU tuna market of<br />
around 3% in recent years. Provisional application dates<br />
from 2008, and we have some experience with figures. It<br />
will not cause any disruption to Europe’s fishing or<br />
canning industries. The development of trade flows will<br />
be further analysed in a study on the effect of the<br />
implementation of the special rules of origin for fishery<br />
products which will be prepared in 2011.<br />
In addition, the Commission will monitor trade with<br />
PNG and will not hesitate to take appropriate measures<br />
if a serious disturbance of the EU market becomes<br />
evident. The Interim Agreement explicitly allows for the<br />
application of such measures in its Chapter 2 on trade<br />
defence instruments. There is no indication at this stage<br />
of any negative impact of Papua New Guinea’s exports<br />
of fishery products on the canning industry in other ACP<br />
or GSP+ countries. This aspect will also be looked at in<br />
the study I have just mentioned.
17-01-2011 53<br />
I should like to add that, independently of any special<br />
rules of origin or preferential trade agreements, countries<br />
and companies exporting fish or fishery products to the<br />
EU will always have to comply with the regulation on<br />
illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing and with the<br />
EU’s health and food safety requirements. I believe that<br />
the Commission has considered the matter very carefully<br />
before bringing this measure forward.<br />
I shall now turn to a broader issue: the EPA in general.<br />
Trade is far from simple. As I have said, the only way to<br />
eradicate poverty is to allow growth in the developing<br />
world. It is true that regional cooperation is rather<br />
difficult at the start. It is not just trade agreements that<br />
make regional development happen. That is why we<br />
have earmarked EUR 45 million for aid for trade in the<br />
Oceania region. This is three times more than was<br />
provided for under the ninth EDF. It is only by<br />
facilitating trade flows that you can expect regional trade<br />
to take place. If we look at all developing countries,<br />
basically all trade is based on monoculture – one<br />
particular export item with a high fluctuation rate. This<br />
has a highly disruptive effect in the countries concerned.<br />
When we talk about migratory flows, security, safety<br />
and justice in the world, we cannot just say that we do<br />
not care about it. We should care about it, and our<br />
departments have carried out an extensive study. We are<br />
proposing very decent measures which are completely in<br />
line with all the European Union’s objectives.<br />
I believe that the measure is right and that the necessary<br />
safeguards are in place in case anything goes wrong. I<br />
believe we have judged this correctly and I therefore<br />
lend my support to this agreement.<br />
1-143<br />
David Martin, author. − Mr President, I will be brief. I<br />
find myself almost, indeed entirely, in agreement with<br />
the Commissioner on this subject.<br />
Firstly, to repeat, it is important that we sign the interim<br />
EPA because, if we do not, existing trade preferences for<br />
Papua New Guinea and Fiji will disappear, under the<br />
WTO ruling. The interim EPA is precisely that: it is an<br />
interim arrangement, and I agree with all the colleagues<br />
who say that our objective in the long run should be a<br />
full, comprehensive EPA with all the Pacific countries,<br />
encouraging regional integration in the Pacific. But we<br />
have to take this step at the moment to ensure the<br />
continuation of preferences for the two largest countries<br />
in the Pacific region.<br />
On fishing, the Commission has made it very clear that<br />
what we have here is an exception. This will be the only<br />
derogation. There are no other parts of the world to<br />
which we intend giving such a derogation. Why are we<br />
giving a derogation to Papua New Guinea? I will tell<br />
you: it is because Papua New Guinea is literally on the<br />
other side of the world, and the likelihood of EU fishing<br />
fleets exploiting that area extensively is limited,<br />
although they are free to do so. There is nothing to stop<br />
EU fishing fleets fishing in Papua New Guinea waters<br />
and landing their catch and getting their catch canned in<br />
Papua New Guinea – and, as has been said earlier, that<br />
would be very good for development, and indeed we<br />
should encourage it.<br />
But the situation at present is that Chinese boats, Thai<br />
boats and boats of other Asian nationalities are fishing in<br />
Papua New Guinea’s waters and landing their fish back<br />
in their own country, giving no opportunity for<br />
development in Papua New Guinea.<br />
There is a development opportunity here in terms of<br />
providing jobs, particularly for women. We often<br />
complain that we do not do enough in our development<br />
policy to encourage downstream activity. Here we are<br />
actually doing something positive for downstream<br />
activity. As the Commissioner has said, in order to<br />
qualify the fish still needs to meet all the standards under<br />
the regulation on illegal, unreported and unregulated<br />
fishing. It has to meet all our sanitary and phytosanitary<br />
conditions. That is absolutely essential. The three<br />
factories in Papua New Guinea meet these standards at<br />
the moment and are providing useful jobs. If we have a<br />
sudden increase in the number of factories, and a sudden<br />
surge in imports from Papua New Guinea, then of course<br />
we will have to revisit the situation and potentially take<br />
action.<br />
At the moment, however, the statistics speak for<br />
themselves. This agreement has been in place since<br />
2008. There has been no surge. There is no threat to the<br />
European tuna industry. I have met, as rapporteur, with<br />
the leaders of the Spanish tuna industry and they<br />
themselves have said to me that there is no current<br />
threat. What they are worried about is the future. They<br />
accept that at the moment there is no serious threat to the<br />
EU industry. So let us not exaggerate the situation. Let<br />
us not make a poor developing country pay for our<br />
preoccupation with our own self-interest.<br />
1-144<br />
Presidente. − Comunico di aver ricevuto una proposta<br />
di risoluzione conformemente all'articolo 115, paragrafo<br />
5, del regolamento.<br />
La discussione è chiusa.<br />
La votazione si svolgerà mercoledì 19 gennaio 2011.<br />
Dichiarazioni scritte (articolo 149)<br />
1-145<br />
Helmut Scholz (GUE/NGL), schriftlich. – Das<br />
Interims-Partnerschaftsabkommen zwischen der<br />
Europäischen Gemeinschaft und Fidschi und Papua-<br />
Neuguinea greift in den komplizierten und komplexen<br />
Integrationsprozess in der pazifischen Region ein. Es<br />
leistet leider kaum erkennbare entwicklungspolitische<br />
Förderung für die beiden Staaten. Ich möchte daran<br />
erinnern, dass der Militärputsch in Fidschi 2006 vom<br />
Europäischen Parlament, vom Rat und auch von der<br />
Kommission einhellig verurteilt wurden. Die bis heute<br />
andauernde Diktatur wird nun mit dem Abschluss dieses<br />
Handelsabkommens quasi als Vertragspartner anerkannt.
54 17-01-2011<br />
Das Bemühen unserer Partner in Australien, Neuseeland<br />
und anderen Ländern der Region um eine Rückkehr zur<br />
Demokratie in Fidschi wird durch diesen Vertrag<br />
unterwandert. Als ich in unserer Sitzung im<br />
Handelsausschuss die Unterdrückung der Demokratie<br />
durch die Militärs in Fidschi kritisierte, war die Antwort<br />
von deren Vertretern: „But we are in control!“ Was ich<br />
für blanken Zynismus hielt, scheint nun den Ansprüchen<br />
der Kommission an die Legitimität ihrer Vertragspartner<br />
zu genügen. Meine Fraktion wird gegen dieses<br />
Abkommen stimmen. Ich werde mich dafür einsetzen,<br />
das Abkommen so lange auszusetzen, bis die<br />
Demokratie in Fidschi wiederhergestellt ist.<br />
1-146<br />
18 - Adozione internazionale nell'Unione<br />
europea (discussione)<br />
1-147<br />
Presidente. − L'ordine del giorno reca la discussione<br />
sull'interrogazione orale alla Commissione sull'adozione<br />
internazionale nell'Unione europea, di Roberta Angelilli<br />
(O-0193/2010 - B7-0670/2010).<br />
1-148<br />
Roberta Angelilli, Autore. − Signor Presidente,<br />
onorevoli colleghi, molti colleghi, insieme a me, sono<br />
stati sensibilizzati nel corso degli anni sul problema dei<br />
minori abbandonati, orfani o bambini di strada. Tra le<br />
associazioni che mi hanno contattato c'è quella degli<br />
Amici dell'adozione.<br />
Di questi bambini abbandonati ce ne sono tanti e non<br />
solo nel terzo mondo, ma anche in <strong>Europa</strong>. Sono<br />
bambini che diventano invisibili e finiscono nel circuito<br />
vizioso della povertà e dell'esclusione sociale o, peggio<br />
ancora, vengono sfruttati dalla criminalità organizzata<br />
per l'accattonaggio, il lavoro nero, la prostituzione, il<br />
traffico di organi o di adozioni illegali; sono bambini che<br />
spesso passano la loro infanzia tra assistenti sociali ed<br />
orfanotrofi.<br />
A questi bambini noi dobbiamo garantire il diritto ad<br />
essere adottati, il diritto ad avere una famiglia. Un<br />
bambino deve rimanere il meno possibile in un istituto.<br />
L'obiettivo, ovviamente, è l'interesse superiore del<br />
minore, quindi l'adottabilità deve essere concessa<br />
certamente con accortezza, sotto la scrupolosa vigilanza<br />
delle competenti autorità nazionali, ma se ci sono le<br />
condizioni, i bambini hanno il diritto di essere adottati,<br />
innanzitutto a livello nazionale, ma anche a livello<br />
internazionale, all'interno dell'Unione europea.<br />
So che la Commissione è sensibile, seppur si tratta di<br />
una competenza squisitamente nazionale, ma sarebbe<br />
appunto auspicabile una sorta di coordinamento tra<br />
Commissione e Stati membri per buone prassi e strategie<br />
capaci di garantire la massima trasparenza, per evitare<br />
adozioni illegali e adozioni facili, ma anche per ottenere<br />
da tutti gli Stati membri la massima collaborazione nel<br />
garantire il diritto all'adozione e per evitare che i<br />
bambini siano abbandonati a se stessi o, come dicevo<br />
prima, abbandonati all'interno di un istituto.<br />
1-149<br />
Kristalina Georgieva, Member of the Commission. −<br />
Mr President, thank you for bringing forward this<br />
important question. The protection and promotion of<br />
children’s rights is a priority for the Commission,<br />
especially since the launch of the communication<br />
entitled ‘Towards an EU strategy on the rights of the<br />
child’ in 2006. The strategy on the rights of the child<br />
focuses on the fundamental rights of children, including<br />
the protection of the best interests of the child as<br />
enshrined in the European Charter of Fundamental<br />
Rights.<br />
The Commission is determined to ensure that all<br />
fundamental rights encompassed in the Charter are duly<br />
respected by all EU actions, both legislative and nonlegislative.<br />
This practice will be upheld and further<br />
developed in the forthcoming communication on the<br />
rights of the child that the Commission will be<br />
publishing this year. As of this year, 2011, the<br />
Commission will also be reporting annually on progress<br />
made on the application of the EU Charter of<br />
Fundamental Rights.<br />
We have to remember that the provisions of the Charter<br />
are addressed to the institutions and bodies of the Union,<br />
with due regard for the principle of subsidiarity, and to<br />
the Member States only when they are implementing<br />
Union law. We therefore have to remember that,<br />
currently, no European Union legislation on<br />
international adoption exists. The subject is regulated by<br />
the Hague Convention of 29 May 1993 on protection of<br />
children and cooperation in respect of inter-country<br />
adoption, as well as by national laws. All the Member<br />
States are party to that Convention, but the EU is not. Its<br />
aim is to implement Article 21 of the UN Convention on<br />
the Rights of the Child by establishing safeguards to<br />
ensure that inter-country adoptions take place in the best<br />
interests of the child and that the child’s fundamental<br />
rights are respected.<br />
Internationally, the Commission supports the accession<br />
of third countries to the 1993 Hague Convention on<br />
inter-country adoption and its correct implementation by<br />
participating in relevant meetings of the contracting<br />
parties. The Commission does not consider specific<br />
European rules on intra-EU adoptions to be necessary, as<br />
all 27 EU Member States are parties to the Hague<br />
Convention. That being said, the Commission is closely<br />
following the issue of international adoption within the<br />
European Union, given the link between adoption and<br />
children’s rights. The Commission has taken steps to see<br />
how countries are implementing the convention on<br />
adoption, and, in November 2009, provided a forum for<br />
an exchange of views on the issue.<br />
The Commission’s Green Paper on the free circulation<br />
of public documents, published on 14 December 2010,<br />
addresses the lack of mutual recognition of adoption<br />
decisions as civil status acts between Member States and<br />
its impact on the freedom of movement of EU citizens.<br />
This is a specific step which addresses the question<br />
raised today.
17-01-2011 55<br />
1-150<br />
Salvatore Iacolino, a nome del gruppo PPE. – Signor<br />
Presidente, onorevoli colleghi, Signora Commissario,<br />
non v'è dubbio che il tema dell'adozione internazionale<br />
sia un tema di particolare rilevanza e bene ha fatto la<br />
collega Angelilli a sottoporlo al Parlamento europeo in<br />
questa sessione.<br />
Procedure più snelle e semplificate, costi che in atto<br />
sono particolarmente rilevanti, dai 20 ai 30 000 euro per<br />
adozione, difficoltà a dare una risposta concreta a<br />
un'esigenza, quella della famiglia, quella dei genitori di<br />
diventare appunto tali. Ragazzi vulnerabili e spesso<br />
abbandonati che si pongono talvolta in condizione di<br />
invisibilità, mi riferisco in particolare ai flussi di<br />
emigranti clandestini e ai tanti ragazzi che sono<br />
sottoposti, dopo essere stati collocati nei centri di<br />
identificazione ed espulsione, a quella tratta vergognosa<br />
di schiavitù nella quale molto spesso gli stessi vengono<br />
coinvolti.<br />
Ci vogliono contributi nei confronti della famiglia; il<br />
modello italiano, il modello di altre realtà, può essere<br />
seguito: detrazione per le spese legate al costo<br />
dell'adozione internazionale, crediti agevolati alle<br />
banche, procedure, dicevamo, snelle e semplificate, con<br />
meccanismi reali di monitoraggio su ciò che accade nei<br />
vari Stati membri, prevenzione reale sul traffico degli<br />
esseri umani – recentemente il Parlamento è intervenuto<br />
con un dossier specifico – contrasto reale alle adozioni<br />
illegali e trasparenza.<br />
E, perché no, se vogliamo restituire centralità alla<br />
famiglia, come spesso riferiamo in questo consesso,<br />
dobbiamo fare in modo che le associazioni, quelle<br />
associazioni che molto spesso sono il veicolo<br />
fondamentale di queste adozioni siano caratterizzate da<br />
standard di garanzia particolarmente elevati.<br />
Se c'è un suggerimento – e concludo – alla Signora<br />
Commissario, è: perché non prevedere una modalità di<br />
accreditamento europeo nei confronti di queste<br />
associazioni, fare in modo che queste associazioni si<br />
muovano con trasparenza, chiarezza e concretezza, ma<br />
con una linea elevata di garanzia che tuteli veramente i<br />
diritti inviolabili e intangibili dei minori?<br />
1-151<br />
Monika Flašíková Beňová, za skupinu S&D. –<br />
Hovoríme tu v tejto večernej hodine o veľmi citlivej<br />
téme, pretože hovoríme o tých najmenších, o tých, ktorí<br />
potrebujú našu lásku a potrebujú našu opateru.<br />
Problém opustených detí v Európe sa stáva čoraz<br />
závažnejším. Vzniknutá situácia je v dnešných dňoch v<br />
oveľa väčšej miere vecou zodpovednosti práve<br />
bezprostredného okolia. Aj prostredníctvom práva<br />
osvojiť si dieťa na medzinárodnej úrovni je možné<br />
predísť tomu, aby boli mnohé deti nútené žiť v detských<br />
domovoch, kde napriek veľkej starostlivosti, ktorú<br />
dostávajú, nikdy nepocítia takú tú skutočnú materskú<br />
lásku alebo otcovské pohladenie.<br />
Je preto potrebné zefektívniť systém adopcií tak, aby si<br />
opustené deti v čo najskoršom veku mohli nájsť<br />
náhradnú rodinu. Treba napríklad zúžiť práva<br />
biologických rodičov, ak o dieťa neprejavujú skutočný<br />
záujem po určitý čas. Skrátilo by sa tým obdobie, ktoré<br />
dieťa trávi v detskom domove, lebo nie je tzv. právne<br />
voľné. Takto by tiež bolo možné do určitej miery<br />
eliminovať zbytočné časové prieťahy v celom adopčnom<br />
procese.<br />
Množstvo dohovorov o ochrane maloletých legislatívne<br />
upravuje snahu kompetentných konať v prospech a v<br />
záujme týchto detí. Ochrana práv dieťaťa je rovnako<br />
jedným z hlavných cieľov Európskej únie. Vhodnými<br />
krokmi je preto potrebné aj naďalej postupovať tak, aby<br />
bol za každých okolností chránený najmä najlepší<br />
záujem dieťaťa.<br />
1-152<br />
Cecilia Wikström, för ALDE-gruppen. – Herr talman!<br />
Jag vill inleda med att tacka Roberta Angelilli för<br />
initiativet och tacka för svaret till kommissionsledamot<br />
Georgieva. Det här är en viktig debatt.<br />
Ett hem att kalla sitt eget, en familj som skyddar en, som<br />
värmer och värnar ett skört litet barn är något som<br />
väldigt många barn runtom i <strong>Europa</strong> idag saknar. Det är<br />
en dröm för de barn som växer upp på institutioner.<br />
Vi måste alla nu göra vårt yttersta för att föräldralösa<br />
eller övergivna barn inte ska behöva växa upp på<br />
barnhem och andra institutioner utan i familjer där de får<br />
den ömhet som kan bära dem ända in i vuxenlivet, så att<br />
de blir hela vuxna och inte trasiga.<br />
I våra medlemsstater har vi olika uppfattningar om vilka<br />
individer som kan utgöra en familj. Jag tror ändå att vi<br />
kan vara överens om att en familj kan se olika ut men att<br />
det är som är viktigast är att man möter barnet med<br />
kärlek och omsorg.<br />
Jag hoppas att vi också kan enas kring hur viktigt<br />
samarbetet kring politiska strategier och instrument för<br />
internationella adoptioner är. Jag utgår från att<br />
kommissionen tar täten i det här arbetet. Jag ser också<br />
fram emot att tillsammans med kollegorna arbeta fram<br />
en gemensam resolution i den här frågan. I den mån vi<br />
kan bidra till att föra samman ett övergivet föräldralöst<br />
barn med en familj som längtar efter barn har vi bidragit<br />
med något mycket stort.<br />
Låt oss också komma ihåg hur viktigt det är hur möter<br />
dessa våra minsta bröder och systrar. Om vi möter dem<br />
med kärlek ökar vi gryningsljuset på jorden. Det tror jag<br />
är en livsuppgift för alla, oaktat vilken roll vi har i<br />
samhället.<br />
1-153<br />
Marina Yannakoudakis, on behalf of the ECR Group.<br />
– Mr President, adoption is a positive way of providing a<br />
new family for children who cannot be brought up by<br />
their birth parents, or children who lose their parents. To<br />
adopt a child in the UK, checks and vetting procedures<br />
are robust, and prospective parents need to be accepted
56 17-01-2011<br />
by an adoption agency. The welfare of the child is and<br />
should be at the heart of the adoption process.<br />
The issue of inter-country adoptions is more complex<br />
than national adoption, but I am very grateful to the PPE<br />
Group for bringing this issue forward. Whilst it is to be<br />
commended that we try and move forward in it, I have<br />
concerns that international adoption does bring risks –<br />
risks that have already been mentioned, such as child<br />
abuse and malpractice, that undermine the welfare of the<br />
child.<br />
That is why I believe that all Member States need to<br />
ensure that their adoption laws are regulated in a way<br />
that promotes the interests of the child. Member States<br />
must work together to ensure that the legal process of<br />
adoption between the providing and receiving countries<br />
is transparent, robust and holds the child’s welfare as its<br />
priority.<br />
1-154<br />
Слави Бинев (NI). – уважаема г-жо комисар<br />
Георгиева, скъпи колеги, ще дам пример с България,<br />
където проблемът с изоставените деца става все посериозен<br />
и са необходими спешни мерки, за да се<br />
овладее ситуацията. Системи, подобни на<br />
българската, в които огромен процент деца се дават<br />
за международно осиновяване, са вредни.<br />
