A two-state model of simple reaction time
A two-state model of simple reaction time
A two-state model of simple reaction time
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
- 12 -<br />
S oA oB A B<br />
S 0 I-a a 0 0<br />
oA 0 0 I-b b 0<br />
Q== oB 0 l-c 0 0 c 0-10)<br />
A 0 0 0 1 0<br />
B 0 0 0 0 1<br />
On each trial the subject begins in the starting <strong>state</strong>,S,<br />
goes to one or the other orienting <strong>state</strong>( oA or oB ) , and from<br />
there, he either goes on to make the recorded response( A or B )<br />
or shifts to the other orienting <strong>state</strong>( oB or oA ). Furthermore,<br />
Kintsch(1963) assumes that the <strong>time</strong> required to complete each<br />
transition step is the discrete random variable which follows<br />
the geometric distribution,eq.(I-II);<br />
k-l<br />
P(k)=p 'O-p) (1-11)<br />
From eqs.(1-10) and (1-11), the mean latency <strong>of</strong> responses<br />
f or the case b=c can be derived;<br />
The mean latency::::: (1 + b)· p<br />
b· (1 - p)<br />
In the recruitment theory proposed by LaBerge(1962),<br />
the accumulation process is determined by sampling by replacement.<br />
This <strong>model</strong> assumes that there are three types <strong>of</strong> elements,C 1 , C 2