20.02.2013 Views

BioSciences - Polysciences, Inc.

BioSciences - Polysciences, Inc.

BioSciences - Polysciences, Inc.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Additional Particles<br />

Microspheres & Particles<br />

Instrument Quality Control<br />

For confidence in test or assay results, a facility must employ a comprehensive quality assurance program that encompasses employee<br />

training and routine instrument maintenance and quality control. Facilities should also ensure that studies, particularly those involving<br />

quantitative fluorescence measurements, are conducted with appropriate standardization.<br />

Microsphere standards aid in defining the instrument’s capabilities and limitations in terms of sensitivity, precision and accuracy and<br />

provide a means for ensuring that the instrument is stable and suitable for use. They are also helpful in understanding the effects of<br />

extraneous factors, such as temperature, humidity and electronic noise. The comparison of daily and historical QC data aids in the<br />

identification of random errors (due to electronic noise, air bubbles, etc.) and systematic errors (due to bias, shifts and trends caused by<br />

temperature variation, laser deterioration, misalignment, etc.) so that suitable corrective action may be taken.<br />

Daily Controls<br />

Flow cytometers are highly configurable and results can vary dramatically with different instrument settings. Establishing a common “Win-<br />

dow of Analysis” for each detector, with the upper and lower fluorescence limits defined, allows reference populations to be positioned in<br />

approximately the same place on the same scale. This type of standardized instrument set-up ensures consistency of results from specific<br />

instruments and enables meaningful comparison between instruments. Therefore, the general status and stability of the cytometer must<br />

be checked daily. In addition, by plotting values over time, random and systemic errors may be identified and corrected. Manually aligned<br />

instruments must be aligned daily. If the data from multiple instruments and/or sites are to be compared, all instruments must be standardized<br />

daily, using the same standard bead. If multi-color analysis and/or quantitation is being performed, then the appropriate standards<br />

must be run on that same day.<br />

Weekly Controls<br />

If only qualitative analyses are being run, weekly checks of the detection threshold, resolution and linearity are sufficient to establish sensitivity.<br />

Some cytometers are fixed alignment instruments. For these, alignment may be verified weekly rather than established daily.<br />

In addition to a regular QA/QC program, specific analyses may require other controls, such as count standards, size standards or<br />

reference standards. Experiments and analyses must be critically evaluated for inclusion of the appropriate controls prior to<br />

instrumental analysis.<br />

For more information please call (800) 523-2575 or visit: polysciences.com 307

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!