20.02.2013 Views

Bioidentical Hormones - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Bioidentical Hormones - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

Bioidentical Hormones - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ards analyses," stratified by clinical<br />

center, age, prior disease, and randomizati<strong>on</strong><br />

status in the low-fat diet trial.<br />

Two forms of Cls are presented,<br />

nominal and adjusted. Nominal 95%<br />

Cis describe the variability in the estimates<br />

that would anse from a simple<br />

trial for a single outcome. Although traditi<strong>on</strong>al,<br />

these Cis do not account for<br />

the multiple statistical testing issues<br />

(across time and across outcome categories)<br />

that occurred in this trial, so<br />

the probability is greater than .05 that<br />

at least I of these Cls will exclude unity<br />

under an overall null hypothesis. The<br />

adjusted 95% CIs presented herein use<br />

group sequential methods to correct for<br />

multiple analyses over time. A B<strong>on</strong>ferr<strong>on</strong>t<br />

correcti<strong>on</strong> for 7 outcomes as specified<br />

in the m<strong>on</strong>itoring plan (described<br />

herein) was applied to all clinical outcomes<br />

other than CHD and breast cancer,<br />

the designated primary and pnmary<br />

adverse effect outcomes, and the<br />

global index. The adjusted Cis are<br />

closely related to the m<strong>on</strong>itoring procedures<br />

and, as such, represent a c<strong>on</strong>servatave<br />

assessment of the evidence.<br />

This report focuses primarily <strong>on</strong> results<br />

using the unadjusted statistics and<br />

also relies <strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>sistency across diagnostic<br />

categ<strong>on</strong>es, supportive data from<br />

other studies, and biologic plausibility<br />

for interpretati<strong>on</strong> of the findings.<br />

Data and Safety M<strong>on</strong>itoring<br />

Trial m<strong>on</strong>itoring guidelines for early<br />

stopping c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong>s were based <strong>on</strong><br />

O'Brien-Fleming boundaries' using<br />

asymmetric upper and lower boundaries:<br />

a 6-sided, .025-level upper boundary<br />

for benefit and I-sided, .05-level<br />

lower boundanes for adverse effects.<br />

The adverse-effect boundaries were further<br />

adjusted with a B<strong>on</strong>ferr<strong>on</strong>i correcti<strong>on</strong><br />

for the 7 major outcomes other<br />

than breast cancer that were specifically<br />

m<strong>on</strong>itored (CHD, stroke, PE, colorectal<br />

cancer, endometrial cancer, hip<br />

fracture, and death due to other causes).<br />

The global index of m<strong>on</strong>itored outcomes<br />

played a supportive role as a<br />

summary measure of the overall balance<br />

of risks and benefits. Trial m<strong>on</strong>itoring<br />

for early stopping c<strong>on</strong>sider-<br />

02092 Anurica.n ledical As.sosiali<strong>on</strong>. All rights resrvced.<br />

160<br />

RISKS AND BENEFITS OF ESTROGEN PLUS PROGESTIN<br />

Table 1. Baseline Characterstics of the Women's Health Initiative Estrogen Plus Progestin<br />

Tnal Partiopants (N 1 16 608) by Randomizati<strong>on</strong> Assignmenr (c<strong>on</strong>t)<br />

Chaeacteftfol<br />

Gat model 5-year isk of breast cancer, %<br />

Estogen . Progeatn<br />

In -8508)<br />

PIatelo<br />

(n- 8102)<br />

P<br />

Value<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!