EFFECT OF VITAMINS C AND E INTAKE ON BLOOD ... - EuroJournals

More documents

Recommendations

Info

European Journal of Social Sciences - Volume 2, Number 1 (2006) Extension Information 3.24; and Extension Methods 3.70. This is generally scored good. This implies that the agricultural extension services aimed at bringing about change in behaviour of the farmers were effective. Table 2: Overall Evaluation of the Four Areas (Components) of Extension Services by the Four Groups of Respondents Areas (Components of Extension Services Respondents N Education Human Information Extension Agricultural Extension Programmes Relations Methods Administrator Agricultural Extension 3.5 3.97 3.67 3.94 3.68 Agents Contact 40 3.71 4.10 4.15 4.17 Farmers Non-Contact 60 3.26 3.04 3.49 3.72 Farmers 60 2.03 2.35 3.21 3.25 Total Mean 195 3.24 3.29 3.69 3.70 Hypothesis 2 There are no significant differences in the rating of the contact between farmers and extension agents in Delta State as viewed by i) Extension Administrators; ii) Extension Agents; iii) Contact Farmers; and iv) Non-Contact Farmers. Findings The analysis (Table 3) below showed significant differences between the different groups of respondents with respect to contact between farmers and extension agents. A comparative analysis indicates that the contact farmers had more contact with the extension agents than the non-contact farmers. The findings reveals that most of the contact farmers, 34 out of 60 of them or 58% as against 18 out of 60 or 30% of the non-contact farmers accepted that the extension agents met them fortnightly. Table 3: Contact between Agricultural Extension Agents and Farmers. Frequency of Contact Respondents N Very Often Sometime Rarely Weekly Monthly Fortnightly Total Extension Administrators Extension 35 - 3 0 0 0 32 32 Agents Contact 40 - - - 8 4 28 40 Farmers Non-Contact 60 7 4 11 4 - 34 60 182
International Research Journal of Finance and Economics – Volume 2, Number I (2006) Farmers 60 - 13 5 9 15 18 60 Column Total 195 7 20 16 21 19 112 195 Significant at P
Page 1 and 2:
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES
Page 3 and 4:
European Journal of Social Sciences
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
OL AOLUWA IWO Component Scores EJIG
Page 43 and 44:
References [1] Abiodun J.O. (1981)
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
International Research Journal of F
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138: International Research Journal of F
Page 187: International Research Journal of F
show all

EFFECT OF VITAMINS C AND E INTAKE ON BLOOD ... - EuroJournals

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?