Download (12MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository
Download (12MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository Download (12MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository
Partner: Social Discontent and Artistic Purity Four years after Before the Revolution which, stylistically, placed Bertolucci in the orbit of the Nouvelle Vague, the director released Partner (1968) - a film so connected to Godard's film-making that Kolker considers it 'a strange attempt to end the relationship [with Godard] by turning influence into imitation" (Kolker 1985: 15). By contrast, this chapter's view is that Partner embodies Bertolucci's unrelinquished enthusiasm for Godard's cinema,(l) despite the critical and commercial failure of Before the Revolution and the years of inactivity that followed. His determination to embrace the new mode of film-making emerges from several declarations. In a 1966 interview, Bertolucci talks about the necessity for a film-maker 'to take a position [...] also in confronting the art he creates', something he said - that he had done in previous films and something which he would do 'above all' in his future work (Bragin, 1966: 23). One implication of this approach was that, due to the difficulties of financing his films, he agreed to make documentaries to avoid compromising his ideas on how cinema should be (Bragin, 1966: 26). hi 1967 Bertolucci indicated that his decision to work with the Living Theatre was motivated by his aspirations towards 'a kind of "rigor", which ultimately 'prevented [him] from working for several years' (Morandini, 1967: 31). On the fortieth anniversary of the release of Marco Bellocchio's seminal Fists in the Pocket, Bertolucci recalls how, when viewing it, he commented: 'between this film and my film [Before the Revolution] a kind of new Italian cinema was born'; in comparing the cinematic ideas expressed by the two films, Bertolucci asserts that he was 'completely for the French Nouvelle Vague\ whereas Bellocchio was 'very much for the English Free Cinema like Lindsay Anderson' (Bertolucci, 2008). These comments support this study's evaluation of Partner as Bertolucci's attempt to introduce to Italy a mode of film-making that he considered new; in addition, the film criticized the transformation that consumerism was 128
inging to contemporary Italian society. Given the film's dense theoretical basis - which includes Godard, Artaud, Brecht, and the Expressionist Theatre - Partner can be viewed as an essay on all the issues that interested Bertolucci in that period, questions such as the language of cinema and the role of cinema in contemporary society. The film, inspired by Dostoevsky's novel Tiie Double, deals with the dualities of realism and anti-realism in cinematic representation, and with the dualism between submission and rebellion within human nature. The two discourses are merged mainly through style, creating a result that no other Bertolucci film emulates in terms of self-conscious artificiality. Within this study's parameters, one could suggest that Partner mainly focuses on cognitive and intellectual forms of viewer engagement; while this is true, this chapter also shows how the film's intellectual orientation informs its emotional structure in generating a viewing experience typified by what Grodal terms intense and saturated modal qualities (Grodal, 1999: 136). The construction of disconcerting emotional associations by means of decor, colour, lighting, sound and music, like the dissonant violin score that dominates the soundtrack when violence is initiated, create a mood of angst punctuated by moments of empathy or of disorientation and estrangement. Plot summary In the style of cinema verite a cafe is shown where a man (later recognizable as Giacobbe's double) is reading a book about the film Nosferatu (1922) and he replicates the vampire's idiosyncratic movements by mimicking his hunched back and claw-like hands. Outside, men put up posters extolling freedom for Vietnam. In the next sequence, shot in theatrical style, the man shoots a youth playing a piano, while caressing his head; the youth seems to submit voluntarily to death. The soundtrack is filled with melancholy noise, produced by a spinning chandelier of which only a shadow is visible. The screen fades to black to end of what is a 129
- Page 81 and 82: viewers identify complicated intert
- Page 83 and 84: diegetic sound, since, except for t
- Page 85 and 86: audiovisual construction of the ope
- Page 87 and 88: evocative representations of landsc
- Page 89 and 90: Another example of this phenomenon
- Page 91 and 92: La stratesia del raeno/The Spider's
- Page 93 and 94: director launching 'a critique from
- Page 95 and 96: possible to understand 'how the mod
