20.02.2013 Views

Qualitative_data_analysis

Qualitative_data_analysis

Qualitative_data_analysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FINDING A FOCUS 67<br />

Sheila The solicitor.<br />

Victoria He was OK—but, as he says himself, he does a<br />

lot of conveyancing so that’ll be seventeen<br />

phone calls just to meet him for a cup of coffee.<br />

Sheila I was rather taken with Simon—the<br />

gynaecologist.<br />

Victoria No—too inhibiting. You can’t flirt with<br />

someone who can visualise your Fallopian<br />

tubes.<br />

Sheila Now Malcolm—what do you think he meant<br />

by ‘lively social life’?<br />

Victoria Drink.<br />

Sheila He wants a breezy, uninhibited companion.<br />

Victoria To drink with.<br />

Sheila And what do you think he meant by ‘life<br />

peppered with personal tragedy’?<br />

Victoria Hangovers.<br />

Source: Wood 1990:39 (abridged)<br />

What kind of humour is this? Well, it is not slapstick comedy, nor joke-telling.<br />

The humour is woven into an ordinary conversation between two women discussing<br />

men. The conversation is ‘ordinary’, but the images are ‘extraordinary’—the drive<br />

tarmacked eight times, the seventeen phone calls. The subject may be mundane, but<br />

the style is distinctive, with an obvious leaning towards hyperbole. There is also a<br />

deflationary element to this humour, with male pretensions punctured by Victoria’s<br />

cynical comments. This sketch has an obvious target. Even on a first and superficial<br />

impression, then, we can identify some lines for <strong>analysis</strong>. We could explore the use<br />

made of the contrast between the ordinary setting and the extraordinary images, or<br />

how the humour targets certain victims. Even at this stage, our general knowledge<br />

of the <strong>data</strong> can shape our thinking, suggest some main themes, and impose some<br />

parameters on our <strong>analysis</strong>.<br />

Why analyse this kind of humour? To answer that question, we have to ask<br />

another: why humour in the first place? Before we plunge headlong into the<br />

<strong>analysis</strong>, this is the point at which to reflect upon our reasons for undertaking the<br />

research. This is a useful exercise, even if means going over old ground. No matter<br />

how well thought out our initial research aims, in the interim, our ideas may have<br />

developed or changed. Why are we interested in humour? Are we simply interested<br />

in what makes people laugh? Are we interested in how the humorist achieves her<br />

effects? Are we interested in the substance of humour—the general social

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!