Download (12MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository
Download (12MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository Download (12MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository
Bertolucci's affirmation that the encounter between Paul and Jeanne ultimately embodies 'forces pulling in different directions' like the 'encounter offerees which exists at the base of all political clashes', the director noting how Jeanne's bourgeois lifestyle is 'upset' (Bachmann, 1973: 93), is not entirely validated by the intellectual implications of what appears on screen. The narration depicts the bourgeois Jeanne as the one who wants to believe in Paul's vision of a new, unconventional relationship; it is she who highlights the hypocrisy of her parents' relationship by questioning her mother about the photo of the Algerian lover that her father kept in his wallet; it is Jeanne who likens love to 'two workers who go to a secret apartment, take off their overalls, become man and woman again and make love', and who seeks a more authentic existence through Tom. By contrast, the decision of the proletarian Paul 'to re-enter the world' (Kolker, 1985: 138) is depicted as if his retreat from the world, and the ideological implications of this, had not happened. Arguably, opinions on the film's ending may differ depending on the gender of the viewer or critic, since Kolker's affirmation that Jeanne's decision to choose Tom 'signifies her ultimate betrayal of the passion Paul attempts finally, and too late, to offer to her' (Kolker, 1985: 135) can be reversed by a female perspective that might view Paul's egoism in inviting Jeanne to live at the hotel once owned by his wife and where she committed suicide as a betrayal of Jeanne after she had embraced his idea of a more idealist, non-conformist lifestyle. This reading of Jeanne's character implies a degree of coherence that is superior to that of Paul and therefore her character cannot be considered as a representation of the 'hated bourgeoisie', nor is she a 'mediocre heroine' (Loshitzky, 1995: 22). This is because Jeanne does not exist in a socio-political context of young politicized, leftist intellectuals, but in a context of bourgeois youngsters becoming aware of, and reacting against, social constraints. Therefore, there are many elements in Jeanne's characterization that are intellectually coherent, and for viewers and critics who are able to look beyond her particular social class, 150
the character might be perceived positively for leaving her comfort zone. However, the following sections will outline how viewer attachments to Jeanne and to the film's other characters are problematic within the film's overall scheme. Erasing the viewer's pro-attitude A pattern emerges in Bertolucci's work where the viewer's nascent affective attachments towards characters are systematically blocked. After spectators assess whether Paul's life trajectory and values are compatible with their own value system, whatever this may be, the narration provokes viewer detachment after the sequence that symbolically concludes Paul's quest. The sequence resembles one at the beginning of the film, but with Paul and Jeanne in inverted positions. In the opening sequence, the camera followed a disconsolate Paul, while Jeanne stared at him as he passed; now it is Paul who passes a disconsolate Jeanne, and stops to introduce himself using his real identity. This symbolic, circular representation of the end of Paul's retreat into an alternative existence cues a possible cognitive expectation from viewers of a positive narrative outcome that might encompass his new self-awareness and Jeanne's love for him. Instead, Bertolucci dwells on Paul's dominance within the film's scheme, hi the next sequence viewers witness Paul's mockery of a tango competition - which functions as a metaphor for society's fakeness - but viewers also have access to Paul's thoughts, through his voiceover, as he reflects on how in America Jeanne would be considered a bimbo. And this is how he treats her in dismissing her understandable reservations about a prospective future at the hotel, and in reacting to her decision to end their relationship by compelling her to masturbate him under the table, because 'there is something left to do'. In this long take, which heralds the film's dramatic denouement, Paul's egocentric dominance, examples of which this chapter has already highlighted, escalates into the worst form of patriarchal contempt towards the female, and the film's last traces of progressive liberation evaporate. This inevitably dismays those viewers who had been sensitive to the 151
- Page 103 and 104: on their shoulders the head of the
- Page 105 and 106: The emotional quality of the musica
- Page 107 and 108: Notes References Regarding the fail
- Page 109 and 110: La trasedia di un uomo ridicolo / T
- Page 111 and 112: the socio-political composition of
- Page 113 and 114: emerge in Bocca's reconstruction of
- Page 115 and 116: Elitism, ascetism and emotional rep
- Page 117 and 118: dangerous estrangement from the rea
