21.02.2013 Views

Download (12MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

Download (12MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

Download (12MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

that the quotient <strong>of</strong> sexuality will escalate. Through Jeanne, viewers oscillate from attraction<br />

- engendered by the mix <strong>of</strong> passion and tenderness in scenes where she is washed by Paul<br />

while taking a bath - to uneasiness caused by his escalating dominance which is brought to<br />

extremes, initially by the act <strong>of</strong> sodomy and later by his insolent masturbation request.<br />

The film's representation <strong>of</strong> sex elicits both a strong fascination and a recognition <strong>of</strong><br />

its ideological perspective concerning the necessity <strong>of</strong> opposing conventional - and therefore<br />

inauthentic - depictions <strong>of</strong> sexual relationships in film. Maria Schneider, the actress<br />

portraying Jeanne, undertook a challenging role with a mixture <strong>of</strong> childish spontaneity and<br />

rebelliousness. But due to their young age at the time <strong>of</strong> filming, a question has to be posed as<br />

to whether the vulnerability <strong>of</strong> Schneider and, later, Eva Green (Isabel in Tlie Dreamers),<br />

compared with more established actresses, was visually exploited by the director, particularly<br />

in scenes where the camera's graphic representation <strong>of</strong> them cannot be ascribed to a diegetic<br />

character's POV. This occurs in the scene in which Jeanne is being bathed by Paul, and gets<br />

to her feet for no apparent narrative reason, her body effectively being objectified in the dual<br />

gazes <strong>of</strong> Paul and the viewer. Another scene, in the apartment's bathroom as the two<br />

protagonists argue, again presents Schneider in a state <strong>of</strong> undress, viewed through the<br />

camera's medium-long shot and also in the reflection <strong>of</strong> the bathroom mirror, the actress<br />

positioning herself - or being asked to position herself - frontally before the camera at a<br />

certain point. So while the film can be considered intellectually progressive in its<br />

conceptualization <strong>of</strong> sexual mores, much <strong>of</strong> the actual eroticism <strong>of</strong> its emotional charge is<br />

attributable to a far less progressive objectification and visual consumption <strong>of</strong> Schneider.<br />

Obstructions <strong>of</strong> the viewer's cognitive schemata<br />

The narrative context <strong>of</strong> Last Tango in Paris is introduced but then left undetermined for a<br />

large part <strong>of</strong> the film, eliciting affective responses appropriate to 'the representation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

155

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!