От друга страна, докато системите за грижи за<br />
децата са такива, международното осиновяване може<br />
да се окаже единствената възможност за семейство и<br />
нормален живот за мнозина от децата в домовете.<br />
Когато подобряваме цялостната система, трябва да<br />
внимаваме да не им отнемаме този шанс.<br />
Необходими са мерки, които да улеснят процедурата<br />
за международно осиновяване, но и да гарантират<br />
интересите на децата ни. Да гарантират, че така<br />
наречените "осиновители" не гонят само европейско<br />
гражданство, нещо, което в момента им се<br />
позволява.<br />
Не трябва аз да питам дали го правят от чисто сърце<br />
или користни цели. Това е работа на тези, които ще<br />
проведат интервюто за осиновяване и ще внимават<br />
за интересите на нашите деца. Принципите на<br />
Конвенцията на ООН за правата на детето и<br />
съпътстващата ги философия трябва да са в основата<br />
на правото на международното осиновяване в<br />
рамките на Европейския съюз.<br />
1-155<br />
Elena Băsescu (PPE). – Apreciez interesul colegilor<br />
mei din delegaţia italiană pentru situaţia copiilor<br />
abandonaţi, interes pe care îl împărtăşim cu toţii, de<br />
altfel, însă această problematică ţine doar de competenţa<br />
naţională. Am insistat să iau parte la această dezbatere,<br />
deoarece provin dintr-o ţară asupra căreia se fac presiuni<br />
pentru reluarea adopţiilor internaţionale şi pentru<br />
modificarea legislaţiei aflate în vigoare. Însă, în<br />
România, există mai multe familii doritoare să adopte,<br />
decât copii adoptabili, iar legislaţia noastră, la care au<br />
participat şi numeroşi experţi internaţionali, este în<br />
perfectă coordonare cu cea europeană.<br />
Referindu-mă acum la această rezoluţie, menţionez că<br />
sintagma „dreptul copilului de a fi adoptat<br />
internaţional”, cum prevede punctul d, nu este<br />
recunoscută de convenţia ONU şi de cea de la Haga.<br />
Adopţia internaţională reprezintă doar o opţiune. Aceşti<br />
copii ajung în sistem datorită situaţiei precare a<br />
familiilor din care provin, care, conform legislaţiei şi<br />
convenţiilor internaţionale, nu trebuie să reprezinte un<br />
motiv pentru adopţie. De aici, numărul mare de copii<br />
aflaţi în centrele de plasament. 22 966 copii au, totuşi,<br />
un părinte. Legislaţia din România nu prevede decăderea<br />
din drepturile părinteşti decât în cazul unui abuz. Deci,<br />
aceşti copii nu sunt în situaţia de a fi adoptaţi. La fel şi<br />
cei 22 285 de copii aflaţi în asistenţă maternală.<br />
Raţionamentul rezoluţiei trebuie axat pe interesul<br />
superior al copilului, aşa cum au spus şi colegii mei<br />
înainte şi nu al celui care adoptă. Fiecare stat şi nu<br />
altcineva are obligaţia de a alege soluţiile cele mai<br />
potrivite pentru copiii săi.<br />
În final, recomand tuturor o mai bună cunoaştere a<br />
legislaţiilor naţionale. Mă refer aici la faptul că, de<br />
exemplu, mai multe tribunale de minori din Italia au<br />
emis în 2009 şapte hotărâri de adopţie pentru copii din<br />
România, fără să ţină cont de legislaţia noastră.<br />
1-156<br />
Victor Boştinaru (S&D). – Salut această dezbatere în<br />
plenul Parlamentului European, pornind de la premiza că<br />
protecţia drepturilor copilului este şi trebuie să fie o<br />
prioritate a fiecărui stat membru al Uniunii noastre.<br />
Scopul final pentru toţi cei prezenţi aici este promovarea<br />
interesului copiilor.<br />
Bineînţeles, criterii comune şi stricte, pe care statele<br />
membre să le implementeze, sunt necesare pentru<br />
ameliorarea condiţiilor de îngrijire şi trai ale copiilor<br />
instituţionalizaţi şi abandonaţi şi pentru protecţia lor<br />
atunci când aceştia sunt adoptaţi şi, mai ales, acum, în<br />
condiţiile în care austeritatea bugetară pare să fie singura<br />
idee a guvernelor de dreapta din Uniunea Europeană. În<br />
consecinţă, primul pas este asigurarea unei îngrijiri<br />
corespunzătoare pentru aceşti copii; în al doilea rând,<br />
lupta împotriva traficului de copii şi a prostituţiei<br />
infantile; în al treilea rând, să nu uităm că, în interesul<br />
copiilor, trebuie dată întâietate adopţiilor de către un<br />
membru al familiei şi adopţiilor naţionale; în al patrulea<br />
rând, abia, adopţiile internaţionale.<br />
Pentru că aici putem trage doar concluziile din trecut,<br />
deschiderea porţilor pentru adopţiile intenţionale în<br />
România a însemnat crearea unor reţele de trafic de copii<br />
fără precedent, cazuri de răpire a copiilor şi vânzarea lor<br />
spre Occident, în colaborare cu organizaţii europene şi<br />
internaţionale. Între 1997-2000, doamnă Comisar,<br />
România „a exportat” 9 150 copii, iar ţara mea nu va<br />
mai accepta niciodată o asemenea monstruozitate.<br />
Aş dori, în final, să vă rog, prin intermediul<br />
dumneavoastră, ca doamna Comisar Reding să clarifice<br />
alegaţiile apărute în mass-media românească şi<br />
internaţională privitoare la Agenţia Europeană de<br />
Supraveghere a Adopţiilor Internaţionale, propunere
17-01-2011 57<br />
care apare şi în studiul comandat de Comisia Europeană.<br />
Un coleg europarlamentar aşteaptă, încă, răspunsul<br />
doamnei Comisar Reding la o întrebare.<br />
1-157<br />
Alexandra Thein (ALDE). – Herr Präsident! Erst vor<br />
kurzem haben wir im großen Plenarsaal unseres<br />
<strong>Parlaments</strong> in Brüssel einen internationalen Workshop<br />
zur elterlichen Verantwortung und zum Schutz von<br />
Kindern veranstaltet, den zu leiten ich die Ehre hatte. In<br />
<strong>Europa</strong> gibt es immer mehr ausgesetzte und aufgegebene<br />
Kinder, die nicht auf Dauer in Waisenhäusern leben<br />
sollen. Es ist deshalb unsere Pflicht als Gesetzgeber, das<br />
Recht auf internationale Adoption innerhalb der EU zu<br />
stärken, damit diesen Kindern geholfen werden kann.<br />
Dies verlangt auch Artikel 24 unserer Grundrechtecharta,<br />
in der es heißt: „Kinder haben Anspruch auf den<br />
Schutz und die Fürsorge, die für ihr Wohlergehen<br />
notwendig sind.“<br />
Wir haben zwar das Haager Adoptionsübereinkommen<br />
und ein Übereinkommen des <strong>Europa</strong>rats, diese sind<br />
jedoch nicht ausreichend. Bei internationalen<br />
Adoptionen bestehen noch große rechtliche Probleme in<br />
der Praxis. Hier helfen nur internationale Regelungen,<br />
die die immer noch bestehenden unterschiedlichen<br />
nationalen Regelungen beseitigen und durch klare und<br />
einfache Prinzipien ersetzen. Dabei darf bei allem<br />
gesetzgeberischen Eifer nicht aus dem Blickfeld geraten,<br />
dass die EU mit der Haager Konferenz für<br />
internationales Privatrecht kooperieren muss, um ein<br />
abgestimmtes Vorgehen zu gewährleisten. Die EU sollte<br />
also auf diesem Gebiet nicht das Rad neu erfinden. Ich<br />
begrüße die entsprechenden Erklärungen der<br />
Kommissarin.<br />
1-158<br />
Ryszard Czarnecki (ECR). – Panie Przewodniczący!<br />
To bardzo ważny, ale też drażliwy temat. Przypomnę, że<br />
w Parlamencie Europejskim zeszłej kadencji mieliśmy<br />
problem adopcji rumuńskich dzieci przez rodziców w<br />
Izraelu i budziło to poważne perturbacje, także natury<br />
politycznej. Teraz kolejna inicjatywa, która – jak sądzę –<br />
ma dobre intencje, ale jak widać budzi emocje. Myślę,<br />
że tutaj trzeba bardzo uważać, aby nie wylać dziecka z<br />
kąpielą, aby troszcząc się o dobre przyszłe życie dla<br />
dzieci, nie spowodować sytuacji, w której pójdziemy na<br />
skróty, w której otworzymy furtkę dla pospiesznych<br />
adopcji i tak naprawdę pozwolimy na odbieranie dzieci<br />
rodzicom. Przed tym bardzo mocno bym przestrzegał.<br />
1-159<br />
Csanád Szegedi (NI). – Tisztelt elnök úr, tisztelt<br />
képviselőtársaim! Örülök, hogy a nemzetközi<br />
örökbefogadás témaköre, az elhagyott gyermekek ügye<br />
napirendre került az Európai Parlamentben. Rendkívül<br />
fontosnak tartom, hogy úgy en bloc a gyermekek<br />
védelme mind az Európai Parlamentben, mind pedig az<br />
Európai Unióban kiemelt prioritás legyen. Az elhagyott,<br />
elhagyatott gyermekek védelmében mindannyiunknak<br />
példát kell mutatni. Nekik is joguk van ahhoz, hogy<br />
egészséges, mind testileg, mind lelkileg egészséges<br />
felnőtté váljanak. Ehhez pedig elengedhetetlen, hogy<br />
ezek az elhagyott, elhagyatott, árva gyermekek<br />
családban, egészséges környezetben nőjenek fel.<br />
Mindent meg kell tennünk annak érdekében, hogy minél<br />
kevesebb gyermek kerüljön árvaházakba. Különös<br />
megvilágítást kap az elhagyott gyermekek témaköre,<br />
hogyha az elöregedő Európára gondolunk, ahol minden<br />
gyermek a saját jövőnk záloga is egyben.<br />
1-160<br />
Edit Bauer (PPE). – Elnök úr! Kedves biztos asszony!<br />
Szeretném megköszönni az Ön alapos válaszát. Azzal<br />
együtt, hogy tudjuk, hogy a Hágai Szerződés<br />
gyakorlatilag szabályozza a nemzetközi örökbefogadást,<br />
azt is tudjuk, hogy a 27 tagországból 26 részese ennek a<br />
szerződésnek, és abban is igaza van Önnek, hogy ez a<br />
szubszidiaritás kérdése, hogy hogy alkalmazzák ezt a<br />
nemzetközi egyezményt. Ezzel együtt én úgy érzem,<br />
hogy nem lehet közömbös, az élet kikényszeríti, hogy ne<br />
csak akkor foglalkozzunk a gyerekek problémájával,<br />
amikor botrányok vannak, amikor kiderül, hogy több<br />
száz gyereket adtak el ide, több száz gyereket, vagy több<br />
mint ezer gyereket adtak el amoda. Ennek a másik oldala<br />
az, hogy azokat a gyerekeket, akikről tudjuk, hogy<br />
léteznek az Európai Unióban ezerszámra, örökbe<br />
lehessen adni. A téma megkerülhetetlen, mert az Európai<br />
Unió felelős a gyerekek jogainak betartásáért, miközben<br />
azt is látjuk, hogy az örökbefogadás körül, bizony annak<br />
következtében, hogy egyes jogokat túldimenzionál a<br />
nemzeti jogszabály és a nemzeti gyakorlat, így<br />
örökbefogadhatatlanná válnak a gyerekek és így<br />
csorbulnak a más jogaik. Biztos asszony! Én nagyon<br />
szeretném Önt arra kérni, hogy azt, amit elmondott a<br />
bevezetőjében, hogy nincs olyan nemzetközi jogszabály,<br />
ami az Európai Unióban már lehetne, hogy az<br />
örökbefogadásról szóló dokumentumokat a tagországban<br />
elismerjék, hogy ebben a kérdésben szükséges gyorsan<br />
előre lépnünk.<br />
1-161<br />
Zita Gurmai (S&D). – Elnök úr, biztos asszony, kedves<br />
kollégák! A nemzetközi örökbefogadás legalább olyan<br />
súlyú kérdés, mint a határokon átnyúló válások ügye, és<br />
legalább olyan figyelmet is igényel, már csak azért is,<br />
mert legtöbbször a felnőttek döntéseinek érzelmileg,<br />
anyagilag és minden lehetséges értelemben<br />
kiszolgáltatott gyermekekről van szó, akiket a<br />
legmagasabb szintű közösségi védelem illet meg.<br />
A nemzetközi örökbefogadás kapcsán szóbeli kérdést<br />
benyújtók érdeklődése elsősorban a jogi környezetre<br />
vonatkozott. A gyakorlat áttekintése legalább olyan<br />
fontos, mint a jogszabályalkotás. Új vagy egyáltalán jó<br />
szakpolitikai döntés, új jogszabályi környezet ugyanis<br />
csak megbízható adatok, statisztikák illetve a tényleges<br />
gyakorlat ismeretében alakítható ki. Csak pontos<br />
adatokból állapítható meg, hogy egyáltalán szükséges-e<br />
hozzányúlni a szabályozáshoz, ezért tartom a kollégák<br />
által feltett kérdést kiemelt jelentőségűnek. Mivel<br />
azonban szerintem ezt az egész kérdéskört nagyon<br />
átfogóan kell kezelni, szeretnék egy lépéssel hátrébb<br />
lépni, mint a kérdésfeltevők tették.<br />
A következő kérdéseket szeretném feltenni a<br />
Bizottságnak: vannak-e pontos statisztikai adataink az<br />
Unión belüli, illetve a harmadik országok
58 17-01-2011<br />
közreműködésével létrejövő nemzetközi örökbefogadási<br />
esetekről? Egészen pontosan milyen adatokat gyűjtünk<br />
ebben a témában? Milyen módszerekkel? Ki gyűjti az<br />
adatokat, és ha a tagállamok gyűjtik, akkor egységes-e<br />
ez a módszertan? Ha nemzetközi örökbefogadásra kerül<br />
sor akár az Unión belül, akár a harmadik fél<br />
közreműködésével, akkor a szülők és a gyerekek<br />
kiválasztása, illetve előzetes felkészítése hogyan néz ki?<br />
A felkészítést hogyan ellenőrizzük? Vannak-e erre közös<br />
szabályaink? Milyen különbségek vannak a tagállamok<br />
gyakorlatai között? Van-e életkori limit akár az<br />
örökbefogadóra, akár a gyermekre nézve? Kapnak-e az<br />
örökbefogadó szülök folyamatos szakmai támogatást?<br />
Van-e megbízható, rendszeres utókövetés? Lehet-e<br />
tudni, hogy az örökbefogadó szülők milyen<br />
gyakorisággal ütköznek problémákba, és hogy ezek a<br />
problémák milyen jellegűek? Milyen segítséget<br />
nyújtanak a tagállamok problémás esetekben?<br />
Köszönöm szépen a figyelmet, és köszönöm biztos<br />
asszony kiváló munkáját!<br />
1-162<br />
Sonia Alfano (ALDE). – Signor Presidente, onorevoli<br />
colleghi, da alcuni anni in Italia numerose famiglie e<br />
altrettanti bambini rumeni subiscono le conseguenze del<br />
blocco delle adozioni internazionali da parte della<br />
Romania.<br />
La Convenzione dell'Aia rappresenta il quadro di<br />
riferimento da attuare in maniera uniforme in tutti i paesi<br />
dell'Unione europea e in questo bisogna che la Romania<br />
faccia uno sforzo per adeguarsi. Se la Romania ritiene<br />
che il blocco delle adozioni internazionali sia funzionale<br />
a tutelare i bambini, ad esempio per il rischio che si<br />
sviluppi un traffico illegale degli stessi, affronti anche<br />
con l'aiuto dell'Unione europea questa problematica,<br />
inasprendo i controlli e con normative severe; è<br />
necessario però un impegno affinché tante famiglie per<br />
bene possano accogliere bambini che meritano una<br />
seconda opportunità di avere un'infanzia felice.<br />
Chiedo quindi alla Commissione in che maniera intende<br />
supportare un eventuale impegno della Romania a<br />
cancellare la moratoria sulle adozioni internazionali e,<br />
inoltre, vorrei conoscere la posizione della Commissione<br />
riguardo alla possibilità di creare un'Agenzia europea per<br />
le adozioni, anche alla luce degli studi effettuati.<br />
1-163<br />
Janusz Wojciechowski (ECR). – Panie<br />
Przewodniczący! Adopcja może być i często jest<br />
dobrodziejstwem dla dziecka, ale procedury z nią<br />
związane mogą być też powodem nadużyć, takich jak<br />
handel dzieci czy wyrywanie dzieci do adopcji z rodzin,<br />
które wcale nie porzuciły swoich dzieci, tylko często z<br />
powodu biedy nie są w stanie zapewnić im właściwych<br />
warunków. Ta wielka liczba dzieci w sierocińcach, o<br />
której wspominamy w dzisiejszej debacie, to często nie<br />
są dzieci porzucone, ale właśnie dzieci rodziców<br />
biednych, którzy nie radzą sobie z trudną sytuacją<br />
życiową. Takim rodzinom trzeba pomóc. Państwa za<br />
dużo mniejsze kwoty mogłyby pomóc tym rodzinom,<br />
wcale nie zabierając dzieci do sierocińca, a w<br />
konsekwencji dalej do adopcji. Powinniśmy przyjąć<br />
jednoznaczną zasadę – w Unii Europejskiej powinno być<br />
to obowiązujące – nigdy nie zabierać dzieci z rodzin z<br />
powodu biedy, pomagać, nie zabierać dzieci. Bieda nie<br />
może być przyczyną zabierania dziecku jego naturalnej<br />
rodziny.<br />
1-164<br />
Raffaele Baldassarre (PPE). – Signor Presidente,<br />
onorevoli colleghi, Signora Commissario, oggi ci<br />
troviamo a discutere di quello che rappresenta un<br />
terribile controsenso per un'Unione che vuole assicurare<br />
la piena libertà di movimento dei propri cittadini ed<br />
essere funzionale alle esigenze degli stessi; un<br />
controsenso che rivela un concreto bisogno di aiuto da<br />
parte di taluni e l'impossibilità da parte di altri di poter<br />
offrire l'aiuto sollecitato.<br />
Quello delle difficoltà e degli ostacoli che si<br />
frappongono all'adozione internazionale è un paradosso<br />
che si traduce in un dramma per migliaia di bambini e<br />
famiglie all'interno dell'Unione europea. Le numerose<br />
convenzioni internazionali hanno dato prova di poter<br />
affrontare i problemi legati alle adozioni solo in maniera<br />
parziale: ciò è dovuto, da un lato, alla specificità di ogni<br />
convenzione e alla natura esclusiva delle stesse;<br />
dall'altro, però, il limite degli sforzi sinora profusi è nel<br />
carattere intergovernativo delle strutture e dei processi<br />
decisionali esistenti.<br />
Il trattato di Lisbona e la Carta dei diritti fondamentali<br />
offrono oggi i capisaldi giuridici e l'approccio politico,<br />
naturalmente, cambia. La protezione e il benessere dei<br />
bambini rientra ufficialmente tra i pilastri dei diritti<br />
salvaguardati dell'Unione. È questa la base del dibattito<br />
odierno e dell'interrogazione orale presentata, una base<br />
sulla quale poggia una discussione più ampia che<br />
dovrebbe essere a cuore di questo Parlamento, che<br />
dovrebbe essere puntuale e attenta in questo Parlamento<br />
e perseguita con la tenacia di cui la collega Angelilli ha<br />
dato prova.<br />
Permettetemi di ricordare Saint-Exupéry, il quale diceva:<br />
"Tutti i grandi sono stati bambini una volta, ma pochi di<br />
essi se ne ricordano".<br />
1-165<br />
Petru Constantin Luhan (PPE). – Întrebarea orală de<br />
la care a pornit Rezoluţia privind adopţiile internaţionale<br />
aduce pe agenda Parlamentului European un subiect de o<br />
importanţă majoră.<br />
Adopţia internaţională poate fi considerată numai ca un<br />
mijloc alternativ, după ce au fost epuizate măsurile de<br />
adopţie la nivel naţional. De asemenea, adopţia<br />
internaţională prezintă o serie de particularităţi şi<br />
dificultăţi care ţin, în mare măsură, de interacţiunea<br />
limitată dintre copil şi adoptori, în perioada anterioară<br />
adopţiei, precum şi de probleme de adaptare lingvistică<br />
şi culturală întâmpinate de acesta ulterior adopţiei.<br />
Principiul interesului superior al copilului şi nu al<br />
adoptorului, după cum rezultă din Convenţia ONU şi din<br />
cea de la Haga, trebuie să stea la baza rezoluţiei<br />
Parlamentului European, axându-se pe dezvoltarea<br />
acestuia într-un mediu familiar, ce asigură continuitate
17-01-2011 59<br />
în creşterea copilului şi luând în considerare<br />
backgroundul etnic, religios, cultural şi lingvistic al<br />
acestuia.<br />
Esenţial în analizarea temei privind adopţiile şi<br />
elaborarea rezoluţiei este principiul reintegrării copilului<br />
din sistemul de protecţie în familia biologică sau extinsă.<br />
Aş dori să atrag atenţia asupra unei confuzii ce se face<br />
adesea între numărul copiilor separaţi de părinţii lor, dar<br />
aflaţi în sistemul de protecţie şi numărul copiilor<br />
adoptabili. Copiii separaţi de părinţii lor beneficiază de<br />
protecţie din partea statului pentru o perioadă limitată şi<br />
nu sunt adoptabili. Consider că nu avem nevoie de<br />
mecanisme de control şi că principiile existente la nivel<br />
internaţional, legate de acestea, sunt suficiente.<br />
1-166<br />
Marco Scurria (PPE). – Signor Presidente, onorevoli<br />
colleghi, noi stiamo affrontando stasera questo dibattito,<br />
frutto anche dell'intervento di tante associazioni che in<br />
tutto il continente, in tutta l'Unione europea si sono<br />
rivolte a noi per, appunto, affrontare questo tema così<br />
delicato che abbiamo trasformato, a cominciare da<br />
Roberta Angelilli, in questa interrogazione.<br />
Ci hanno sottoposto un problema molto semplice,<br />
almeno sembra, da un punto di vista dialettico: ci sono<br />
tanti bambini negli istituti europei e ci sono tante<br />
famiglie che vogliono adottare bambini, ma spesso<br />
questo incrocio non avviene e i bambini continuano a<br />
rimanere negli istituti e le famiglie continuano a<br />
rimanere senza bambini.<br />
Bambini che, chiaramente, hanno la nostra priorità, la<br />
nostra attenzione, e quindi hanno bisogno di tutte le<br />
accortezze del caso, ma bambini che, quando rimangono<br />
per troppi anni negli istituti, spesso in questi istituti<br />
diventano oggetto dei mercanti di prostituzione e di<br />
traffici di organi per i nuovi mercanti di schiavi.<br />
Tutto questo avviene mentre appunto molte famiglie<br />
vorrebbero aprire le loro case a questi bambini e allora<br />
sono molto contento di aver ascoltato il Commissario<br />
per le misure che intende adottare, a cui dovremmo<br />
aggiungere, però, la possibilità di una maggiore<br />
cooperazione tra gli Stati in materia di collaborazione, di<br />
adozione internazionale, insieme ovviamente ad una<br />
vigilanza sulla tutela del minore adottato.<br />
Chiediamo quindi procedure più snelle nell'interesse<br />
delle famiglie e dei bambini, perché tra qualche anno<br />
questi ex bambini e ragazzi diventati uomini e donne<br />
non debbano chiedersi perché un'<strong>Europa</strong> piena di<br />
potenziali famiglie accoglienti li ha lasciati nella loro<br />
condizione.<br />
1-167<br />
Anna Záborská (PPE). – Dovoľte mi trochu iný pohľad<br />
na adopcie. Deti si zaslúžia to najlepšie. To v prvom<br />
rade znamená, že si zaslúžia rodinu. Vlastnú alebo<br />
náhradnú, s milujúcou matkou a otcom. V ceste k takejto<br />
