Final Programme - International Bar Association
Final Programme - International Bar Association
Final Programme - International Bar Association
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Working sessions – Monday<br />
80<br />
‘Is the storm over?’ – the evolving liabilities<br />
of financial institutions<br />
Presented by the Financial Services Section.<br />
Session Co-Chairs<br />
Benoît Feron NautaDutilh, Brussels, Belgium; SIRC Liaison Officer,<br />
Banking Law Committee<br />
Liam Flynn Bank for <strong>International</strong> Settlements, Basel, Switzerland<br />
The global financial crisis and its aftermath have exposed weaknesses<br />
in the management of legal risks by financial institutions. Unforeseen<br />
liabilities have resulted and banks, insurers and securities firms have<br />
incurred significant time and expense in dealing with these. Going<br />
forward, financial firms must strengthen their legal risk and liability<br />
management practices, put in place new procedures and even consider<br />
avoiding areas of activity with high potential to lead to liability.<br />
This panel will discuss the grounds on which financial firms have been<br />
subject to liability claims following the crisis. In some cases, claims have<br />
been made for negligent, or even fraudulent, structuring of CDO or<br />
CLO-type investment products. In others the sales practices adopted by<br />
financial firms when selling products to retail and wholesale investors<br />
have been attacked. Delinquent borrowers in collapsed property<br />
markets have more strenuously resisted banks’ attempts to enforce<br />
their security and argued that the banks themselves are partially<br />
responsible for losses. After the collapse of Lehman Brothers, firms<br />
were exposed to unprecedented litigation under derivative contracts,<br />
which has exposed ambiguities in the market standard master<br />
agreements. Accounting errors and trading losses have led to an<br />
increase in investor claims under US and other securities laws.<br />
The panel will review liability exposures that have occurred and<br />
consider how these new and increased liability exposures can be<br />
best managed by financial firms going forward. Insurance is an<br />
important risk and liability mitigation tool and the panel will discuss<br />
the notification and coverage issues. Firms risk management practices<br />
will also need to improve and the panel will look at developments in<br />
this area.<br />
This panel will complement the joint Litigation/ Banking session – ‘Class<br />
actions or mass actions – the experience of litigators and financial<br />
institutions’, taking place on Thursday 4 October, which will analyse the<br />
litigation experience regarding these liability issues and the resulting<br />
lessons to be learned from the events of the last five years.<br />
Speakers<br />
Roddy Bourke McCann FitzGerald, Dublin, Ireland<br />
Christoph Graber Prager Dreyfuss, Zurich, Switzerland; Senior Vice-<br />
Chair, Insurance Committee<br />
Thomas Mannsdorfer ANV Underwriting, <strong>Bar</strong>celona, Spain<br />
Annette Nazareth Davis Polk and Wardwell, Washington DC, USA<br />
Coffee and tea breaks will be held between 1100 – 1130 and<br />
1600 – 1630. To accommodate the flow of delegates through<br />
the Conference Centre please note the closest coffee/tea<br />
stations to this session are in the Foyer of Levels 2 and 3.<br />
WICKLOW HALL 2B, LEVEL 2<br />
Market demand – a key driver of the<br />
multidisciplinary approach to legal services<br />
Joint session with the Law Firm Management Committee and the<br />
Multidisciplinary Practices Committee.<br />
Session Co-Chairs<br />
Alain Chedal Landwell & Associés, Paris, France; Secretary,<br />
Multidisciplinary Practices Committee<br />
Herman J Knott Luther, Cologne, Germany; Secretary, Law Firm<br />
Management Committee<br />
General counsel and their companies are more and more<br />
contemplating legal services within a multidisciplinary context and<br />
often require a one-stop shop.<br />
The purpose of this session is to build a practical case where a client,<br />
the general counsel of a large group, requires assistance in view of<br />
a major group carve-out reorganisation. The bidding process will be<br />
built on an engagement letter, a document reflecting the various<br />
constraints in a selected number of countries.<br />
The practical case is structured in order to solicit from the legal<br />
profession a comprehensive offer for services, which shall include:<br />
• corporate services;<br />
• valuation and financial services;<br />
• social planning;<br />
• tax planning; and<br />
• implementation.<br />
The session will be organised by a panel of IBA multi-practice<br />
representatives illustrating their respective countries’ constraints and<br />
solutions in order to achieve a successful and competitive bid.<br />
Speakers<br />
Nicolás Herrera Guyer & Regules, Montevideo, Uruguay<br />
Linfei Liu Jun He Law Firm, Beijing, China<br />
Paul Olney Slaughter & May, London, England<br />
Michael Roch KermaPartners, London, England<br />
Margaret Stack A&L Goodbody, Dublin, Ireland<br />
Coffee and tea breaks will be held between 1100 – 1130 and<br />
1600 – 1630. To accommodate the flow of delegates through<br />
the Conference Centre please note the closest coffee/tea<br />
station to this session is in The Forum on Ground Level.<br />
LIFFEY HALL 1, LEVEL 1<br />
Mediator by day, arbitrator by night. So you<br />
want to be an international adjudicator?<br />
Joint session with the Arbitration Committee and the Mediation<br />
Committee.<br />
Session Co-Chairs<br />
Babak <strong>Bar</strong>in <strong>Bar</strong>in Avocats, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Chair,<br />
Mediation Committee<br />
Lawrence S Schaner Jenner & Block, Chicago, Illinois, USA; Vice-<br />
Chair, Arbitration Committee<br />
This session will consider hybrid dispute resolution clauses and their<br />
application from both common law and civil law perspectives. Can<br />
arbitrators change hat in the middle of proceedings and become<br />
mediators? Can they then revert to their initial role and carry on with<br />
proceedings if the matter is not settled? What about mediators? Can<br />
they agree to become arbitrators after having participated in the<br />
proceedings as mediator? Does international public policy play a role<br />
in all this? If so, what does it say?<br />
Speakers<br />
Mark Appel <strong>International</strong> Centre for Dispute Resolution, Dublin,<br />
Ireland<br />
Martin Bernet Schellenberg Wittmer, Zurich, Switzerland<br />
John J Buckley Jr Williams & Connolly, Washington DC, USA<br />
Teresa Cheng Des Voeux Chambers, Hong Kong SAR<br />
Carole Malinvaud Gide Loyrette Nouel, Paris, France<br />
Hiroyuki Tezuka Nishimura & Asahi, Tokyo, Japan<br />
Gerhard Wegan Gleiss Lutz, Stuttgart, Germany<br />
Alvin Yeo WongPartnership, Singapore; Vice-Chair, Arbitration<br />
Committee<br />
Coffee and tea breaks will be held between 1100 – 1130 and<br />
1600 – 1630. To accommodate the flow of delegates through<br />
the Conference Centre please note the closest coffee/tea<br />
station to this session is in The Forum on Ground Level.<br />
LIFFEY HALL 2, LEVEL 1