20.02.2013 Views

Qualitative_data_analysis

Qualitative_data_analysis

Qualitative_data_analysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

68 QUALITATIVE DATA ANALYSIS<br />

expectations and assumptions it reveals, or the particular groups it targets? Do we<br />

want to look at humour from a philosophical, psychological, sociological,<br />

anthropological, semantic or literary perspective, or some combination of these?<br />

Addressing or re-addressing such basic questions can help to develop a focus for the<br />

<strong>analysis</strong>.<br />

Another way of finding a focus is through a review of the decisions we have made<br />

in selecting material for <strong>analysis</strong>. Why have we selected the particular sites,<br />

individuals or events we have included in our observations? If they are in some way<br />

‘typical’ or ‘exceptional’, then how are they ‘typical’ or ‘exceptional’—and why is<br />

this important? Why choose Victoria Wood as an example? How, if at all, is<br />

Victoria Wood ‘representative’ of a wider population? Is it because she is successful?<br />

Does it matter that she is a woman? Is it important that she is a contemporary<br />

comedienne? Is it significant that she works in television and radio as well as in<br />

print? How we answer these questions may help to focus our <strong>analysis</strong>. For example,<br />

we might concentrate on issues of gender, taking Victoria Wood as a significant figure<br />

amongst contemporary female humorists. Thinking through the reasons we have<br />

selected our <strong>data</strong> can give us clues about the direction our <strong>analysis</strong> should take.<br />

We also have to think about our potential audience: who is going to read the results<br />

of the research, and what would be interesting or useful to report? We can ask<br />

ourselves bluntly: who cares? If we are conducting a study of gender and humour for<br />

a television network, for example, we might identify a rather different set of analytic<br />

interests and concerns, than if we are hoping to produce a Ph.D. in media studies.<br />

We also have to ask ourselves another blunt question: so what? Trying to anticipate<br />

what our audience may value as a worthwhile <strong>analysis</strong> can help to shape our<br />

thinking even at a preliminary stage. In some cases, such as policy-oriented research,<br />

it may be possible or indeed necessary to discuss research aims and analytic<br />

objectives with others with a stake in the project’s outcomes.<br />

Questions to help find a focus<br />

• What kind of <strong>data</strong> are we analysing?<br />

• How can we characterize this <strong>data</strong>?<br />

• What are our analytic objectives?<br />

• Why have we selected this <strong>data</strong>?<br />

• How is the <strong>data</strong> representative/exceptional ?<br />

• Who wants to know? What do they want to know?<br />

Rather than start the <strong>analysis</strong> from scratch, we also need to consider what<br />

resources we can call upon. In trying to clarify our interests and aims, we may want

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!