Download (12MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

Download (12MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository Download (12MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

usir.salford.ac.uk
from usir.salford.ac.uk More from this publisher
21.02.2013 Views

1987: 237). So, considering the film's depiction of Pu Yi's quest for aesthetic beauty, one might consider his choice of horticulture as a way of continuing to enjoy multiple colours and forms. However, the luxurious atmosphere in the Forbidden City is always associated with the absolute power that the Emperors had; similarly, a cruel regime is embedded in the aesthetic beauty of the Manchurian court. In this respect the mise-en-scene indirectly highlights an issue related to independent and creative human thought, in terms of it being either subjected to exploitation in a capitalist social order, or a source of suspicion in an egalitarian social order; the issue is further complicated by the unexpected socio-political disgrace of the prison governor. This occurs after viewer alignment with the character's thought processes and his sense of justice and humanity, and his humiliation is compounded because it occurs at the hands of youngsters whose fanatical mistreatment of their fellow Communists is disconcerting on all levels. Therefore sympathy is generated towards the governor because his disgrace is perceived by the viewer as unjustified. The sequence also induces intellectual reflection as it implies that power ultimately reproduces its oppressive, negative facets, regardless of the forms that it assumes according to historical circumstances. The presence of these socio-political elements, although only implied, prevents the film from resulting in catharsis, as they create a narration that does not cloud viewers' judgment of reality, (Benjamin, 1966: 18) but which induces reflection on the portrayed events. Consequently, I have reservations about Yosefa Loshitzky's assessment of this stage of Bertolucci's career as a 'capitulation to Hollywood-style spectacle', with the Oscars as proof of his 'total assimilation into mainstream cinema and the ultimate recognition of his conformism by the film industry' (Loshitsky, 1995: 201). In my view the Hollywood-style spectacle frequently features variants of the 'arrival of the cavalry' or the 'idealistic sentiment' - expressed either directly or metaphorically - as embodiments of the military or moral supremacy of the USA and/or the Western world. These values, of which Avatar 236

(2009) is one recent, successful expression,(3) are absent in Bertolucci's work. Regarding the dichotomy between intellectual films and mainstream films, it is arguable that a balanced judgment must take into account the long debated notions that intellectual arthouse films are frequently received by limited audiences who already share the films' perspective or sensibility, and that 'popular' films are not necessarily politically conservative. Arguably, a progressive society needs both: the avant-garde as the intellectual beacon indicating new perspectives, and the popular as the vehicle to spread socio-political awareness. In the history of the Oscars, films such as Dr. Strangelove, (1964) Guess VWw 's Coming to Dinner, (1967) and Philadelphia (1993) have stimulated worldwide reflection on issues such as nuclear armaments, racism and homosexuality. Consideration should also be given to the effect that mainstream distribution and publicity can have on intelligent, low budget films after Oscar recognition, enabling them to reach global audiences as occurred with The Full Monty (1997). Loshitzky's evaluation stems from continuing to compare Bertolucci to Godard, but on closer scrutiny, the debate on Tfre Last Emperor and Bertolucci's subsequent films can no longer take place in an avant-garde context since Bertolucci departed from Godard's view on film-making decades earlier, with The Conformist. The Last Emperor indisputably initiated a phase in Bertolucci's work characterized by an emphasis on visual spectacle, his projects being supported by big budgets. But because none of these later films feature elements such as cathartic narratives or a direct identification with the screen protagonists, instead maintaining complex narrations often characterized by open endings and by a range of intellectual resonances, arguably they do not conform to mainstream cinema codes. As discussed in the conclusion to Last Tango in Paris, I think that many of Bertolucci's post- Conformist films attempt to combine cinematic spectacle with components of auteur cinema, an approach which ultimately left the avant-garde connoisseur and the multiplex cinemagoer 237

(2009) is one recent, successful expression,(3) are absent in Bertolucci's work. Regarding the<br />

dichotomy between intellectual films and mainstream films, it is arguable that a balanced<br />

judgment must take into account the long debated notions that intellectual arthouse films are<br />

frequently received by limited audiences who already share the films' perspective or<br />

sensibility, and that 'popular' films are not necessarily politically conservative. Arguably, a<br />

progressive society needs both: the avant-garde as the intellectual beacon indicating new<br />

perspectives, and the popular as the vehicle to spread socio-political awareness. In the history<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Oscars, films such as Dr. Strangelove, (1964) Guess VWw 's Coming to Dinner, (1967)<br />

and Philadelphia (1993) have stimulated worldwide reflection on issues such as nuclear<br />

armaments, racism and homosexuality. Consideration should also be given to the effect that<br />

mainstream distribution and publicity can have on intelligent, low budget films after Oscar<br />

recognition, enabling them to reach global audiences as occurred with The Full Monty<br />

(1997).<br />

Loshitzky's evaluation stems from continuing to compare Bertolucci to Godard, but<br />

on closer scrutiny, the debate on Tfre Last Emperor and Bertolucci's subsequent films can no<br />

longer take place in an avant-garde context since Bertolucci departed from Godard's view on<br />

film-making decades earlier, with The Conformist. The Last Emperor indisputably initiated a<br />

phase in Bertolucci's work characterized by an emphasis on visual spectacle, his projects<br />

being supported by big budgets. But because none <strong>of</strong> these later films feature elements such<br />

as cathartic narratives or a direct identification with the screen protagonists, instead<br />

maintaining complex narrations <strong>of</strong>ten characterized by open endings and by a range <strong>of</strong><br />

intellectual resonances, arguably they do not conform to mainstream cinema codes. As<br />

discussed in the conclusion to Last Tango in Paris, I think that many <strong>of</strong> Bertolucci's post-<br />

Conformist films attempt to combine cinematic spectacle with components <strong>of</strong> auteur cinema,<br />

an approach which ultimately left the avant-garde connoisseur and the multiplex cinemagoer<br />

237

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!