23.02.2013 Views

FOURTEENTH ANNUAL EUROPEAN PRESSURE ULCER ...

FOURTEENTH ANNUAL EUROPEAN PRESSURE ULCER ...

FOURTEENTH ANNUAL EUROPEAN PRESSURE ULCER ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Thursday September 1st<br />

Proceedings of the 14th Annual European Pressure Ulcer Meeting<br />

Oporto, Portugal<br />

The first national pressure ulcer prevalence study in Sweden<br />

Ami Hommel 1* , Carina Bååth 2 , Ewa Idvall 3 , Lena Gunningberg 4<br />

1* Lund University & Skåne University Hospital, Sweden, Ami.Hommel@med.lu.se<br />

2 Karlstad University & County Council of Värmland, Sweden 3 Malmö University & Skåne University Hospital, Sweden<br />

4 Uppsala University & Uppsala University Hopital, Sweden<br />

Introduction<br />

Two hospitals in Sweden conducted in 2002 the first<br />

pressure ulcer prevalence study, using the<br />

methodology developed by the European Pressure<br />

Ulcer Advisory Panel (1). The methodology has spread<br />

to many hospitals and nursing homes and shows<br />

prevalence that vary between 19-27% when pressure<br />

ulcer category 1 is included (2,3). But there has also<br />

been quality improvement work using different<br />

methodologies, which make it difficult to compare<br />

outcomes. In Sweden there are about 100 quality<br />

registries and public comparison is available between<br />

the 21 county councils and regions. These quality<br />

registries have focused on medical diagnosis and few<br />

include nursing sensitive quality measures. The<br />

Swedish Associations of Local Authorities and<br />

Regions (SALAR) launched a patient safety initiative in<br />

2007. One out of six areas that were prioritized was<br />

pressure ulcers.<br />

The aim of this study was to describe pressure ulcer<br />

prevalence and prevention in hospitals and nursing<br />

homes on a national level.<br />

Methods<br />

The study used a cross sectional design and all<br />

Swedish hospitals (n=84) and nursing homes (2100)<br />

were invited to participate. The hospitals and nursing<br />

homes decided if and how many wards they were able<br />

to include. All patients 18 year and above were<br />

applicable to the study. The study was conducted<br />

during one specific day in March 2011<br />

An expert group was formed by the SALAR. This<br />

group developed the data collection protocol and<br />

instructions for the site coordinators.<br />

Educational sessions (n=10) were conducted in<br />

different parts of Sweden, including possibility to<br />

participate on-line. The PUCLAS educational program<br />

was recommended for all data collectors.<br />

Instructions, protocols, information letter to the patients<br />

were available on the SALAR web site. The<br />

methodology followed the EPUAP recommendations<br />

(1). In addition, information to identify hospital acquired<br />

pressure ulcers were gathered from the patient<br />

records (4)<br />

93<br />

Results<br />

Totally 37 113 patients were included in the study,<br />

17353 from hospitals and 18 865 from nursing homes.<br />

All 7 university hospital participated.<br />

The results will be published online in May 2011, and<br />

then prepared for this report.<br />

Discussion<br />

The Swedish government and the SALAR have an<br />

agreement to improve patient safety during year 2011<br />

to 2014. The agreement includes all heath care funded<br />

by the county councils and has a performance-based<br />

remuneration model to the county councils. When<br />

more than 50% of a hospital’s wards participated this<br />

generated money to the county council. Totally 100<br />

million Swedish crowns were allocated. This might<br />

have been a reason why so many hospitals<br />

participated in the study. However, many municipals<br />

participated as well without any extra money.<br />

Clinical relevance<br />

This study highlights the importance of nursing<br />

sensitive outcomes in quality improvement work on a<br />

national level.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

We appreciate the support of the Swedish<br />

Associations of Local Authorities and Regions.<br />

Conflict of Interest<br />

None<br />

References<br />

[1] Vanderwee K, Clark M, Dealey C, Gunningberg L,<br />

Defloor T. Pressure ulcer prevalence in Europe: a pilot<br />

study. J Eval Clin Pract, 2007;13(2):227-35.<br />

[2] Gunningberg L, Brudin L, Idvall E. Nurse Managers’<br />

prerequisite for nursing development: a survey on<br />

pressure ulcers and contextual factors in hospital<br />

organizations. J Nurs Manag 2010:18:757-766.<br />

[3] Wann-Hansson C, Hagell P, Willman A. Risk<br />

factors and prevention among patients with hospitalacquired<br />

and pre-existing pressure ulcers in an acute<br />

care hospital. J Clin Nurs 2008;17:1718-27.<br />

[4] Aydin C, et al. Creating and analyzing a statewide<br />

nursing quality measurement database. J Nurs<br />

scholarsh 2004;36:371-378.<br />

Copyright © 2011 by EPUAP

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!