21.02.2013 Views

Cisco - TABPI

Cisco - TABPI

Cisco - TABPI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NEWS&ANALYSIS<br />

Eric Lundquist: Up Front<br />

Golden-oldie lessons<br />

Vendors and prognosticators are either<br />

wringing their hands looking for the next big<br />

thing or worrying that IT has become a lowpriced<br />

commodity to be purchased like electricity<br />

or paper clips. They could learn a thing<br />

or two from mainframes, pay phones and backhoes.<br />

Here’s why. The mainframe business has been predicted<br />

to die ever since IBM developed the Model 704<br />

in 1957. Full-time venture capitalist and part-time Fortune<br />

columnist Stewart Alsop predicted that the last<br />

mainframe would be unplugged in 1996. This month,<br />

IBM once again proved Alsop’s and others’ predictions<br />

to be ludicrously off the mark by introducing the z990,<br />

code-named T-Rex. The advance of Intel-based microprocessors and Microsoft<br />

software was supposed to be the equivalent of the cataclysmic asteroid impact that<br />

wiped out the dinosaurs. It has been little more than a summer meteor shower.<br />

Why do mainframes continue to<br />

inhabit the planet? That they work as<br />

advertised is probably the immediate<br />

answer. The stories about old mainframes<br />

still cranking out reports and<br />

doing financials on some proprietary program<br />

written in the 1970s are legion. A<br />

second reason is that if you are willing<br />

to invest—say, about $1 billion over four<br />

years—you can make a mainframe<br />

that looks a lot like what IBM is selling.<br />

“We continue to invest in those features<br />

and capabilities our customers<br />

are asking for,” Peter McCaffrey, IBM’s<br />

director of product marketing for the<br />

zSeries of mainframes, told me. Combining<br />

the reliability and scale of mainframes<br />

with recent developments such<br />

as Linux has created an alluring platform<br />

for e-commerce.<br />

What’s more, working on a platform<br />

that pundits are forever declaring extinct<br />

has proved motivational to IBM engineers.<br />

“Every once in a while, they<br />

have a good laugh over it. In the end, it<br />

drives our engineers to constantly reinvent<br />

the platform,” said McCaffrey.<br />

26 eWEEK n MAY 26, 2003<br />

Now, pay phones. They are ubiquitous<br />

and yet underused in this era of cell<br />

phones. When Intel introduced its<br />

wireless chips under the Centrino<br />

label, it produced a movie, ostensibly<br />

humorous, that included a spoof on<br />

pay phones. Now, Verizon is striking<br />

back by adding wireless hot-spot capabilities<br />

to its pay phones. Starting in New<br />

York, Verizon is making hot-spot access<br />

for 802.11-enabled devices free for Verizon<br />

Internet access customers.<br />

This is a smart move for Verizon<br />

and a challenge to all those venture<br />

capitalists who were betting on the<br />

vendors of equipment you’d need to be<br />

wirelessly logging on at McDonald’s as<br />

you scarf down your Big Mac. Philip Nutsugah,<br />

executive director for broadband<br />

wireless at Verizon, said the company<br />

intends to have 1,000 pay phone hot spots<br />

in New York by year’s end.<br />

Now take a guess what the following<br />

quote refers to. “Every feature was<br />

designed with productivity, serviceability<br />

and reliability in mind.” No, it’s not<br />

Scott McNealy trying to persuade you to<br />

buy more Solaris, and it’s not Bill<br />

Gates contending he finally has the security<br />

thing under control. The quote was<br />

part of a press release for the new John<br />

Deere 710G backhoe introduced in<br />

January and replete with new features<br />

and technologies. In a 1997 article on<br />

HotWired.com titled “50 Ways to Crash<br />

the Net,” security expert Simson Garfinkel<br />

included buying 10 backhoes as<br />

one of the 50. That’s because, back<br />

then, critical Internet backbones too<br />

often ran through underground cables,<br />

which too frequently fell victim to the<br />

digging of backhoes.<br />

When a backhoe blade sliced through<br />

a cable and cut off Internet access to a<br />

big chunk of Boston on May 13, I started<br />

to wonder if backhoe technology is evolving<br />

faster than the physical security of<br />

the Internet.<br />

I tracked down Garfinkel, now going<br />

for his doctorate at MIT. While it<br />

might take more than 10 backhoes to<br />

do the job now, the physical security<br />

of the Internet’s routers, name servers<br />

and associated hardware remains far<br />

too vulnerable for the elevated threats<br />

the Net faces, Garfinkel said. “There<br />

ERIC_ LUNDQUIST@ZIFFDAVIS.COM<br />

Why do mainframes continue to inhabit<br />

the planet? That they work as advertised<br />

is probably the immediate answer.<br />

is a very high risk of physical damage.<br />

People tend to forget about physical<br />

security,” he said.<br />

Part of progress is the illusion that we<br />

leave some things behind. But some<br />

golden-oldie technologies stick around<br />

for a reason. They’re good at what they<br />

do. Still, that backhoe technology remains<br />

one step ahead of Internet architects<br />

should give us all pause. ´

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!