22.02.2013 Views

EFFECT OF VITAMINS C AND E INTAKE ON BLOOD ... - EuroJournals

EFFECT OF VITAMINS C AND E INTAKE ON BLOOD ... - EuroJournals

EFFECT OF VITAMINS C AND E INTAKE ON BLOOD ... - EuroJournals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

European Journal of Social Sciences - Volume 2, Number 1 (2006)<br />

of a people is above all an essential part of its general history" and that taxes do not only help to create<br />

the state, but also help to form it. Schumpeter's argument appears relevant to Nigeria's political history<br />

where fiscal finance forms a dominant part. Nobert EIias (1996:345-6) focuses on the state’s monopoly<br />

of violence and explains the inter-relationship between the use of physical violence and taxation. He<br />

comments,<br />

The society of what we call the modern age is characterized, above all in the West, by a certain level of monopolization. Free use of<br />

military weapons is denied the individual and reserved to a central authority of whatever kind, and likewise the taxation of the property<br />

or income of individuals is concentrated in the hands of a central social authority. The financial means thus flowing into this central<br />

authority maintain its monopoly of military force, while this in turn maintains the monopoly of taxation.<br />

Many African States, including Nigeria, have abused this monopoly of violence and taxation. In<br />

Nigeria, the military has used its weapons not only to harass, but to extort money from innocent and<br />

defenceless citizens. In December 1968, "a combined team of police and army opened fire on (tax)<br />

agitators" in Western State. At the end of the demonstrations, "it was estimated that more than fifty<br />

people had been killed in different parts of the state with several more wounded." (Drum, 1969). This<br />

type of state violence has replayed itself times without number in the country.<br />

State monopoly can be viewed from another angle. The federal government enjoys some certain<br />

monopoly of taxing powers as contained in the constitution. 3 It also enjoys monopoly over the armed<br />

forces (the army, the air force and navy), the police and other para-military bodies.Human (1995:20)<br />

provides explanation for the State’s monopoly of violence:<br />

States justify the violence they use to this end by saying that they cannot do the good that they do for their societies if they are not given<br />

the right of ultimate recourse to violence against those who impede, resist or impair their efforts. To forestall a situation where, in every<br />

case, individuals or groups of people resist their actions, states have to employ violent means; states establish their control over society<br />

by demanding a monopoly over the means of violence. ... Hence the force used by the state is sometimes referred to as 'legitimate'.<br />

Violence used by any one else in society is seen as 'illegitimate.'<br />

Human’s argument appears reasonable and logical provided it is not turned to oppression of citizens.<br />

Some scholars have dealt with specific aspects of public finance in Nigeria. Adedeji (1969) reviews<br />

Nigeria’s fiscal policy from 1946 to 1969; Mbanefoh and Anyanwu (1990) deal with the constitutional<br />

role of revenue mobilization and allocation among the various tiers of government; and Adesola (1989)<br />

examines the machinery for collection and disbursement of public funds in Nigeria with a prescription<br />

for the aborted Third Republic. A great deal of work has also been devoted to tax administration in<br />

Nigeria. They include (Adesola, 1986; Okele, 1986; Omopariola and Nassar, 1986; Oyelere and<br />

Oyewole, 1986; Oribabor, 1986). Others have limited their scope to local government finance. In this<br />

category, are Adedeji and Rowland (1971) and Bello-Imam (1989). The intellectual and theoretical<br />

discourse has shown that the subject of taxation and fiscal policy has received substantial attention;<br />

although not from governance perspective, which is the focus of this paper.<br />

Nigerian governance: historical and geographical profile<br />

Nigerian governance environment can best be understood within its political, historical and<br />

geographical profile. The amalgamation of the Southern and Northern Protectorates and the Lagos<br />

Colony gave birth to Nigeria from a motley of nationalities and ethnic groups on January 1, 1914 . In<br />

1954, the country adopted a federal system and attained Independence on October 1960 with<br />

Westminster Parliamentary system of government. The federal system has transmuted from a twotiered<br />

federal structure, comprising three unequal regions to a three-tiered federal system of 36 states,<br />

one federal capital territory (FCT) and 774 local governments. Nigeria is 924,000 square kilometres<br />

with two distinct climatic zones - the tropical south and the hot, dry north. Three main cultural groups<br />

3See item 39 of the Exclusive Legislative List of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.<br />

128

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!