- Page 119 and 120: abandons any attempt to understand
- Page 121 and 122: with Adelfo and Laura, Primo is sur
- Page 123 and 124: spatio-temporal attachment to Primo
- Page 125 and 126: manages to expand the flimsy substa
- Page 127 and 128: Moravia, A. (1971) lo e lui, (1990)
- Page 129 and 130: established in Tango. Yet the analy
- Page 131 and 132: evidently designed to push the boun
- Page 133 and 134: inging to contemporary Italian soci
- Page 135 and 136: said he was inspired by the Third C
- Page 137 and 138: creation of Expressionist theatre w
- Page 139 and 140: The Godardian scheme Partner's debt
- Page 141 and 142: scene of Clara's murder by the doub
- Page 143 and 144: scene, since objects indexed by the
- Page 145 and 146: conventional art, the injustices of
- Page 147 and 148: Bertolucci, B. (1967) 'Versus Godar
- Page 149 and 150: compositions; the outcome is a dens
- Page 151 and 152: Like Pirandello's protagonists, Pau
- Page 153: Winston and Julia establish a lovin
- Page 157 and 158: Another scene that creates a tense
- Page 159 and 160: that the quotient of sexuality will
- Page 161 and 162: from peculiar angles, sometimes thr
- Page 163 and 164: also cue a sense of cold unresponsi
- Page 165 and 166: 2. 'Holy family, church of good cit
- Page 167 and 168: easoned, 'great movies of the past,
- Page 169 and 170: it towards the images being splashe
- Page 171 and 172: when, in voiceover, he recollects:
- Page 173 and 174: to one of the character's parents a
- Page 175 and 176: Sexuality and shifts of subjectivit
- Page 177 and 178: nudity, commodified on to celluloid
- Page 179 and 180: notion that 'Decadence cultivates a
- Page 181 and 182: engaging. Unfortunately the core of
- Page 183 and 184: Section Three: Between History and
- Page 185 and 186: II conformista/The Conformist: The
- Page 187 and 188: to the female protagonists Severine
- Page 189 and 190: constitute an example of the femme
- Page 191 and 192: despises, ranging from Fascist offi
- Page 193 and 194: the closed doors, his sense of soli
- Page 195 and 196: lying on. Bearing in mind the manne
- Page 197 and 198: Bertolucci seemed aware of the film
- Page 199 and 200: illuminated as if to imply the brig
- Page 201 and 202: hues of bluish-grey colouring are d
- Page 203 and 204: a narrative focus means that the de
Bertolucci's affirmation that the encounter between Paul and Jeanne ultimately<br />
embodies 'forces pulling in different directions' like the 'encounter <strong>of</strong>ferees which exists at<br />
the base <strong>of</strong> all political clashes', the director noting how Jeanne's bourgeois lifestyle is<br />
'upset' (Bachmann, 1973: 93), is not entirely validated by the intellectual implications <strong>of</strong><br />
what appears on screen. The narration depicts the bourgeois Jeanne as the one who wants to<br />
believe in Paul's vision <strong>of</strong> a new, unconventional relationship; it is she who highlights the<br />
hypocrisy <strong>of</strong> her parents' relationship by questioning her mother about the photo <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Algerian lover that her father kept in his wallet; it is Jeanne who likens love to 'two workers<br />
who go to a secret apartment, take <strong>of</strong>f their overalls, become man and woman again and make<br />
love', and who seeks a more authentic existence through Tom. By contrast, the decision <strong>of</strong><br />
the proletarian Paul 'to re-enter the world' (Kolker, 1985: 138) is depicted as if his retreat<br />
from the world, and the ideological implications <strong>of</strong> this, had not happened.<br />
Arguably, opinions on the film's ending may differ depending on the gender <strong>of</strong> the<br />
viewer or critic, since Kolker's affirmation that Jeanne's decision to choose Tom 'signifies<br />
her ultimate betrayal <strong>of</strong> the passion Paul attempts finally, and too late, to <strong>of</strong>fer to her'<br />
(Kolker, 1985: 135) can be reversed by a female perspective that might view Paul's egoism in<br />
inviting Jeanne to live at the hotel once owned by his wife and where she committed suicide<br />
as a betrayal <strong>of</strong> Jeanne after she had embraced his idea <strong>of</strong> a more idealist, non-conformist<br />
lifestyle. This reading <strong>of</strong> Jeanne's character implies a degree <strong>of</strong> coherence that is superior to<br />
that <strong>of</strong> Paul and therefore her character cannot be considered as a representation <strong>of</strong> the 'hated<br />
bourgeoisie', nor is she a 'mediocre heroine' (Loshitzky, 1995: 22). This is because Jeanne<br />
does not exist in a socio-political context <strong>of</strong> young politicized, leftist intellectuals, but in a<br />
context <strong>of</strong> bourgeois youngsters becoming aware <strong>of</strong>, and reacting against, social constraints.<br />
Therefore, there are many elements in Jeanne's characterization that are intellectually<br />
coherent, and for viewers and critics who are able to look beyond her particular social class,<br />
150