rodine nesmú stáť hranice ani Európska únia. A hoci<br />
hlavné slovo v otázke adopcií majú členské štáty, našou<br />
povinnosťou je túto cestu uľahčiť.<br />
Nezabúdajme však na to, že na prvom mieste musí<br />
zostať snaha o dobro dieťaťa. Snaha pomôcť jeho<br />
rodičom, ak sa ocitnú v ťažkostiach. Sociálna situácia<br />
rodičov nesmie byť dôvodom na rozhodnutie o adopcii<br />
ich dieťaťa. Zobrať dieťa chudobným rodičom je<br />
jednoduché, ale zároveň to najhoršie, čo môžeme<br />
dieťaťu urobiť. A to platí dvojnásobne o<br />
medzinárodných adopciách.<br />
Ako jedna z tých, ktorí sú podpísaní pod otázkou o<br />
medzinárodných adopciách, ktorú sme predložili<br />
Komisii, som veľmi rada, že táto téma oslovila veľa<br />
mojich kolegov. Alebo bola by som ešte radšej, keby<br />
sme s rovnakou energiou a nástojčivosťou zohľadňovali<br />
dobro rodiny a jej potreby pri všetkých európskych<br />
politikách.<br />
1-168<br />
Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra (PPE). –<br />
Señor Presidente, la adopción internacional inspirada en<br />
los principios de prevalencia del interés superior del<br />
niño y del respeto de sus derechos fundamentales resulta<br />
un medio apropiado para procurar una familia a los que<br />
no se les puede encontrar una familia en sus países de<br />
origen.<br />
El tráfico de seres humanos, la explotación sexual y la<br />
esclavitud laboral constituyen una terrible realidad que<br />
afecta a cientos de millones de menores. Veamos<br />
algunos datos: hay más de ciento cuarenta y cinco<br />
millones de niños abandonados en el mundo; solo en<br />
Rusia, más de seiscientos mil viven en la calle; desde<br />
1980, más de dos millones de niños han muerto en los<br />
conflictos armados; más de seiscientos millones de niños<br />
viven en situación de extrema pobreza; más de cinco<br />
millones mueren cada año; más de ciento treinta<br />
millones de niños en países desarrollados crecen sin<br />
tener acceso a la educación básica, por causa de su<br />
pobreza, y, de ellos, el 60 % son niñas; siete millones de<br />
niños están sometidos a esclavitud sexual en el mundo.<br />
Por todo ello, debemos impulsar mecanismos que<br />
favorezcan un instrumento de adopción internacional<br />
inspirado en la protección del menor, armonizando para<br />
ello los diferentes requisitos y procedimientos previstos<br />
en las legislaciones de los Estados miembros, aplicando<br />
singularmente el artículo 21 de la Carta de los Derechos<br />
del Niño y tomando en consideración el artículo 24 de<br />
nuestra Carta de los Derechos Fundamentales.<br />
1-169<br />
Erminia Mazzoni (PPE). – Signor Presidente,<br />
onorevoli colleghi, Signor Commissario, ho sottoscritto<br />
questa interrogazione proposta dalla collega Angelilli<br />
perché ritengo che ancor di più all'indomani di Lisbona<br />
l'Unione europea non possa non porre tra le proprie<br />
priorità la tutela dei minori.<br />
Le procedure di adozione sono, a mio avviso, solo la<br />
cartina di tornasole di una deriva sociale della quale<br />
abbiamo il dovere di farci carico ponendo degli argini. I<br />
minori, nel migliore dei casi, diventano oggetto di<br />
scambi commerciali che sono sicuramente non dignitosi
60 17-01-2011<br />
per ciascuno di noi, ma purtroppo sono spesso anche<br />
vittime di sfruttamento e di violenza.<br />
Al di là del fenomeno dei cosiddetti fantasmi, cioè di<br />
quei nati in condizione di clandestinità e di abbandono<br />
che non vengono censiti dal sistema, si conta un numero<br />
incerto di bambini in stato di adottabilità, cui<br />
corrisponde un numero di coppie che richiedono<br />
l'adozione, che non si incontrano per questioni di<br />
interpretazione legislativa e di burocrazia ingombrante.<br />
L'Unicef ha di recente pubblicato uno studio dal quale<br />
emergono dati allarmanti anche in molti paesi europei.<br />
Come presidente della commissione per le petizioni mi<br />
sono imbattuta più volte in casi di conflitti normativi tra<br />
paesi dell'Unione dai quali derivano conseguenze<br />
negative, a volte drammatiche, solo per i minori.<br />
Le complesse procedure previste in molti ordinamenti<br />
nazionali non sempre si rivelano proficue per l'interesse<br />
del minore, i tempi lunghi contrastano con l'esigenza di<br />
promuovere il passaggio del minore entro il primo anno<br />
di vita per ridurre il trauma dello sradicamento e di<br />
evitare una lunga permanenza negli orfanotrofi, anche<br />
perché consideriamo che, superato un certo limite di età,<br />
purtroppo, vengono richiesti meno dal mercato.<br />
Alla luce di questi dati, credo che sia opportuno dar<br />
corso alla necessità avvertita da tempo di un<br />
coordinamento a livello europeo delle normative<br />
nazionali che consenta, da un canto, la semplificazione<br />
delle procedure delle adozioni intraeuropee e che,<br />
dall'altro, garantisca il rispetto dei principi fondamentali<br />
nelle adozioni da paesi extraeuropei.<br />
1-170<br />
Carlos Coelho (PPE). – Senhor Presidente, Senhora<br />
Comissária, caras e caros Colegas, felicito a colega<br />
Angelilli pela oportunidade desta pergunta oral. Sou dos<br />
que consideram que temos de desenvolver políticas mais<br />
eficazes de protecção das crianças que visem prevenir<br />
situações de pobreza, de abuso e de abandono das<br />
crianças e, paralelamente, de alternativas ao seu<br />
internamento em instituições, onde a adopção deverá<br />
desempenhar um papel crucial.<br />
A UNICEF reconhece que não se reduziu o número de<br />
crianças em instituições e que o aumento de adopções<br />
ficou muito aquém do crescimento do número de<br />
crianças institucionalizadas, pelo que temos que fazer<br />
um exame dentro de nós. É importante proceder a uma<br />
avaliação geral do direito e da prática administrativa e<br />
judiciária relativamente aos processos de adopção<br />
existentes nos vários Estados-Membros de forma a<br />
podermos identificar os eventuais obstáculos ao seu bom<br />
funcionamento.<br />
E, relativamente aos países terceiros, temos de vigiar o<br />
problema das adopções irregulares ou ilegais que incide<br />
principalmente sobre as regiões mais pobres. É por<br />
exemplo o caso da Guiné-Bissau, em que mais de 50 %<br />
das crianças não foram registadas, o que facilita o<br />
desenvolvimento da acção criminosa de redes de tráfico<br />
de crianças.<br />
Creio, assim, ser necessária uma estratégia europeia de<br />
protecção dos interesses das crianças no âmbito dos<br />
procedimentos de adopção internacional, de forma a<br />
evitar e prevenir o rapto, a venda ou o tráfico de seres<br />
humanos.<br />
1-171<br />
Mairead McGuinness (PPE). – Mr President, in Ireland<br />
the motto of the International Adoption Association is<br />
that families are made in many ways. The debate tonight<br />
reflects the interest that there is in adoption. There are<br />
over 1 200 members of that Association: many have<br />
adopted and some wish to adopt.<br />
Our attitudes to adoption have changed utterly. In<br />
Ireland we come from a past where mothers –<br />
particularly single mothers – had their babies taken from<br />
them and given away to others to be adopted. That is not<br />
a good history, but it is certainly one that has now<br />
conditioned how we think of adoption: the child must be<br />
at the centre of it. Certainly, the birth families are very<br />
important in all of this.<br />
Equally, we have a duty and a responsibility to give the<br />
very best possible home to all our children. Each<br />
Member State – and that is the level on which this<br />
should operate – needs to protect children within its own<br />
borders. Europe should provide a coordinating role.<br />
I hope that in Ireland we will have a referendum on the<br />
rights of the child. We talk about it a lot, but we are not<br />
so effective in actually dealing with it. I am hopeful that<br />
the referendum will happen. The situation will certainly<br />
improve then. This has been a really useful debate and I<br />
thank colleagues for it.<br />
1-172<br />
Seán Kelly (PPE). – Mr President, the greatest gift that<br />
we can give to any child is that of a happy home. Most<br />
children find that in their own home with their natural<br />
parents. Many though, get this with their adoptive<br />
parents.<br />
Either is preferable to an institutional life, provided of<br />
course that there is no corruption or exploitation<br />
involved.<br />
To find the balance is very difficult, but I think that we<br />
need – while taking into consideration the Hague<br />
Convention etc. – where there are prospective adoptive<br />
parents who are bona fide and beyond reproach, to<br />
facilitate them more in giving the gift of a happy home<br />
to a child who has not otherwise got one, and not<br />
encumbering them with lengthy, expensive, drawn-out<br />
processes.<br />
We need to get the balance right because, as a teacher, I<br />
came across many adopted children and the vast<br />
majority were in very good homes.<br />
1-173
17-01-2011 61<br />
Mario Pirillo (S&D). – Signor Presidente, onorevoli<br />
colleghi, onorevole Angelilli, Signora Commissario, la<br />
protezione e la cura del benessere dei minori sono<br />
divenuti, con l'entrata in vigore del trattato di Lisbona,<br />
uno dei diritti fondamentali che l'<strong>Europa</strong> tutela in<br />
maniera vincolante. Ciononostante, si registrano ancora<br />
in <strong>Europa</strong> troppi episodi di abbandono di minori, che<br />
finiscono nel migliore dei casi in orfanotrofio. Una<br />
situazione drammatica, che per le nostre democrazie non<br />
può essere tollerata.<br />
Occorre per questo mettere in campo tutte le energie<br />
necessarie per impedire che questa situazione diventi<br />
ingestibile, adottando una strategia per innalzare il<br />
livello di attenzione e favorendo al massimo il diritto di<br />
adottare i minori a livello internazionale.<br />
Per fare ciò, innanzitutto, serve una precisa fotografia<br />
della situazione in tutti i paesi membri, con un<br />
monitoraggio costante da effettuare magari attraverso<br />
l'istituzione di un osservatorio permanente sui diritti dei<br />
minori. Inoltre, è necessario avere un quadro<br />
complessivo delle misure in essere prese dall'Unione<br />
europea e di quelle che potrebbero essere intraprese per<br />
tutelare al massimo i minori che devono essere adottati<br />
dai cittadini europei.<br />
1-174<br />
Catherine Bearder (ALDE). – Mr President, the wide<br />
range of instruments which currently govern<br />
international adoptions has led to confusion over whose<br />
role it is to safeguard the rights of children subject to<br />
international adoptions. The Commission needs to focus<br />
further on the competent authorities, and ensure that<br />
those regulating the adopters’ and the adopted children’s<br />
rights are making sure that basic minimum standards are<br />
adhered to, and that, in the longer term, the child is able<br />
to maintain a link to its birth country and its culture.<br />
Specifically, urgent measures must be taken to react to<br />
the abuse and trafficking of children, which, as a report<br />
in my own country today shows, is alarmingly on the<br />
rise both within and across European borders. Child<br />
trafficking and child laundering – the stealing of<br />
children who are subsequently sold to adoptive parents<br />
as legitimate orphans – is a phenomenon which does not<br />
receive adequate attention at an international level.<br />
I would call on the Commission to play a more active<br />
role in the field of international adoption, to take<br />
concrete steps to improve the convoluted and confused<br />
legislative framework which currently governs<br />
international adoption in the EU, and to protect those<br />
most vulnerable young people.<br />
1-175<br />
Miroslav Mikolášik (PPE). – V tejto chvíli hovoríme o<br />
medzinárodných adopciách preto, lebo v každom štáte<br />
existujú deti, ktoré akosi nemožno alebo nie je možné<br />
z rôznych dôvodov umiestniť vo fungujúcich rodinách<br />
alebo v náhradných rodinách v tom-ktorom štáte<br />
samotnom.<br />
Je neprípustné, aby sa opakovali také situácie, ako sme v<br />
nedávnej minulosti boli svedkami toho, že jedna<br />
bohatšia krajina, napríklad Taliansko, mala možnosť vo<br />
väčšej miere adoptovať deti z chudobnejšieho<br />
Rumunska. Určite, tak ako aj niektorí kolegovia už v<br />
tejto večernej hodine povedali, chudoba nemôže byť<br />
dostatočným dôvodom na to, aby sme zobrali dieťa z<br />
rodiny a umožnili medzinárodnú adopciu.<br />
A chcem veľmi zdôrazniť, aby sme v tejto situácii dávali<br />
veľký pozor, aby boli zachovávané nielen národné<br />
zákony, ale aj medzinárodné. Aby sa zabránilo riziku<br />
zneužívania, obchodovania a únosov detí.<br />
1-176<br />
George Sabin Cutaş (S&D). – Doresc să fac, de<br />
asemenea, referire la Convenţia ONU prin care se spune<br />
că adopţiile internaţionale nu pot fi decât o alternativă de<br />
ajutorare a copilului, atunci când acestuia nu îi poate fi<br />
găsită o familie adoptivă sau când nu poate fi îngrijit<br />
corespunzător în ţara sa de origine.<br />
Riscurile unei liberalizări a adopţiilor internaţionale sunt<br />
multiple. Pe de o parte, creşte posibilitatea traficului de<br />
copii şi a abuzurilor survenite ca urmare a intereselor de<br />
ordin financiar şi a dificultăţilor de monitorizare a<br />
situaţiei post adopţie. Pe de altă parte, separarea<br />
copilului de părinţii săi biologici, de locul său de origine,<br />
poate avea consecinţe nefaste de ordin psihologic, social<br />
şi educaţional. Atunci când vorbim despre adopţii<br />
trebuie să avem, în primul rând, în vedere asigurarea<br />
bunăstării copilului şi, prin urmare, nu trebuie exercitate<br />
presiuni asupra statelor membre ale Uniunii, cu tradiţii şi<br />
proceduri legale diverse în domeniul adopţiilor, pentru<br />
liberalizarea adopţiilor internaţionale.<br />
1-177<br />
Antonyia Parvanova (ALDE). – Mr President, I would<br />
again like to draw your attention to the practice of illegal<br />
adoption. There is an organised crime network in Europe<br />
– and especially in south-eastern Europe – which deals<br />
in this. Hundreds of children are being illegally adopted<br />
or put up for trade.<br />
After everything that we have succeeded in doing here in<br />
Parliament, we should not have just one small recital on<br />
this issue in the Human Trafficking Directive. I call on<br />
the Commission to take special measures to prevent this<br />
horrible crime, and also to punish the perpetrators. We<br />
could not cope, country by country, at national level,<br />
with this very vicious practice. It constitutes organised<br />
crime, and I therefore insist that it should be dealt with<br />
at EU level.<br />
1-178<br />
Marian-Jean Marinescu (PPE). – Rezoluţia referitoare<br />
la adopţia internaţională în Uniune trebuie să menţioneze<br />
clar următoarele aspecte: familiile care intenţionează să<br />
recurgă la adopţia internaţională trebuie să aibă avizul<br />
instituţiei naţionale competente din ţara din care provin;<br />
adopţia internaţională trebuie să se realizeze numai sub<br />
responsabilitatea autorităţilor competente din cele două<br />
state membre, a familiei şi a copilului.
62 17-01-2011<br />
De asemenea, monitorizarea copiilor adoptaţi prin<br />
procedura de adopţie internaţională trebuie să fie<br />
efectuată de către instituţia naţională cu atribuţii în acest<br />
domeniu. Nu în ultimul rând, este necesar ca autorităţile<br />
naţionale competente să raporteze periodic statului<br />
membru din care provine copilul adoptat, prin procedura<br />
de adopţie internaţională, cu privire la procesul de<br />
dezvoltare a acestuia.<br />
1-179<br />
Catherine Stihler (S&D). – Mr President, I just wanted<br />
to add something about kinship care, and support to<br />
kinship carers.<br />
Most kinship carers are grandparents and find<br />
themselves being the main caregivers for their<br />
grandchildren, normally because the parent either has a<br />
drug addiction or has died through that drug addiction.<br />
The issue I wanted to bring to this House’s attention is<br />
the good work that Mentor UK has been doing on the<br />
rights of kinship carers. Some kinship carers adopt their<br />
grandchildren. Others do not, but are in a caring<br />
relationship with that child and provide a stable and safe<br />
home for them. However, the rights of kinship children<br />
are often actually less than those of children who are in<br />
proper care. This is something which I felt people had<br />
touched upon in this debate, but I would urge you, if you<br />
are interested in the issue of kinship carers, to look at the<br />
work of Mentor UK and the help that is given to kinship<br />
carers in different countries.<br />
1-180<br />
Kristalina Georgieva, Member of the Commission. −<br />
Mr President, let me first echo the sentiments of those<br />
who expressed thanks to Ms Angelilli for initiating a<br />
very rich debate this evening. I have five points to make<br />
in summing up the debate.<br />
First, the Commission fully agrees with the views that<br />
have been expressed on the importance of protecting and<br />
promoting the rights of children in inter-country<br />
adoptions. This is and will remain the main objective of<br />
the Commission as we participate in discussions on this<br />
topic, both in the context of the Hague Convention and<br />
in our work on the rights of children in Europe.<br />
On this issue, I would point out that in the forthcoming<br />
communication on children’s rights, we will present<br />
actions to promote the rights of the child for the period<br />
between 2011 and 2014. These will include actions<br />
aimed at improving the support the Commission<br />
provides to Member States in the implementation of the<br />
United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.<br />
As I mentioned with reference to the Green Paper, we<br />
are also taking steps that will facilitate the circulation of<br />
civil status acts as adoption decisions – in other words,<br />
the mutual recognition of national adoption decisions<br />
within the EU.<br />
With regard to MEPs’ concerns that the issue is sensitive<br />
and should be seen in the context of national needs and<br />
national legislation, the Commission would like to<br />
underline that the Romanian law on international<br />
adoptions is the sole responsibility of the Romanian<br />
Government. The measure that has been taken must be<br />
seen in connection with the abusive practices in intercountry<br />
adoption in Romania in the past. The<br />
Commission is closely following developments in<br />
Romanian legislation, but I would like to stress again<br />
that it is Romania’s sole responsibility to further develop<br />
this law.<br />
On monitoring, it is our strong belief that the appropriate<br />
institution is the Special Commission of the Hague<br />
Convention on the Protection of Children and<br />
Cooperation in respect of Inter-Country Adoption. The<br />
Commission participates in that monitoring body. We<br />
will take many of the points that have been made this<br />
evening into account when we think about how we<br />
participate in the work of this body.<br />
The Commission considers accreditation to be a matter<br />
of national authority. It relates to family laws that<br />
Member States have and develop, and therefore it is<br />
appropriate that it should be addressed at that level.<br />
Finally, I will convey to Vice-President Reding the<br />
points that have been made here this evening, including<br />
the question raised by one Member in relation to which<br />
an answer is expected.<br />
As the godmother of an adopted boy, I have seen how<br />
emotional and difficult the issue of adoption can be, and<br />
how many factors are involved in a decision to adopt. I<br />
have listened to the debate this evening not only with<br />
great interest, but also with a sense that it is a matter not<br />
just of legislation, but also of hearts and minds.<br />
Therefore let us pray that hearts and minds are brought<br />
into play in a way that best protects the interests of<br />
children, both our children and children in other<br />
countries.<br />
1-181<br />
Presidente. − Comunico di aver ricevuto cinque<br />
proposte di risoluzione conformemente all'articolo 115,<br />
paragrafo 5, del regolamento.<br />
La discussione è chiusa.<br />
La votazione si svolgerà mercoledì 19 gennaio 2011.<br />
1-182<br />
19 - Interventi di un minuto (articolo 150 del<br />
regolamento)<br />
1-183<br />
Presidente. − L'ordine del giorno reca gli interventi di<br />
un minuto su questioni di rilevanza politica.<br />
1-184<br />
Zuzana Roithová (PPE). – Je to již 19 měsíců, kdy<br />
Kanada náhle a jednostranně zavedla vízovou povinnost<br />
pro občany České republiky, která jako člen Unie nesmí<br />
