MEMORANDUM FOR A1 - Air Force E-Publishing

44 AFI91-202 5 AUGUST 2011
3.9.2. HQ AFSC will conduct SAVs of all MAJCOMs on a continuous rotating basis or as
requested.
3.9.3. MAJCOMs may delegate installation staff assistance visits to the NAF.
3.9.4. SAVs should be conducted to assist units that receive a rating of marginal or
unsatisfactory during program evaluations, Operational Readiness Inspections (ORI) or Unit
Compliance Inspections (UCI). The goal of SAVs is to train personnel and develop a roadmap
for program management improvement.
3.10. Environment, Safety and Occupational Health Compliance Assessment and
Management Program (ESOHCAMP).
3.10.1. Tier 2 and 3 ESOHCAMPs. Safety staffs may use the Tier 2 and 3 ESOHCAMPs as
an opportunity to conduct a program evaluation of installation safety functions. Similarly,
MAJCOM safety staffs may partner with the Inspector General to meet program evaluation
responsibilities. MAJCOM safety staffs will coordinate the scope and content of Tier 2 and 3
ESOHCAMPs with MAJCOM Safety and Health professionals.
3.10.2. Tier 1 ESOHCAMP. Installation units (wing, base, center, etc.,) will coordinate the
scope and content of Tier 1 ESOHCAMPs with installation Occupational, Safety and Health
professionals (such as Bioenvironmental Engineering, PH and SGP). Tier 1 ESOHCAMPs
should be used as an opportunity to conduct a self-inspection of installation level programs.
3.11. Department of Labor (DoL) Inspections. OSHA officials may conduct inspections of
nonmilitary-unique workplaces and operations where Air Force civilian personnel work
(inspections may be unannounced). See Chapter 8 for specific requirements.
3.12. Contract Performance Assessment. Installation safety offices will assist the multifunctional
team (MFT) in validating that contractors are meeting the safety requirements of the
contract. The contracting officer is responsible for notifying contractors performing work on the
installation that the installation is pursuing VPP certification.
3.12.1. The MFT will ensure contractors perform IAW the terms and conditions of the
contract. Discrepancies will be reported to the MFT via contracting officer’s representative
(COR). Commanders will ensure CORs that are required to monitor safety requirements are
trained in the recognition of hazardous conditions/environments, the use of safety and health
standards, and in other areas of safety, as necessary. The Safety Office will assist
commanders and CORs in specialized safety training requirements to ensure the COR is
properly trained to provide oversight of the contract.
3.12.2. Air Force personnel who note potential safety violation(s) will report the hazard to
the COR. CORs notify the multi-functional team, and initiate the appropriate actions related
to violations. Unless there is imminent danger, Air Force personnel should avoid reporting
safety violations directly to the contractor, but should immediately report observed violations
to the contracting officer or the installation safety office.
3.12.3. Inspection of Contractor Work Areas and Government Owned Contractor Operated
(GOCO) Work Areas. When Air Force personnel conduct safety inspections in contractor
work areas their primary concern is the potential risks to Air Force personnel and
government property. Hazardous conditions or violations of safety standards should be
reported to the contracting officer, the responsible commander or to the installation safety