23.02.2013 Views

Do Stryker Brigade Combat Teams Need Forward Support ...

Do Stryker Brigade Combat Teams Need Forward Support ...

Do Stryker Brigade Combat Teams Need Forward Support ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Army level on at least two separate occasions through<br />

the equipment common operating picture, but it still<br />

has not been resourced. In order to man the MEVs, an<br />

additional 15 healthcare specialists (MOS 68W) are<br />

needed to fill the requirement for a third crewmember<br />

in each MEV. The three Soldiers that are required in<br />

the vehicle are a driver, a vehicle commander, and a<br />

medical attendant for patient care on site and during<br />

movement.<br />

The SBCT’s medical capability can be strengthened<br />

in other ways as well. The brigade medical warehouse<br />

must be authorized a school-trained medical logistics<br />

officer (area of concentration 70K) in the grade of first<br />

lieutenant. The brigade medical supply office mission<br />

requires pharmaceuticals and narcotics management,<br />

so an additional pharmacy specialist (MOS 68Q) also<br />

must be added to the MTOE.<br />

Meeting the Most Unforeseen Circumstances<br />

A strong comparison can be made between the<br />

FSC’s relationship to a battalion and the old forward<br />

support battalion’s relationship to a brigade. One<br />

capability that should be considered for the BSB is<br />

the ability to replace the personnel and equipment in<br />

an FSC, just as the main support battalion was able to<br />

do in the old division support command. In the future,<br />

the U.S. military’s undisputed dominance of a theater<br />

of operations may not be as certain as it has been in<br />

recent times. The ability to reconstitute an FSC that<br />

is rendered ineffective by an enemy would enable the<br />

SBCT to be a strategically responsive force.<br />

In order to supply a replacement FSC, the BSB<br />

MTOE would have to contain redundant personnel and<br />

equipment. For example, the HHC would maintain a<br />

field feeding team that is manned with enough cooks<br />

and equipment to be able to push personnel and equipment<br />

to a maneuver FSC in the event that the FSP is<br />

rendered incapable of performing its mission. The<br />

distribution company would retain enough personnel<br />

and equipment to replace the FSC’s loss of fuel<br />

and transportation assets. The maintenance company<br />

would have a CRT embedded in the wheeled vehicle<br />

repair platoon that could quickly detach and fill the<br />

requirements of the FSC’s maintenance support platoon,<br />

if needed. This design would allow commanders<br />

to pull individual sections or resource an entire FSC.<br />

The BSB, as a customer, would normally use the brigade<br />

special troops battalion’s FSC for food service,<br />

distribution, and maintenance support.<br />

The use of FSCs will allow maneuver battalions to<br />

conduct autonomous operations across a spectrum of<br />

conflict. Fundamentally, an SBCT must see first, understand<br />

first, act first, and finish decisively; it does this<br />

by incorporating digital capability into the combined<br />

32<br />

arms fight and by relying on intelligence that is available<br />

within the brigade. The FSC is nested in the concept<br />

that “intelligence drives maneuver.” FSCs allow<br />

maneuver battalions to plan and execute operations<br />

without relying on additional support. An LST could<br />

never support a maneuver battalion without significant<br />

augmentation. <strong>Combat</strong> operations in OIF 04–06 and<br />

OIF 07–09 demonstrated the importance of battlefield<br />

agility; future operations will be no different.<br />

As the Army continues to transform and redesign<br />

its fighting forces, changes needed for the support battalion<br />

to meet the brigade’s sustainment requirements<br />

become more apparent. The current capabilities of<br />

an SBCT BSB are not adequate to support seven battalions<br />

and maintain the flexibility needed to push sustainment<br />

assets where and when they are needed. The<br />

BSB’s capability gaps will only continue to expand<br />

when the SBCT has to perform tactical operations in a<br />

logistically undeveloped theater. A determined enemy<br />

that can operate in land combat operations and pose<br />

an increased threat will take advantage of these gaps.<br />

We believe that the resources proposed in this article<br />

will provide the BSB with the capability to meet the<br />

sustainment requirements of current and future SBCT<br />

missions. Now is the time to address these requirements<br />

and develop a TOE that will allow this premier<br />

fighting organization to meet the warfighting challenges<br />

presented now and in the future. ALOG<br />

Li e u t e n a n t co L o n e L Da n n y f. tiLzey iS t h e c o M-<br />

M a n D e r o f t h e re G i M e n t a L <strong>Support</strong> SQ u a D r o n,<br />

2D StryKer cavaLry re G i M e n t, w h i c h iS c u r r e n t L y<br />

<strong>Support</strong>inG operation ir a Q i free<strong>Do</strong>M 07–09. he<br />

h a S ServeD in variouS a S S i G n M e n t S aS a S c o u t,<br />

LoGiStician, e D u c a t o r, t r a i n e r, Joint p L a n n e r, a n D<br />

c o M M a n D e r. he iS a G r a D u a t e o f Sa L f o r D coLLeGe,<br />

fL o r i D a inStitute o f te c h n o L o G y, a n D So u t h e r n<br />

co n n e c t i c u t State univerSity.<br />

Ma J o r Gary KaSavicha iS t h e executive officer o f<br />

t h e re G i M e n t a L <strong>Support</strong> SQ u a D r o n a n D iS c u r r e n t L y<br />

DepLoyeD in <strong>Support</strong> o f operation ir a Q i free<strong>Do</strong>M<br />

07–09. he h a S been previouSLy aSSiGneD in Sbct<br />

u n i t S aS a <strong>Support</strong> o p e r a t i o n S officer, <strong>Support</strong><br />

o p e r a t i o n S p L a n S officer, a n D forwarD M a i n t en<br />

a n c e coMpany c o M M a n D e r. he iS a G r a D u a t e o f<br />

Si e n a coLLeGe.<br />

Ma J o r ch a r L e S x. ro t e iS t h e r e G i M e n t a L <strong>Support</strong><br />

o p e r a t i o n S officer f o r t h e 2D StryKer cavaLry re G i-<br />

M e n t. in o t h e r Sbct a S S i G n M e n t S, h e c o M M a n D e D<br />

a M a i n t e n a n c e coMpany a n D w a S t h e r e G i M e n t a L<br />

S–4. he receiveD a MaSter’S D e G r e e in Defence S t u DieS<br />

f r o M Ki n G'S coLLeGe Lo n D o n w h iL e a t t e n D i n G<br />

t h e un i t e D Ki n G D o M'S Jo i n t ServiceS co M M a n D a n D<br />

Staff coLLeGe.<br />

JULY–AUGUST 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!