20.02.2013 Views

SELFISH INTENTIONS - K-REx - Kansas State University

SELFISH INTENTIONS - K-REx - Kansas State University

SELFISH INTENTIONS - K-REx - Kansas State University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

only the right to divorce would insure that abused women were not forever trapped in such<br />

brutality. For any particular case, however, the question must necessarily be asked: did a<br />

divorce petition of this type reveal a horrible and vicious truth, or did it merely reveal a woman<br />

who knew what language must necessarily be used to leave an inconvenient marriage? Clearly,<br />

the district judges who were polled the same year that Susanna Downing filed this petition were<br />

suspicious that, at least at times, it was the latter that guided the plaintiff’s actions. Certainly in<br />

the Downing case, some of the action that ensued raised those very questions about Susanna.<br />

There was, for example, the fact that the Court records for this case included a letter from<br />

Susanna’s attorney, dated February 2, 1899, to the sheriff of Wyandotte County. The attorney<br />

offered the sheriff compensation to serve a summons for Mr. Downing to return to Clay County<br />

for the case. The problem was that the sheriff would have to find him first: the attorney<br />

provided a physical description of William Downing, his last known address, and the<br />

information that Downing was believed to be in <strong>Kansas</strong> City working a meat packing plant. 145 If<br />

Downing was no longer in Clay County, why had Susanna Downing filed for a restraining order<br />

in early January? And did it mean anything that this allegedly terrorized woman had specifically<br />

asked that Downing be required to leave her property alone?<br />

William Downing was obviously found because he responded to the divorce petition in<br />

late February. Not surprisingly, he denied all of her claims of abuse. But his response went on<br />

to make a startling accusation: his wife, he claimed, had lured him into marriage under false<br />

pretenses and, since the beginning of the marriage, had treated him with contempt. In short,<br />

William Downing turned the tables. There was an abused party, but his claim was that it was<br />

himself.<br />

145 Downing v Downing, Clay Center District Court, Case No. 4549, <strong>State</strong> of <strong>Kansas</strong> (Letter from Prosecuting<br />

Attorney Williams to the Sheriff of Wyandotte County, <strong>Kansas</strong>).<br />

63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!