A two-state model of simple reaction time
A two-state model of simple reaction time
A two-state model of simple reaction time
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
* * *<br />
- 18 -<br />
* * * *<br />
Many <strong>model</strong>s have been proposed, each <strong>of</strong> which emphasizes<br />
a different aspect <strong>of</strong> choice <strong>reaction</strong> <strong>time</strong>. To the author,<br />
Falmagne(1965)'s <strong>two</strong>-<strong>state</strong> <strong>model</strong> is most interesting because<br />
<strong>of</strong> the following <strong>two</strong> reasons;<br />
1). It has very <strong>simple</strong> structure, i.e., it assumes only <strong>two</strong><br />
<strong>state</strong>s. Comparing <strong>two</strong>-<strong>state</strong>, three-<strong>state</strong> and four-<strong>state</strong> <strong>model</strong>s,<br />
Lupker and Theios(1975) concluded that the <strong>two</strong>-<strong>state</strong> <strong>model</strong><br />
could be accepted, but the three-<strong>state</strong> and four-<strong>state</strong> <strong>model</strong>s could<br />
be rejected. That is, the <strong>model</strong> with the smallest number <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>state</strong>s was the best.<br />
2). The <strong>two</strong>-<strong>state</strong> <strong>model</strong> is a discrete one. The question<br />
whether psychological <strong>state</strong>s are discrete or continuous is one<br />
<strong>of</strong> fundamental problems. But, to determine experimentally whether<br />
the <strong>state</strong> is discrete or not is difficult, because the prediction<br />
made by a particular <strong>model</strong> is also dependent on the assumptions<br />
other than the one to test. The author is interested in the<br />
question how well <strong>model</strong>s with discrete <strong>state</strong>s can do.