Download (12MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

Download (12MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository Download (12MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

usir.salford.ac.uk
from usir.salford.ac.uk More from this publisher
21.02.2013 Views

Bertolucci's affirmation that the encounter between Paul and Jeanne ultimately embodies 'forces pulling in different directions' like the 'encounter offerees which exists at the base of all political clashes', the director noting how Jeanne's bourgeois lifestyle is 'upset' (Bachmann, 1973: 93), is not entirely validated by the intellectual implications of what appears on screen. The narration depicts the bourgeois Jeanne as the one who wants to believe in Paul's vision of a new, unconventional relationship; it is she who highlights the hypocrisy of her parents' relationship by questioning her mother about the photo of the Algerian lover that her father kept in his wallet; it is Jeanne who likens love to 'two workers who go to a secret apartment, take off their overalls, become man and woman again and make love', and who seeks a more authentic existence through Tom. By contrast, the decision of the proletarian Paul 'to re-enter the world' (Kolker, 1985: 138) is depicted as if his retreat from the world, and the ideological implications of this, had not happened. Arguably, opinions on the film's ending may differ depending on the gender of the viewer or critic, since Kolker's affirmation that Jeanne's decision to choose Tom 'signifies her ultimate betrayal of the passion Paul attempts finally, and too late, to offer to her' (Kolker, 1985: 135) can be reversed by a female perspective that might view Paul's egoism in inviting Jeanne to live at the hotel once owned by his wife and where she committed suicide as a betrayal of Jeanne after she had embraced his idea of a more idealist, non-conformist lifestyle. This reading of Jeanne's character implies a degree of coherence that is superior to that of Paul and therefore her character cannot be considered as a representation of the 'hated bourgeoisie', nor is she a 'mediocre heroine' (Loshitzky, 1995: 22). This is because Jeanne does not exist in a socio-political context of young politicized, leftist intellectuals, but in a context of bourgeois youngsters becoming aware of, and reacting against, social constraints. Therefore, there are many elements in Jeanne's characterization that are intellectually coherent, and for viewers and critics who are able to look beyond her particular social class, 150

the character might be perceived positively for leaving her comfort zone. However, the following sections will outline how viewer attachments to Jeanne and to the film's other characters are problematic within the film's overall scheme. Erasing the viewer's pro-attitude A pattern emerges in Bertolucci's work where the viewer's nascent affective attachments towards characters are systematically blocked. After spectators assess whether Paul's life trajectory and values are compatible with their own value system, whatever this may be, the narration provokes viewer detachment after the sequence that symbolically concludes Paul's quest. The sequence resembles one at the beginning of the film, but with Paul and Jeanne in inverted positions. In the opening sequence, the camera followed a disconsolate Paul, while Jeanne stared at him as he passed; now it is Paul who passes a disconsolate Jeanne, and stops to introduce himself using his real identity. This symbolic, circular representation of the end of Paul's retreat into an alternative existence cues a possible cognitive expectation from viewers of a positive narrative outcome that might encompass his new self-awareness and Jeanne's love for him. Instead, Bertolucci dwells on Paul's dominance within the film's scheme, hi the next sequence viewers witness Paul's mockery of a tango competition - which functions as a metaphor for society's fakeness - but viewers also have access to Paul's thoughts, through his voiceover, as he reflects on how in America Jeanne would be considered a bimbo. And this is how he treats her in dismissing her understandable reservations about a prospective future at the hotel, and in reacting to her decision to end their relationship by compelling her to masturbate him under the table, because 'there is something left to do'. In this long take, which heralds the film's dramatic denouement, Paul's egocentric dominance, examples of which this chapter has already highlighted, escalates into the worst form of patriarchal contempt towards the female, and the film's last traces of progressive liberation evaporate. This inevitably dismays those viewers who had been sensitive to the 151

Bertolucci's affirmation that the encounter between Paul and Jeanne ultimately<br />

embodies 'forces pulling in different directions' like the 'encounter <strong>of</strong>ferees which exists at<br />

the base <strong>of</strong> all political clashes', the director noting how Jeanne's bourgeois lifestyle is<br />

'upset' (Bachmann, 1973: 93), is not entirely validated by the intellectual implications <strong>of</strong><br />

what appears on screen. The narration depicts the bourgeois Jeanne as the one who wants to<br />

believe in Paul's vision <strong>of</strong> a new, unconventional relationship; it is she who highlights the<br />

hypocrisy <strong>of</strong> her parents' relationship by questioning her mother about the photo <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Algerian lover that her father kept in his wallet; it is Jeanne who likens love to 'two workers<br />

who go to a secret apartment, take <strong>of</strong>f their overalls, become man and woman again and make<br />

love', and who seeks a more authentic existence through Tom. By contrast, the decision <strong>of</strong><br />

the proletarian Paul 'to re-enter the world' (Kolker, 1985: 138) is depicted as if his retreat<br />

from the world, and the ideological implications <strong>of</strong> this, had not happened.<br />

Arguably, opinions on the film's ending may differ depending on the gender <strong>of</strong> the<br />

viewer or critic, since Kolker's affirmation that Jeanne's decision to choose Tom 'signifies<br />

her ultimate betrayal <strong>of</strong> the passion Paul attempts finally, and too late, to <strong>of</strong>fer to her'<br />

(Kolker, 1985: 135) can be reversed by a female perspective that might view Paul's egoism in<br />

inviting Jeanne to live at the hotel once owned by his wife and where she committed suicide<br />

as a betrayal <strong>of</strong> Jeanne after she had embraced his idea <strong>of</strong> a more idealist, non-conformist<br />

lifestyle. This reading <strong>of</strong> Jeanne's character implies a degree <strong>of</strong> coherence that is superior to<br />

that <strong>of</strong> Paul and therefore her character cannot be considered as a representation <strong>of</strong> the 'hated<br />

bourgeoisie', nor is she a 'mediocre heroine' (Loshitzky, 1995: 22). This is because Jeanne<br />

does not exist in a socio-political context <strong>of</strong> young politicized, leftist intellectuals, but in a<br />

context <strong>of</strong> bourgeois youngsters becoming aware <strong>of</strong>, and reacting against, social constraints.<br />

Therefore, there are many elements in Jeanne's characterization that are intellectually<br />

coherent, and for viewers and critics who are able to look beyond her particular social class,<br />

150

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!