SELFISH INTENTIONS - K-REx - Kansas State University
SELFISH INTENTIONS - K-REx - Kansas State University
SELFISH INTENTIONS - K-REx - Kansas State University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
years, and that into their large and beautiful rooms, where can be found now the largest line of<br />
fine millinery, ladies’ tailored suits, waists, skirts, furs, neckwear, and novelties.” 85<br />
Before she married, Mrs. Selts trained in the millinery and dressmaking business in<br />
Illinois. When she began her millinery business, she bought her goods from a reliable Chicago<br />
millinery house. For twenty-five years she continued to buy from this same company which was<br />
the largest and best millinery house in the United <strong>State</strong>s. 86 The newspaper article maintained,<br />
“Mrs. Selts attributes a large part of her success to the fact that she made a wise choice in the<br />
beginning and then knew enough to stick to a reliable house. The business made a steady<br />
increase from the very first.” 87 In 1887, her son Henry took over the growing jewelry<br />
department after having studied watch repair for three years. From that point on, the two worked<br />
together in the business. After twenty years in the same location, the business needed more<br />
space, so the Selts Millinery and Jewelry store moved to a larger building that allowed the Selts<br />
to expand their merchandise. 88 Mrs. Selts clearly possessed an aptitude for business; however, it<br />
was also this aptitude for business that led her to divorce her husband.<br />
Seventeen years into her run as a business owner and thirty-one years into her marriage,<br />
Mrs. Ida M. Selts petitioned the Clay Center District Court for a divorce from Mr. Benjamin D.<br />
Selts. In the Court Petition, Mrs. Selts cited abandonment as the reason behind her divorce<br />
petition. She claimed that they had lived together as husband and wife until Benjamin<br />
abandoned her in 1890 during which time she had remained a “good and faithful wife,” a<br />
standard claim in most divorce petitions. 89 In her petition before the court, Mrs. Selts based her<br />
case solely on the fact that Mr. Selts had not been holding up his part of the union. She claimed<br />
85<br />
Ibid.<br />
86<br />
The Times, “It is Historical,” 6 April 1905, 1.<br />
87<br />
Ibid.<br />
88<br />
Ibid.<br />
89<br />
Selts v Selts, Clay County District Court, Case No. 4386, <strong>State</strong> of <strong>Kansas</strong>.<br />
33