MEMORANDUM FOR A1 - Air Force E-Publishing
MEMORANDUM FOR A1 - Air Force E-Publishing
MEMORANDUM FOR A1 - Air Force E-Publishing
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
AFI91-202 5 AUGUST 2011 99<br />
the charter. Minimum mandatory membership includes the Chairman (Program Manager,<br />
Deputy or Chief Engineer), Program System Safety Manager/Engineer, Center System Safety<br />
Manager, AFSC, AFMC/SE (for non-space systems), AFSPC/SE (for space systems), the<br />
Lead MAJCOM safety office, and the Lead MAJCOM user representative. Optional,<br />
advisory members include SAF/AQRE, the contractor system safety manager, the ALC<br />
Materiel Safety Officer (MSO), program engineering staff (as needed based on issues at<br />
hand), AFOTEC, AFFTC, Space Launch Ranges, and others as may determined by<br />
mandatory members.<br />
11.3.4. SSG minutes shall be sent to SAF/AQR, AFMC/EN or SMC/EA (as applicable), HQ<br />
AFSC/SEA/SEF/SEG/SES/SEW, AFSPC/SES or AFMC/SES (as applicable), and the<br />
owning command.<br />
11.3.5. SSG recommendations that require capability changes or materiel modifications by<br />
the program office must be validated and documented IAW the process and criteria outlined<br />
in AFI 10-601.<br />
11.4. Networks, Automated Information Systems, and Non-Developmental Items. Program<br />
managers are required to conduct a System Safety analysis appropriate for the system or item.<br />
For non-developmental items, the analysis should review usage history, verify intended use<br />
similarities, evaluate differences, and plan for adequate safety evaluation for all <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong>-unique<br />
modifications or changes in use. This System Safety review should be accomplished by the<br />
procuring/buying agency that is in the best position to assess the intended use and necessary<br />
modification. For example, Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) certification requirements are<br />
incrementally implemented and may not apply to all models or year groups of similar aircraft.<br />
Operations from military fields and or with military support equipment provide unique hazard<br />
opportunities that may not have been considered in the original design. Exercise care in<br />
accepting FAA certification as a sufficient indication for safety of the design.<br />
11.5. System Safety Engineering Analysis (SSEA). The SSEA program evaluates and<br />
approves new operations that are prohibited due to the perceived risks (e.g. hot pit refueling,<br />
integrated combat turnaround (ICT)/hot ICT, aircraft-to-aircraft servicing operations, wet<br />
wing/rapid defueling and concurrent servicing).<br />
11.5.1. SSEA of a proposed operation is performed by a highly qualified team under<br />
controlled conditions. The team conducts actual demonstrations and analysis of the operation<br />
to validate overall risk assessment and recommend actions. The SSEA team is normally<br />
chaired by the AFMC System Safety Office and includes experts from AFSC and the<br />
developing, supporting and operational commands.<br />
11.5.2. A using command requests a SSEA in writing to AFMC/SES and informs HQ<br />
AFSC. Requests must include:<br />
11.5.2.1. A complete description of the proposed operation.<br />
11.5.2.2. Justification for accepting the increased risk.<br />
11.5.2.3. Recommended location and dates for the SSEA demonstrations.<br />
11.5.2.4. Identification of other DoD, Government or foreign agencies that might be<br />
involved.