SELFISH INTENTIONS - K-REx - Kansas State University
SELFISH INTENTIONS - K-REx - Kansas State University
SELFISH INTENTIONS - K-REx - Kansas State University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
divorce. They had to have been abandoned or emotionally terrorized in order to have grounds to<br />
file for divorce.<br />
These conservative alterations in divorce law made the relative liberality of western legal<br />
codes regarding divorce even more dramatic. First, the divorce laws of the West provided for a<br />
greater number of grounds for divorce, and hence, provided women (and men) with more options<br />
and a greater ability to use the law. Also, western divorce laws had shorter waiting periods for<br />
establishing residency and for finalizing divorces. The reasons for this openness are not entirely<br />
clear, but most historians believed that it stemmed from the uncertainties of western life. Men<br />
and women faced difficulties unknown to the settled life in the East. Divorce became a remedy<br />
for women especially when their husbands abused them or abandoned them. Abandonment and<br />
extreme cruelty were the top two reasons listed on divorce petitions in the west. As one of the<br />
earliest examples, the state of Illinois provided both men and women with liberal access to<br />
divorce. In that state the circuit courts had held jurisdiction over divorce since 1819 and the state<br />
legislature banned legislative divorces in any capacity in 1839. In particular, Illinois followed,<br />
Indiana as the first states to pass an omnibus, or incompatibility, clause. After the passage of the<br />
omnibus clause, the courts “allowed petitioners to obtain divorces for any misconduct that<br />
resulted in unhappiness and destroyed the marriage relationship.” 51 Historian Stacy Pratt<br />
McDermott argues that many Illinois women used divorce when in a situation of marital<br />
difficulty. 52 She also believes that such “situations” were actually encouraged by the legislature.<br />
She contends that the system of patriarchy had shifted to a system of paternalism in Illinois: “A<br />
paternalistic interpretation suggests that Illinois legislators carefully crafted divorce law in order<br />
51 Stacey Pratt McDermott, “Dissolving the Bonds of Matrimony: Women and Divorce in Sangamon County,<br />
Illinois, 1837-60,” in Daniel W. Stowell, ed., In Tender Consideration: Women, Families, and the Law in Abraham<br />
Lincoln’s Illinois, (Chicago: <strong>University</strong> of Illinois Press, 2002), 74.<br />
52 Ibid., 71.<br />
17