22.02.2013 Views

Teaching The Trainer: How To Give Feedback - Medicine

Teaching The Trainer: How To Give Feedback - Medicine

Teaching The Trainer: How To Give Feedback - Medicine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>How</strong> to <strong>Give</strong> <strong>Feedback</strong><br />

Linda A. Waggoner-Fountain, M.D.


I have no disclosures to state. I do have my<br />

own opinions.


Learning Objectives<br />

• In this workshop, we will<br />

– Review basic principles of effective feedback.<br />

• Following this session, participants will be able to:<br />

– Describe what feedback is and what it is not<br />

– Describe how and when to give feedback<br />

– Develop skills in giving feedback<br />

– Recognize the importance of providing feedback.


<strong>Feedback</strong> - Definition<br />

Interactive process aimed at<br />

reinforcing positive behavior and<br />

providing specific guidelines for<br />

future behaviors<br />

“corrective” – negative<br />

“reinforcing” – positive


Characteristics of Good <strong>Feedback</strong><br />

• Video


<strong>Feedback</strong> – Why is it important?<br />

• <strong>Feedback</strong> is central to medical education<br />

in:<br />

– promoting learning<br />

– ensuring that standards are met<br />

• Provides:<br />

– Student/resident with an accurate perception<br />

of their own performance<br />

– Enhanced student/resident self awareness


Room for improvement<br />

• Residents report feedback is not common<br />

– In one study, only 8% of residents were “very<br />

satisfied” with feedback process<br />

• “Corrective” feedback much less common than<br />

“reinforcing” feedback<br />

– Reinforcing feedback<br />

• Never or infrequently receiving 17%<br />

• Sometimes receiving 52%<br />

• Often receiving 34%<br />

– Corrective feedback:<br />

• Never or infrequently receiving 80%<br />

• Sometimes receiving 20%<br />

• Often receiving 0%<br />

Isaacson et al 1995


<strong>Feedback</strong>? Coaching?<br />

Performance Evaluations?<br />

<strong>Feedback</strong> Coaching Performance<br />

Evaluation<br />

Purpose <strong>To</strong> reinforce or<br />

change behavior<br />

Participants Any ≥ 2 people Typically supervisor to<br />

direct report but can be<br />

multidirectional<br />

Place Private and quiet<br />

space<br />

<strong>To</strong> improve skills <strong>To</strong> evaluate past work<br />

Depends on the skill to<br />

be learned<br />

<strong>To</strong>ne Casual, can be formal Somewhat formal, but<br />

potentially relaxed<br />

Timing Impromptu prn or<br />

during formal<br />

sessions<br />

Supervisor to direct<br />

report<br />

Usually in the<br />

supervisor’s office<br />

formal; often stressful<br />

Regular meetings Scheduled, e.g. q 6<br />

mos or yearly<br />

Follow-up Continual Continual Based on action plan


Obstacles for Teachers<br />

• It can be uncomfortable giving negative<br />

feedback<br />

• Concerns about consequences of negative<br />

feedback<br />

• Time constraints<br />

• Poor feedback skills<br />

• Unaware of the importance of feedback<br />

• Limited knowledge about the performance


Obstacles for Receiving Effective<br />

<strong>Feedback</strong><br />

• Perceived as personal judgment<br />

• Inconsistent messages<br />

• Inappropriate environment<br />

• Different goals<br />

• <strong>To</strong>o busy


What Are <strong>The</strong> Critical<br />

Elements In <strong>The</strong> <strong>Feedback</strong><br />

Process?


