Download (12MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository
Download (12MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository Download (12MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository
distanciation effect or conspicuous instance of intertextuality activates the viewer's subjectivity and personal networks of associations. Consequently, the world of a film like Pierrot lefou 'is not primarily represented as a source of perceptions and a goal for acts, but as "a state of consciousness" and should therefore be approached in a lyrical-associative way. It further activates the viewer's proximal or proprioceptive "feeling of himself during viewing' (Grodal 1997: 219). This different application of Brecht's established notion of Verfremdung may appear problematic by adding emotion into the equation, but my study will suggest that Bertolucci's use of the camera and editing sometimes produces the interruption of the illusion prefigured by Brecht, while also triggering emotion within viewers. In this volume it will sometimes be observed how, in Bertolucci's films - even in Partner, his most 'Brechtian' film, where the viewer's emotional engagement with the film is limited - specific sequences that increase the viewer's awareness of the cinematic medium coincide with the activation of affective responses. In Before the Revolution one example of this is the jagged editing that characterizes the sequence of Agostino's bizarre performance on a bicycle in front of Fabrizio; Fabrizio's POV is slowly replaced by a neutral camera perspective which highlights how Agostino's antics escalate from showing off into a disturbing episode of self-harm, caused by the youth repeatedly falling off the bicycle (see images). The technique gradually raises viewers" awareness of the camera's presence and of the editing pattern that has been adopted, reducing the film's reality status while cueing an increasing sense of discomfort - within the viewer's own consciousness - at what is seen. 84
Another example of this phenomenon occurs when the same shots are screened several times in sequence. Bertolucci uses the technique during the Fabrizio/Gina liaison; the pair exchange amorous glances as they approach each other (a sequence screened three times), and a young woman scrutinizes Fabrizio as he wanders the streets (screened twice). The repeated screening serves to jolt viewers, but at the same time, the slow pace and the mute soundtrack that characterize both sequences divert part of the viewer's attention to the characters' glances and body language, thereby inviting viewers to interpret and respond to this subtle non-verbal emotional communication. Conclusion hi 1964, it was the French public and critics who acknowledged the innovative way in which Before the Revolution explored the nature of individual and social discontent by awarding Bertolucci the 'Prix Max Ophuls' and the 'Prix de la Jeune Critique'. Years later, Bertolucci still proudly recalls how, at the end of the Cannes screening, Godard had publically praised the film (Bertolucci, 2001:147). With regard to its political theme, according to Bertolucci, the film was praised 'precisely because it was seen as a criticism of the PCI from the Left"; (Maraini, 1973: 86). But in Italy the film was not well received (Casetti 1978: 39-40),(5) despite Bertolucci explaining that Fabrizio^s cowardice was a way to exorcise his own fear about being sucked back into his bourgeois milieu, (Marcorelles and Bontemps, 1965: 15) and he defended the film by saying that it referred to 'a generational question' in the sense that his generation 'discovered politics at the end of the period of commitment. It was an empty, really hollow moment and that explains the ambiguity of my film' (Fieschi, 1968: 34). The contrasting reactions from foreign critics and those from Italy established a pattern for the reception of Bertolucci's work for the rest of his career. 85
- Page 37 and 38: information to which the character
- Page 39 and 40: emotional state that the individual
- Page 41 and 42: opera houses in Before the Revoluti
- Page 43 and 44: manipulation, Bordwell analyses the
- Page 45 and 46: narrative schema clarifies how we o
- Page 47 and 48: to the point of drawing the spectat
- Page 49 and 50: for granted, in a 'slightly hazardo
- Page 51 and 52: passive emotionalism' (Sterritt, 19
- Page 53 and 54: Godard's approach from Bertolucci's
- Page 55 and 56: characters being stimulated into ta
- Page 57 and 58: apolitical art' in La Chinoise (p.