zavést reciproční víza pro všechny Kanaďany. Předseda<br />
Barroso ihned řekl, že to je unijní, nikoli bilaterální<br />
problém, ale bohužel komisařka Malmströmová to neřeší<br />
jako prioritu, jen pasivně monitoruje bilaterální pracovní<br />
jednání. Rada na mou interpelaci řekla, že o reciprocitě<br />
Unie nejedná, neboť dosud ani nedostala žádné návrhy
17-01-2011 63<br />
od komisařky. Čeští občané tak jsou de facto<br />
evropskými občany druhé kategorie, pokud jde o jejich<br />
práva, a diví se, že Kanaďané do České republiky jezdí<br />
dál bez víz.<br />
Upozorňuji, že liknavost Komise zvyšuje také riziko, že<br />
český parlament odloží ratifikace smluv mezi Unií a<br />
Kanadou. Nemá totiž jinou možnost, jak bránit práva<br />
občanů, když EU selhává a netlačí na Kanadu. Proto<br />
žádám spolu s vámi, aby paní komisařka neprodleně<br />
jednala s Kanadou a také se postavila za Rumuny a<br />
Bulhary. Anebo společná vízová politika a princip<br />
solidarity už nejsou evropskými hodnotami? Je si paní<br />
komisařka vědoma, co vše je dnes ve hře?<br />
1-185<br />
Petru Constantin Luhan (PPE). – Consumul de<br />
substanţe psihotrope şi psihoactive ce se situează, de<br />
regulă, în zona gri a legislaţiei are efecte mult mai<br />
nocive decât drogurile cunoscute până acum. Aceste<br />
substanţe sunt întâlnite în mod frecvent în <strong>Europa</strong>, în<br />
magazinele de vise şi sunt cunoscute sub numele de<br />
etnobotanice, un termen inventat pentru a da un aspect<br />
nevinovat traficului şi consumului de droguri.<br />
Ţări precum Polonia, Israel, Suedia, Danemarca, Anglia,<br />
Germania au interzis deja un număr semnificativ de<br />
substanţe identificate ca fiind psihotrope şi psihoactive.<br />
Substanţele comercializate, deşi nu fac parte din lista<br />
substanţelor interzise, sunt foarte greu de supus<br />
controlului, punând corpul medical în imposibilitatea de<br />
a oferi ajutor, deoarece combinaţiile chimice folosite au<br />
reacţii necunoscute. Singura măsură ce se poate lua este<br />
aceea de a interzice funcţionarea acestor magazine, după<br />
care trebuie să ne concentrăm eforturile asupra eliminării<br />
comercializării prin intermediul internetului.<br />
1-186<br />
Άννυ Ποδηματά (S&D). – Κύριε Πρόεδρε, η<br />
συνεχιζόμενη κρίση στην ευρωζώνη θέτει όλους –<br />
ευρωπαϊκά θεσμικά όργανα, κράτη μέλη, πολιτικές<br />
ηγεσίες – ενώπιον των ευθυνών μας. Πρέπει να πάρουμε<br />
την πρωτοβουλία των κινήσεων από τις αγορές, να<br />
δώσουμε μια ολοκληρωμένη και πειστική απάντηση<br />
στην κρίση συμπληρώνοντας - και όχι υποκαθιστώντας<br />
ή παραβλέποντας - τις ευθύνες που έχουν αναλάβει τα<br />
κράτη μέλη να εκπληρώσουν τις υποχρεώσεις τους. Σ’<br />
αυτό το πλαίσιο, ευρωπαϊκές προσωπικότητες, πολιτικά<br />
κόμματα, κινήσεις πολιτών, ευρωπαϊκά συνδικάτα<br />
υποστηρίζουν ότι τα ευρωομόλογα μπορούν να παίξουν<br />
ένα ρόλο κλειδί για την υπέρβαση της κρίσης χρέους και<br />
τη διασφάλιση της σταθερότητας του ευρώ.<br />
Θέλω λοιπόν να τονίσω ότι το Συμβούλιο πρέπει να<br />
ανταποκριθεί άμεσα στο αίτημα που διατύπωσε το<br />
Ευρωπαϊκό Κοινοβούλιο με το ψήφισμά του στις 16<br />
Δεκεμβρίου 2010 και να δώσει ένα ξεκάθαρο σήμα στην<br />
Ευρωπαϊκή Επιτροπή ώστε να προχωρήσει σε ενδελεχή<br />
μελέτη του θέματος και σε υποβολή συγκεκριμένων<br />
προτάσεων.<br />
1-187<br />
Graham Watson (ALDE). – Mr President, I rise to<br />
make a statement about the plight of hundreds of<br />
thousands of airline passengers in Europe in the 10 days<br />
before Christmas and the chaos in the arrangements for<br />
transporting them and their baggage to their intended<br />
destinations. The failure of our airlines and our airports<br />
to deal with a few centimetres of snow in a few Member<br />
States caused devastating delay, disruption and despair<br />
for travellers.<br />
I call on Parliament’s Committee on Transport and<br />
Tourism, the Union’s Transport Commissioner and<br />
transport ministers in the Council to conduct an inquiry<br />
into the disruption, to make provisions to prevent its<br />
recurrence, to ensure that those affected are properly<br />
compensated, and to study a sharing of the burden of<br />
compensation in future between the airline companies<br />
and others involved, such as airport operators.<br />
Unusual snowfalls and uncommonly low temperatures,<br />
as predicted in 2009 by the Potsdam Institute, arise from<br />
the melting of the Arctic ice cap. They will become<br />
more frequent. We cannot prevent them, however much<br />
we must try to limit them, but we can – and we must –<br />
be prepared for them.<br />
1-188<br />
Ryszard Czarnecki (ECR). – W Moskwie ogłoszono<br />
wyniki raportu specjalnej komisji badającej przyczyny<br />
katastrofy polskiego samolotu pod rosyjskim miastem<br />
Smoleńsk 10 kwietnia zeszłego roku. W tej katastrofie<br />
zginął prezydent Polski i 96 innych pasażerów, w tym<br />
szereg najważniejszych osób w państwie. Ten raport jest<br />
absolutnie skandaliczny. Zawiera szereg kłamstw i<br />
ewidentnie spycha odpowiedzialność za tę katastrofę na<br />
stronę polską, całkowicie pomijając poważne błędy po<br />
stronie rosyjskiej, np. złe naprowadzanie tego samolotu<br />
przez kontrolerów wieży lotniczej w Smoleńsku. Strona<br />
rosyjska nie uwzględniła bardzo wielu uwag Polski do<br />
tego raportu, 20 stron uwag zostało po prostu<br />
zlekceważonych. To sprawa bardzo przykra, tym<br />
powinna się zająć Unia Europejska.<br />
1-189<br />
João Ferreira (GUE/NGL). – Senhor Presidente,<br />
terminou 2010, declarado o Ano Europeu de Combate à<br />
Pobreza e à Exclusão Social, ano em que a União<br />
Europeia, com inauditos cinismo e hipocrisia, pôs em<br />
marcha políticas e orientações que tiveram e têm como<br />
consequência o significativo aumento da pobreza e da<br />
exclusão social.<br />
Em Portugal, o orçamento de Estado para 2011,<br />
concebido e aprovado sob a pressão e o aplauso da<br />
União Europeia, conduzirá o país à recessão económica<br />
e à regressão no plano social, com subida do<br />
desemprego, já hoje em níveis históricos, e alastramento<br />
da pobreza e da exclusão social.<br />
Somam-se a tudo isto as inaceitáveis pressões e<br />
chantagens que se abateram sobre o país nas últimas<br />
semanas e que aqui queremos vivamente denunciar, o<br />
crescente tom de ameaça do capital financeiro e das<br />
instituições ao seu serviço para que o país e o seu povo<br />
se submetam e aceitem a injustiça e o esbulho, para que
64 17-01-2011<br />
aceitem a drenagem de recursos do país para os bolsos<br />
do capital financeiro.<br />
Uma coisa é certa: espera-nos um ano de muitas lutas, se<br />
persistirem por este caminho.<br />
1-190<br />
Angelika Werthmann (NI). – Mr President, with regard<br />
to Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human<br />
Rights, and to Article 10 of the Charter of Fundamental<br />
Rights of the European Union, I was informed that, on<br />
Christmas Day, a massive abuse of religious freedom<br />
took place in the Church of St Synesios in the occupied<br />
town of Rizokarpaso.<br />
The so-called authorities, supported by Turkey, had<br />
stopped the Saturday service on the pretext that no<br />
application had been made to hold the mass that day,<br />
although according to the Church of Cyprus, such<br />
permission was requested at the beginning of December,<br />
as has been the case for the last 36 years.<br />
Mr President, I strongly encourage you to take the<br />
appropriate steps to guarantee religious freedom on the<br />
soil of a European Union Member State.<br />
1-191<br />
Ioannis Kasoulides (PPE). – Mr President, on<br />
Christmas Day, the Turkish Security forces in<br />
Rizokarpaso, in the occupied part of Cyprus, interrupted<br />
by force the Christmas mass being celebrated by the few<br />
remaining – elderly – Christians there, evicted the priests<br />
from the church and ordered the congregation to leave.<br />
The excuse was that they had been given written<br />
permission for Sunday mass, but that Christmas was on<br />
a Saturday.<br />
Demanding written permission for mass is a restriction<br />
of the freedom of religion in itself, let alone to interrupt<br />
a Christmas Day mass on the grounds of a petty<br />
bureaucratic excuse – all this in a Member State of the<br />
Union, by ordinance of a country aspiring to join it.<br />
Under the Vienna Agreement, 12 000 Greek Cypriots<br />
enclaved in the Karpass Peninsula were allowed to live<br />
there after the Turkish invasion. Today there are 300.<br />
Now you understand why.<br />
1-192<br />
Alf Svensson (PPE). – Herr talman! Jag tror det vore av<br />
mycket stort värde att EU från högsta nivå startade en<br />
interreligiös dialog. Jag skulle gärna se att EU försökte<br />
få Turkiet att stå värd för en sådan dialog. Vi vet alla hur<br />
kristna har behandlats runtom i världen, på olika håll i<br />
Mellanöstern, kopterna i Egypten, kristna irakier i Irak<br />
etc., etc. Vi kan inte, enligt min bestämda uppfattning,<br />
bara referera, åhöra och åse detta, utan vi måste göra<br />
någonting konkret.<br />
Det första vi måste göra, enligt mitt sätt att se, är att<br />
skapa en dialog. Det vore värdefullt om Turkiet, med<br />
den brobyggaranda som trots allt tror jag finns där, fick<br />
stå värd för den typen av dialog. Det handlar om judar,<br />
om kristna, om muslimer. Låt oss få till stånd en bred<br />
interreligiös dialog i EU:s regi.<br />
1-193<br />
Philippe Juvin (PPE). – Monsieur le Président, en Iraq,<br />
en Égypte, les chrétiens disent: "Notre calvaire est<br />
lourd". Bientôt, chers collègues, il n'y aura plus de<br />
chrétiens sur les terres qui ont vu naître le christianisme.<br />
En Turquie – on en parlait il y a quelques instants –,<br />
pays musulman laïc, pays qui frappe à notre porte, 20 %<br />
de la population était chrétienne il y a cent ans, ils sont<br />
moins de 1 % aujourd'hui.<br />
Le mouvement auquel nous assistons est en réalité un<br />
mouvement de fond. Le monde arabo-musulman<br />
persécute ses chrétiens, les condamne, empêche leur<br />
con<strong>version</strong>, les punit, les tue. On voit très bien que la<br />
religion, l'islam, devient une religion d'État. Le résultat<br />
est là, la religion chrétienne est la plus persécutée au<br />
monde.<br />
Or, chers collègues, défendre les chrétiens d'Orient, c'est<br />
augmenter les chances de faire contrepoids à la montée<br />
de l'extrémisme de l'islam. La présence des chrétiens<br />
partout est un facteur d'équilibre. Il faut donc<br />
absolument la défendre.<br />
Et vraiment, je me demande, chers collègues, où sont<br />
passés les défenseurs des droits de l'homme, qui se<br />
félicitent, comme nous, que l'Occident soit laïc et<br />
pluraliste et qui baissent honteusement les yeux devant<br />
un Orient qui devient peu à peu réservé à une seule<br />
religion.<br />
1-194<br />
Frédéric Daerden (S&D). – Monsieur le Président,<br />
chers collègues, le gouvernement hongrois a décidé, fin<br />
de l'année 2010, de ne plus subventionner l'Institut de la<br />
petite enfance créé par Emmi Pikler à Budapest.<br />
Cette scientifique hongroise a créé ce centre pour qu'il<br />
développe des méthodes pédagogiques à destination des<br />
tout petits sur des bases scientifiques. L'efficacité de ces<br />
méthodes pour le développement psychomoteur des<br />
enfants a été reconnue internationalement. Des<br />
institutions de la petite enfance calquée sur ce modèle se<br />
sont multipliées en Europe, jusque dans ma propre ville<br />
belge.<br />
Il est dommage qu'à la sortie de l'année européenne de<br />
lutte contre la pauvreté, notamment la pauvreté infantile,<br />
un tel signal soit donné par la Hongrie. Cette décision est<br />
surprenante, vu le rayonnement international de cet<br />
Institut Pikler et les autorités administratives hongroises<br />
ayant annoncé leur volonté de continuité dans les<br />
fonctions de celle-ci. Je m'interroge donc, mais sans<br />
aucun préjugé, sur les motifs qui ont présidé à cette<br />
décision du gouvernement hongrois.<br />
1-195<br />
Ramon Tremosa i Balcells (ALDE). – Mr President, I<br />
would like to express concerns over the Agreement<br />
between the EU and Morocco. The future of the<br />
agriculture sectors in the Euro-Mediterranean countries
17-01-2011 65<br />
will be seriously affected if this Agreement remains as it<br />
is now.<br />
We have to open our borders and reach an agreement<br />
with the European agricultural sectors, and not one<br />
behind their backs. The Commission has carried out<br />
studies that clearly show that the Euro-Mediterranean<br />
countries will be the most negatively affected by the EU-<br />
Morocco Agreement.<br />
I would not ratify this Agreement without the inclusion<br />
of some clauses concerning the labour market, the social<br />
dimension and the environment in Morocco. If we do<br />
nothing, it is our farming activity and food chain<br />
industry that will risk losing out, especially in the Euro-<br />
Mediterranean countries. These are the concerns I<br />
wanted to share with you tonight.<br />
1-196<br />
Constance Le Grip (PPE). – Monsieur le Président, je<br />
voulais à mon tour, à l'instar de plusieurs de nos<br />
collègues, aborder la question de la persécution des<br />
chrétiens partout dans le monde, notamment des<br />
chrétiens d'Orient.<br />
Nul n'est besoin de rappeler les actes horribles<br />
récemment perpétrés. Je voudrais rappeler tout à fait<br />
solennellement que défendre les chrétiens en Orient<br />
comme partout dans le monde, plaider pour la liberté<br />
religieuse, la diversité des croyances, c'est plaider pour<br />
la liberté, la démocratie et les droits de l'homme, qui<br />
sont des valeurs au cœur du projet européen et qui sont,<br />
bien sûr, en tout cas nous en sommes tous convaincus<br />
ici, des valeurs universelles.<br />
Il est vraiment temps maintenant, par-delà l'indignation,<br />
l'émotion, les condamnations solennelles, de passer des<br />
paroles aux actes. J'appelle donc instamment les<br />
autorités de l'Union européenne, la haute représentante<br />
pour les affaires étrangères et la politique de sécurité<br />
mais également tous nos gouvernants, les ministres des<br />
affaires étrangères à engager des mesures précises, à<br />
mettre en place un plan d'action précis, concret pour<br />
faire du respect de la diversité religieuse et de la lutte<br />
contre toutes les formes de persécution religieuse une<br />
priorité.<br />
1-197<br />
Tamás Deutsch (PPE). – Tisztelt elnök úr, kedves<br />
képviselőtársaim! Magyarországon tavaly májusig nyolc<br />
esztendőn keresztül a szocialisták és a liberálisok<br />
koalíciója volt hatalmon. Magyarországon nyolc<br />
esztendőn keresztül folyamatosan gyengült a<br />
demokrácia, tömegessé vált az emberi jogok sérelme.<br />
Magyarországon gyengült nyolc esztendőn keresztül a<br />
sajtószabadság. Ezzel kapcsolatban az európai<br />
szocialistáknak és az európai liberálisoknak szava sem<br />
volt. Tavaly májusban a magyar polgárok elsöprő<br />
többsége leváltotta ezt a szocialista-liberális kormányt és<br />
Európában példa nélküli többséggel a Fidesz-<br />
Kereszténydemokrata kormányt jutatta hatalomhoz. Ez a<br />
kormány tavaly év végén egy új médiatörvényt fogadott<br />
el, amelyik garanciáját adja a sajtószabadságnak. Ilyen<br />
körülmények között éri éles támadást Magyarországot és<br />
az Unió soros elnöki tisztségét betöltő magyar kormányt.<br />
Nem egyeztethető össze az európai értékekkel ez a<br />
kettős mérce. Ez ellen fel kell emelnünk a szavunkat.<br />
1-198<br />
Sergej Kozlík (ALDE). – Pred tromi rokmi došlo k<br />
rozšíreniu schengenského priestoru o nové členské<br />
krajiny. Avšak na hraniciach medzi starými a novými<br />
členskými krajinami stále existujú obmedzujúce<br />
opatrenia.<br />
Napríklad na hraničnom prechode Rusovce – Kittsee, je<br />
to diaľničný prechod medzi Slovenskom a Rakúskom,<br />
rakúska strana uplatňuje výrazné obmedzenie rýchlosti<br />
na 30 km/h. Pritom prejazd je ešte výrazne zúžený<br />
betónovou zábranou.<br />
Nie je ničím výnimočným, že na tejto hranici sa<br />
pravidelne vykonáva kontrola rýchlosti prechádzajúcich<br />
vozidiel a dosť často aj policajné kontroly dokladov<br />
a obsahu kufrov áut.<br />
Členstvo v Schengene predsa znamená voľný pohyb<br />
ľudí a tovarov. Na to, že občan prekračuje hranicu<br />
členského štátu Únie, by ho mala upozorniť len obyčajná<br />
informačná tabuľa. Uvedené správanie, a to nielen v<br />
prípade Rakúska, je porušovaním pravidiel Schengenu a<br />
Európska komisia by mala na to dať principiálnu<br />
odpoveď.<br />
1-199<br />
Marek Henryk Migalski (ECR). – Panie<br />
Przewodniczący! Moi poprzednicy mówili o<br />
dyskryminacji chrześcijan. Ja też chciałbym powiedzieć<br />
o pewnej formie dezawuowania części państw<br />
europejskich. W ciągu ostatnich paru tygodni na<br />
początku prezydencji Węgier padło bardzo wiele<br />
krytycznych słów pod adresem Węgrów i bardzo często<br />
te słowa były nieuzasadnione i nieusprawiedliwione.<br />
Niestety oprócz słów ministra spraw zagranicznych<br />
Luksemburga również bardzo niesprawiedliwe słowa,<br />
chyba obrażające Węgrów, padły z ust polityków tej<br />
Izby, między innymi pana Martina Schulza. Myślę, że to<br />
jest przejaw pewnej wiary, że państwa w Unii<br />
Europejskiej dzielą się na lepsze i gorsze. Lepsze są te,<br />
które są tutaj już od dłuższego czasu, a gorsze są te,<br />
które są tutaj dopiero od 2004 roku.<br />
Myślę, że ten typ dyskryminacji powinien się<br />
zakończyć, wszyscy powinni się przyzwyczaić do tego,<br />
że nowe państwa są pełnoprawnymi członkami Unii<br />
Europejskiej, zwłaszcza na tej sali. Dlatego proszę o to,<br />
żeby osoby na tej sali, które pozwalają sobie na tego<br />
typu dyskryminację, dyscyplinować i karać.<br />
1-200<br />
Alajos Mészáros (PPE). – Sokakkal együtt én is<br />
üdvözlöm a magyar EU-elnökséget. Büszke vagyok arra,<br />
hogy ez a közép-európai tagállam a 2004-ben<br />
csatlakozottak közül harmadikként láthatja el ezt a<br />
megtisztelő és felelősségteljes küldetést. Nem fér hozzá<br />
kétség, hogy Magyarország mindig is a demokrácia<br />
élharcosai közé tartozott. Ki kérdőjelezné meg 1956-ot,<br />
1989-et vagy 2006 őszét. Ezért nagyon megdöbbent az a
66 17-01-2011<br />
negatív kampány, amelyet bizonyos politikai erők a<br />
soros EU-elnök ellen indítottak, többek között a magyar<br />
médiatörvény ürügyén. Egészen nyilvánvaló, hogy nem<br />
jogi kérdésről van itt szó, hanem a politikai vesztesek<br />
támadásáról. Ők próbálják kikezdeni az egységes<br />
európai eszmét. A kultúrtörténeti szőnyegen ábrázolt<br />
Magyarország térképéhez pedig ennyit: aki nem képes<br />
szembenézni a történelemmel, az a jövőt sem látja<br />
tisztán. Úgy, ahogy egy francia, egy német vagy lengyel<br />
beszélhet nemzete múltjáról, megteheti ugyanezt egy<br />
magyar is. Nagyon felelőtlennek és veszélyesnek tartom<br />
az elnöklő országunk ilyen jellegű lejáratását éppen<br />
akkor, amikor a legnagyobb összefogásra lenne<br />
szükségünk.<br />
1-201<br />
Γεώργιος Παπανικολάου (PPE). – Κυρίες και κύριοι<br />
συνάδελφοι, η Ελλάδα αποτελεί τη βασική πύλη<br />
εισόδου παρανόμων μεταναστών προς όλη την Ευρώπη.<br />
Σύμφωνα με την FRONTEX, το 90% των<br />
λαθρομεταναστών που καταφεύγουν στην Ευρώπη<br />
μπαίνουν από την Ελλάδα.<br />
Αντιμετωπίζουμε στην Ελλάδα, λοιπόν, μια μεγάλη<br />
κρίση σε ό,τι αφορά το ζήτημα αυτό. Το τελευταίο<br />
διάστημα η ελληνική κυβέρνηση ανακοίνωσε την<br />
πρόθεσή της να δημιουργήσει ένα φράχτη στα χερσαία<br />
σύνορά μας με την Τουρκία. Διερωτάται κανείς αν μία<br />
τέτοια λύση μπορεί στρατηγικά να βοηθήσει στην<br />
επίλυση του προβλήματος, αν αρκεί αυτό. Φυσικά και<br />
όχι. Όσους φράχτες και να φτιάξουμε, όσες προσπάθειες<br />
και να κάνουμε, χρειάζεται συνολική στρατηγική και<br />
αλληλεγγύη μεταξύ των ευρωπαϊκών κρατών. Και για<br />
να ξεκινήσουμε σωστά, το πρώτο που πρέπει να<br />
κάνουμε είναι να εδραιώσουμε μια καλή συνεργασία για<br />
τα θέματα αυτά με τη βασική χώρα προέλευσης, την<br />
Τουρκία.<br />
Εκκρεμεί η υπογραφή σύμβασης Ευρώπης-Τουρκίας.<br />
Γνωρίζουμε πολύ καλά ότι, για να καταλήξουμε σε μία<br />
συμφωνία και να προχωρήσουμε στην εφαρμογή της,<br />
χρειάζονται ενάμιση με δύο χρόνια· μέχρι τότε, λοιπόν,<br />
ας εφαρμόσουμε τη διμερή συμφωνία που υπάρχει με<br />
την Ελλάδα από το 2002, όπως έκαναν και άλλες χώρες<br />
του Νότου και ρύθμισαν το πρόβλημα.<br />
1-202<br />
Catherine Stihler (S&D). – Mr President, next week all<br />
across the world people will be celebrating the life of<br />
Scotland’s national poet, Robert Burns. As many of you<br />
know, a central part of a Burns supper is a haggis.<br />
Currently there is a ban in the USA on importing<br />
Scottish haggis, yet one in three Americans claim<br />
Scottish ancestry and would like to try some authentic<br />
Scottish haggis. What action can the Commission and<br />
the Council take in their transatlantic dialogues to put<br />
