LabAutomation 2006 - SLAS
LabAutomation 2006 - SLAS
LabAutomation 2006 - SLAS
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
MP27<br />
J. Colin Cox<br />
Duke University Medical Center<br />
Duke University Biochemistry<br />
Durham, North Carolina<br />
colin@biochem.duke.edu<br />
Protein Fabrication Automation<br />
<strong>LabAutomation</strong><strong>2006</strong><br />
Co-Author(s)<br />
Janel Lape<br />
Mahmood A. Sayed<br />
Homme W. Hellinga<br />
Duke University Medical Center<br />
The ability to ‘write’ a gene sequence has widespread applications in biological analysis and engineering. Rapid writing of open reading<br />
frames (ORFs) coding for expressed proteins has the potential to transform the way by which proteins can be engineered and produced,<br />
and has applications in protein design, synthetic biology, crystallography, etc. Here we present a process, Protein Fabrication Automation<br />
(PFA), that facilitates the rapid de novo creation of any desired expressed ORF with low effort, high speed, and little human interaction.<br />
The method is robust and scaleable.<br />
Our PFA scheme is based on the total synthesis of genes from synthetic oligonucleotides and contains three main components: 1) software<br />
to handle and manipulate ORF design (GeneFab), maintain a database of oligonucleotides and generate robotic movement scripts (FabMgr);<br />
2) a programmable commercial liquid handling robot; 3) a genetic selection scheme to enhance yields of correctly assembled synthetic<br />
ORFs. A wild-type protein, or scaffold, is assigned a primer assembly scheme based upon inside-out nucleation PCR gene assembly. Next,<br />
a mutation list is provided to the PFA software package which then applies desired codon variants to a wild-type scaffold (in our applications,<br />
these mutation lists are generated by protein design algorithms). The DNA sequences are analyzed for restriction site and codon frequency<br />
usage, and an oligonucleotide list is generated for electronic ordering. After synthesis of the primers, FabMgr then produces a script program<br />
for programmable liquid handling robots (here, any Tecan Genesis or Evo).<br />
MP28<br />
Matthew Cu<br />
Beckman Coulter<br />
Fullerton, California<br />
mcu@beckman.com<br />
Co-Author<br />
Michael Gary Jackson<br />
Automation of Total RNA Isolation From Cultured Eukaryotic Cells on Beckman<br />
Coulter’s Biomek ® 3000 Laboratory Automation Workstation Using Agencourt ®<br />
Manual isolation of total RNA can be tedious and prone to nuclease degradation due to human error. Recognizing the role of automation<br />
in addressing these conditions, we developed an automated method on Beckman Coulter’s Biomek 3000 Laboratory Automation<br />
Workstation to purify total RNA from cultured eukaryotic cells using Agencourt RNAPrep. Since total RNA is the starting material for a<br />
number of downstream applications including reverse transcriptase-PCR1 (RT-PCR), quantitative real-time PCR, cDNA synthesis, cDNA<br />
library construction and microarray analysis, confidence in the data corresponds directly to the quality of the purified RNA. Various cell lines,<br />
in a 96-well format, were used to demonstrate the automated process for RNA isolation. Purification begins with the addition of a magnetic<br />
lysis solution to disrupt cell membranes and bind RNA to the paramagnetic particles. RNA remains affixed to the beads during DNase<br />
treatment and washing, and then is eluted from the particles. Purified total RNA is evaluated spectrophotometrically and then is observed<br />
by gel electrophoresis for quality. This total RNA isolation method is the starting point for additional automated methods that conveniently<br />
use the same deck configuration in applications such as cDNA Synthesis, In-vitro Transcription and Fragmentation.<br />
The information presented here will include:<br />
• The description of the automated methods<br />
• The results obtained when using the methods.<br />
1. The PCR process is covered by patents owned by Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. and F. Hoffman-LaRoche, Ltd.<br />
116