21.02.2013 Views

Cisco - TABPI

Cisco - TABPI

Cisco - TABPI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

War on spam gains 2 allies<br />

MICROSOFT, SYMANTEC GO TO WASHINGTON TO PUSH NEW PRODUCTS<br />

By Caron Carlson IN WASHINGTON<br />

The anti-spam crusade is<br />

gaining momentum as<br />

industry players, including<br />

Microsoft Corp. and<br />

Symantec Corp., counter<br />

pending bills on Capitol Hill<br />

with legislative proposals of<br />

their own.<br />

To date, proposed ideas<br />

have covered a wide range<br />

of measures, from jail time<br />

for repeat spammers to a tiny<br />

charge on every piece of spam<br />

sent. The Senate is slated to<br />

sort through all the options<br />

and vote on one proposal<br />

before summer’s end.<br />

Microsoft, of Redmond,<br />

Wash., got into the act last<br />

week when company Chairman<br />

and Chief Software Architect<br />

Bill Gates called for Congress<br />

to create incentives for<br />

e-mail marketers to adopt best<br />

practices and become certified<br />

trusted senders. As part of<br />

the proposal, the Federal Trade<br />

Commission would provide<br />

a safe harbor for companies<br />

that join an FTC-approved selfregulating<br />

group. Legislation<br />

would require marketers to<br />

properly label their e-mail and<br />

would give ISPs the right to<br />

take spammers to court.<br />

Symantec suggested to lawmakers<br />

last week that legislation<br />

should focus on false<br />

labeling and require a physical<br />

address in commercial bulk<br />

e-mail. The Cupertino, Calif.,<br />

company, whose brand and<br />

products have been fraudulently<br />

peddled by e-mail, also<br />

asked Congress to give the<br />

FTC more resources to prosecute<br />

electronic fraud.<br />

For America Online Inc.,<br />

spam is the most important<br />

issue today, Ted Leonsis, AOL<br />

vice chairman, told the Sen-<br />

ate Commerce Committee<br />

last week. “There is raw anger<br />

that spam generates,” Leonsis<br />

said, adding that the government<br />

needs<br />

stronger tools to<br />

track down the<br />

most fraudulent<br />

offenders.<br />

Others maintain,<br />

however, that<br />

anger stems not<br />

only from fraudulent<br />

e-mail but<br />

also from the<br />

growing volume<br />

of unsolicited<br />

messages, to which ISPs contribute.<br />

Charging that AOL,<br />

of New York, operates its<br />

“own personal spam com-<br />

Schumer’s bill would give<br />

repeat spammers jail time.<br />

pany,” Ronald Scelson,<br />

owner of Scelson Online<br />

Marketing Inc., in Slidell,<br />

La., told lawmakers that<br />

some ISPs are<br />

filtering out<br />

legal messages<br />

if they receive<br />

one complaint,<br />

driving bulk<br />

e-mailers to<br />

forge addresses.<br />

Calling himself<br />

“the most<br />

hated person” at<br />

the hearing,<br />

Scelson said he<br />

sends as many as 180 million<br />

e-mail messages every day<br />

and that it takes him less<br />

than 24 hours to thwart an<br />

NEWS&ANALYSIS<br />

ISP’s spam filters.<br />

The industry approaches,<br />

which urge Congress to preempt<br />

state anti-spam laws, are<br />

largely consistent with the<br />

longest-standing anti-spam<br />

bill, the CAN-SPAM initiative<br />

sponsored by Sens. Conrad<br />

Burns, R-Mont., and Ron<br />

Wyden, D-Ore. CAN-SPAM<br />

would ban the use of false or<br />

deceptive headers or subject<br />

lines, require senders to provide<br />

users with an opt-out feature,<br />

and prohibit private<br />

rights of action.<br />

Consumer groups, and<br />

many state attorneys general,<br />

are calling on Congress<br />

to take a tougher approach.<br />

Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y.,<br />

is sponsoring a bill that would<br />

establish jail time as a penalty<br />

for serious, repeat spammers<br />

and create a national<br />

“Do not spam” list. Sen. Mark<br />

Dayton, D-Minn., last week<br />

suggested that a small tax on<br />

e-mail would deter spam. ´<br />

Smarter storage on horizon?<br />

By Evan Koblentz<br />

For several years, users have clamored<br />

for more management features to be added<br />

to existing hardware. Now, a number of<br />

vendors are suggesting it’s better to build<br />

smarter hardware in the first place.<br />

In fact, technologies are under development,<br />

according to industry experts, that improve<br />

the way low-end RAID controllers communicate<br />

with drive clusters and that enable highend<br />

array intelligence to reside as objects in<br />

central servers.<br />

“The future of the storage industry looks<br />

just like the future of the rest of computing,”<br />

said John Webster, an analyst at Data<br />

Mobility Group Inc., in Nashua, N.H. “People<br />

build functions, express it in hardware or software,<br />

and [eventually] express it in more efficient<br />

ways of doing things.”<br />

On the low-end storage front, users in the<br />

future will be able to consolidate storage,<br />

move drives among controller units, replace<br />

failed parts and upgrade to new features—all<br />

among different vendors and without having to<br />

use backup data sets or remap every drive and<br />

volume, said Wayne Rickard, chairman of the<br />

Storage Networking Industry Association’s Technical<br />

Council and vice president of advanced<br />

technology at Seagate Technology LLC.<br />

Such interoperability will be facilitated by the<br />

Disk Data Format Provisional Working Group<br />

proposed this month by Adaptec Inc., Dell Computer<br />

Corp. and LSI Logic Corp., Rickard<br />

said. Creating the standards could take two years,<br />

said Rickard, in Scotts Valley, Calif.<br />

In high-end storage, object-based storage is<br />

also on its way to becoming a context-aware,<br />

native technology. For evidence, users can look<br />

to hardware such as EMC Corp.’s Centera and<br />

software such as IBM’s StorageTank.<br />

Instead of mapping logical units, numbers<br />

and zones directly between servers and<br />

storage, “with object-based storage, the devices<br />

are doing all this themselves,” said Mike<br />

Mesnier, co-chair of SNIA’s object storage<br />

devices working group and storage architect<br />

at Intel Corp.<br />

By this fall, the working group will complete<br />

its security and data sharing documents,<br />

said Mesnier, in Pittsburgh. ´<br />

MAY 26, 2003 n eWEEK 15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!