21.02.2013 Views

Download (12MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

Download (12MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

Download (12MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

placed by Marcus on Bertolucci's shift away from the sense <strong>of</strong> 'inexorable fate' in Moravia's<br />

original novel in favour <strong>of</strong> a greater emphasis on 'Marcello's sovereign free will' and the<br />

moral consequences <strong>of</strong> this, is supported in my own study (Marcus, 1986: 296). Nevertheless,<br />

having outlined this assumption, there is a contradiction when Marcus indicates that where<br />

Marcello Clerici is concerned, the film's cinematic devices 'all suggest an abnormal, chaotic<br />

mental state' (Marcus, 1986: 296). While the notion <strong>of</strong> abnormality can be defended, that <strong>of</strong><br />

mental chaos is less tenable; my analysis will identify a cold determination in Clerici ? s<br />

pursuit <strong>of</strong> conformism and a lucid awareness <strong>of</strong> Fascism's threatening and repressive nature.<br />

Yosefa Loshitzky, in The Radical Faces <strong>of</strong> Godard and Bertolucci (1995), analyses in<br />

parallel the career <strong>of</strong> the two directors. Her analysis <strong>of</strong> Bertolucci's films generally mirrors<br />

other scholarly analysis, in terms <strong>of</strong> reaffirming Godard's influence on Bertolucci, the<br />

implication <strong>of</strong> an Oedipus complex in their relationship, and Bertolucci's departure from<br />

Godard's avant-garde view on cinema. On the latter point, and without any intention <strong>of</strong><br />

mounting a defence or criticism <strong>of</strong> the decision that led to this different strand <strong>of</strong> film-<br />

making, I believe that more consideration should be given to the question <strong>of</strong> cinema and<br />

elitism that troubled Bertolucci and other directors in the early 1970s, film-makers such as<br />

Elio Petri, as both Bertolucci and Petri added their own reflections to the debate. In 1973,<br />

while discussing politically committed films, Bertolucci asserted: 'The great problem <strong>of</strong> the<br />

political film is very difficult. I see a great contradiction in my work when I do political films<br />

like Before the Revolution and Partner, because political films must be popular films, and<br />

Partner, for example, was anything but popular' (Georgakas, Rubenstein, 1984: 38). hi<br />

commenting on Solanas's regret at having been unable to show his film Hour <strong>of</strong> the Furnaces<br />

(1973) to the people he would have liked to, Bertolucci affirmed that a revolutionary film<br />

'never goes into a revolutionary space' but 'into festivals. So you do revolutionary films for<br />

the cinephiles' (Georgakas, Rubenstein, 1984: 38-39). This was a preoccupation shared by<br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!