SELFISH INTENTIONS - K-REx - Kansas State University
SELFISH INTENTIONS - K-REx - Kansas State University
SELFISH INTENTIONS - K-REx - Kansas State University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
only the right to divorce would insure that abused women were not forever trapped in such<br />
brutality. For any particular case, however, the question must necessarily be asked: did a<br />
divorce petition of this type reveal a horrible and vicious truth, or did it merely reveal a woman<br />
who knew what language must necessarily be used to leave an inconvenient marriage? Clearly,<br />
the district judges who were polled the same year that Susanna Downing filed this petition were<br />
suspicious that, at least at times, it was the latter that guided the plaintiff’s actions. Certainly in<br />
the Downing case, some of the action that ensued raised those very questions about Susanna.<br />
There was, for example, the fact that the Court records for this case included a letter from<br />
Susanna’s attorney, dated February 2, 1899, to the sheriff of Wyandotte County. The attorney<br />
offered the sheriff compensation to serve a summons for Mr. Downing to return to Clay County<br />
for the case. The problem was that the sheriff would have to find him first: the attorney<br />
provided a physical description of William Downing, his last known address, and the<br />
information that Downing was believed to be in <strong>Kansas</strong> City working a meat packing plant. 145 If<br />
Downing was no longer in Clay County, why had Susanna Downing filed for a restraining order<br />
in early January? And did it mean anything that this allegedly terrorized woman had specifically<br />
asked that Downing be required to leave her property alone?<br />
William Downing was obviously found because he responded to the divorce petition in<br />
late February. Not surprisingly, he denied all of her claims of abuse. But his response went on<br />
to make a startling accusation: his wife, he claimed, had lured him into marriage under false<br />
pretenses and, since the beginning of the marriage, had treated him with contempt. In short,<br />
William Downing turned the tables. There was an abused party, but his claim was that it was<br />
himself.<br />
145 Downing v Downing, Clay Center District Court, Case No. 4549, <strong>State</strong> of <strong>Kansas</strong> (Letter from Prosecuting<br />
Attorney Williams to the Sheriff of Wyandotte County, <strong>Kansas</strong>).<br />
63