POSTERS - BLAST X - University of Utah
POSTERS - BLAST X - University of Utah
POSTERS - BLAST X - University of Utah
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>BLAST</strong> X Wed. Morning Session<br />
ELECTRON CRYOTOMOGRAPHY OF BACTERIAL CHEMOTAXIS ARRAYS<br />
Ariane Briegel 1 , H. Jane Ding 1 , Zhuo Li 1 , John Werner 2 , Zemer Gitai 2 , D. Prabha Dias 1 ,<br />
Rasmus B. Jensen 3 , Elitza Tocheva 1 and Grant Jensen 1<br />
1 California Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology, CA<br />
2 Princeton <strong>University</strong>, NJ<br />
3 <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Roskilde, Denmark<br />
Motile prokaryotes are able to sense and to respond to ambient conditions through a<br />
process known as chemotaxis. Attractants and repellents bind to the sensing domain <strong>of</strong> methylaccepting<br />
chemotaxis proteins (MCPs), thereby regulating the activity <strong>of</strong> the histidine kinase<br />
CheA. Together with the linking protein CheW, CheA is located at the distal tip <strong>of</strong> the<br />
cytoplasmic signaling domain <strong>of</strong> the MCPs. If activated, CheA phophorylates CheY (CheY-P),<br />
which in turn controls the direction <strong>of</strong> flagellar rotation. Together with CheA and a linking protein<br />
CheW, the MCPs form extended chemotaxis arrays at the cell poles.<br />
Electron cryotomograhy (ECT) makes it possible to visualize chemoreceptor clusters in<br />
prokaryotes in vivo at macromolecular resolution (4-8 nm). While high-resolution structures <strong>of</strong><br />
the individual chemotaxis proteins are available, their arrangement and position in the arrays<br />
remain unclear. Understanding this "mesoscale" architecture <strong>of</strong> the clusters is critical, however,<br />
since it is vital to the arrays' cooperative signal amplification and regulation. In order to<br />
unambiguously identify the chemotaxis arrays inside cells, we have correlated ECT with<br />
fluorescent light microscopy (FLM), using slightly fixed and immobilized Caulobacter crescentus<br />
cells with a fusion <strong>of</strong> the red-fluorescent protein, mCherry, to the C-terminus <strong>of</strong> the<br />
chemoreceptor (McpA). After plunge freezing, we imaged the same cells by ECT. In<br />
combination with ECT <strong>of</strong> near-native wild-type and mutant cells, we used the correlated FLM<br />
and ECT approach to identify the chemotactic array, its location and its in-vivo structure. We<br />
demonstrate that in wild-type Caulobacter crescentus cells preserved in a near-native state, the<br />
chemoreceptors are hexagonally packed with a lattice spacing <strong>of</strong> 12 nm, just a few tens <strong>of</strong><br />
nanometers away from the flagellar motor that they control. The arrays were always found on<br />
the concave side <strong>of</strong> the cell, further demonstrating that Caulobacter cells maintain dorsal/ventral<br />
as well as anterior/posterior asymmetry. Placing the known crystal structure <strong>of</strong> a trimer <strong>of</strong><br />
receptor dimers at each vertex <strong>of</strong> the lattice accounts well for the density, supporting an array<br />
composition unlike the published models for Escherichia coli [1] or Thermotoga maritima [2].<br />
We are now in the process <strong>of</strong> comparing the chemotaxis arrays <strong>of</strong> a wide range <strong>of</strong> bacteria to<br />
determine the similarities and differences <strong>of</strong> these macromolecular assemblies at the<br />
‘mesoscale’ level.<br />
1. Shimizu T. S. et al, Nat Cell Biol 11 (2000) 792.<br />
2. Park, S.-Y. et al, Nat Struct Mol Biol 13 (2006) 400.<br />
36