20.02.2013 Views

Bioidentical Hormones - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Bioidentical Hormones - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Bioidentical Hormones - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6<br />

with every stage of the disease: from the initiati<strong>on</strong>, to the progressi<strong>on</strong>,<br />

to the treatment of the complicati<strong>on</strong>s-that is, people who<br />

have already had heart attacks.<br />

Statins are effective at every stage, OK? So, therefore, <strong>on</strong>e can<br />

assume that if you start statins at a young age and c<strong>on</strong>tinue them<br />

lifel<strong>on</strong>g, they will c<strong>on</strong>tinue to have benefit., That is an assumpti<strong>on</strong><br />

because that trial is not feasible, as it is also not feasible to do a<br />

really l<strong>on</strong>g-term lifel<strong>on</strong>g trial of horm<strong>on</strong>e therapy.<br />

So statins represent a favorable or an acceptable preventi<strong>on</strong><br />

strategy. There are no known l<strong>on</strong>g-term complicati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

The situati<strong>on</strong> is different with estrogens, be they Premarin, c<strong>on</strong>jugated<br />

estrogens or estradiol.<br />

There is increasing evidence that estrogens, generally, may retard<br />

the earliest stages, the initiati<strong>on</strong>, of atherosclerosis. There will<br />

be more evidence in the next coming years that may or may not<br />

be c<strong>on</strong>sistent with that idea. But at the moment there is reas<strong>on</strong>ably<br />

good evidence that that is the case, including from the Women's<br />

Health Initiative, the recent publicati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

However, <strong>on</strong>ce there are established raised lesi<strong>on</strong>s,- established<br />

atherosclerosis, there is good evidence that estrogen in any form,<br />

be it c<strong>on</strong>jugated estrogens or estradiol, does not prevent further<br />

progressi<strong>on</strong>. There is also good evidence that <strong>on</strong>ce there are complicated<br />

lesi<strong>on</strong>s, estrogens actually trigger events and make matters<br />

worse.<br />

So estrogens do not represent a good preventi<strong>on</strong> strategy. We<br />

cannot assume that if you start it early, and there is potential benefit,<br />

that that benefit will persist into older age.<br />

Again, that is an assumpti<strong>on</strong>. We cannot do that trial. But knowing<br />

what we know, that would be a very far stretch of the imaginati<strong>on</strong><br />

to imagine that if you start it early and use the right estrogen,<br />

you will get a different outcome than we found in the Women's<br />

Health Initiative.<br />

So, again, we d<strong>on</strong>'t think that there is any essential difference<br />

between estradiol and c<strong>on</strong>jugated equine estrogen as far as heart<br />

disease is c<strong>on</strong>cerned. We d<strong>on</strong>'t believe that this window of opportunity<br />

is anything but a window into the present. There is a reas<strong>on</strong>ably<br />

safe period to use horm<strong>on</strong>e therapy close to the menopause,<br />

but it is not necessarily a window into the future if you<br />

start then and persist that that benefit will persist.<br />

With that, I will close and thank the committee for addressing<br />

them <strong>on</strong> this very important issue to women's health. I am happy<br />

to entertain questi<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

[The prepared statement of Dr. Rossouw follows:]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!