Bioidentical Hormones - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
Bioidentical Hormones - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging Bioidentical Hormones - U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging
101 the grand scheme of things, old women - aren't women at all past a certain point. If this phase-shift happens quickly- say after decades of childbearing and breastfeeding --some of us make it through it without getting cancer. But, if it takes too long, we're targeted for transformation, because cancer is an evolutionary function in nature. All of the genes active in cancer are active at only one other time in life. They are all switched on in the high estrogen/low progesterone state of the first nine weeks of life in utero when we are neither man nor woman. Since nature abhors a vacuum and is about duality, we must be one or the other -- man or woman. We can't remain in limbo for more than nine weeks or nature will take over, trying out combinational strategies in an effort to make us become "something". Cancer is no plague on mankind, it is life, it's just the new you. It's a group of cells turned on to rapid unchecked growth by genes that are exactly the same in fetal tissue. That's why they call them fetal oncogenes in research. That's also why cancer isn't something you can kill like a germ with an antibiotic. You can't bum it, poison it or take it away because it is us -- or at least what's become of us in the absence of performing a role in nature. Cancer is actually the genetic creativity shown in nature when an organism ceases to fit into-The Plan. Of rn'rce, a lot of us die froali this evolutionary tunction, but many of us live with it, too. 93% of elderly men show some degree of prostate cancer on autopsy, but it's not listed as the cause of death. Most of us will likely die with, not of, some form of cancer. Cancer is only transformation, unless it kills you first. I believe there is an alternative. We can turn back the clock with the products nature has to offer. The catch is, how do we prove it? You see only the bio-identical molecules do this. The product from Wyeth does not. The hormone receptors can tell the difference. The bio-identicals need to be compounded from bulk materials and left in their unpatentable form. All that means is that the drug companies won't make as much money as they would by turning it into a drug. That also means there's no money for research because drug companies foot the bills for scientists and those drug companies will never be able to patent a "natural substance" and their already patented drugs don't work the same way on almost any system in a woman's body. Oh, and then there's the impending Kennedy, Burr, Roberts Bill that could literally put an end to it all.
102 Bio-identical progesterone replacement is a shoe-in as a cancer treatment because cancer was never about cellular overgrowth. It has always been about not enough death-- in the presence of overgrowth. But cutting edge medicine has never equated menopause with cancer, even though cancer strikes at the time in a woman's life when her hormones are disappearing. The Standard of Care treatment plan is to further remove her estrogen. Taking estrogen away from women, or selectively blocking it without ever considering the synergy between the estrogen and progesterone, the most selective potent apoptotic factor known in the human body, is not the way to eradicate cancer. It's the way to cause heart disease and Alzheimer's. Are They
- Page 53 and 54: 50 claim." Therefore, since the ter
- Page 55 and 56: 52 Such quality control problems ha
- Page 57 and 58: 54 Statement Before the U.S. <stron
- Page 59 and 60: in the U.S., whereas WHI participan
- Page 61 and 62: 58 between science and hearsay and
- Page 63 and 64: 60 How can we determine whether bio
- Page 65 and 66: 62 doctors-are not getting the obje
- Page 67 and 68: 64 27. Writing Group for the PEPI T
- Page 69 and 70: 66 Dr. MANSON. Well, I think that m
- Page 71 and 72: 68 Statement of Leonard Wartofsky,
- Page 73 and 74: 70 in the WHI. In fact, no study as
- Page 75 and 76: In summary, the Endocrine Society i
- Page 77 and 78: 74 The FDA also regulates aspects o
- Page 79 and 80: Statement of Loyd V. Allen, Jr., Ph
- Page 81 and 82: Statement of Loyd V. Allen, Jr., Ph
- Page 83 and 84: Statement of Loyd V. Allen, Jr., Ph
- Page 85 and 86: 82 Senator SMITH. Dr. Allen, as I h
- Page 87 and 88: 84 Now, when you are talking about
- Page 89 and 90: 86 The only thing the WHI proved wa
- Page 91 and 92: 88 Testimony Of T.S. Wiley before t
- Page 93 and 94: Confusion and Media Hype 90 Instead
- Page 95 and 96: 92 see a doctor tell a diabetic nea
