23.02.2013 Views

LabAutomation 2006 - SLAS

LabAutomation 2006 - SLAS

LabAutomation 2006 - SLAS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TP17<br />

Michael Gary Jackson<br />

Beckman-Coulter<br />

Fullerton, California<br />

mgjackson@beckman.com<br />

<strong>LabAutomation</strong><strong>2006</strong><br />

Co-Author(s):<br />

Matthew Cu<br />

Sunghae Joo<br />

Han-Chang Chi<br />

Keith Roby<br />

Scott Boyer,<br />

Beckman-Coulter<br />

Automation of Gene Expression on Beckman Coulter’s Biomek ® 3000 Laboratory<br />

Automation Workstation<br />

Manual preparation of materials through the complex gene expression chemistry process can introduce variation in samples and potentially<br />

distort data output. Even simplified processes with higher numbers of samples would also be likely to suffer from such inaccuracies.<br />

Automated processing of samples provides consistency in results for the steps from RNA preparation and cDNA setup through PCR1<br />

setup. Consistency in sample preparation is essential to be able to monitor the variations in cellular signals characteristic of biological<br />

systems. Automation is based on the Biomek 3000 and requires no changes in the deck configuration through the sample preparation<br />

process. We evaluated the sample preparation of total RNA from treated and untreated cell cultures for both human and rat cell lines.<br />

The samples were then processed through automation methods that are part of the GenomeLab GeXP application. Both singlet and<br />

multiplex PCR primer sets were used for comparison of transcript levels. We also included intra-plate samples to show consistency and<br />

reproducibility of the process in comparison to the manual process.<br />

TP18<br />

Joby Jenkins<br />

TTP LabTech<br />

Royston, Hertfordshire,<br />

United Kingdom<br />

joby.jenkins@ttplabtech.com<br />

Co-Author(s)<br />

Rob Lewis<br />

Tristan Cope<br />

Wayne Bowen<br />

TTP LabTech<br />

Automated Nanolitre Hit-Picking Using A mosquito ® X1 Low Volume Pipettor<br />

A prerequisite for efficient primary screening is the automated selection of “hits” for confirmation and secondary profiling. Solutions exist for<br />

low density microplates, however, the 1,536 well format presents significant challenges for many liquid handling systems. The mosquito ®<br />

X1 offers precision sampling of any individual well in 48-, 96-, 384- or 1,536-well plates. This enables researchers to quickly select small<br />

volumes of “hits” from primary screening plates and transfer them directly to the next screening stage without further dilution. mosquito ®<br />

X1’s disposable pipette tips guarantee zero cross-contamination. The system’s unique positive displacement pipetting technology allows<br />

it to pipette accurately and reproducibly throughout the 25nl-1.2ìl range, producing CVs of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!