Critical Steps<br />

1. Orientation and Climate<br />

2. Elicitation<br />

3. Diagnosis and <strong>Feedback</strong><br />

4. Improvement Plan<br />

5. Application<br />

6. Review


Study<br />

• Study: Clinician teachers’ personal experiences during a<br />

course for improving teaching of medical interviewing<br />

– 83 physicians/scientists from 60 centers (US, UK, Canada)<br />

– Select population of enthusiastic, motivated, talented, intelligent,<br />

energetic people asking for feedback of simulated settings<br />

• 1 week course; small groups of 5 with facilitator<br />

– Six 2-hour training sessions, simulated patients, etc<br />

– Encounters discussed in working groups<br />

• <strong>Feedback</strong> on feedback<br />

– Qualitative (narratives) and quantitative (semantic differential<br />

ratings of different techniques)<br />

Hewson MG, Little M, J Gen Intern Med 1998;13:111-116


Critical Steps<br />

1. Orientation and Climate<br />

2. Elicitation<br />

3. Diagnosis and <strong>Feedback</strong><br />

4. Improvement Plan<br />

5. Application<br />

6. Review


Method of feedback


Method of feedback


Timing of feedback<br />

• Ideally, schedule/prepare person for session<br />

– e.g. at end of first week of rotation, quarterly, after<br />

code or difficult procedure<br />

– Clarify why you are giving feedback<br />

– If delayed = “advice”<br />

• Allow resident self-appraisal<br />

• Defuse emotionally charged situation<br />

• Immediate – constructive criticism<br />

• Logical, practical (prevent recurrence; unique)<br />

• Avoid emotionally charged situation


Critical Steps<br />

1. Orientation and Climate<br />

2. Elicitation<br />

3. Diagnosis and <strong>Feedback</strong><br />

4. Improvement Plan<br />

5. Application<br />

6. Review


Method of feedback


2. Elicitation<br />

• Ask recipient about their goals<br />

– “What are/were your goals for this rotation?<br />

• Ask person for self-assessment<br />

– “<strong>How</strong> do you think it went?”<br />

– “What did you do well?”<br />

– “What could be improved?”<br />

– “<strong>How</strong> did it go for you?”


Critical Steps<br />

1. Orientation and Climate<br />

2. Elicitation<br />

3. Diagnosis and <strong>Feedback</strong><br />

• Content of the feedback<br />

4. Improvement Plan<br />

5. Application<br />

6. Review


Content of feedback


Content of feedback


3. Focus on specific observations<br />

• Sometimes forced to resort to “practical”<br />

feedback (esp. if there’s a pattern)<br />

– e.g. “<strong>The</strong>re’s a perception by some of the<br />

support staff that… When you go out into<br />

practice, you cannot afford to be perceived<br />

as…”


