21.02.2013 Views

A two-state model of simple reaction time

A two-state model of simple reaction time

A two-state model of simple reaction time

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

- 12 -<br />

S oA oB A B<br />

S 0 I-a a 0 0<br />

oA 0 0 I-b b 0<br />

Q== oB 0 l-c 0 0 c 0-10)<br />

A 0 0 0 1 0<br />

B 0 0 0 0 1<br />

On each trial the subject begins in the starting <strong>state</strong>,S,<br />

goes to one or the other orienting <strong>state</strong>( oA or oB ) , and from<br />

there, he either goes on to make the recorded response( A or B )<br />

or shifts to the other orienting <strong>state</strong>( oB or oA ). Furthermore,<br />

Kintsch(1963) assumes that the <strong>time</strong> required to complete each<br />

transition step is the discrete random variable which follows<br />

the geometric distribution,eq.(I-II);<br />

k-l<br />

P(k)=p 'O-p) (1-11)<br />

From eqs.(1-10) and (1-11), the mean latency <strong>of</strong> responses<br />

f or the case b=c can be derived;<br />

The mean latency::::: (1 + b)· p<br />

b· (1 - p)<br />

In the recruitment theory proposed by LaBerge(1962),<br />

the accumulation process is determined by sampling by replacement.<br />

This <strong>model</strong> assumes that there are three types <strong>of</strong> elements,C 1 , C 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!