SELFISH INTENTIONS - K-REx - Kansas State University
SELFISH INTENTIONS - K-REx - Kansas State University
SELFISH INTENTIONS - K-REx - Kansas State University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CHAPTER 3 - Concerns about Liberal Divorce Law<br />
Statistics compiled by the Bureau of Labor and Statistics showed that women were the<br />
primary petitioners for divorce in <strong>Kansas</strong>. During the forty-year period from 1867 to 1906,<br />
<strong>Kansas</strong> women petitioned the court 25,334 out of the total number of 36,094 or 70.2% of the<br />
cases petitioned. The number one cause for divorce was abandonment. 46.5% of the divorce<br />
cases in <strong>Kansas</strong> were filed based on the ground of abandonment. Of the divorces filed by<br />
women, 40.9% of them filed on the basis of abandonment. The second highest ground for<br />
divorce was cruelty, a charge made in 18.8% of the divorce cases. 23.5% of the cases filed by<br />
women used cruelty as the reason behind the petition. 98 These statistics show that the state of<br />
<strong>Kansas</strong> along with other western states had a problem with men abandoning their wives and<br />
families. Since society in the west was more fluid than on the east coast men could simply walk<br />
away from their marriages. In many cases, women would be left destitute after their husband<br />
abandoned them; therefore, they needed the support of the court system in order to retain their<br />
rights to certain property, in order to remarry to keep their family in tact, or to retain custody of<br />
their children.<br />
Following the 1909 changes in the state statute, lawyers found that one change in the<br />
statutes could possibly lead to an increase in divorces in <strong>Kansas</strong>. The statute in question was<br />
section 664 which required the plaintiff to be a resident in good faith of the state for at least one<br />
year preceding the filing of the petition. The statute further required that the plaintiff be a<br />
resident of the county in which the legal action was adjudicated. These requirements were<br />
retained from the previous statutes; however, following these requirements the statute read,<br />
98 Wright, 103-105.<br />
39