Scottish haggis back, not just on the agenda, but also on<br />
the menu when it comes to American traditional Scottish<br />
Burns suppers?<br />
1-203<br />
Sonia Alfano (ALDE). – Signor Presidente, onorevoli<br />
colleghi, il 13 e il 14 gennaio si è svolto nello<br />
stabilimento FIAT di Mirafiori un referendum con il<br />
quale gli operai e gli impiegati sono stati chiamati a<br />
votare a favore o contro il piano di rilancio dello<br />
stabilimento torinese.<br />
Il piano di rilancio è basato su un nuovo contratto<br />
collettivo che intacca diritti fondamentali dei lavoratori,<br />
quali quello alla malattia, allo sciopero, addirittura<br />
quello alla pausa intermedia durante otto ore ad una<br />
catena di montaggio. Il referendum è illegittimo, perché<br />
l'amministratore delegato Sergio Marchionne ha<br />
minacciato gli operai che, in caso di vittoria dei "no"<br />
all'accordo, l'azienda avrebbe abbandonato la produzione<br />
italiana, trasferendo tutto altrove.<br />
Questa strategia della paura, di un capitalismo al ribasso<br />
senza regole e senza diritti, ha avuto il sostegno del<br />
governo e addirittura di gran parte del Partito<br />
Democratico, partito di opposizione con radici nel<br />
Partito Comunista Italiano. Gli unici sindacati a opporsi<br />
sono stati la FIOM e la CGIL e sono state estromesse<br />
dalla rappresentanza sindacale.<br />
Ciononostante, il "sì" ha vinto con solo il 54% dei voti.<br />
Con questo accordo, l'Italia dei diritti torna indietro di<br />
parecchi decenni. È giusto che l'<strong>Europa</strong> sappia e ne<br />
tenga conto.<br />
1-204<br />
Ρόδη Κράτσα-Τσαγκαροπούλου (PPE). – Κύριε<br />
Πρόεδρε, θα ήθελα να αναφερθώ στην ανησυχητική<br />
κατάσταση σε χώρες εταίρους της Μεσογείου και τις<br />
επιπτώσεις που μπορεί να έχει η κατάσταση αυτή στις<br />
σχέσεις μας, στην ασφάλεια, στην ευημερία στην<br />
περιοχή.<br />
Μιλήσαμε σήμερα το απόγευμα για τις ραγδαίες<br />
ανατροπές στην Τυνησία· κοινωνικές ταραχές υπάρχουν<br />
σε χώρες του Μαγκρέμπ και του Μασρέκ· νέα πολιτική<br />
αστάθεια στο Λίβανο, ενώ αδιέξοδα συνεχίζουν να<br />
υπάρχουν στην ειρηνευτική διαδικασία. Πρέπει να μας<br />
απασχολήσει σοβαρά η κατάσταση αυτή, διότι οι χώρες<br />
της Μεσογείου είναι χώρες εταίροι και όχι μόνο χώρες<br />
γείτονες.<br />
Θα σας θυμίσω ότι στην Τυνησία από το 1995 μέχρι<br />
σήμερα έχουν διατεθεί ποσά άμεσης βοήθειας που<br />
υπερβαίνουν το 1 δισεκατομμύριο ευρώ, πέρα από τα<br />
χαμηλότοκα δάνεια της Ευρωπαϊκής Τράπεζας<br />
Επενδύσεων, και μέχρι το 2013 έχουμε προγραμματίσει<br />
σημαντικά ποσά άμεσης βοήθειας.<br />
Θα ήθελα λοιπόν να κάνω μια έκκληση, κύριε Πρόεδρε.<br />
Να κάνουμε μία σοβαρή πολυμερή συζήτηση με<br />
απολογισμό των σχέσεών μας, να δούμε τις προοπτικές<br />
και τις διαδικασίες που πρέπει να ακολουθήσουμε, και η<br />
Ύπατη Εκπρόσωπος να μας παρουσιάσει ένα<br />
ολοκληρωμένο σχέδιο γειτονίας μέσα στο πλαίσιο της<br />
Ένωσης για τη Μεσόγειο για να αντιμετωπίσουμε τις<br />
κρίσεις αυτές από κοινού με τις χώρες εταίρους.<br />
1-205<br />
Joe Higgins (GUE/NGL). − Mr President, in December<br />
Commission President Barroso told me by letter that his
17-01-2011 67<br />
meeting with President Nazarbayev last October would<br />
help advance respect for human rights in Kazakhstan.<br />
The same was said about granting Kazakhstan the chair<br />
of the OSCE in 2010 and holding a major OSCE summit<br />
in Astana in December. However, world leaders had<br />
scarcely left that summit when it was announced that a<br />
referendum was to be held in March to cancel the<br />
presidential election in 2012, thus keeping Nazarbayev<br />
in power until 2020.<br />
Harassment of the opposition press and of human rights<br />
defenders is being stepped up. Activists from the leftwing<br />
movement ‘Kazakhstan 2012’ are being harassed<br />
and jailed.<br />
I demand that the EU stop boosting the Nazarbayev<br />
dictatorship. The independent trade union and social<br />
movements in Kazakhstan must be fully supported so<br />
that they can lead mobilisation to end this dictatorship –<br />
just as people power in Tunisia ended the Ben Ali<br />
dictatorship – and put in place structures to bring the<br />
wealth of Kazakhstan into the democratic ownership of<br />
the majority.<br />
1-206<br />
Krisztina Morvai (NI). – (a képviselő mikrofonja nem<br />
volt bekapcsolva, így a mondat eleje nem hallható)...a<br />
Bizottságnak a rendkívüli ülése. Mi más is lett volna a<br />
téma, mint a magyar médiatörvény? Nem akartam hinni<br />
a fülemnek, amikor befolyásos szocialista és liberális<br />
képviselőtársaink azt követelték, hogy az Európai Unió<br />
indítson úgynevezett súlyos jogsértési eljárást<br />
Magyarországgal, a jelenlegi soros elnökkel szemben.<br />
Ez a rendelkezésre álló legsúlyosabb szankció. Ilyen<br />
szankciót, sem pedig semmilyen szankciót nem<br />
alkalmaztak akkor, amikor 2002 és 2010 között a<br />
szocialista és liberális kormány Magyarországon minden<br />
egyes tüntetést szétveretett, emberek százait börtönözte<br />
be önkényesen, szemeket lövetett ki és súlyos<br />
sérüléseket okozott. Ha ezek után az Európai Unió<br />
súlyos jogsértési eljárást fog a jelenlegi magyar kormány<br />
és állam ellen indítani, akkor végre kinyitja azoknak a<br />
szemét, akiknek bármiféle illúziójuk volt az Európai<br />
Unió Magyarországhoz való hozzáállásával<br />
kapcsolatban, és azt gondolom, hogy a magyar nemzet<br />
követelni fogja az Európai Unióból való kilépésünket, és<br />
lesznek, akik követnek bennünket.<br />
1-207<br />
Antigoni Papadopoulou (S&D). – Mr President, I also<br />
want to raise the issue of respect for religious freedom<br />
for all, without discrimination, because this is a basic<br />
human right.<br />
That human right was violated in my country for the few<br />
Christians attending Christmas mass at the church of<br />
Agios Synesios in the occupied village of Rizokarpaso.<br />
The so-called police of the Turkish occupying regime<br />
entered the church and forced the priest to terminate the<br />
Christmas Day service and then forced the enclaved<br />
Greek Cypriots attending the mass to evacuate the<br />
church.<br />
The European Parliament must strongly condemn such<br />
actions, which reveal the ugly and oppressive face of the<br />
Turkish occupation of the northern part of Cyprus, in<br />
violation of European law and human rights and the<br />
Third Vienna agreement of 1975.<br />
The EU must stop Turkey and its subordinate local<br />
administration in the occupied part of Cyprus from<br />
committing further violations, and from continuing the<br />
ethnic cleansing of the remaining 300 Christian Greek<br />
Cypriots.<br />
1-208<br />
Seán Kelly (PPE). – Mr President, the Food<br />
Supplements Directive was adopted in 2002 but, almost<br />
nine years later, it has still not been fully implemented.<br />
The Commission has yet to produce a proposal to<br />
harmonise the maximum amounts of vitamins and<br />
minerals that can be included in food supplements as<br />
required by the directive. This failure means that<br />
companies have to produce multiple product<br />
formulations to comply with different national laws.<br />
This is unfair and expensive, especially as a scientific<br />
model for setting maximum amounts is available. The<br />
Commission itself cited this in a paper in 2006.<br />
It begs the question of why the proposal has not been<br />
produced? Perhaps, to paraphrase Robbie Burns, whom<br />
somebody mentioned a minute ago, ‘The best laid plans<br />
of mice and men and the Commission gang aft agley’. It<br />
needs to happen very soon, because EU legislation is<br />
intended to make it easier for companies to compete in<br />
the internal market by standardising requirements. The<br />
sooner it happens, the better. I urge the Commission to<br />
get a move on.<br />
1-209<br />
Илиaна Ивaнова (PPE). – уважаеми колеги,<br />
напоследък обществеността в България е свидетел на<br />
поредица от публикации за предполагаемо<br />
използване на специални разузнавателни средства за<br />
подслушване на висши управляващи. Източникът на<br />
тази информация е неясен, с неясен произход и<br />
автентичност, остава анонимен и никой не поема<br />
отговорността за разпространението й.<br />
Ясно изразената воля за реформи и борба с<br />
организираната престъпност от правителството,<br />
недопускането на влияние от страна на бившата<br />
Държавна сигурност, както и фактът, че тази година<br />
в България предстоят президентски и местни избори,<br />
дадоха старт на тази кампания, създаваща<br />
напрежение и насаждаща недоверие в управлението.<br />
Интерес от това състояние имат кръговете на<br />
влияние, които покровителстваха и се<br />
облагодетелстваха от срастването на престъпността с<br />
държавата. Днес те търсят реванш за засегнатите си<br />
интереси.<br />
Искам да ви уверя, че България е правова държава, в<br />
която такива средства се прилагат от органите само в<br />
рамките на закона и че управлението ще продължи<br />
реформите по пътя, който е поело, недопускайки
68 17-01-2011<br />
нелегитимни интереси да пречат на борбата с<br />
престъпността.<br />
1-210<br />
Станимир Илчев (ALDE). – през последните<br />
месеци в България наистина расте тревогата сред<br />
обществото от ескалацията в използването на<br />
специални разузнавателни средства. Но към този<br />
проблем има и друга гледна точка. Подслушванията<br />
се превръщат като че ли във фетиш за някои<br />
политици и ръководители на съвременните<br />
специални служби.<br />
Ефективността в борбата с престъпността не се е<br />
повишила. Още по-неприемлива е назряващата<br />
страхова психоза от тези подслушвания. Наистина<br />
не са ясни авторите на тази вакханалия: дали това са<br />
хора от сектора за сигурност, дали са техни бивши<br />
колеги или нелегитимни структури, които имат<br />
дестабилизиращи намерения. Съдържанието на<br />
подслушваните разговори мистериозно циркулира из<br />
медиите. В такъв разговор участва и министърпредседателят<br />
на България. Съдържанието е<br />
дискредитиращо, но той твърди, че записът е<br />
манипулиран.<br />
Отвъд тази неприятна фактология е усещането на<br />
българските граждани, че институциите не работят<br />
добре, че брутално се нарушават човешки права. И<br />
затова като новоприета страна член на Европейския<br />
съюз България се нуждае от съдействие, за да<br />
преструктурира своите специални служби.<br />
1-211<br />
Presidente. − C'è una lunga lista di interventi, quindi<br />
pregherei tutti gli oratori di essere puntuali e rigorosi<br />
nell'attenersi ad un minuto.<br />
1-212<br />
20 - Consenso europeo in materia di aiuto<br />
umanitario (breve presentazione)<br />
1-213<br />
Presidente. − L'ordine del giorno reca la relazione di<br />
Michèle Striffler, a nome della commissione per lo<br />
sviluppo, sull'attuazione del consenso europeo sull'aiuto<br />
umanitario: bilancio di metà percorso del suo piano<br />
d'azione e prospettive future [2010/2101(INI)].<br />
1-214<br />
Michèle Striffler, rapporteure. − Monsieur le Président,<br />
Madame la Commissaire, chers collègues, le contexte<br />
humanitaire global s'est aggravé, les défis et besoins<br />
humanitaires sont immenses et il y a une multiplication<br />
des terrains d'intervention.<br />
Le consensus européen pour l'aide humanitaire est un<br />
instrument fondamental qui garde toute sa pertinence<br />
dans ce contexte humanitaire en pleine mutation. Les<br />
défis humanitaires peuvent trouver leur réponse dans une<br />
application rigoureuse du consensus et de son plan<br />
d'action. Cependant, le consensus reste encore trop<br />
méconnu au-delà des partenaires humanitaires. Un effort<br />
est donc à effectuer afin de renforcer sa visibilité et de<br />
mieux le faire connaître auprès des États membres et des<br />
acteurs impliqués. Il faut plaider pour que ce consensus<br />
soit diffusé, compris et appliqué au sein du service<br />
européen d'action extérieure et par les acteurs militaires.<br />
En 2009 a été mis sur pied le groupe de travail sur l'aide<br />
humanitaire et l'aide alimentaire au sein du Conseil, qui<br />
est devenu un forum pertinent, mais dont le rôle devrait<br />
être renforcé en termes de coordination entre États<br />
membres et de suivi de la mise en œuvre du consensus et<br />
de plaidoyer pour l'aide humanitaire vis-à-vis des autres<br />
groupes de travail du Conseil du COPS.<br />
La révision à mi-parcours du plan d'action est une<br />
occasion unique de renforcer l'action dans des domaines<br />
méritant plus d'attention tels que, premièrement, la<br />
promotion des principes humanitaires et du droit<br />
international humanitaire, car l'aide humanitaire n'est pas<br />
un instrument de gestion de crise et il convient de<br />
regretter la politisation croissante de l'aide humanitaire<br />
et de ses conséquences sur le respect de l'espace<br />
humanitaire. Un deuxième domaine concerne les<br />
questions liées à la qualité, à la coordination et à la<br />
cohérence dans le cadre de la fourniture de l'aide<br />
humanitaire de l'Union européenne, et un troisième<br />
élément est la clarification de l'utilisation des moyens et<br />
capacités militaires et de protection civile en conformité<br />
avec le consensus humanitaire et les directives des<br />
Nations unies.<br />
La distinction entre les mandats des acteurs militaires et<br />
humanitaires doit rester bien claire et un dialogue entre<br />
acteurs militaires et humanitaires est nécessaire afin de<br />
favoriser une compréhension mutuelle.<br />
De plus, j'invite dans mon rapport la Commission<br />
européenne à présenter des propositions législatives très<br />
ambitieuses afin de créer une force européenne de<br />
protection et je me félicite de la récente communication<br />
de la Commission sur le renforcement des capacités de<br />
réponse de l'Union européenne en cas de catastrophe.<br />
Enfin, il faut renforcer la dimension "réduction des<br />
risques de catastrophe" et le lien entre l'aide d'urgence,<br />
la réhabilitation et le développement.<br />
Le traité de Lisbonne a introduit le service européen<br />
d'action extérieure. Nous nous sommes donc attachés, au<br />
cours des négociations, à défendre l'indépendance de la<br />
DG ECO et à éviter toute instrumentalisation possible de<br />
l'aide humanitaire à des fins de politiques étrangères.<br />
Des règles strictes et transparentes doivent être mises en<br />
place pour la coopération et la coordination entre le<br />
service européen d'action extérieure et la Commission<br />
pour la gestion d'une crise de grande ampleur.<br />
Pour finir, j'aimerais attirer votre attention sur la<br />
multiplication des violences sexuelles – Je pense en<br />
particulier à l'Est de la République du Congo dans le<br />
Kivu – et sur l'importance d'intégrer systématiquement<br />
le genre et la santé reproductive dans la réponse<br />
humanitaire dans les services de santé de première<br />
urgence.
17-01-2011 69<br />
1-215<br />
Anna Záborská (PPE). – Monsieur le Président, je<br />
félicite M me Striffler pour son rapport. Il omet cependant<br />
de mentionner les acteurs qui fondent leur engagement<br />
sur la religion, notamment chrétienne. Le texte du<br />
consensus européen mentionne bien la Croix-Rouge<br />
mais ignore d'autres acteurs disposant du même statut en<br />
droit international mais qui se fondent sur la religion<br />
chrétienne comme par exemple l'Ordre de Malte.<br />
Ainsi, ce rapport apporte une nouvelle preuve de la<br />
négligence avec laquelle les institutions européennes<br />
accueillent l'engagement des acteurs chrétiens dans<br />
l'intervention humanitaire. Les religions n'ont pas<br />
seulement l'obligation, mais aussi la compétence<br />
nécessaire pour intervenir rapidement dans les situations<br />
de crise et de catastrophe naturelle.<br />
J'invite le rapporteur à proposer un amendement oral<br />
pour reconnaître l'utilité et l'efficacité des acteurs qui<br />
fondent leur travail sur la foi chrétienne.<br />
1-216<br />
Miroslav Mikolášik (PPE). – Európska únia spolu s<br />
členskými štátmi sú najvýznamnejším svetovým darcom<br />
humanitárnej pomoci. A je to naša morálna povinnosť.<br />
Európsky konsenzus o humanitárnej pomoci sa stal<br />
významným medzníkom, čo dosvedčuje aj analýza<br />
akčného plánu realizácie humanitárnej pomoci. Správa<br />
však poukazuje aj na konkrétne slabiny systému a iné<br />
prekážky, ktoré bránia efektívnemu a rýchlemu prísunu<br />
humanitárneho tovaru a služieb pre najzraniteľnejšie<br />
obyvateľstvo v krízových oblastiach.<br />
Verím, že Lisabonská zmluva prinášajúca celý rad<br />
inovácií v oblasti humanitárnej pomoci Európskej únie,<br />
ktorá je odteraz aj samostatnou politikou, bude vhodne<br />
a promptne využitá na zlepšenie dosahovania<br />
hmatateľných výsledkov v súlade s rešpektovaním<br />
ľudskej dôstojnosti, humanitárnych hodnôt a<br />
dodržiavaním ľudských práv, ako sú zakotvené v<br />
medzinárodnom práve, napríklad aj pri rýchlej pomoci<br />
pri katastrofách.<br />
1-217<br />
Zuzana Roithová (PPE). – Trvalé zvyšování počtu a<br />
rozsahu humanitárních katastrof ve třetích zemích, které<br />
je mimo jiné i důsledkem klimatických změn, vyžaduje<br />
kvantitativní, ale i kvalitativní zlepšení humanitární<br />
pomoci. A proto plně podporuji opatření zmíněná ve<br />
zprávě, včetně transformace civilní ochrany členských<br />
států, aby mohla sloužit i jako akceschopná<br />
koordinovaná pomoc Evropské unie. Za naléhavé ovšem<br />
považuji také zlepšit bezpečnost humanitárních<br />
pracovníků. Myslím, že by Komise měla vyčlenit<br />
kapacity také na šíření osvěty zejména na Haiti, aby<br />
postižení obyvatelé chápali příčiny a následné okolnosti<br />
jejich katastrofy a pomáhali chránit bezpečnost<br />
humanitárních pracovníků, a nikoli naopak. Jinak je<br />
nutné – a nikoli nežádoucí – využívat ochrany<br />
armádních sil.<br />
1-218<br />
Seán Kelly (PPE). – Mr President, I should briefly like<br />
to ask some questions. Regarding the European Union, I<br />
know that we are wonderful for donating aid to where it<br />
is needed, but it often goes through NGOs. Are there any<br />
NGOs that have not been up to scratch, or that have been<br />
the subject of complaints in the countries in which they<br />
operate, or that the European Union itself might have<br />
reservations about? In other words, do we just give the<br />
aid and the supplements – let us put it that way – to the<br />
NGOs annually? Where is the accountability?<br />
In the light of some programmes I have seen recently, I<br />
was rather concerned about allegations being made as to<br />
what some of the NGOs were doing and their lack of<br />
accountability. Having said that, I know that the vast<br />
majority are doing good work and are properly<br />
motivated.<br />
1-219<br />
Peter Jahr (PPE). – Herr Präsident! Vielen Dank an die<br />
Berichterstatterin, dass wir diese Problematik heute in<br />
diesem Haus diskutieren können. Ich habe noch zwei<br />
Anmerkungen bzw. Fragen, die mich immer bei der<br />
humanitären Hilfe umtreiben: Erstens ist es unstrittig<br />
und wichtig, dass man natürlich hilft, wenn Menschen in<br />
Not sind, aber – das hat mein Vorredner schon gesagt –<br />
man sollte auch immer wieder die Frage stellen: Werden<br />
diese Mittel auch angemessen und ordentlich<br />
verwendet?<br />
Zweitens dürfen wir auch nicht vernachlässigen:<br />
Humanitäre Hilfe, Menschen geraten in Not, das ist<br />
richtig. Das können Naturkatastrophen sein, aber es sind<br />
auch zunehmend von Menschen selbst verursachte<br />
Katastrophen. Dazu zählen insbesondere politische oder<br />
auch kriegerische Auseinandersetzungen. Wir müssen<br />
bedenken, dass humanitäre Hilfe Soforthilfe ist, wir aber<br />
gleichzeitig auch die Ursachen, nämlich die politischen<br />
Gewalttaten, beseitigen müssen.<br />
1-220<br />
Kristalina Georgieva, Member of the Commission. −<br />
Mr President, I very much welcome Mrs Striffler’s<br />
report, as well as Parliament’s involvement in and<br />
continued strong advocacy for effective European<br />
humanitarian action.<br />
The consensus was adopted in 2007. It provides an<br />
essential common policy framework for the EU – a<br />
common vision accompanied by an action plan. Both the<br />
Member States and the Commission have a shared<br />
responsibility to make sure that the consensus is well<br />
implemented.<br />
I want to stress that what comes very clearly out of the<br />
report is the message that humanitarian principles,<br />
international humanitarian law and protection of the<br />
humanitarian space have to be at the centre of our action<br />
on the consensus. Four-fifths of our humanitarian aid<br />
goes to people in need in conflict-related, man-made<br />
emergencies. For us to be able to reach these people it is<br />
critical that our aid is independent and neutral and that it<br />
is perceived in this way.
