22.02.2013 Views

MEMORANDUM FOR A1 - Air Force E-Publishing

MEMORANDUM FOR A1 - Air Force E-Publishing

MEMORANDUM FOR A1 - Air Force E-Publishing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AFI91-202 5 AUGUST 2011 99<br />

the charter. Minimum mandatory membership includes the Chairman (Program Manager,<br />

Deputy or Chief Engineer), Program System Safety Manager/Engineer, Center System Safety<br />

Manager, AFSC, AFMC/SE (for non-space systems), AFSPC/SE (for space systems), the<br />

Lead MAJCOM safety office, and the Lead MAJCOM user representative. Optional,<br />

advisory members include SAF/AQRE, the contractor system safety manager, the ALC<br />

Materiel Safety Officer (MSO), program engineering staff (as needed based on issues at<br />

hand), AFOTEC, AFFTC, Space Launch Ranges, and others as may determined by<br />

mandatory members.<br />

11.3.4. SSG minutes shall be sent to SAF/AQR, AFMC/EN or SMC/EA (as applicable), HQ<br />

AFSC/SEA/SEF/SEG/SES/SEW, AFSPC/SES or AFMC/SES (as applicable), and the<br />

owning command.<br />

11.3.5. SSG recommendations that require capability changes or materiel modifications by<br />

the program office must be validated and documented IAW the process and criteria outlined<br />

in AFI 10-601.<br />

11.4. Networks, Automated Information Systems, and Non-Developmental Items. Program<br />

managers are required to conduct a System Safety analysis appropriate for the system or item.<br />

For non-developmental items, the analysis should review usage history, verify intended use<br />

similarities, evaluate differences, and plan for adequate safety evaluation for all <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong>-unique<br />

modifications or changes in use. This System Safety review should be accomplished by the<br />

procuring/buying agency that is in the best position to assess the intended use and necessary<br />

modification. For example, Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) certification requirements are<br />

incrementally implemented and may not apply to all models or year groups of similar aircraft.<br />

Operations from military fields and or with military support equipment provide unique hazard<br />

opportunities that may not have been considered in the original design. Exercise care in<br />

accepting FAA certification as a sufficient indication for safety of the design.<br />

11.5. System Safety Engineering Analysis (SSEA). The SSEA program evaluates and<br />

approves new operations that are prohibited due to the perceived risks (e.g. hot pit refueling,<br />

integrated combat turnaround (ICT)/hot ICT, aircraft-to-aircraft servicing operations, wet<br />

wing/rapid defueling and concurrent servicing).<br />

11.5.1. SSEA of a proposed operation is performed by a highly qualified team under<br />

controlled conditions. The team conducts actual demonstrations and analysis of the operation<br />

to validate overall risk assessment and recommend actions. The SSEA team is normally<br />

chaired by the AFMC System Safety Office and includes experts from AFSC and the<br />

developing, supporting and operational commands.<br />

11.5.2. A using command requests a SSEA in writing to AFMC/SES and informs HQ<br />

AFSC. Requests must include:<br />

11.5.2.1. A complete description of the proposed operation.<br />

11.5.2.2. Justification for accepting the increased risk.<br />

11.5.2.3. Recommended location and dates for the SSEA demonstrations.<br />

11.5.2.4. Identification of other DoD, Government or foreign agencies that might be<br />

involved.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!