21.02.2013 Views

Download (12MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

Download (12MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

Download (12MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

for granted, in a 'slightly hazardous way' that it would not turn 'into a scientific<br />

demonstration' (Willett, 1992: 276).<br />

In her study on Brecht, Meg Mumford adopts 'defamiliarization' as her preferred<br />

translation <strong>of</strong> the term Verfremdung, in relation to Brecht using the effect as a form <strong>of</strong><br />

political intervention against 'the familiar', in order to free socially conditioned phenomena<br />

from 'that stamp <strong>of</strong> familiarity which protects them against our grasp' and to elicit a more<br />

questioning attitude from spectators towards these social, economic and political 'givens'<br />

(Mumford, 2009: 61). Although recognizing the appropriateness <strong>of</strong> this terminology, my<br />

study will use the term 'distanciation', since - in a cinematic context - it appears more<br />

suitable to express the effect created by the devices that can be adopted to break viewers'<br />

absorption in stories and reawaken their awareness <strong>of</strong> the cinematic medium. Bertolucci<br />

transposed into some <strong>of</strong> his films Godard's configuration <strong>of</strong> the distanciation effect, which<br />

consisted <strong>of</strong> strategies such as the use <strong>of</strong> unconventional editing and techniques through<br />

which the cinematic illusion was broken, hi Partner Bertolucci incorporated an overt form <strong>of</strong><br />

Brechtian didacticism, whereas with regard to the directors work as a whole, this study<br />

illustrates how other elements in his films also retain a Brechtian influence, such as the lack<br />

<strong>of</strong> viewer identification with characters, the paratelic forms <strong>of</strong> narration that rarely centre on<br />

the defining <strong>of</strong>, and achievement <strong>of</strong>, a character's goals, the conspicuous presence <strong>of</strong> the<br />

camera, and the way that empathic phenomena rarely possess a cathartic function. It might be<br />

suggested that by essentially positioning the viewer in the role <strong>of</strong> observer, Bertolucci fulfils<br />

- in his own way - Brecht's instruction that 'acceptance or rejection <strong>of</strong> their [the characters']<br />

actions and utterances was meant to take place on a conscious plane, instead <strong>of</strong>, as hitherto, in<br />

the audience's subconscious' (Willett, 1992: 91). Moreover, the paradox that some <strong>of</strong><br />

Bertolucci's distancing devices arguably generate emotion in terms <strong>of</strong> aesthetic fascination,<br />

or by intensifying a film's mood, will also be discussed.<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!