70 17-01-2011<br />
I would like to give you one example of this. I have just<br />
come back from Yemen where, together with the UN<br />
High Commissioner for Refugees, Antonio Gutierrez,<br />
we engaged on the humanitarian access issue with<br />
high-level government officials and representatives of<br />
the al-Houthi rebel movement. For the first time we<br />
obtained commitment on their part to facilitate<br />
humanitarian access and respect delivery of aid to all<br />
Yemeni people in need, in line with the humanitarian<br />
principles of neutrality and independence. Having spent<br />
a number of hours with men with Kalashnikovs, I would<br />
like to observe that we in Europe do bring this value of<br />
neutrality that is a bridge to people in need. In the<br />
Yemeni case, there are 300 000 internally displaced<br />
people and many more hundred thousands affected by<br />
six wars in six years in the north of Yemen.<br />
Of course, for a long-lasting impact, humanitarian aid is<br />
not the right instrument. It is development that can lay<br />
the foundation for lasting peace. We in the Commission<br />
have completed a year-long review process of the<br />
European consensus action plan, in close liaison with<br />
our Member State and humanitarian partners. On 8<br />
December, the Commission adopted a Communication<br />
on this. The review shows that over the past three years<br />
we have made significant contributions to strengthening<br />
the humanitarian response in terms of advocacy and<br />
humanitarian action, as well as by bringing humanitarian<br />
aid and civil protection together.<br />
We also concluded that there is scope for further<br />
improvement in three areas.<br />
Firstly we need to promote the quality and effectiveness<br />
of aid by good assessment, a well-coordinated response<br />
and investment in disaster risk reduction and local<br />
capacity. At a time when needs are growing and budgets<br />
are constrained, this is critical.<br />
Let me just respond here to the question of<br />
accountability. Obviously we need to stretch every euro<br />
to the full and deliver it with the highest possible quality<br />
and in the most effective way. In order to ensure that our<br />
partners – UN agencies and NGOs – are accountable, we<br />
review one-third of all partners and one-third of all<br />
projects every year. We have our own humanitarian aid<br />
offices in all the hotspot areas of the planet to be the ears<br />
and the eyes of our taxpayers, including in Yemen,<br />
because of increasing humanitarian needs. I recently cut<br />
the ribbon of our humanitarian aid office there.<br />
The second issue concerning which we can see room for<br />
improvement is the strengthening of the European voice.<br />
We are the largest donor and have to make sure that we<br />
speak very clearly with one voice. We must also reach<br />
out to other donors so that we play our leadership role,<br />
vis-à-vis traditional donors, but also by engaging new<br />
donors.<br />
Thirdly we need to ensure coherence which means<br />
working, together with the External Action Service, with<br />
military actors to make sure that a principled<br />
humanitarian approach is safeguarded and is also<br />
promoted in Europe.<br />
Let me finish by once again thanking Mrs Striffler for<br />
her work on this issue and calling upon Parliament to<br />
continue the discussion on this topic. The world has<br />
changed. Unfortunately there will be more and more<br />
natural and man-made disasters. Whatever action we<br />
take will determine not only the lives of the people<br />
affected, but also the moral standing and the capacity of<br />
the EU to lead in the world.<br />
1-221<br />
Presidente. − La discussione è chiusa.<br />
La votazione si svolgerà martedì 18 gennaio 2011.<br />
1-222<br />
21 - Agricoltura come settore strategico per<br />
la sicurezza dell'approvvigionamento<br />
alimentare (breve presentazione)<br />
1-223<br />
Presidente. − L'ordine del giorno reca la relazione di<br />
Daciana Octavia Sârbu, a nome della commissione per<br />
l'agricoltura e lo sviluppo rurale, sul riconoscimento<br />
dell'agricoltura come settore strategico per la sicurezza<br />
dell'approvvigionamento alimentare [2010/2112(INI)].<br />
1-224<br />
Daciana Octavia Sârbu, Raportoare. − Sunt onorată să<br />
vă prezint raportul meu, care vorbeşte despre importanţa<br />
strategică a agriculturii în asigurarea securităţii<br />
alimentare a Uniunii Europene. Agricultura este<br />
neglijată în discuţiile privind strategia şi viitorul Uniunii<br />
Europene, iar raportul vine să arate că <strong>Europa</strong> nu se află<br />
într-o situaţie de securitate alimentară, că fermierii şi<br />
întregi zone rurale sunt în pericol de dispariţie şi că noile<br />
provocări, cum sunt schimbările climatice, tind să<br />
destabilizeze rezervele alimentare, deja în scădere, nu<br />
doar în <strong>Europa</strong>, ci şi în lume.<br />
În contextul în care producţia de alimente trecuie să<br />
crească până în anul 2050, cu cel puţin 70%, pentru a<br />
satisface nevoia de hrană a populaţiei la nivel global,<br />
este nevoie ca securitatea alimentară să se afle în centrul<br />
dezbaterilor atât la nivel mondial, cât şi european.<br />
Uniunea Europeană trebuie să răspundă ferm acestor<br />
provocări, iar prin acest Raport încercăm să propunem<br />
astăzi câteva căi concrete de acţiune.<br />
În primul rând, avem nevoie de o politică agricolă<br />
comună puternică, menită să garanteze securitatea<br />
alimentară atât a cetăţenilor săi, cât şi să contribuie la<br />
asigurarea securităţii alimentare la nivel mondial, în<br />
contextul resurselor limitate şi al efectelor schimbărilor<br />
climatice. Nu putem vorbi despre securitatea alimentară<br />
dacă nu abordăm două probleme esenţiale şi anume:<br />
volatilitatea pieţelor şi a preţurilor şi rezervele de hrană<br />
în scădere la nivel mondial.<br />
În ceea ce priveşte volatilitatea preţurilor, am solicitat<br />
Comisiei ca, în cadrul noii PAC, să consolideze rolul<br />
instrumentelor de intervenţie pe piaţă şi să ia măsuri mai<br />
consistente pentru limitarea speculaţiilor pe pieţele
17-01-2011 71<br />
agricole. În zilele noastre, rezervele de alimente la nivel<br />
global sunt mult mai limitate decât în trecut, conform<br />
estimărilor, acestea putând acoperi nevoia de hrană de la<br />
nivel mondial doar o lună şi jumătate. De aceea, am<br />
considerat că ar fi benefic să se creeze un sistem global<br />
de rezerve alimentare, atât rezerve de urgenţă, pentru a<br />
reduce foametea, cât şi rezerve care să fie folosite pentru<br />
reglementarea preţurilor pe pieţele agricole, care să se<br />
afle sub egida internaţională şi să se prijine pe expertiza<br />
instituţiilor deja existente, precum ONU sau FAO. Cred<br />
că Uniunea Europeană trebuie să fie iniţiatorul acestui<br />
demers, de aceea am cerut Comisiei să îşi asume acest<br />
rol.<br />
O altă chestiune importantă abordată în acest Raport este<br />
situaţia tinerilor agricultori. Dacă ne gândim la viitorul<br />
agriculturii europene, atunci trebuie să acordăm mai<br />
multă atenţie tinerilor agricultori. La nivel european,<br />
doar 7% din agricultori sunt sub 35 ani. De aceea, am<br />
cerut Comisiei să se prevadă măsuri de încurajare a<br />
acestora.<br />
Pe de altă parte, am subliniat necesitatea păstrării<br />
diversităţii agriculturii europene. În acest sens, am<br />
menţionat faptul că practicile agricole tradiţionale,<br />
exploataţiile familiale, fermele mici, dar şi agricultura<br />
ecologică pot aduce o contribuţie valoroasă la asigurarea<br />
securităţii alimentare şi am solicitat crearea de programe<br />
la nivel european, care să sprijine aceste tipuri de<br />
agricultură. Să nu uităm însă că şi pe teritoriul Uniunii<br />
încă există sărăcie şi foamete şi că milioane de europeni<br />
au apelat în această iarnă la ajutoare alimentare<br />
europene. De aceea, în contextul crizei economice, este<br />
de o importanţă majoră menţinerea programului<br />
european „Ajutoare alimentare pentru persoanele cele<br />
mai defavorizate”, cu finanţare europeană.<br />
În încheiere, aş dori să mulţumesc raportorilor din umbră<br />
şi celorlalţi colegi din Comisia pentru agricultură pentru<br />
buna colaborare şi pentru contribuţiile aduse în<br />
redactarea acestui raport, cât şi secretariatului Comisiei<br />
pentru agricultură şi sper ca, împreună, să adoptăm<br />
mâine un raport care să răspundă aşteptărilor cetăţenilor<br />
europeni.<br />
1-225<br />
Mairead McGuinness (PPE). – Mr President, I would<br />
like to thank Mrs Sârbu, our rapporteur, for the excellent<br />
work she has done on this report and for her cooperation<br />
with all the shadows. This follows work which I carried<br />
out in the previous mandate on the role of the common<br />
agricultural policy and global food security.<br />
I regret that we are debating this report just before<br />
midnight. Perhaps it will be at a minute to midnight that<br />
Europe and the world wake up to the realities of how<br />
insecure we are when it comes to food production.<br />
This report is extremely welcome in our overall debate<br />
on this issue and in the context of our debate on reform<br />
of the common agricultural policy.<br />
I had some concerns, but I think they are reflected in the<br />
final text. The idea that one form of production system is<br />
better than another – that organic, small, local is better –<br />
is not a good argument. We need all production systems<br />
to contribute to our food security. We do need to address<br />
market volatility and speculation and I do not think we<br />
have all the answers yet.<br />
The single key problem with agriculture is low incomes<br />
for farmers. Young farmers will not work for nothing,<br />
and we have to address the low income problem if we<br />
want security of food supply.<br />
1-226<br />
Miroslav Mikolášik (PPE). – V dôsledku neustáleho<br />
rastu populácie sme nútení čoraz intenzívnejšie sa<br />
zaoberať otázkou potravinovej bezpečnosti, prístupu<br />
k primeranej, zdravotne neškodnej a výživnej strave.<br />
S cieľom zaistiť potravinovú bezpečnosť je preto<br />
nevyhnutné zvýšiť transparentnosť a spravodlivosť v<br />
samotnom potravinovom reťazci. Zabezpečiť<br />
spravodlivú návratnosť pre poľnohospodárov, zisky a<br />
tvorbu cien, ako aj životaschopné poľnohospodárstvo.<br />
Osobne považujem za vysoko dôležité uplatňovanie<br />
ráznej politiky rozvoja vidieka, prostredníctvom ktorej<br />
zachováme životaschopnosť vidieckej Európy a zvýšime<br />
konkurencieschopnosť poľnohospodárstva, podporíme<br />
inovácie a v konečnom dôsledku aj samotnú<br />
zamestnanosť.<br />
Poľnohospodárstvo má veľký význam predovšetkým v<br />
znevýhodnených oblastiach a aj preto treba prijímať<br />
stimuly, ktoré podporia poľnohospodárstvo vidieka,<br />
prilákajú do poľnohospodárstva viac mladých ľudí a<br />
napomôžu znížiť regionálne rozdiely a zabezpečia trvalo<br />
udržateľný rozvoj.<br />
1-227<br />
Luís Paulo Alves (S&D). – Quero dar os meus parabéns<br />
sinceros à colega Sârbu pela excelência do relatório<br />
produzido, aconselhando vivamente a que a Comissão o<br />
tenha em conta, sobretudo naqueles aspectos em que a<br />
dimensão complexa das questões agrícolas – que em<br />
muito ultrapassam a dimensão estrita da agricultura –<br />
exigem o envolvimento de outras áreas como a da<br />
concorrência do mercado interno e da regulação<br />
financeira, bem como também exigem o seu tratamento<br />
noutros palcos extracomunitários como o G-20 ou a<br />
OMC.<br />
As questões absolutamente determinantes para a<br />
agricultura, para os agricultores e para a disponibilização<br />
em quantidade e qualidade suficiente de alimentos às<br />
populações da <strong>Europa</strong> e do mundo só poderão de facto<br />
ser enfrentadas se o forem em todas estas suas<br />
dimensões, e os objectivos ambiciosos da reforma da<br />
PAC só poderão ser alcançados se a reforma ultrapassar<br />
as fronteiras estritas da agricultura e os seus objectivos<br />
forem igualmente tidos em conta nas necessárias<br />
intervenções nas outras áreas de políticas e nos outros<br />
organismos de carácter global.
72 17-01-2011<br />
Este relatório deixou-o bem claro e eu saúdo-o por isso.<br />
1-228<br />
Janusz Wojciechowski (ECR). – Panie<br />
Przewodniczący! Też przyłączam się do gratulacji dla<br />
pani Sârbu za znakomite sprawozdanie, które uważam<br />
za jedno z najważniejszych w tej kadencji.<br />
Ludzi na świecie jest coraz więcej, ziemi pod uprawę<br />
coraz mniej. Żywność staje się produktem strategicznym<br />
w coraz większym stopniu. O ile ropę naftową można<br />
zastąpić energią słoneczną czy atomową, o tyle<br />
żywności pochodzącej z ziemi nie da się zastąpić<br />
niczym. W Unii Europejskiej zachowujemy się niekiedy<br />
tak, jakbyśmy ciągle borykali się z problemem<br />
nadprodukcji żywności. Cała polityka rolna Unii<br />
Europejskiej w ostatnich latach nastawiona była na to<br />
jak ograniczać produkcję rolną, jak ją zmniejszać.<br />
Dzisiaj na horyzoncie są już czasy, kiedy żywności<br />
będzie brakować. Bardzo dobrze, że z Parlamentu,<br />
dzięki sprawozdaniu pani Sârbu, wychodzi ten sygnał,<br />
że sytuacja się zmieniła i polityka rolna Unii<br />
Europejskiej też musi się zmienić. Musimy szanować<br />
rolnictwo – gwarancję naszego bezpieczeństwa<br />
żywnościowego.<br />
1-229<br />
Peter Jahr (PPE). – Herr Präsident! Es ist nun einmal<br />
in der Politik so wie im täglichen Leben: Das, was man<br />
hat, das schätzt man am wenigsten. Und so scheint es ja<br />
auch offenbar so, dass wir in der Europäischen Union<br />
einen Überfluss an Nahrungsmitteln haben, und es gibt<br />
ja immer noch genügend zu kaufen. Wenn man die<br />
Futtermittelexporte gegenrechnet, haben wir in der<br />
Europäischen Union einen Selbstversorgungsgrad von<br />
88 %. Das heißt, auch wir in der Europäischen Union<br />
müssen aufpassen, dass der Selbstversorgungsgrad an<br />
landwirtschaftlichen Produkten und Nahrungsmitteln<br />
gewährleistet ist.<br />
Deshalb bin ich der Berichterstatterin, Frau Sârbu sehr<br />
dankbar, dass sie dieses Problem wieder in den<br />
Mittelpunkt gerückt hat. Auch wir brauchen in der<br />
Europäischen Union eine gemeinsame Agrarpolitik, die<br />
die Menschen in unserer Union ausreichend mit<br />
Lebensmitteln versorgt. Angesichts einer wachsenden<br />
Weltbevölkerung oder der Auswirkungen des<br />
Klimawandels und steigender Energiepreise wird<br />
deutlich, dass die Landwirte in <strong>Europa</strong> dies zukünftig<br />
nicht alleine bewältigen können. Wir brauchen dazu<br />
auch eine strategische Abstimmung in der Welt.<br />
1-230<br />
Csaba Sándor Tabajdi (S&D). – Az Unió biztonságos<br />
élelmiszer-ellátása a következő évtizedek egyik<br />
legnagyobb biztonságpolitikai kihívása lesz. A Sârbujelentésnek<br />
ez a legnagyobb értéke, ami rámutat arra,<br />
hogy egy-két évtized múlva az élelmiszer és az édesvíz<br />
olyan stratégiai termék lesz, mint most a kőolaj és a<br />
földgáz. Azért is jó az időzítése a jelentésnek, mivel<br />
most folynak a közös agrárpolitika jövőjéről szóló viták,<br />
most folyik a 2014 utáni költségvetés tervezése, és sokan<br />
fenik a fogukat a közös agrárpolitika költségvetésének<br />
megcsorbítására. Nagyon fontos, hogy ez a közös<br />
agrárpolitika a jövőben megfelelő forrásokkal<br />
rendelkezzen. Ehhez meg kell győzni a<br />
pénzügyminisztereket, a döntéshozókat, hogy az<br />
élelmiszer-gazdaság az Európai Unióban nem csak<br />
élelmiszert termel, hanem olyan közjavakat,<br />
környezetvédelmi szociális közjavakat is, amelyeket a<br />
mezőgazdaság nélkül semmi módon nem tudnánk<br />
szavatolni és megtermelni.<br />
1-231<br />
Krisztina Morvai (NI). – Az élelmiszer–biztonságról<br />
szólva zavaró számomra, hogy az Európai Unió<br />
országait egységes egészként kezeli a jelentés. Az új<br />
tagállamokban egészen más a helyzet, mint a régiekben.<br />
Magyarországgal kapcsolatban például hadd tegyek fel<br />
két kérdést. Hogyan lehetséges, hogy egy csodálatos<br />
mezőgazdasági adottságokkal rendelkező országban<br />
gyermekéhezésről beszélhetünk? Az Európai Unió<br />
közepén gyerekek és felnőttek is éheznek. A másik<br />
kérdésem: hogyan lehetséges, hogy olyan egészségtelen<br />
irányban változott a mezőgazdaságunk, hogy hatalmas<br />
területeken ipari jelleggel nyersanyagot állítunk elő,<br />
elsősorban valamiféle –elnézést a kifejezésért, de –<br />
gyarmati jelleggel, és ugye a feldolgozása ennek az<br />
élelmiszernek külföldön folyik, ott termelik meg azt a<br />
profitot, amit aztán – megint csak visszahozva<br />
Magyarországra a feldolgozott élelmiszert – realizálnak<br />
magas áron. Valami alapvető probléma van mindezzel.<br />
1-232<br />
Seán Kelly (PPE). – A Uachtaráin, cosúil le cainteoirí<br />
eile ba mhaith liom comhghairdeas a ghabháil leis an<br />
rapóirtéir Bean Uí Sârbu as an dea-obair san ábhar seo.<br />
1-233<br />
In four minutes, Mrs Sârbu covered a multitude of<br />
issues. I am not going to go over all the things she<br />
mentioned, but I would like to reiterate two points. First,<br />
there is a need for a well-funded CAP. I hope this<br />
Parliament will play a key role in ensuring that the CAP<br />
is not demeaned or diminished in any way. Second, we<br />
need to ensure that young people are encouraged to go<br />
into farming as a livelihood.<br />
Furthermore, we have a policy of encouraging the<br />
growth of energy crops on good agricultural land. In<br />
view of the fact that we may be facing a food shortage<br />
worldwide, with a population increasing at a rate of<br />
80 million per year, should we reassess that policy? Are<br />
we robbing Peter to pay Paul, or perhaps robbing Paul<br />
and Peter and finishing up with nothing? That is the<br />
question I would like to ask.<br />
1-234<br />
Csanád Szegedi (NI). – Tisztelt elnök úr, tisztelt<br />
képviselőtársaim! A jelentésből egyértelműen kitűnik,<br />
hogy a mezőgazdaság területén sem mehet minden úgy,<br />
ahogy eddig ment. Nem mehet az tovább, hogy a világ<br />
egyik végéből a másik végére szállítunk, illetve a<br />
nagyvállalatok szállítanak mezőgazdasági termékeket.<br />
Ugye, ez működhet természetellenes módon. Európába<br />
hoznak be, köztük Magyarországra is almát, paprikát,<br />
paradicsomot, és nem is Spanyolországból vagy<br />
Hollandiából nagyrészt, hanem Kínából, Brazíliából, hát<br />
hústermékeket. Mehet ez így, csak hát azokat a
17-01-2011 73<br />
termékeket fel kell tenni a szállítóeszközre, mondjuk<br />
hajóra, heteken-hónapokon át utaznak. Ezeket<br />
különböző tartósítószerekkel tartósítani kell, amik az<br />
emberek számára nagy fogyasztás esetén mérgezőek.<br />
Namost az emberek a nagy kereskedelmi láncokban<br />
ehhez a termékekhez jutnak hozzá, és aztán<br />
csodálkoznak, mi ez a sok betegség, daganatos, rákos<br />
megbetegedés. Hát nyilvánvaló, hogy az ételszínezékek<br />
és a mesterséges adalékanyagok ezeknek a kiváltói.<br />
Hozzá kell tennem, hogy a kisgazdákat kell támogatni,<br />
hogy egy kialakulóban lévő élelmiszerválságban Európa<br />
mentőövei lehessenek, ezért a multicégek helyett a<br />
kisgazdákat kell támogatni.<br />
1-235<br />
João Ferreira (GUE/NGL). – Senhor Presidente, o<br />
reconhecimento da agricultura como um sector<br />
estratégico no contexto da segurança alimentar de que<br />
nos fala este relatório é indissociável do reconhecimento<br />
e promoção do conceito da soberania alimentar. Quanto<br />
maior a dependência alimentar de um país, maior a sua<br />
insegurança alimentar, maior a dificuldade em assegurar<br />
o abastecimento de alimentos à sua população em<br />
quantidade e qualidade suficientes.<br />
A soberania alimentar é o melhor seguro contra a<br />
volatilidade dos preços dos bens alimentares, assunto<br />
que volta dramaticamente a estar na ordem do dia. Esta<br />
volatilidade tem tido origem fundamentalmente na<br />
especulação financeira exercida sobre os produtos<br />
alimentares, área em que os especuladores, fundos de<br />
investimento, hedge funds, fundos de pensões, grandes<br />
bancos, se foram concentrando à medida que outras<br />
bolhas especulativas foram secando ou rebentando.<br />
A única maneira de impedir esta especulação é acabar<br />
com os instrumentos que a viabilizam, nomeadamente<br />
com alguns produtos financeiros como os derivados<br />
OTC.<br />
Infelizmente, as medidas que a União Europeia adoptou<br />
neste domínio estão muito longe de poder travar esta<br />
sinistra engrenagem da especulação e as suas desumanas<br />
consequências – como vem, aliás, reconhecer um<br />
relatório recente das Nações Unidas da autoria do relator<br />
especial para o direito à alimentação.<br />
1-236<br />
Lívia Járóka (PPE). – Mr President, we are discussing<br />
the poorest of the poor – the European Roma – and,<br />
together with the new Hungarian Presidency, we are all<br />
addressing the European Roma strategy.<br />
Among inter-sectoral issues that concern the poorest of<br />
the poor, agriculture is very rarely addressed, notably<br />
because no land is owned by the poorest of the poor in<br />
Europe. So we are talking not just about food security<br />
but about having food on the table. As one of my<br />
colleagues has already said, this is an essential question<br />
for the EU today. I believe that the agricultural sector –<br />
and the Commission’s work on these documents – has to<br />
be in line with all the EU micro-regional development<br />
projects which are concerned with fighting poverty and<br />
securing food on the table for future generations.<br />
1-237<br />
Kristalina Georgieva, Member of the Commission. −<br />
Mr President, the Commission very much welcomes this<br />
timely report, as food prices are rising sharply, mainly<br />
due to erratic weather conditions and natural disasters,<br />
but also to increases in energy prices that impact on the<br />
cost of food.<br />
Therefore I want to thank the rapporteur, Mrs Sârbu, and<br />
the members of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural<br />
Development for their efforts.<br />
Food security is fundamental for the almost one billion<br />
people around the world that still suffer from hunger, but<br />
it is also important for vulnerable populations across<br />
Europe. For them, the common agricultural policy<br />
makes a real difference. The – sometimes criticised –<br />
CAP has managed to provide EU citizens with food at<br />
affordable prices and has ensured food security in<br />
Europe. This must continue. Food security is identified<br />
as a central issue in the communication on the common<br />
agricultural policy towards 2020 that was adopted on 18<br />
November by the Commission.<br />
The report that Mrs Sârbu has put in front of us<br />
underlines the issue of excessive price volatility, which<br />
is closely linked to food security because of the impact it<br />
has both on farmers and on consumers.<br />
The Commission fully agrees that there is a need to<br />
tackle excessive price volatility. We must collectively<br />
look for better regulation, supervision and transparency<br />
to address market issues, and this requires not only<br />
better financial regulations but also substantially<br />
improved transparency on the market.<br />
The report recommends the creation of a global food<br />
system. Not an easy subject. We have had experiences in<br />
the past of commodity boards. They have proved not to<br />
be successful and therefore this topic undoubtedly<br />
requires more detailed debate. It also requires analysis of<br />
the experience we have gained, for example from the<br />
EUR 1 billion Food Facility adopted by the Commission<br />
in 2008, and also from the work that the Commission<br />
undertakes closely with the FAO and the World Food<br />
Programme to ensure that bumper stocks are<br />
pre-positioned in order to soften the blow of rising food<br />
prices.<br />
All these efforts can be developed when the G20 looks<br />
closely into the food stocks issue, and you can be<br />
assured that the European Commission will be an active<br />
participant in the related deliberations in the coming<br />
weeks.<br />
The report has made a call, echoed by many of you here<br />
this evening, for a strong agricultural and rural<br />
development policy in Europe, capable of ensuring food<br />
security for all, with the support of research and<br />
innovation to face the challenges of producing more<br />
with the fewer resources we have and will have.