- Page 97 and 98: 94 the only compelling reason to ta
- Page 99 and 100: 96 identical hormones synthesized f
- Page 101 and 102: 98 The world as we know it, from ba
- Page 103: 100 thereby experienced long period
- Page 107 and 108: 104 had reached optimum theoretical
- Page 109 and 110: 106 and the patient can be can reas
- Page 111 and 112: 108 Estradiol and Analytical Resear
- Page 113 and 114: 110 A controlled systematic pilot c
- Page 115 and 116: 112 of set doses. The Wiley Protoco
- Page 117 and 118: 114 I'd advocate for either Accredi
- Page 119 and 120: 116 D.C., and established a goal to
- Page 121 and 122: 118 If this legislation passes, fed
- Page 123 and 124: first and second finger on the barr
- Page 125 and 126: 122 These products that have been s
- Page 127 and 128: 124 Bcl-2, survivin and variant CD4
- Page 129 and 130: 126 These are experiments by other
- Page 131 and 132: 128 cerebro-cellular inflammation c
- Page 133 and 134: 130 Years # women *1>0.5 8 *1+ 9 *2
- Page 135 and 136: *Breast cancer 132 -57 y.o. recurre
- Page 137 and 138: 134 *Labor intense for patient and
- Page 139 and 140: 136 Senator SMITH. Thank you very m
- Page 141 and 142: 138 makes these hormones uniquely s
- Page 143 and 144: 140 tomize the Wiley Protocol by ra
- Page 145 and 146: 142 "natural," because all lead to
- Page 147 and 148: 144 maceutical commerce, often with
- Page 149 and 150: 146 WHITE PAPER #1 DID YOU KNOW THA
- Page 151 and 152: 148 WHITE PAPER #2 Pharmacy Compoun
- Page 153 and 154: 150 bleeding of the bowel, locate t
101<br />
the grand scheme of things, old women - aren't women at all past a certain point. If this<br />
phase-shift happens quickly- say after decades of childbearing and breastfeeding --some<br />
of us make it through it without getting cancer. But, if it takes too l<strong>on</strong>g, we're targeted for<br />
transformati<strong>on</strong>, because cancer is an evoluti<strong>on</strong>ary functi<strong>on</strong> in nature. All of the genes<br />
active in cancer are active at <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong>e other time in life. They are all switched <strong>on</strong> in the<br />
high estrogen/low progester<strong>on</strong>e state of the first nine weeks of life in utero when we are<br />
neither man nor woman. Since nature abhors a vacuum and is about duality, we must be<br />
<strong>on</strong>e or the other -- man or woman.<br />
We can't remain in limbo for more than nine weeks or nature will take over,<br />
trying out combinati<strong>on</strong>al strategies in an effort to make us become "something". Cancer<br />
is no plague <strong>on</strong> mankind, it is life, it's just the new you. It's a group of cells turned <strong>on</strong> to<br />
rapid unchecked growth by genes that are exactly the same in fetal tissue. That's why<br />
they call them fetal <strong>on</strong>cogenes in research.<br />
That's also why cancer isn't something you can kill like a germ with an antibiotic.<br />
You can't bum it, pois<strong>on</strong> it or take it away because it is us -- or at least what's become of<br />
us in the absence of performing a role in nature. Cancer is actually the genetic creativity<br />
shown in nature when an organism ceases to fit into-The Plan.<br />
Of rn'rce, a lot of us die froali this evoluti<strong>on</strong>ary tuncti<strong>on</strong>, but many of us live with<br />
it, too. 93% of elderly men show some degree of prostate cancer <strong>on</strong> autopsy, but it's not<br />
listed as the cause of death. Most of us will likely die with, not of, some form of cancer.<br />
Cancer is <strong>on</strong>ly transformati<strong>on</strong>, unless it kills you first.<br />
I believe there is an alternative. We can turn back the clock with the products<br />
nature has to offer. The catch is, how do we prove it? You see <strong>on</strong>ly the bio-identical<br />
molecules do this. The product from Wyeth does not. The horm<strong>on</strong>e receptors can tell the<br />
difference. The bio-identicals need to be compounded from bulk materials and left in<br />
their unpatentable form. All that means is that the drug companies w<strong>on</strong>'t make as much<br />
m<strong>on</strong>ey as they would by turning it into a drug. That also means there's no m<strong>on</strong>ey for<br />
research because drug companies foot the bills for scientists and those drug companies<br />
will never be able to patent a "natural substance" and their already patented drugs d<strong>on</strong>'t<br />
work the same way <strong>on</strong> almost any system in a woman's body. Oh, and then there's the<br />
impending Kennedy, Burr, Roberts Bill that could literally put an end to it all.