22.02.2013 Views

Annual report 2006-2007 - Taranaki Regional Council

Annual report 2006-2007 - Taranaki Regional Council

Annual report 2006-2007 - Taranaki Regional Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

mayflies, elmid beetles, Archichauliodes dobsonfly, Hydrobiosis, Pycnocentrodes and<br />

Costachorema caddisflies and Aphrophila cranefly); and four ‘tolerant’ taxa (oligochaete<br />

worms, Aoteapsyche caddisfly, and Maoridiamesa and orthoclad midges), generally similar to<br />

taxa characteristic of upstream sites. Few significant differences in individual taxon<br />

abundances between adjacent sites (F and G) were evident, and despite increases in the<br />

abundance of some ‘moderately sensitive’ taxa (Table 3), and a decrease in abundance of<br />

some ‘tolerant’ taxa, there was little difference in the SQMCIs score at this site, compared to<br />

site F (and most other upstream sites). The SQMCIs value of 5.4 was significantly higher than<br />

the median of previous scores at this site (Table 2), which was indicative of no recent<br />

impacts of the power station's discharges on the macroinvertebrate community of the<br />

Kahouri Stream.<br />

MCI value<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

Number of taxa and MCI values in the Kahouri Stream 80m d/s<br />

Stratford CC pow er station discharge (KHI000465)<br />

Jan-88<br />

Jan-89<br />

Jan-90<br />

Jan-91<br />

Jan-92<br />

Jan-93<br />

Jan-94<br />

Jan-95<br />

Jan-96<br />

Jan-97<br />

Jan-98<br />

Jan-99<br />

Jan-00<br />

Jan-01<br />

Jan-02<br />

Jan-03<br />

Jan-04<br />

Jan-05<br />

Jan-06<br />

Jan-07<br />

MCI value M edian M CI to date<br />

No. of taxa M edian no. of taxa to date<br />

Figure 9 Number of taxa and MCI values in the Kahouri Stream at site G (KHI000465)<br />

The MCI was also very similar to that recorded upstream at site F, indicating that any<br />

differences in communities between these two sites were more associated with subtle<br />

changes in the abundance of individual taxa rather than the increase or decrease in numbers<br />

of ‘sensitive’ taxa between sites. A moderate proportion (55% of taxa richness) of ‘sensitive’<br />

taxa were present at this site, slightly less what was present in the nearest upstream (site E)<br />

community.<br />

Site N: Kahouri Stream (KHI000480)<br />

This lower catchment site, located a further 1.4 km downstream, immediately upstream of<br />

the confluence with the Piakau Stream, had a moderately high community richness of 29<br />

taxa. This was higher than the median richness recorded by previous surveys (Table 2 and<br />

Figure 2) and richnesses found at the nearest and all other upstream sites.<br />

Two ‘highly sensitive’ taxa (indicative of good water quality conditions) were present at this<br />

site, one of which was abundant (Deleatidium mayfly). Other taxa characteristic of this site’s<br />

community (Table 3) included six ‘moderately sensitive’ taxa (Coloburiscus and Austroclima<br />

mayflies, Archichauliodes dobsonfly, elmid beetles, Hydrobiosis caddisflies and eriopterini<br />

cranefly), and four ‘tolerant’ taxa (oligochaete worms, Aoteapsyche caddisfly, orthoclad and<br />

Maoridiamesa midges); most taxa similar to the characteristic taxa at the other five upstream<br />

sites.<br />

12<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

No. of taxa

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!