Content of feedback


Difficult<br />

Easy<br />

Job Skills Time and Work<br />

Management<br />

HELPING PEOPLE CHANGE: EASY TO DIFFICULT<br />

Know ledge Attitude Habits Personality<br />

Characteristics


3. Content of feedback<br />

1. Based on your observations ideally<br />

2. Based on specific actions<br />

3. Based on behavior, not personality


Content of feedback


3. Steps to goal-based feedback<br />

• You respond to the self-assessment<br />

• And explain your responses in context of<br />

shared goals


Method of feedback


4 Methods of <strong>Feedback</strong><br />

• Sit-Down One-on-One <strong>Feedback</strong> Model<br />

– <strong>Feedback</strong> Sandwich or Oreo Cookie<br />

• <strong>Feedback</strong> on the Fly Model<br />

– Open-faced Sandwich


4 Methods of <strong>Feedback</strong><br />

• Start, Stop, Continue Model<br />

– Start – What learner needs to start doing<br />

– Stop – What learner needs to stop doing<br />

– Continue – What learner should continue<br />

doing<br />

• Agenda Led, Outcome-based Analysis<br />

– ALOBA model


Agenda Lead, Outcome-Based<br />

Analysis – ALOBA model<br />

• Self assessment by learner to acknowledge what was<br />

done well<br />

• What was done well reinforced by the teacher<br />

• Skills used to achieve successful outcomes discussed<br />

• Self-assessment by learner – what could have been done<br />

better – analyses alternatives skills<br />

• Facilitator suggests alternative skills if necessary<br />

• Learner feedback to the facilitator - content of feedback<br />

and skills


Critical Elements<br />

1. Orientation and Climate<br />

2. Elicitation<br />

3. Diagnosis and <strong>Feedback</strong><br />

4. Improvement Plan<br />

5. Application<br />

6. Review


Method of feedback


4. Improvement Plan<br />

• Invite person’s suggestions<br />

– “<strong>How</strong> do you think it could have gone<br />

differently?”<br />

• Ask again about goals<br />

– “Have your goals changed?”<br />

• <strong>Give</strong> your suggestions/Teach<br />

– “This is my suggestion:”<br />

• Consider identifying a coach


Critical Elements<br />

1. Orientation and Climate<br />

2. Elicitation<br />

3. Diagnosis and <strong>Feedback</strong><br />

4. Improvement Plan<br />

5. Application<br />

6. Review


5. Application<br />

• Apply planned improvements/strategies to<br />

current or future problems<br />

– “What will you do next time?”


Critical Elements<br />

1. Orientation and Climate<br />

2. Elicitation<br />

3. Diagnosis and <strong>Feedback</strong><br />

4. Improvement Plan<br />

5. Application<br />

6. Review


6. Review<br />

• Person reviews performance, behaviors,<br />

including any that need change<br />

– What do you do well?<br />

– What changes will you make?<br />

• Reaffirm person’s worth and ability to<br />

correct their behavior<br />

– “I am confident that you’ll be able to…”<br />

• Schedule follow-up (when applicable)


Critical Elements<br />

1. Orientation and Climate<br />

2. Elicitation<br />

3. Diagnosis and <strong>Feedback</strong><br />

4. Improvement Plan<br />

5. Application<br />

6. Review


Small Group Cases<br />

• Work in pairs or trios<br />

• Pick 2 cases<br />

• Focus on the feedback language you<br />

would use


Don’ts<br />

1. Don’t email feedback (esp. negative)<br />

• No opportunity for orientation, elicitation<br />

• No opportunity to clarify the facts<br />

• Impersonal<br />

• No way to control tone or modify conversation<br />

2. Try not to give feedback when angry<br />

• Think about the timing of your feedback<br />

3. Don’t be accusatory, demeaning or sarcastic<br />

4. Avoid negative feedback in front of<br />

peers/patients<br />

5. Think about post call/up all night issues


Take Home Points<br />

• Tell the person that you are going to give<br />

them feedback<br />

• Engage the learner in the process – self<br />

assessment<br />

• Focus on behaviors – what needs to be<br />

changed<br />

• Develop an action plan


• Hilary Sanfey<br />

• Ted Burns<br />

• Nancy McDaniel<br />

• Casey White<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

• <strong>The</strong> patients, students, residents &<br />

colleagues I have worked with over the<br />

past 20 years.


Suggested Reading<br />

• Sachdeva A. Use of effective feedback to facilitate adult<br />

learning/ Journal of Cancer Education 1996;11:106-118<br />

• Salermo et al. Faculty development seminars based on<br />

the one minute preceptor improve feedback in the<br />

ambulatory setting. JGIM 2002;17(10):779-787<br />

• Spickard A. Words hard to say and hard to hear ”May I<br />

give you some feedback?” JGIM 1998;13(2):142-143<br />

• Hewson M et al. Giving feedback in medical education:<br />

verification of recommended techniques. JGIM<br />

1998;13(2): 111-116


Suggested Reading<br />

• Gil et al. Perceptions of medical school faculty<br />

members and students on clinical clerkship<br />

feedback. J Med Educ. 1984; 59:856 – 864<br />

• Irby et al. Factors affecting ratings of clinical<br />

teachers by medical students and residents J<br />

Med Educ 1987;55:1-7<br />

• Isaacson JH et al Resident Perceptions of the<br />

evaluation process. Society of General Internal<br />

<strong>Medicine</strong>. J Gen Intern Med 1995;10(suppl):89

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!