Bioidentical Hormones - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Bioidentical Hormones - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging Bioidentical Hormones - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

aging.senate.gov
from aging.senate.gov More from this publisher
20.02.2013 Views

Evidence-based Cardiclogy unity for each category except transient ischernic attack (0-90, 95% Cl 0-57-1-42), and the highest relative risk was for fatal stroke (1-61, 95% Cl 0-73-3-55). The trend towards an excess of more severe strokes In the hormone group Is similar to that observed in WEST, Venous thromboembolism Observational studies Early observational studies did not suggest an increased risk for venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis or puilmonary embolism) in postmenopausal hormone users; however, as reviewed elsewnere, several more recent studies have found a two- to fourfold increased risk in hormone users.6 The studies are consistent in showing an increased relative risk for current but not past use of hormones. Recent onset of current use conferred higher risk than long duration of use, consistent with an immediate effect on coagulation factors. Some but not all studies reported a dose-response relationship. Estrogen alone, as well as estrogen with progestn, appeared to be assodated with higher risk. Though transdermal estradiol causes less perturbation of coagulation proteins than oral estrogen, one study suggested that the risk for venous thromboembolism was present for this formulation also. clinical trials Venous thromhoembollsmn Is usually recorded as an adverse effect In clinical trials of hormone therapy. A pooled analysis of short-term trials found five thromboembolic events in the hormone groups and one in the control groups." HERS found a significant, almost threefold increase in the risk for venous thromboembolism (34 in the hormone group and 13 in the placebo group, relative hazard 2-7, 95% Cl 1-4-5-0, P= 0-003).6 The trend towards higher excess risk in the first few years was not significant, and some excess 191 persisted over the duration of the study. These findings on at adverse event from a clinical trial are very similar to those fton the observational studies. In exploratory analyseR other risi factors for venous thromboembolism included older age a menopause, lower extremity fractures, cancer; being withir 90 days of Inpatient surgery, or non-surgical hospitalization After non-fatal M- the risk was Increased for 90 days. Use o statins or aspirin appeared to decrease risk; It should be noted however, that these were non-randomized comparisons ant that the large number of comparisons performed may have let to chance findings. The WEST study investigators stated tha there were no differences in venous thromboemholisir between treatment groups. 5 3 As noted above, healthy worner in the WHI have been informed of an excess risk during the first few years of the study.a5 Some trials with Intermediate o; surrogate outcomes (for example, the Postmenopausa Estrogen-Progestin Interventions and ERA) have also notet small numbers of venous events, with more events In the active treatment groups than the placebo groups, althougt nsumbers were too small for statistical testing, Be One randomized controlled trial, initiated before it wa: known that estrogen Increases risk for venous throintio embolism, strongly suggested that hormone therap) increases the risk for recurrent events.t3 Women with prioi venous thromboembolisrn =n 140) received either ora estradiol 2 mg and norethisterone acetate I mg or placebo for 2 years. Though predefined stopping boundaries had no been crossed, the trial was stopped prematurely because o the emergence of data from observational studies and din1 cal trials, and the clustering of end points (recurrent venos thmrnhoenntvilsmt in moe ,eatment grnup, Them weur eight events In the active treatment group (I 0-7%) and one In the placebo group (2-3%) indicating a 4-6-fold increase tri the hormone group. Al of the recurrent events in the active treatment group occurred during the 9 months, while the single event in the placebo group occurred at 14 months Five of the eight cases with recurrent events in the hormone group also had familial thrombophilla (three with factor V Leiden, two with anticardiolipin antibodies).