74 17-01-2011<br />
The Commission fully agrees with this. There is no more<br />
relevant instrument to fulfil these objectives than a<br />
strong common agricultural policy able to guarantee the<br />
economic and environmental competitiveness of<br />
agriculture and – as some of you said – able to bring<br />
young people into the agricultural sector of Europe.<br />
1-238<br />
Presidente. − La discussione è chiusa.<br />
La votazione si svolgerà martedì 18 gennaio 2011.<br />
Dichiarazioni scritte (articolo 149)<br />
1-239<br />
Sergio Berlato (PPE), per iscritto. – Signor Presidente,<br />
onorevoli colleghi, la sicurezza alimentare rappresenta<br />
una priorità politica sia a livello comunitario sia<br />
mondiale. Il processo di globalizzazione della catena<br />
alimentare fa emergere costantemente nuove sfide e,<br />
talvolta, anche rischi per la salute e per gli interessi dei<br />
consumatori.<br />
Una delle principali sfide che l’Unione europea dovrà<br />
affrontare è rappresentata dall’elaborazione di riforme<br />
agricole e alimentari volte a soddisfare le esigenze della<br />
popolazione mondiale. Secondo dati recenti,<br />
quest’ultima è in continua crescita e si prevede che<br />
aumenterà del 40% circa entro il 2050, determinando un<br />
aumento della domanda di alimenti che si stima<br />
raddoppi rispetto agli attuali fabbisogni.<br />
Per far fronte al crescente aumento della domanda<br />
mondiale di prodotti agricoli e alimentari, gli Stati<br />
membri e l’Unione saranno chiamati a garantire la<br />
sicurezza dell’approvvigionamento alimentare. Per<br />
realizzare tale obiettivo, l'UE dovrà garantire la<br />
sicurezza dei prodotti alimentari tenendo conto delle loro<br />
specificità e assicurando, allo stesso tempo, il corretto<br />
funzionamento del mercato interno.<br />
Da ultimo, sollecito l'attenzione della Commissione su<br />
tutte le possibili misure volte a migliorare la formazione<br />
dei giovani sul lavoro ed a creare opportunità di lavoro<br />
per i laureati nel campo della sicurezza alimentare, con il<br />
principale obiettivo di contribuire all'occupazione nel<br />
settore agricolo.<br />
1-240<br />
Zuzana Brzobohatá (S&D), písemně. – Je zcela<br />
správné podtrhnout význam potravinového zajištění<br />
obyvatelstva EU, které je jejich základním lidským<br />
právem. Evropská unie proto musí usilovat o zajištění<br />
zdravotně nezávadných a výživných potravin, které<br />
budou ekonomicky a fyzicky dostupné pro všechny<br />
občany EU a umožní jim tak vést aktivní a zdravý život.<br />
Je třeba striktně dbát na dodržování nejvyšších standardů<br />
potravinové a zemědělské produkce, na bezpečnost a<br />
kvalitu potravin stejně jako na jejich ekologickou<br />
udržitelnost. Nicméně v této souvislosti je třeba<br />
upozornit také na striktní vyžadování stejných<br />
kvalitativních a bezpečnostních standardů, pokud jde o<br />
potraviny dovážené z třetích zemí, tak aby byla chráněna<br />
konkurenceschopnost evropských zemědělců. Ráda bych<br />
také podpořila opatření, která budou zemědělce<br />
motivovat k vyšší energetické účinnosti, neboť<br />
energetické náklady jsou klíčový faktor pro míru<br />
ziskovosti zemědělské činnosti. Jako nejdůležitější v<br />
celé zprávě vidím důrazný apel na Komisi, aby ve<br />
veřejném zájmu zajistila ve spolupráci s členskými státy<br />
přístup veřejnosti k informacím o výsledcích kontrol<br />
zajišťování potravin, zejména rychlým sdílením těchto<br />
informací mezi členskými státy. Nesmí se prostě<br />
opakovat stejné selhání jako prodej masa obsahujícího<br />
stopy dioxinu, jako tomu je nyní v Německu, kdy ostatní<br />
členské státy byly nedostatečně a pozdě informovány o<br />
nastalé situaci.<br />
1-241<br />
Robert Dušek (S&D), písemně. – Zabezpečení dodávek<br />
potravin považujeme za jedno ze základních lidských<br />
práv. Již dnes je ve světě 900 milionů lidí, kteří kvůli<br />
chudobě trpí neustálým hladem. Do roku 2050 má<br />
světová populace překročit počet 9 miliard lidí a světová<br />
produkce potravin se bude muset zvýšit až o 70 %.<br />
Zemědělství má na jedné straně zvyšovat produkci a na<br />
druhé straně se potýká s vysokými cenami energií, stále<br />
se zmenšující neznečištěnou půdní plochou a s následky<br />
klimatických změn. Musíme řešit nestabilitu a kolísání<br />
cen způsobené spekulacemi na komoditních trzích i<br />
ubývání zásob potravin. Budoucí zajištění dodávek<br />
základních potravin vyžaduje silnou společnou<br />
zemědělskou politiku. SZP by měla zlepšit zabezpečení<br />
dodávek potravin zvýšením produktivity a podporovat<br />
ekologicky udržitelnou produkci potravin i tradiční<br />
zemědělství, drobné zemědělce, ekologické farmy,<br />
místní a regionální distribuci potravin. Tyto modely<br />
zemědělství přispívají k zajišťování dodávek potravin,<br />
neboť využívají po generace vyzkoušené metody a<br />
postupy v jednotlivých oblastech EU. Zemědělství je<br />
nejstrategičtější politikou EU, jeho úspěšnost pomůže<br />
zajistit přežití evropské populace v době potravinové<br />
krize. Aby mohla společná zemědělská politika bojovat s<br />
následky klimatických změn, s udržením cen potravin na<br />
akceptovatelné úrovni a zvyšovat dodávky nezávadných<br />
základních potravin, je nezbytné, aby její rozpočet zůstal<br />
zachován na minimálně stávající úrovni.<br />
1-242<br />
Sandra Kalniete (PPE), rakstiski. – <strong>Eiropas</strong><br />
lauksaimniecība ir viena no Savienības stratēģiski<br />
svarīgākajām nozarēm, jo tā nodrošina ar pārtiku vairāk<br />
nekā 500 miljonus iedzīvotāju. Lai <strong>Eiropas</strong><br />
lauksaimniecības politika varētu sasniegt savu galveno<br />
uzdevumu, proti, nodrošināt <strong>Eiropas</strong> iedzīvotājus ar<br />
veselīgu un kvalitatīvu pārtiku par samērīgām cenām,<br />
vienlaikus saglabājot pienācīgus ienākumus<br />
lauksaimniekiem, tai ir jābūt konkurētspējīgai globālajā<br />
tirgū un jānodrošina godīga konkurence <strong>Eiropas</strong> iekšējā<br />
tirgū. Tāpēc mūsu uzdevums KLP reformas ietvaros ir<br />
nodrošināt vienlīdzīgas konkurences iespējas visiem<br />
<strong>Eiropas</strong> lauksaimniekiem. ES valstis nav saskārušās ar<br />
pārtikas nodrošinātības problēmām, tomēr šādi riski<br />
pastāv nākotnē, un mums ir jāspēj attiecīgi reaģēt, pirms<br />
tas ir noticis. Jāņem vērā, ka lauksaimnieki jau šobrīd<br />
strādā ar minimāliem ienākumiem vai pat zaudējumiem,<br />
kas nelabvēlīgi ietekmē viņu spēju uzturēt ražošanu. Arī<br />
dabas kataklizmas ietekmē pārtikas cenas veikalos un
17-01-2011 75<br />
līdz ar to arī pārtikas pieejamību cilvēkiem. Mums ir<br />
jāapzinās lauksaimniecības stratēģiskā nozīme <strong>Eiropas</strong><br />
Savienībā un jādara viss, lai nākotnē <strong>Eiropas</strong> cilvēkiem<br />
nenāktos pieredzēt situācijas, kad iestājas pārtikas<br />
nepietiekamība, jo ES politiķi un valdības nebūs laikus<br />
saskatījuši riskus un tos novērsuši. Lauksaimniecības<br />
atzīšana par stratēģiski svarīgu nozari pārtikas<br />
nodrošinātībā ir svarīgs solis, lai mēs nākotnē izvairītos<br />
no pārtikas nodrošinājuma problēmām.<br />
1-243<br />
Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska (PPE), na piśmie. –<br />
Drogie Koleżanki i Koledzy! <strong>Europa</strong> potrzebuje<br />
Wspólnej Polityki Rolnej, która zapewni rozwój, a nie<br />
stagnację europejskiego rolnictwa. Polityka rolna musi<br />
odpowiadać na wyzwania europejskie i globalne,<br />
zwłaszcza gdy weźmiemy pod uwagę fakt, że według<br />
Światowej Organizacji ds. Wyżywienia i Rolnictwa<br />
produkcja żywności musi wzrosnąć co najmniej o 70%,<br />
aby zaspokoić populację światową, która do 2050 roku<br />
ma przekroczyć 9 mld. Widać zatem, że Wspólna<br />
Polityka Rolna powinna zwiększać bezpieczeństwo<br />
żywnościowe poprzez zwiększenie wydajności przy<br />
jednoczesnym promowaniu zrównoważonej<br />
środowiskowo polityki żywności. Chciałabym zwrócić<br />
uwagę, że uregulowania w tym zakresie powinny być<br />
przejrzyste. Cenię sobie inicjatywy, które zalecają<br />
promocję różnorodności rolnictwa, uwzględnienie<br />
rolnictwa tradycyjnego i ekologicznego. Dodatkowo<br />
ważnym aspektem jest zagwarantowanie młodym<br />
rolnikom dostępu do ziemi i kredytów, aby realizować<br />
cele WPR takie jak innowacyjność, modernizacja,<br />
wzmocnienie konkurencyjności, a przede wszystkim<br />
nowoczesne rolnictwo.<br />
1-244<br />
Rareş-Lucian Niculescu (PPE), în scris. – Salut<br />
raportul referitor la recunoaşterea agriculturii ca sector<br />
strategic în contextul securităţii alimentare dar, în acelaşi<br />
timp, îmi exprim regretul pentru faptul că Parlamentul a<br />
decis să aloce atât de puţin timp pentru dezbaterea<br />
acestuia. Tema este cu atât mai actuală în această<br />
perioadă, în care am devenit conştienţi de modul în care<br />
criza alimentară poate afecta stabilitatea statelor. Revolta<br />
din Tunisia a avut printre motivaţii scumpirea<br />
alimentelor. Algeria, India, Bangladesh sunt state în care<br />
scumpirea alimentelor a provocat tensiuni serioase.<br />
Sporirea culturilor de biodiesel, speculaţiile financiare,<br />
reorientarea extrem de rapidă a producătorilor către<br />
culturi agricole mai rentabile, nu în ultimul rând,<br />
schimbarea obiceiurilor alimentare ale cetăţenilor multor<br />
state sunt, de asemenea, teme noi, legate strâns de<br />
subiectul raportului de astăzi.<br />
Un comentariu final: într-un top al vulnerabilităţii la<br />
creşterea preţului alimentelor, realizat de o bancă<br />
japoneză, dintre 40 de ţări cele mai vulnerabile, patru<br />
sunt membre ale Uniunii Europene, un alt stat va deveni<br />
curând membru al UE, iar 3 state sunt vecini imediaţi ai<br />
Uniunii. Un top interesant care trebuie să ne dea de<br />
gândit.<br />
1-245<br />
Iosif Matula (PPE), în scris. – Creşterea cererii de<br />
alimente la nivel global, ca efect al creşterii populaţiei<br />
planetei, se reflectă în mod evident asupra resurselor<br />
naturale de hrană şi implică noi reglementări şi precauţii<br />
în domeniul securităţii alimentare. UE are misiunea<br />
prioritară de a garanta statelor membre dreptul la<br />
securitate alimentară şi de a susţine ţările în curs de<br />
dezvoltare să atingă un nivel adecvat de siguranţă<br />
alimentară. Consider importantă promovarea producţiei<br />
şi comercializării alimentelor tradiţionale locale.<br />
Produsele alimentare cu referinţă regională prezintă<br />
multiple beneficii prin: costurile reduse de transport şi<br />
reducerea riscului de perisabilitate. Există multe regiuni<br />
cu un pronunţat potenţial agricol neexploatat din cauza<br />
unor dezechilibre în plan social sau economic, pe fondul<br />
accentuării îmbătrânirii populaţiei rurale sau<br />
industrializării. Astfel, importante suprafeţe agricole nu<br />
sunt utilizate eficient. Un rol cheie în asigurarea<br />
securităţii alimentare îl pot avea autorităţile regionale<br />
prin sprijinirea capacităţii agricole a regiunilor ce deţin<br />
acest potenţial. UE este unul dintre liderii mondiali în<br />
domeniul cercetării şi inovării, inclusiv în agricultură.<br />
Cu o majoritate a populaţiei urbane în continuă creştere,<br />
apare o nouă provocare: cât de prioritară este<br />
dezvoltarea agriculturii urbane în vederea asigurării<br />
securităţii alimentare, prin diverse modele cum ar fi<br />
agricultura urbana pe verticală?<br />
1-246<br />
Pavel Poc (S&D), písemně. – Chápeme-li zemědělství<br />
jako strategické odvětví, pak nezbytnou podmínkou<br />
zajištění bezpečnosti dodávek potravin je soběstačnost<br />
EU minimálně na úrovni produkce základních potravin a<br />
krmiv. Závislost EU na dovozu zemědělských produktů<br />
způsobuje růst cen potravin a poškozuje jejich přímé<br />
producenty v obchodním řetězci. Podle Organizace OSN<br />
pro výživu a zemědělství (FAO) by se do roku 2050<br />
mohla poptávka po potravinách a krmivech zvýšit o<br />
70 %. Bude proto třeba uplatnit všechny formy<br />
zemědělství, které jsou k dispozici, a významně podpořit<br />
finanční investice do vědy a výzkumu v této oblasti.<br />
Účinné využívání tradičních zemědělských odrůd, které<br />
jsou pro určité regiony charakteristické, také vyžaduje<br />
větší podporu a zájem veřejnosti. Například posouzení<br />
environmentálního dopadu produkce potravin a<br />
přepravních vzdáleností je pro spotřebitele snadno<br />
srozumitelné. Současné až 50% plýtvání v rámci celého<br />
řetězce výroby nebo neúměrný růst nákladní dopravy<br />
nejsou faktory slučitelné se zajištěním bezpečnosti<br />
potravinových dodávek. Nelze předstírat snahu o<br />
zajištění bezpečnosti dodávek potravin ani ochranu<br />
životního prostředí a současně tolerovat závislost na<br />
dovozu produktů vypěstovaných na jiném kontinentě a<br />
dovážených tisíce kilometrů. Taková praxe vytváří<br />
obrovskou ekologickou stopu a současně nutí rozvojové<br />
země dovážet téměř veškeré potřebné potraviny, činí je<br />
závislými, ničí jejich hospodářství, zbídačuje jejich<br />
obyvatelstvo a ničí jejich životní prostředí.
76 17-01-2011<br />
1-247<br />
22 - Ordine del giorno della prossima<br />
seduta: vedasi processo verbale<br />
1-248<br />
23 - Chiusura della seduta<br />
1-249<br />
(La seduta è tolta alle 23.30)
НЕОКОНЧАТЕЛНО ИЗДАНИЕ<br />
В настоящото издание (достъпно и в интернет - вж.<br />
страница последна) всяко изказване фигурира на<br />
езика, използван от оратора. Окончателно издание<br />
е достъпно едва впоследствие. Ораторите, които<br />
желаят в текста на изказванията им да бъдат<br />
нанесени корекции, следва да ги представят на<br />
Отдел "Протоколи и пълни стенографски протоколи<br />
на пленарни заседания" в едноседмичен срок<br />
на адреса, посочен на страница последна (по<br />
електронна поща поставете в полето "Относно"<br />
"CRE / дата").<br />
EDICIÓN PROVISIONAL<br />
La presente edición (disponible también en Internet -<br />
véase última página) contiene todas las intervenciones<br />
en la lengua usada por el orador. La edición<br />
definitiva estará disponible posteriormente. Las<br />
correcciones que los oradores deseen efectuar en el<br />
texto de su intervención deben enviarse a la Unidad de<br />
Actas y Actas Literales de la Sesión Plenaria en el plazo<br />
de una semana a la dirección que figura en la última<br />
página (para el e-mail: asunto «CRE / fecha»).<br />
PROZATÍMNÍ VYDÁNÍ<br />
V tomto vydání (které je rovněž k dispozici na<br />
internetu – viz poslední strana) je každé vystoupení<br />
zaznamenáno v jazyce, ve kterém je řečník přednesl.<br />
Řečníci, kteří si přejí provést opravy ve znění svých<br />
vystoupení, mohou do jednoho týdne předat opravy<br />
oddělení pro doslovný záznam a zápis z plenárního<br />
zasedání na adresu uvedenou na poslední straně (v<br />
příslušném e-mailu uvést v předmětu zprávy (subject):<br />
„CRE / datum“).<br />
FORELØBIG UDGAVE<br />
Denne udgave (findes også på internettet - se sidste<br />
side) indeholder samtlige taler på det af taleren<br />
anvendte sprog. En endelig udgave offentliggøres<br />
senere. Enheden for Plenarmødeprotokoller og -<br />
referater bør inden en uge, på den adresse der er<br />
angivet på sidste side, underrettes om de ændringer,<br />
som talerne måtte ønske at foretage i deres indlæg<br />
(ved henvendelse pr. e-mail, skriv venligst "CRE / dato"<br />
under "subject").<br />
VORLÄUFIGE AUSGABE<br />
Diese Ausgabe (auch im Internet abrufbar — siehe<br />
hintere Umschlagseite) enthält alle Reden in der vom<br />
Redner verwendeten Sprache. Eine endgültige Ausgabe<br />
wird später veröffentlicht. Etwaige Korrekturen,<br />
die die Redner am Text ihrer Reden vorzunehmen<br />
wünschen, sollten innerhalb einer Woche dem Referat<br />
Plenarprotokolle an die auf der Rückseite angegebene<br />
Adresse zugesandt werden (für E-Mail: im Betreff<br />
erwähnen: CRE / Datum).<br />
ESIALGNE VERSIOON<br />
Käesolevas versioonis (mis on kättesaadav ka internetis<br />
– vt viimast lehekülge) on toodud kõikide sõnavõttude<br />
originaaltekstid. Lõplik versioon avaldatakse hiljem.<br />
Sõnavõtjatel, kes soovivad oma sõnavõtus teha<br />
muudatusi, palutakse edastada muudatused ühe<br />
nädala jooksul täiskogu istungite protokollide üksusele<br />
viimasel leheküljel toodud aadressil (e-posti puhul<br />
märkida teemaks „CRE / kuupäev”).<br />
Списък на съкращенията на политическите групи<br />
PPE<br />
S&D<br />
ALDE<br />
Verts/ALE<br />
ECR<br />
GUE/NGL<br />
EFD<br />
NI<br />
Група на Европейската народна партия (Християндемократи)<br />
Група на прогресивния алианс на социалистите и демократите в<br />
Европейския парламент<br />
Група на Алианса на либералите и демократите за Европа<br />
Група на Зелените/Европейски свободен алианс<br />
Европейски консерватори и реформисти<br />
Конфедеративна група на Европейската обединена левица -<br />
Северна зелена левица<br />
Група „Европа на свободата и демокрацията”<br />
Независими членове<br />
Lista de las siglas de los grupos políticos<br />
PPE<br />
S&D<br />
ALDE<br />
Verts/ALE<br />
ECR<br />
GUE/NGL<br />
EFD<br />
NI<br />
Grupo del Partido Popular Europeo (Demócrata-cristianos)<br />
Grupo de la Alianza Progresista de los Socialistas y Demócratas en<br />
el Parlamento Europeo<br />
Grupo de la Alianza de los Demócratas y Liberales por <strong>Europa</strong><br />
Grupo de los Verdes/Alianza Libre Europea<br />
Grupo de los Conservadores y Reformistas Europeos<br />
Grupo Confederal de la Izquierda Unitaria Europea/Izquierda Verde<br />
Nórdica<br />
Grupo <strong>Europa</strong> de la Libertad y de la Democracia<br />
No inscritos<br />
Seznam zkratek politických skupin<br />
PPE<br />
S&D<br />
ALDE<br />
Verts/ALE<br />
ECR<br />
GUE/NGL<br />
EFD<br />
NI<br />
Skupina Evropské lidové strany (Křesťanští demokraté)<br />
Skupina Pokrokové aliance socialistů a demokratů v Evropském<br />
parlamentu<br />
Skupina Aliance liberálů a demokratů pro Evropu<br />
Skupina Zelených/Evropské svobodné aliance<br />
Skupina Evropských konzervativců a reformistů<br />
Skupina konfederace Evropské sjednocené levice a Severské zelené<br />
levice<br />
Skupina Evropa svobody a demokracie<br />
Nezařazení poslanci<br />
Liste over forkortelserne for de politiske grupper<br />
PPE<br />
S&D<br />
ALDE<br />
Verts/ALE<br />
ECR<br />
GUE/NGL<br />
EFD<br />
NI<br />
Det Europæiske Folkepartis gruppe (Kristelige Demokrater)<br />
Gruppen for Det Progressive Forbund af Socialdemokrater i <strong>Europa</strong>-<br />
Parlamentet<br />
Gruppen Alliancen af Liberale og Demokrater for <strong>Europa</strong><br />
Gruppen De Grønne/Den Europæiske Fri Alliance<br />
Gruppen De Europæiske Konservative og Reformister<br />
Den Europæiske Venstrefløjs Fællesgruppe/Nordisk Grønne Venstre<br />
Gruppen for Europæisk Frihed og Demokrati<br />
Løsgængere<br />
Liste der Abkürzungen der Fraktionen<br />
PPE<br />
S&D<br />
ALDE<br />
Verts/ALE<br />
ECR<br />
GUE/NGL<br />
EFD<br />
NI<br />
Fraktion der Europäischen Volkspartei (Christdemokraten)<br />
Fraktion der Progressiven Allianz der Sozialisten & Demokraten<br />
im Europäischen Parlament<br />
Fraktion der Allianz der Liberalen und Demokraten für <strong>Europa</strong><br />
Fraktion der Grünen / Freie Europäische Allianz<br />
Fraktion Europäische Konservative und Reformisten<br />
Konföderale Fraktion der Vereinigten Europäischen<br />
Linken/Nordische Grüne Linke<br />
Fraktion <strong>Europa</strong> der Freiheit und der Demokratie<br />
Fraktionslos<br />
Fraktsioonide lühendite nimekiri<br />
PPE<br />
S&D<br />
ALDE<br />
Verts/ALE<br />
ECR<br />
GUE/NGL<br />
EFD<br />
NI<br />
Euroopa Rahvapartei (kristlike demokraatide) fraktsioon<br />
Euroopa Parlamendi Sotsialistide ja Demokraatide Progressiivse<br />
Liidu fraktsioon<br />
Euroopa Demokraatide ja Liberaalide Liidu fraktsioon<br />
Roheliste / Euroopa Vabaliidu fraktsioon<br />
Euroopa Konservatiivide ja Reformistide fraktsioon<br />
Euroopa Ühendatud Vasakpoolsete / Põhjamaade Roheliste<br />
Vasakpoolsete liitfraktsioon<br />
Vaba ja Demokraatliku Euroopa fraktsioon<br />
fraktsioonilise kuuluvuseta parlamendiliikmed<br />
