21.02.2013 Views

Download (12MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

Download (12MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

Download (12MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

narrative schema clarifies how we organize information, it 'does not directly address such<br />

problems as a perceiver's fascination, emotional reaction or participation in a story'<br />

(Branigan, 1992:16). One <strong>of</strong> the objectives <strong>of</strong> this study is to investigate how emotional<br />

responses are occasionally derived - indirectly - from the frustration <strong>of</strong> the viewers'<br />

attempted schematization <strong>of</strong> Bertolucci's narratives, and also from a systematic analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

the aesthetics and visual techniques used by the director to engender emotional responses.<br />

Branigan also links narrative causality to human mental schemata, individuals<br />

evaluating the causes behind sequences <strong>of</strong> events in real life and those in fictional narratives<br />

on the basis <strong>of</strong> the 'relative likelihood 7 <strong>of</strong> particular events appearing together (Branigan,<br />

1992: 26). He argues that viewers perceive narrative events not only 'as a chain <strong>of</strong> causes and<br />

effects' linked together and triggered by local determinants, but viewers also draw upon their<br />

cultural knowledge in evaluating which actions are plausibly compatible with each other,<br />

given 'our general knowledge <strong>of</strong> social interaction' (Branigan, 1992: 27). Branigan uses a<br />

cognitive psychological distinction to differentiate the way we perceive what occurs on<br />

screen; one process, functioning in a 'bottom-up s direction, is centred on the data seen on<br />

screen, whose features are perceived and organized in terms <strong>of</strong> colour, motion, aural pitch,<br />

and other qualities, with the viewer 'utilizing little or no associated memory' during this<br />

process (Branigan, 1992: 37). By contrast, what he terms 'top-down' perceptual processes are<br />

based on the spectators acquired knowledge and mental schemas, and these work 'top-down'<br />

upon the screen data, using the spectator's expectations and goals as a way <strong>of</strong> organizing and<br />

making sense <strong>of</strong> what is seen; this leads to the making <strong>of</strong> hypotheses and the creation <strong>of</strong><br />

narrative expectations (Branigan, 1992: 37). The top-down process is facilitated or hindered<br />

by the way the story is presented - its 'narration'; certain forms <strong>of</strong> narration can complicate<br />

the procedure <strong>of</strong> 'acquiring knowledge' about the story (Branigan, 1992: 65).<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!