Treatmnent recommendations Based on current evidence, postmenopausal hormone therapy Is not recommended for prevention or treatment of CHD or stroke.' For primary prevention, the American Heart Association (ARA) states that firm recommendations should await the results of ongoing randomized dinical trials, and that there are currently Insufficient data to suggest that hormone therapy should be initiated for the sole purpose of primary prevention of cardiovascular diseae.64 The AHA makes a stronger statement that hormone therapy should not be initiated for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease; however women on hormone therapy for several years do not necessarily have to stop since they have presumably passed through the period of initial Increased risk. Women with a prior history of venous thromboemboldsm should be counseled against using hormone therapy.6i Because the trials have failed to show benefit for secondary prevention, and there are no published trial data for primary prevention, In both instances decisions about hormone therapy should be based on established noncardiovascular risks and benefits.04 The major proven benefits of estrogen are relief of the symptoms accompanying the menopause, urogenital atrophy, and prevention of osteoporosis. Known risks include endometrial cancer, venous thromboembolism, pancreatitis (in women with high blood triglycerldes), and gallbladder disease. At the average age of menopause, the risk for cardiovascular and non-cardlovascutar disease conditions is low, and therefore, the short-term use of estrogens to manage the menopause is not at Issue.a5 However, long-term use (5 years or more) of hormone therapy is more problematic, given the possible Increase In breast cancer associated with prolonged use. 0 5 Calculations show that in older women and with prolonged use, the potential risks for breast cancer, stroke, and venous thromboembolism, may outwelgh the potential beriefit for reducton In fractures if the treatment does not reduce risk for CHD.°° Since CHD and stroke are by far the most common causes of disease and death in older women, the cltnical trial data on the long-term effects of hormone therapy on cardiovascular disease will provide the key Information on whether long-term estrogen should be prescribed for any Indication in older women. It these trials show that longterm use confers cardiovascular benefit (and If methods are 192 Postmenopausal hormone therapy and cardiovascular disease found to screen out women at high initial risk for cardiovascular complications), then hormone therapy may In future play a more prominent role as a viable prevention strategy. However, until these clinical trial data are known, It may be wise to consider alternatives to hormone therapy even for proven Indications such as prevention of osteoporosis.1 5 For osteoporosis prevention, exercise, diet, calcium, and vitamin D may be recommended, and for treatment the bisphosphonates and raloxifene have been shown to prevent fractures. Lifestyle measures and medical management of risk factors such as high blood cholesterol and high blood pressure will prevent many cases of CHD and stroke, and for secondary prevention of CHD aspirin, statins, 0 blockers, and ACE inhibitors have all been found to be effective.6' The AHiA statement acknowledges that the current recommendations are based mainly on data from trials using standard doses of conjugated equine estrogens and medroxyprogesterone, and that evidence is insufficient for different preparations, routes of delivery, and doses that may have a more favorable or more adverse effect on cardiovascular outcomes. Addendum On July 9, 2002, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Imistute announced that the WHI trials of estrogen plus progestin versus placebo in 16608 healthy women with an intact uterus had been stopped early, after an average of

Evidence-based Cardiclogy<br />

unity for each category except transient ischernic attack<br />

(0-90, 95% Cl 0-57-1-42), and the highest relative risk was<br />

for fatal stroke (1-61, 95% Cl 0-73-3-55). The trend<br />

towards an excess of more severe strokes In the horm<strong>on</strong>e<br />

group Is similar to that observed in WEST,<br />

Venous thromboembolism<br />

Observati<strong>on</strong>al studies<br />

Early observati<strong>on</strong>al studies did not suggest an increased risk<br />

for venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis or puilm<strong>on</strong>ary<br />

embolism) in postmenopausal horm<strong>on</strong>e users; however,<br />

as reviewed elsewnere, several more recent studies have<br />

found a two- to fourfold increased risk in horm<strong>on</strong>e users.6<br />

The studies are c<strong>on</strong>sistent in showing an increased relative<br />

risk for current but not past use of horm<strong>on</strong>es. Recent <strong>on</strong>set of<br />

current use c<strong>on</strong>ferred higher risk than l<strong>on</strong>g durati<strong>on</strong> of use,<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sistent with an immediate effect <strong>on</strong> coagulati<strong>on</strong> factors.<br />

