23.02.2013 Views

Do Stryker Brigade Combat Teams Need Forward Support ...

Do Stryker Brigade Combat Teams Need Forward Support ...

Do Stryker Brigade Combat Teams Need Forward Support ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

included the selection of the vessels to be loaded and<br />

the decision by the 3d ACR on whether any of their<br />

aircraft would be deployed by strategic air assets. Key<br />

evaluation criteria included safety, feasibility, and<br />

expediency.<br />

The unit also incorporated composite risk management<br />

into the wargame by including its approved risk<br />

assessment and considering possible accident and reaction<br />

contingencies. Safety is one of the key operational<br />

considerations, so the unit’s safety officer was present<br />

to provide feedback at each turn.<br />

6<br />

The 842d initiated a<br />

deliberate planning process<br />

for the deployment of the 3d<br />

ACR in the summer of 2007<br />

by visiting with regimental<br />

and installation representatives<br />

at Fort Hood. At that time,<br />

the 842d received the mission<br />

requirements and the<br />

regiment’s deployment<br />

timeline. Mission analysis<br />

commenced immediately<br />

with the consideration of<br />

rail and truck requirements<br />

and labor needs. The daily<br />

operations meeting<br />

provided a forum for the<br />

staff to conduct mission<br />

analysis and then develop and<br />

discuss possible courses<br />

of action (COAs).<br />

The commander of the 842d provided the overall<br />

direction for the wargame and served as its referee.<br />

This wargame took the battalion through its planned<br />

COA shift by shift. At each turn, representatives from<br />

terminal operations, traffic management, safety, and<br />

physical security stated their actions. As appropriate,<br />

the commander of the 842d then proposed possible<br />

reactions based on contingencies, such as weather.<br />

The staff then offered counteractions.<br />

To record the results of the wargame, the operations<br />

officer produced a synchronization matrix on the<br />

overhead projector and recorded the results of the wargame<br />

turn by turn. At the end of the wargame, the commander<br />

determined that the chosen COA was feasible<br />

and approved it. The operations officer then produced<br />

a matrix order and concept of support containing the<br />

completed plan and published it for all relevant parties.<br />

MDMP Advantages<br />

The MDMP, particularly the wargaming phase,<br />

was an effective tool for the 842d because it allowed<br />

the unit to better execute branch and sequel plans.<br />

Often, during the course of the wargame, staff members<br />

noted that tentative plans had been developed to<br />

deal with various contingencies. Then, at the end of<br />

the wargame, unit personnel were able to finally say,<br />

“yes, let’s do this if that happens.” The wargame was<br />

also useful because it allowed terminal operations<br />

and traffic management personnel to work together<br />

and walked everyone through the entire operation.<br />

It enabled the unit to forecast and anticipate friction<br />

points and properly allocate resources.<br />

Since planning support operations does not take<br />

place in a vacuum, the MDMP was ideal because it<br />

incorporated Coast Guard, Port Authority, and other<br />

non-Governmental agencies into the process. Feedback<br />

from Department of the Army civilian employees<br />

was almost universally positive, and nearly all looked<br />

forward to the opportunity to participate in the planning<br />

process.<br />

The MDMP enabled the 842d to formulate the best<br />

possible COA for deploying the 3d ACR safely and<br />

successfully. The battalion plans to continue applying<br />

MDMP principles in all operations as it holds fast to<br />

being “First in Warfighter <strong>Support</strong>” throughout the<br />

Gulf Coast region. ALOG<br />

Li e u t e n a n t co L o n e L MarShaLL n. raMSey iS t h e<br />

c o M M a n D e r o f t h e 842D tranSportation battaLion<br />

at be a u M o n t, texaS. he h o L D S a bacheLor’S D e G r e e<br />

f r o M t h e univerSity o f tenneSSee a n D a MaSter’S<br />

D e G r e e f r o M ce n t r a L MichiGan univerSity. he iS<br />

a G r a D u a t e o f t h e QuarterMaSter officer baSic<br />

co u r S e, t h e or D n a n c e officer aD v a n c e D co u r S e,<br />

t h e ar M y co M M a n D a n D GeneraL Staff coLLeGe,<br />

a n D t h e Jo i n t fo r c e S Staff coLLeGe.<br />

Ma J o r ry o n f. aD a M S iS a S t u D e n t at t h e ar M y<br />

co M M a n D a n D GeneraL Staff coLLeGe. he w a S t h e<br />

o p e r a t i o n S officer f o r t h e 842D tranSportation<br />

battaLion w h e n h e co-w r o t e t h i S articLe. he h o L D S<br />

a bacheLor’S D e G r e e in M a n a G e M e n t f r o M caSe weStern<br />

reServe univerSity a n D a D o c t o r o f JuriSpru-<br />

D e n c e D e G r e e f r o M t h e univerSity o f ho u S t o n Law<br />

center. he iS a G r a D u a t e o f t h e co M b i n eD LoGiSticS<br />

captainS career co u r S e.<br />

JULY–AUGUST 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!