EFFECT OF VITAMINS C AND E INTAKE ON BLOOD ... - EuroJournals
EFFECT OF VITAMINS C AND E INTAKE ON BLOOD ... - EuroJournals
EFFECT OF VITAMINS C AND E INTAKE ON BLOOD ... - EuroJournals
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
European Journal of Social Sciences - Volume 2, Number 1 (2006)<br />
7. The aftermath of 9/11 and international cooperation<br />
Europe was fortunate enough to escape with minor injuries the changing face of terrorism, but US was<br />
not. On September 11, 2001 the ‘new terrorism’ claimed a tremendously lethal attack on New York<br />
City. The actual attack and its aftermath have sparkled a discussion on the need for international cooperation<br />
in the attempt of successful counter-terrorism. The theory that has been put forward calls for<br />
greater co-operation in the area of intelligence gathering and evaluation, and for the need of a strategic<br />
national approach comprehending both preventive and response measures (Gray, 2002, pp. 5-14,<br />
Heymann, 1998, Ch.2 & 8 and Wolf, 1989, pp.55-70).<br />
In that sense, the first phase of a successful counter-terrorist activity is the need to recognise<br />
that the terrorist threat exists and not to ignore it. As Gray puts it, “underreaction, let alone no reaction,<br />
most likely would be interpreted as weakness, perhaps as evidence of successful intimidation” (Ibid, p.<br />
7). In doing so, the necessity to isolate the adversary and deny him popular support will be of<br />
paramount importance, because it will attempt to undermine the legitimacy of terrorist attacks. In that<br />
way, the governmental response will try to force terrorists in making mistakes that will eventually<br />
make terrorism defeat itself. In theory this proposition is what counter-terrorism is all about: a plan that<br />
will force the terrorist threat to be defeated by itself.<br />
8. Conclusions<br />
The driving force behind successful international co-operation is the building of trust between different<br />
cultures, different experiences and different techniques in relation to the process of countering<br />
terrorism. The building of trust is bound to lead to considerable exchange of intelligence and<br />
information. By relating exchange of information to the different cultures and techniques of each<br />
counter-terrorism agency, what is created is an actual determination that each such agency will cover<br />
the omissions of the other and vice versa. In that way, the room for error from the terrorist point of<br />
view will be halved, as terrorism and counter-terrorism are inter-related processes. What this<br />
proposition suggests is that counter-terrorism will come one step closer to terrorism. In doing so, the<br />
asymmetry between terrorism and counter-terrorism will not be so asymmetric as it is now. And<br />
despite the fact that the tactical advantage of asymmetry favours the terrorist, counter-terrorist planners<br />
can attempt minimising the level of damage that will result from the element of any surprise terrorist<br />
attack thus having greater possibility of success in applying the necessary amount of pressure to<br />
terrorist groups that will eventually result to their demise.<br />
This theory can be of subsequent importance if international co-operation could be spread in a<br />
great number of state parties. In that way, mutual assistance especially in intelligence sharing, could<br />
help in shaping a web of networks in which terrorist groups would not be able to operate as freely as<br />
they currently do. The problem, however, lies on the fact that any such co-operation has yet to be<br />
successfully implemented.<br />
If the answer to that consideration is affirmative or at least not completely negative, then one<br />
can really examine the possibility of succeeding in counter-terrorism attempts through, and based on,<br />
international co-operation.<br />
References<br />
[1] Alexander, Y., Pluchinsky, D. D., [eds.], 1992, Europe’s Red Terrorists: The Fighting<br />
Communist Organisations, (London, Frank Cass).<br />
[2] Berkowitz, B., “Intelligence and the War on Terrorism”, Orbis, vol. 46, no. 2, (Spring 2002),<br />
pp. 289-300.<br />
[3] Betts, R. K., “The Soft Underbelly of American Primacy: Tactical Advantages of Terror”,<br />
Political Science Quarterly, vol. 117, no. 1, (Spring 2002).<br />
[4] Crenshaw, M., “Counterterrorism Policy and the Political Process”, Studies in Conflict and<br />
Terrorism, vol. 24, (2001), pp.329-337.<br />
21