Some but not all studies reported a dose-resp<strong>on</strong>se relati<strong>on</strong>ship.<br />

Estrogen al<strong>on</strong>e, as well as estrogen with progestn, appeared<br />

to be assodated with higher risk. Though transdermal estradiol<br />

causes less perturbati<strong>on</strong> of coagulati<strong>on</strong> proteins than oral<br />

estrogen, <strong>on</strong>e study suggested that the risk for venous thromboembolism<br />

was present for this formulati<strong>on</strong> also.<br />

clinical trials<br />

Venous thromhoembollsmn Is usually recorded as an adverse<br />

effect In clinical trials of horm<strong>on</strong>e therapy. A pooled analysis<br />

of short-term trials found five thromboembolic events in the<br />

horm<strong>on</strong>e groups and <strong>on</strong>e in the c<strong>on</strong>trol groups." HERS<br />

found a significant, almost threefold increase in the risk for<br />

venous thromboembolism (34 in the horm<strong>on</strong>e group and<br />

13 in the placebo group, relative hazard 2-7, 95% Cl<br />

1-4-5-0, P= 0-003).6 The trend towards higher excess risk<br />

in the first few years was not significant, and some excess<br />

191<br />

persisted over the durati<strong>on</strong> of the study. These findings <strong>on</strong> at<br />

adverse event from a clinical trial are very similar to those ft<strong>on</strong><br />

the observati<strong>on</strong>al studies. In exploratory analyseR other risi<br />

factors for venous thromboembolism included older age a<br />

menopause, lower extremity fractures, cancer; being withir<br />

90 days of Inpatient surgery, or n<strong>on</strong>-surgical hospitalizati<strong>on</strong><br />

After n<strong>on</strong>-fatal M- the risk was Increased for 90 days. Use o<br />

statins or aspirin appeared to decrease risk; It should be noted<br />

however, that these were n<strong>on</strong>-randomized comparis<strong>on</strong>s ant<br />

that the large number of comparis<strong>on</strong>s performed may have let<br />

to chance findings. The WEST study investigators stated tha<br />

there were no differences in venous thromboemholisir<br />

between treatment groups. 5 3 As noted above, healthy worner<br />

in the WHI have been informed of an excess risk during the<br />

first few years of the study.a5 Some trials with Intermediate o;<br />

surrogate outcomes (for example, the Postmenopausa<br />

Estrogen-Progestin Interventi<strong>on</strong>s and ERA) have also notet<br />

small numbers of venous events, with more events In the<br />

active treatment groups than the placebo groups, althougt<br />

nsumbers were too small for statistical testing, Be<br />

One randomized c<strong>on</strong>trolled trial, initiated before it wa:<br />

known that estrogen Increases risk for venous throintio<br />

embolism, str<strong>on</strong>gly suggested that horm<strong>on</strong>e therap)<br />

increases the risk for recurrent events.t3 Women with prioi<br />

venous thromboembolisrn =n 140) received either ora<br />

estradiol 2 mg and norethister<strong>on</strong>e acetate I mg or placebo<br />

for 2 years. Though predefined stopping boundaries had no<br />

been crossed, the trial was stopped prematurely because o<br />

the emergence of data from observati<strong>on</strong>al studies and din1<br />

cal trials, and the clustering of end points (recurrent venos<br />

thmrnhoenntvilsmt in moe ,eatment grnup, Them weur<br />

eight events In the active treatment group (I 0-7%) and <strong>on</strong>e<br />

In the placebo group (2-3%) indicating a 4-6-fold increase tri<br />

the horm<strong>on</strong>e group. Al of the recurrent events in the active<br />

treatment group occurred during the 9 m<strong>on</strong>ths, while the<br />

single event in the placebo group occurred at 14 m<strong>on</strong>ths<br />

Five of the eight cases with recurrent events in the horm<strong>on</strong>e<br />

group also had familial thrombophilla (three with factor V<br />

Leiden, two with anticardiolipin antibodies).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!