20.02.2013 Views

Qualitative_data_analysis

Qualitative_data_analysis

Qualitative_data_analysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

74 QUALITATIVE DATA ANALYSIS<br />

• How can you tell the difference between Essex Girl and a supermarket trolley<br />

(the supermarket trolley has a mind of its own).<br />

• How does an Essex Girl turn on the light afterwards? She kicks open the car<br />

door.<br />

• What did the Essex Girl ask when told she was pregnant? ‘How do you know<br />

it’s mine?’<br />

This humour has a savage streak, and Brown comments that these are jokes which<br />

‘no one would dare to tell’ against traditional targets of humour. As social mores<br />

change, so do social scapegoats. A recent example was an intended joke made by a<br />

panellist on a satirical TV programme when asked to explain the difference between<br />

four people, one of whom was black. The comment ‘Well, one of them is coloured’<br />

was greeted with a stony silence on all sides, and the panellist had to be rescued from<br />

his embarrassing predicament. Colour is no longer a ‘funny’ issue.<br />

Despite its penchant for disrupting expectations, humour may function to<br />

confirm rather than undermine stereotypes. Women as a butt of humour often<br />

involves confirmation of male conceits: the female as sexually avaricious, the wife as<br />

a pain in the neck. The Essex girl is stereotyped as brainless, promiscuous, and<br />

incredibly stupid. The doctor is typecast as a drunk. Men with white socks are<br />

stereotyped as unreliable, untrustworthy and prone to vaseline jokes. Humour<br />

trades in such stereotypes, affirming rather than subverting existing values.<br />

Finally, we can ask how humour treats its victims. Are we invited to laugh at<br />

them, or laugh with them? Is there, as Merrill suggests, a ‘distance between empathy<br />

and judgement’, such that criticism is softened by empathy? Or are the victims<br />

subjected to unmitigated ridicule? Is comedy self-critical without being selfdeprecating?<br />

Is humour critical without being cruel?<br />

Main themes in <strong>analysis</strong> of humour<br />

• Disrupting expectations: incongruity<br />

• Releasing emotions: catharsis<br />

• Affirming or subverting values<br />

• Laughing with or at victims<br />

• Trading in stereotypes<br />

We have identified a number of themes which can form the main threads of our<br />

<strong>analysis</strong> (Figure 5.2).<br />

Now we can consider how these can be woven together. For example, we could<br />

distinguish between style and substance in humour, drawing a contrast between

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!