- Page 59 and 60: SECTION 1; Pessimism and Melancholi
- Page 61 and 62: La commare secca/The Grim Reaper: A
- Page 63 and 64: the film. Several of the suspects a
- Page 65 and 66: to reduce realism in favour of an a
- Page 67 and 68: giant publicity poster for the aper
- Page 69 and 70: mark out the sequence as significan
- Page 71 and 72: emphasizes his youth and simple nat
- Page 73 and 74: The camera movement and the frame c
- Page 75 and 76: Smith, G. M. (1999) 'Local Emotions
- Page 77 and 78: of respectability. Inspired by Cesa
- Page 79 and 80: film is/was viewed, the goal orient
- Page 81 and 82: viewers identify complicated intert
- Page 83 and 84: diegetic sound, since, except for t
- Page 85 and 86: audiovisual construction of the ope
- Page 87: evocative representations of landsc
- Page 91 and 92: La stratesia del raeno/The Spider's
- Page 93 and 94: director launching 'a critique from
- Page 95 and 96: possible to understand 'how the mod
- Page 97 and 98: The peak of this integration is rea
- Page 99 and 100: phase of his inquiries becomes clou
- Page 101 and 102: Bertolucci praises Storaro's sensit
- Page 103 and 104: on their shoulders the head of the
- Page 105 and 106: The emotional quality of the musica
- Page 107 and 108: Notes References Regarding the fail
- Page 109 and 110: La trasedia di un uomo ridicolo / T
- Page 111 and 112: the socio-political composition of
- Page 113 and 114: emerge in Bocca's reconstruction of
- Page 115 and 116: Elitism, ascetism and emotional rep
- Page 117 and 118: dangerous estrangement from the rea
- Page 119 and 120: abandons any attempt to understand
- Page 121 and 122: with Adelfo and Laura, Primo is sur
- Page 123 and 124: spatio-temporal attachment to Primo
- Page 125 and 126: manages to expand the flimsy substa
- Page 127 and 128: Moravia, A. (1971) lo e lui, (1990)
- Page 129 and 130: established in Tango. Yet the analy
- Page 131 and 132: evidently designed to push the boun
- Page 133 and 134: inging to contemporary Italian soci
- Page 135 and 136: said he was inspired by the Third C
- Page 137 and 138: creation of Expressionist theatre w
Another example <strong>of</strong> this phenomenon occurs when the same shots are screened several times<br />
in sequence. Bertolucci uses the technique during the Fabrizio/Gina liaison; the pair exchange<br />
amorous glances as they approach each other (a sequence screened three times), and a young<br />
woman scrutinizes Fabrizio as he wanders the streets (screened twice). The repeated<br />
screening serves to jolt viewers, but at the same time, the slow pace and the mute soundtrack<br />
that characterize both sequences divert part <strong>of</strong> the viewer's attention to the characters'<br />
glances and body language, thereby inviting viewers to interpret and respond to this subtle<br />
non-verbal emotional communication.<br />
Conclusion<br />
hi 1964, it was the French public and critics who acknowledged the innovative way in which<br />
Before the Revolution explored the nature <strong>of</strong> individual and social discontent by awarding<br />
Bertolucci the 'Prix Max Ophuls' and the 'Prix de la Jeune Critique'. Years later, Bertolucci<br />
still proudly recalls how, at the end <strong>of</strong> the Cannes screening, Godard had publically praised<br />
the film (Bertolucci, 2001:147). With regard to its political theme, according to Bertolucci,<br />
the film was praised 'precisely because it was seen as a criticism <strong>of</strong> the PCI from the Left";<br />
(Maraini, 1973: 86). But in Italy the film was not well received (Casetti 1978: 39-40),(5)<br />
despite Bertolucci explaining that Fabrizio^s cowardice was a way to exorcise his own fear<br />
about being sucked back into his bourgeois milieu, (Marcorelles and Bontemps, 1965: 15)<br />
and he defended the film by saying that it referred to 'a generational question' in the sense<br />
that his generation 'discovered politics at the end <strong>of</strong> the period <strong>of</strong> commitment. It was an<br />
empty, really hollow moment and that explains the ambiguity <strong>of</strong> my film' (Fieschi, 1968: 34).<br />
The contrasting reactions from foreign critics and those from Italy established a pattern for<br />
the reception <strong>of</strong> Bertolucci's work for the rest <strong>of</strong> his career.<br />
85