- Page 97 and 98: The peak of this integration is rea
- Page 99 and 100: phase of his inquiries becomes clou
- Page 101 and 102: Bertolucci praises Storaro's sensit
- Page 103 and 104: on their shoulders the head of the
- Page 105 and 106: The emotional quality of the musica
- Page 107 and 108: Notes References Regarding the fail
- Page 109 and 110: La trasedia di un uomo ridicolo / T
- Page 111 and 112: the socio-political composition of
- Page 113 and 114: emerge in Bocca's reconstruction of
- Page 115 and 116: Elitism, ascetism and emotional rep
- Page 117 and 118: dangerous estrangement from the rea
- Page 119 and 120: abandons any attempt to understand
- Page 121 and 122: with Adelfo and Laura, Primo is sur
- Page 123 and 124: spatio-temporal attachment to Primo
- Page 125 and 126: manages to expand the flimsy substa
- Page 127 and 128: Moravia, A. (1971) lo e lui, (1990)
- Page 129 and 130: established in Tango. Yet the analy
- Page 131: evidently designed to push the boun
- Page 135 and 136: said he was inspired by the Third C
- Page 137 and 138: creation of Expressionist theatre w
- Page 139 and 140: The Godardian scheme Partner's debt
- Page 141 and 142: scene of Clara's murder by the doub
- Page 143 and 144: scene, since objects indexed by the
- Page 145 and 146: conventional art, the injustices of
- Page 147 and 148: Bertolucci, B. (1967) 'Versus Godar
- Page 149 and 150: compositions; the outcome is a dens
- Page 151 and 152: Like Pirandello's protagonists, Pau
- Page 153 and 154: Winston and Julia establish a lovin
- Page 155 and 156: the character might be perceived po
- Page 157 and 158: Another scene that creates a tense
- Page 159 and 160: that the quotient of sexuality will
- Page 161 and 162: from peculiar angles, sometimes thr
- Page 163 and 164: also cue a sense of cold unresponsi
- Page 165 and 166: 2. 'Holy family, church of good cit
- Page 167 and 168: easoned, 'great movies of the past,
- Page 169 and 170: it towards the images being splashe
- Page 171 and 172: when, in voiceover, he recollects:
- Page 173 and 174: to one of the character's parents a
- Page 175 and 176: Sexuality and shifts of subjectivit
- Page 177 and 178: nudity, commodified on to celluloid
- Page 179 and 180: notion that 'Decadence cultivates a
- Page 181 and 182: engaging. Unfortunately the core of
Partner: Social Discontent and Artistic Purity<br />
Four years after Before the Revolution which, stylistically, placed Bertolucci in the orbit <strong>of</strong><br />
the Nouvelle Vague, the director released Partner (1968) - a film so connected to Godard's<br />
film-making that Kolker considers it 'a strange attempt to end the relationship [with Godard]<br />
by turning influence into imitation" (Kolker 1985: 15). By contrast, this chapter's view is that<br />
Partner embodies Bertolucci's unrelinquished enthusiasm for Godard's cinema,(l) despite<br />
the critical and commercial failure <strong>of</strong> Before the Revolution and the years <strong>of</strong> inactivity that<br />
followed. His determination to embrace the new mode <strong>of</strong> film-making emerges from several<br />
declarations. In a 1966 interview, Bertolucci talks about the necessity for a film-maker 'to<br />
take a position [...] also in confronting the art he creates', something he said - that he had<br />
done in previous films and something which he would do 'above all' in his future work<br />
(Bragin, 1966: 23). One implication <strong>of</strong> this approach was that, due to the difficulties <strong>of</strong><br />
financing his films, he agreed to make documentaries to avoid compromising his ideas on<br />
how cinema should be (Bragin, 1966: 26). hi 1967 Bertolucci indicated that his decision to<br />
work with the Living Theatre was motivated by his aspirations towards 'a kind <strong>of</strong> "rigor",<br />
which ultimately 'prevented [him] from working for several years' (Morandini, 1967: 31). On<br />
the fortieth anniversary <strong>of</strong> the release <strong>of</strong> Marco Bellocchio's seminal Fists in the Pocket,<br />
Bertolucci recalls how, when viewing it, he commented: 'between this film and my film<br />
[Before the Revolution] a kind <strong>of</strong> new Italian cinema was born'; in comparing the cinematic<br />
ideas expressed by the two films, Bertolucci asserts that he was 'completely for the French<br />
Nouvelle Vague\ whereas Bellocchio was 'very much for the English Free Cinema like<br />
Lindsay Anderson' (Bertolucci, 2008). These comments support this study's evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />
Partner as Bertolucci's attempt to introduce to Italy a mode <strong>of</strong> film-making that he<br />
considered new; in addition, the film criticized the transformation that consumerism was<br />
128