BG<br />
ES<br />
CS<br />
DA<br />
DE<br />
ET
ΠΡΟΣΩΡΙΝΗ ΕΚΔΟΣΗ<br />
Η παρούσα έκδοση (διαθέσιμη και στο Διαδίκτυο - βλ.<br />
οπισθόφυλλο) περιέχει τα πρωτότυπα όλων των<br />
αγορεύσεων. Η τελική έκδοση θα είναι διαθέσιμη<br />
αργότερα. Οι αγορητές που επιθυμούν να επιφέρουν<br />
διορθώσεις στις αγορεύσεις τους καλούνται να τις<br />
διαβιβάσουν στη μονάδα Πρακτικών της Ολομέλειας<br />
στο αργότερο μέσα σε μία εβδομάδα στη διεύθυνση<br />
που αναγράφεται στο οπισθόφυλλο (για το e-mail: να<br />
αναγράφεται στο θέμα "CRE / ημερομηνία").<br />
PROVISIONAL EDITION<br />
This edition (also available on the Internet – see back<br />
cover) contains the texts of all speeches in the original<br />
<strong>language</strong> used by the speaker. The final edition will be<br />
available later. Speakers wishing to correct their<br />
speeches are requested to send any corrections<br />
within a week to the Plenary Records Unit at the<br />
address shown on the last page (if using e-mail,<br />
please enter ‘CRE / date’ in the subject line).<br />
EDITION PROVISOIRE<br />
Dans la présente édition (disponible également sur<br />
Internet - v. dernière page) chaque intervention figure<br />
dans la langue utilisée par l'orateur. Une édition<br />
définitive sera disponible ultérieurement. Les orateurs<br />
qui désirent voir apporter des corrections au texte de<br />
leur intervention sont priés de transmettre celles-ci à<br />
l'unité des Procès-verbaux et des Comptes rendus de<br />
la plénière dans un délai d'une semaine à l'adresse<br />
figurant en dernière page (pour l'e-mail: mentionner<br />
dans le sujet "CRE / date").<br />
EAGRÁN SEALADACH<br />
Is é atá san eagrán seo (atá ar fáil ar an Idirlíon chomh<br />
maith - feic clúdach cúil) ná téacsanna bunaidh de<br />
gach aitheasc. Beidh eagrán deiridh ar fáil níos déanaí.<br />
Ba cheart do chainteoirí aon cheartúcháin a chur in<br />
iúl don Aonad do Thaifead na gCruinnithe Iomlánacha<br />
trí ríomhphost a sheoladh laistigh de sheachtain<br />
chuig an seoladh ar an leathanach deiridh (cuir<br />
'CRE/dáta' mar ábhar an ríomhphoist le do thoil).<br />
EDIZIONE PROVVISORIA<br />
La presente edizione (disponibile anche su Internet<br />
all'indirizzo indicato all'ultima pagina) contiene tutti i<br />
discorsi nella lingua usata dall'oratore. L'edizione<br />
definitiva sarà pubblicata successivamente. Gli oratori<br />
che desiderino rivedere il testo dei loro interventi<br />
sono pregati di far pervenire le correzioni entro una<br />
settimana all'unità Processi verbali e resoconti<br />
integrali della seduta plenaria all'indirizzo indicato<br />
all'ultima pagina (per l'e-mail indicare nell'oggetto<br />
"CRE / data").<br />
PAGAIDU VERSIJA<br />
Šajā izdevumā (pieejams arī internetā — sk. pēdējo<br />
lappusi) visas runas ir oriģinālajā valodā. Galīgā versija<br />
būs pieejama vēlāk. Runātāji, kas vēlas labot savas<br />
runas, tiek lūgti izlaboto tekstu vienas nedēļas laikā<br />
nosūtīt Plenārsēžu protokolu un stenogrammu<br />
nodaļai uz adresi, kura norādīta pēdējā lappusē (epastā<br />
kā tematu rakstīt: CRE / datums).<br />
Συντομογραφίες των πολιτικών ομάδων<br />
PPE<br />
S&D<br />
ALDE<br />
Verts/ALE<br />
ECR<br />
GUE/NGL<br />
EFD<br />
NI<br />
Ομάδα τoυ Ευρωπαϊκoύ Λαϊκoύ Κόμματoς (Χριστιαvoδημoκράτες)<br />
Ομάδα της Προοδευτικής Συμμαχίας των Σοσιαλιστών και<br />
Δημοκρατών στο Ευρωπαϊκό Κοινοβούλιο<br />
Ομάδα της Συμμαχίας Φιλελευθέρων και Δημοκρατών για την<br />
Ευρώπη<br />
Ομάδα τωv Πρασίvωv / Ευρωπαϊκή Ελεύθερη Συμμαχία<br />
Ευρωπαίοι Συντηρητικοί και Μεταρρυθμιστές<br />
Συνομοσπονδιακή Ομάδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ενωτικής<br />
Αριστεράς/Αριστερά των Πρασίνων των Βορείων Χωρών<br />
Ευρώπη ελευθερίας και δημοκρατίας<br />
Μη Εγγεγραμμένοι<br />
List of abbreviations denoting political groups<br />
PPE<br />
S&D<br />
ALDE<br />
Verts/ALE<br />
ECR<br />
GUE/NGL<br />
EFD<br />
NI<br />
Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats)<br />
Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the<br />
European Parliament<br />
Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe<br />
Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance<br />
European Conservatives and Reformists Group<br />
Confederal Group of the European United Left - Nordic Green Left<br />
Europe of Freedom and Democracy Group<br />
Non-attached Members<br />
Liste des sigles des groupes politiques<br />
PPE<br />
S&D<br />
ALDE<br />
Verts/ALE<br />
ECR<br />
GUE/NGL<br />
EFD<br />
NI<br />
Groupe du Parti populaire européen (Démocrates-Chrétiens)<br />
Groupe de l'Alliance progressiste des Socialistes et Démocrates au<br />
Parlement européen<br />
Groupe Alliance des démocrates et des libéraux pour l'Europe<br />
Groupe des Verts/Alliance libre européenne<br />
Groupe des Conservateurs et Réformistes européens<br />
Groupe confédéral de la Gauche unitaire européenne/Gauche verte<br />
nordique<br />
Groupe Europe Liberté Démocratie<br />
Non-inscrits<br />
Liosta de ghiorrúcháin na ngrúpaí polaitiúla<br />
PPE<br />
S&D<br />
ALDE<br />
Verts/ALE<br />
ECR<br />
GUE/NGL<br />
EFD<br />
NI<br />
Grúpa Pháirtí an Phobail Eorpaigh (Na Daonlathaithe Críostaí)<br />
An Grúpa d’Aontas Forchéimnitheach na Sóisialaithe agus na<br />
nDaonlathaithe i bParlaimint na hEorpa<br />
Grúpa Chomhghuaillíocht na Liobrálaithe agus na nDaonlathaithe<br />
An Grúpa Glas/Grúpa na Saor-Chomhghuaillíochta Eorpaí<br />
An Grúpa do Choimeádaigh agus Leasaitheoirí na hEorpa<br />
Grúpa Cónasctha den Chlé Aontaithe Eorpach - den Chlé Ghlas<br />
Nordach<br />
An Grúpa d’Eoraip na Saoirse agus an Daonlathais<br />
Feisirí Neamhcheangailte<br />
Elenco delle sigle dei gruppi politici<br />
PPE<br />
S&D<br />
ALDE<br />
Verts/ALE<br />
ECR<br />
GUE/NGL<br />
EFD<br />
NI<br />
Gruppo del Partito popolare europeo (Democratico Cristiano)<br />
Gruppo dell'Alleanza Progressista di Socialisti e Democratici al<br />
Parlamento europeo<br />
Gruppo dell'Alleanza dei Democratici e dei Liberali per l'<strong>Europa</strong><br />
Gruppo Verde/Alleanza libera europea<br />
Gruppo dei Conservatori e Riformisti europei<br />
Gruppo confederale della Sinistra unitaria europea/Sinistra verde<br />
nordica<br />
Gruppo <strong>Europa</strong> della libertà e della democrazia<br />
Non iscritti<br />
Saraksts ar politisko grupu saīsinājumiem<br />
PPE<br />
S&D<br />
ALDE<br />
Verts/ALE<br />
ECR<br />
GUE/NGL<br />
EFD<br />
NI<br />
<strong>Eiropas</strong> Tautas partijas grupa (Kristīgie demokrāti)<br />
<strong>Eiropas</strong> Parlamenta sociālistu un demokrātu progresīvās alianses<br />
grupa<br />
<strong>Eiropas</strong> Liberāļu un demokrātu apvienības grupa<br />
Zaļo un <strong>Eiropas</strong> Brīvās apvienības grupa<br />
<strong>Eiropas</strong> Konservatīvo un reformistu grupa<br />
<strong>Eiropas</strong> Apvienotā kreiso un Ziemeļvalstu Zaļo kreiso spēku<br />
konfederālā grupa<br />
grupa „Brīvības un demokrātijas Eiropa”<br />
Pie politiskajām grupām nepiederošie deputāti<br />
EL<br />
EN<br />
FR<br />
GA<br />
IT<br />
LV
NEGALUTINĖ REDAKCIJA<br />
Šioje redakcijoje (ją taip pat galima rasti internete – žr.<br />
paskutinį puslapį) pateikiami visų pranešimų tekstai<br />
originalo kalba. Galutinė redakcija bus paruošta<br />
vėliau. Kalbėjusiųjų, norinčių pataisyti savo<br />
pranešimus, prašome pateikti savo pataisymus<br />
Plenarinių posėdžių protokolų ir stenogramų skyriui<br />
paskutiniame puslapyje nurodytu adresu ne vėliau<br />
kaip per vieną savaitę (siunčiant el. paštu, dalyko<br />
skiltyje nurodykite CRE / data).<br />
IDEIGLENES KIADÁS<br />
A jelen kiadásban (amely az Interneten is<br />
hozzáférhető, ld. az utolsó oldalt) minden felszólalás a<br />
felszólaló által használt nyelven szerepel. A végleges<br />
kiadás elkészítésére később kerül sor. Azok a<br />
felszólalók, akik javításokat kívánnak tenni<br />
felszólalásuk szövegében, szíveskedjenek a kívánt<br />
javításokat egyhetes határidőn belül eljuttatni<br />
a plenáris ülések jegyzőkönyvéért és szó szerinti<br />
jegyzőkönyvéért felelős osztályhoz, az utolsó oldalon<br />
szereplő címre (az e-mailek tárgyában tüntesse fel a<br />
következőt: „CRE / dátum”).<br />
EDIZZJONI PROVIŻORJA<br />
Din l-edizzjoni (li tinstab ukoll fuq l-Internet - ara lqoxra<br />
ta' wara) fiha t-testi oriġinali tad-diskorsi kollha.<br />
L-edizzjoni finali tkun disponibbli aktar 'il quddiem.<br />
Dawk li jixtiequ jikkoreġu d-diskors tagħhom huma<br />
mitluba li jgħaddu, fi żmien ġimgħa, l-verżjonijiet<br />
riveduti lill-Unità tal-Minuti u ta' l-Atti tal-Plenarja, flindirizz<br />
indikat fuq il-qoxra ta' wara (jekk tuża l-email,<br />
jekk jogħġbok ikteb CRE / id-data fil-linja indikata).<br />
VOORLOPIGE UITGAVE<br />
Deze uitgave (ook te vinden op Internet - zie<br />
achterkant) omvat alle redevoeringen in de taal<br />
waarin zij zijn uitgesproken. Een definitieve versie in<br />
elk van de officiële talen zal op een later tijdstip<br />
verschijnen. Sprekers die verbeteringen in de tekst<br />
van hun redevoeringen wensen aan te brengen,<br />
kunnen deze binnen een week aan de Afdeling<br />
notulen en volledig verslag plenaire vergaderingen<br />
op het op de achterkant aangegeven adres doen<br />
toekomen (Voor e-mail: onder onderwerp vermelden:<br />
CRE / datum).<br />
WYDANIE TYMCZASOWE<br />
Niniejsze wydanie (dostępne również na stronach<br />
internetowych - zob. ostatnia strona) zawiera teksty<br />
wszystkich przemówień w językach mówców.<br />
Wydanie ostateczne będzie dostępne później. Mówcy,<br />
którzy chcieliby wnieść poprawki do tekstu swojego<br />
przemówienia, proszeni są o przesłanie poprawek do<br />
Wydziału protokołów i stenogramów z posiedzenia<br />
plenarnego w terminie jednego tygodnia na adres<br />
podany na ostatniej stronie (zaznaczając w temacie<br />
wiadomości e-mail: CRE / data).<br />
EDIÇÃO PROVISÓRIA<br />
A presente edição (também disponível na Internet - cf.<br />
última página) contém todas as intervenções na<br />
língua utilizada pelo respectivo orador. A edição<br />
definitiva será publicada ulteriormente. As correcções<br />
que os oradores desejem efectuar no texto das<br />
respectivas intervenções devem ser transmitidas, no<br />
prazo de uma semana, à Unidade da Acta e do Relato<br />
Integral das Sessões, para o endereço que figura na<br />
última página deste caderno (para a transmissão via<br />
e-mail, é necessário inscrever a menção "CRE / data"<br />
no campo assunto).<br />
Frakcijų pavadinimų sutrumpinimų sąrašas<br />
PPE<br />
S&D<br />
ALDE<br />
Verts/ALE<br />
ECR<br />
GUE/NGL<br />
EFD<br />
NI<br />
Europos liaudies partijos (krikščionių demokratų) frakcija<br />
Europos Parlamento socialistų ir demokratų pažangiojo aljanso<br />
frakcija<br />
Liberalų ir demokratų aljanso už Europą frakcija<br />
Žaliųjų frakcija / Europos laisvasis aljansas<br />
Europos konservatorių ir reformuotojų frakcija<br />
Europos vieningųjų kairiųjų jungtinė frakcija / Šiaurės šalių žalieji<br />
kairieji<br />
Laisvos ir demokratiškos Europos frakcija<br />
Nepriklausomi nariai<br />
A képviselőcsoportok betűszó szerinti listája<br />
PPE<br />
S&D<br />
ALDE<br />
Verts/ALE<br />
ECR<br />
GUE/NGL<br />
EFD<br />
NI<br />
az Európai Néppárt (Kereszténydemokraták) képviselőcsoportja<br />
az Európai Szocialisták és Demokraták Progresszív Szövetsége<br />
képviselőcsoport<br />
Liberálisok és Demokraták Szövetsége Európáért képviselőcsoport<br />
a Zöldek/Európai Szabad Szövetség képviselőcsoport<br />
Európai Konzervatívok és Reformisták képviselőcsoport<br />
az Egységes Európai Baloldal/Északi Zöld Baloldal képviselőcsoport<br />
a Szabadság és Demokrácia Európája képviselőcsoport<br />
független képviselők<br />
Lista ta' abbrevjazzonijiet ta' gruppi politiċi<br />
PPE<br />
S&D<br />
ALDE<br />
Verts/ALE<br />
ECR<br />
GUE/NGL<br />
EFD<br />
NI<br />
Grupp tal-Partit Popolari Ewropew (Demokristjani)<br />
Grupp tal-Alleanza Progressiva tas-Soċjalisti u d-Demokratiċi fil-<br />
Parlament Ewropew<br />
Grupp ta' l-Alleanza tal-Liberali u d-Demokratiċi għall-Ewropa<br />
Grupp tal-Ħodor/Alleanza Ħielsa Ewropea<br />
Konservattivi u Riformisti Ewropej<br />
Grupp Konfederali tax-Xellug Magħqud Ewropew - Xellug Aħdar<br />
Nordiku<br />
Grupp għall-Ewropa ħielsa u demokratika<br />
Membri mhux affiljati<br />
Lijst van afkortingen van de fracties<br />
PPE<br />
S&D<br />
ALDE<br />
Verts/ALE<br />
ECR<br />
GUE/NGL<br />
EFD<br />
NI<br />
Fractie van de Europese Volkspartij (Christen-democraten)<br />
Fractie van de Progressieve Alliantie van Socialisten en Democraten<br />
in het Europees Parlement<br />
Fractie Alliantie van Liberalen en Democraten voor <strong>Europa</strong><br />
Fractie De Groenen/Vrije Europese Alliantie<br />
Fractie Europese Conservatieven en Hervormers<br />
Confederale Fractie Europees Unitair Links/Noords Groen Links<br />
<strong>Europa</strong> van Vrijheid en Democratie<br />
Niet-ingeschrevenen<br />
Lista skrótów grup politycznych<br />
PPE<br />
S&D<br />
ALDE<br />
Verts/ALE<br />
ECR<br />
GUE/NGL<br />
EFD<br />
NI<br />
Grupa Europejskiej Partii Ludowej (Chrześcijańscy Demokraci)<br />
Grupa Postępowego Sojuszu Socjalistów i Demokratów w<br />
Parlamencie Europejskim<br />
Grupa Porozumienia Liberałów i Demokratów na rzecz Europy<br />
Grupa Zielonych / Wolne Przymierze Europejskie<br />
Grupa Europejskich Konserwatystów i Reformistów<br />
Konfederacyjna Grupa Zjednoczonej Lewicy Europejskiej / Nordycka<br />
Zielona Lewica<br />
Grupa Europy Wolności i Demokracji<br />
Niezrzeszeni<br />
Lista das siglas dos grupos políticos<br />
PPE<br />
S&D<br />
ALDE<br />
Verts/ALE<br />
ECR<br />
GUE/NGL<br />
EFD<br />
NI<br />
Grupo do Partido Popular Europeu (Democratas-Cristãos)<br />
Grupo da Aliança Progressista dos Socialistas e Democratas no<br />
Parlamento Europeu<br />
Grupo da Aliança dos Democratas e Liberais pela <strong>Europa</strong><br />
Grupo dos Verdes/Aliança Livre Europeia<br />
Grupo dos Conservadores e Reformistas Europeus<br />
Grupo Confederal da Esquerda Unitária Europeia/Esquerda Nórdica<br />
Verde<br />
Grupo <strong>Europa</strong> da Liberdade e da Democracia<br />
Não-inscritos<br />
LT<br />
HU<br />
MT<br />
NL<br />
PL<br />
PT
EDIŢIE PROVIZORIE<br />
În prezenta ediție (disponibilă și pe internet –<br />
consultați ultima pagină), fiecare intervenție figurează<br />
în limba utilizată de către vorbitor. Ediția definitivă va<br />
fi disponibilă la o dată ulterioară. Vorbitorii care<br />
doresc să aducă modificări textului intervenției lor<br />
sunt rugați să le transmită în termen de o<br />
săptămână Unității Procese-verbale și Stenograme<br />
Ședințe Plenare, la adresa indicată pe ultima pagină<br />
(în cazul trimiterilor pe e-mail: menționați la rubrica<br />
subiect „CRE/data”).<br />
EDBEŽNÉ VYDANIE<br />
Toto vydanie, ktoré sa nachádza aj na internete (pozri<br />
poslednú stranu), obsahuje znenie všetkých prejavov<br />
uvedené v pôvodnom jazyku rečníka. Konečná verzia<br />
bude k dispozícii neskôr. Rečníci, ktorí chcú vložiť<br />
opravy do svojich prejavov, môžu zaslať všetky opravy<br />
na adresu Oddelenia pre zápisnice a doslovné zápisy z<br />
plenárnej schôdze uvedenú na poslednej strane, a to<br />
do jedného týždňa (ak ide o e-mailovú korešpondenciu,<br />
treba uviesť ako predmet = CRE / dátum).<br />
ZAČASNA VERZIJA<br />
V začasni različici (na razpolago tudi na svetovnem<br />
spletu - glej hrbtno stran) so govori v jeziku, v katerem<br />
je govorec nastopil. Naknadno bo na razpolago tudi<br />
končna različica. Govorci, ki želijo vnesti popravke v<br />
besedilo svojega govora, naj jih v roku enega tedna<br />
posredujejo službi za zapisnike in dobesedne zapise<br />
plenarnega zasedanja na naslov, naveden na hrbtni<br />
strani (prek elektronske pošte: omenjeno v zadevi<br />
"CRE / datum").<br />
VÄLIAIKAINEN VERSIO<br />
Julkaisu (joka on saatavilla myös Internetissä – katso<br />
takakansi) sisältää kaikkien puheiden alkuperäiset<br />
versiot. Lopullinen julkaisu ilmestyy myöhemmin.<br />
Puhujia, jotka haluavat tehdä korjauksia puheisiinsa,<br />
pyydetään toimittamaan korjatut versiot täysistuntopöytäkirjoista<br />
ja sanatarkoista istuntoselostuksista<br />
vastaavalle yksikölle viikon kuluessa takakannessa<br />
mainittuun osoitteeseen (sähköpostia varten:<br />
asiakenttään maininta "CRE / päivämäärä").<br />
PRELIMINÄR UTGÅVA<br />
Denna utgåva (som också finns tillgänglig på Internet<br />
– se nedan) innehåller samtliga anföranden på<br />
originalspråket. En slutlig <strong>version</strong> kommer att<br />
offentliggöras senare. Talare som önskar justera sina<br />
anföranden ombeds skicka den justerade <strong>version</strong>en<br />
till enheten för plenarsammanträdesprotokoll inom<br />
en vecka, se adress nedan (för e-post: ange som<br />
ärende ”CRE / datum”).<br />
Lista siglelor grupurilor politice<br />
PPE<br />
S&D<br />
ALDE<br />
Verts/ALE<br />
ECR<br />
GUE/NGL<br />
EFD<br />
NI<br />
Grupul Partidului Popular European (Creștin Democrat)<br />
Grupul Alianței Progresiste a Socialiștilor și Democraților din<br />
Parlamentul European<br />
Grupul Alianței Liberalilor și Democraților pentru <strong>Europa</strong><br />
Grupul Verzilor/Alianța Liberă Europeană<br />
Grupul Conservatorilor și Reformiștilor Europeni<br />
Grupul Confederal al Stângii Unite Europene/Stânga Verde Nordică<br />
Grupul <strong>Europa</strong> Libertății și Democrației<br />
Deputați neafiliați<br />
Zoznam skratiek politických skupín<br />
PPE<br />
S&D<br />
ALDE<br />
Verts/ALE<br />
ECR<br />
GUE/NGL<br />
EFD<br />
NI<br />
Poslanecký klub Európskej ľudovej strany (kresťanských<br />
demokratov)<br />
Skupina Pokrokovej aliancie socialistov a demokratov v Európskom<br />
parlamente<br />
Skupina Aliancie liberálov a demokratov za Európu<br />
Skupina zelených/Európska slobodná aliancia<br />
Európski konzervatívci a reformisti<br />
Konfederatívna skupina Európskej zjednotenej ľavice - Severskej<br />
zelenej ľavice<br />
Skupina Európa slobody a demokracie<br />
Nezaradení poslanci<br />
Seznam kratic političnih skupin<br />
PPE<br />
S&D<br />
ALDE<br />
Verts/ALE<br />
ECR<br />
GUE/NGL<br />
EFD<br />
NI<br />
skupina Evropske ljudske stranke (krščanskih demokratov)<br />
skupina Napredne zveze socialistov in demokratov v Evropskem<br />
parlamentu<br />
skupina Zavezništva liberalcev in demokratov za Evropo<br />
skupina Zelenih/Evropske svobodne zveze<br />
skupina Evropskih konservativcev in reformistov<br />
konfederalna skupina Evropske združene levice - Zelene nordijske<br />
levice<br />
skupina Evropa svobode in demokracije<br />
samostojni poslanci<br />
Poliittisten ryhmien lyhenteet<br />
PPE<br />
S&D<br />
ALDE<br />
Verts/ALE<br />
ECR<br />
GUE/NGL<br />
EFD<br />
NI<br />
Euroopan kansanpuolueen (kristillisdemokraatit) ryhmä<br />
Euroopan parlamentin sosialistien ja demokraattien progressiivisen<br />
liiton ryhmä<br />
Euroopan liberaalidemokraattien liiton ryhmä<br />
Vihreät / Euroopan vapaa allianssi -ryhmä<br />
Euroopan konservatiivit ja reformistit<br />
Euroopan yhtyneen vasemmiston konfederaatioryhmä /<br />
Pohjoismaiden vihreä vasemmisto<br />
Vapaa ja demokraattinen Eurooppa<br />
Sitoutumattomat<br />
Förteckning över förkortningarna för de politiska grupperna<br />
PPE<br />
S&D<br />
ALDE<br />
Verts/ALE<br />
ECR<br />
GUE/NGL<br />
EFD<br />
NI<br />
PARLEMENT EUROPÉEN<br />
Secrétariat général - Procès-verbaux et Comptes rendus de la Plénière<br />
L-2929 LUXEMBOURG<br />
e-mail : pv-cre@europarl.europa.eu<br />
Internet : http://www.europarl.europa.eu<br />
(aller vers: "Activités", "Plénière", "Débats")<br />
Europeiska folkpartiets grupp (kristdemokrater)<br />
Gruppen Progressiva alliansen av socialister och demokrater i<br />
<strong>Europa</strong>parlamentet<br />
Gruppen Alliansen liberaler och demokrater för <strong>Europa</strong><br />
Gruppen De gröna/Europeiska fria alliansen<br />
Gruppen Europeiska konservativa och reformister<br />
Gruppen Europeiska enade vänstern/Nordisk grön vänster<br />
Gruppen Frihet och demokrati i <strong>Europa</strong><br />
Grupplösa<br />
RO<br />
SK<br />
SL<br />
FI<br />
SV