20.02.2013 Views

Qualitative_data_analysis

Qualitative_data_analysis

Qualitative_data_analysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

66 QUALITATIVE DATA ANALYSIS<br />

options for our <strong>analysis</strong>. The danger lies not in having assumptions but in not being<br />

aware of them; in qualitative <strong>analysis</strong> we should try to suspend beliefs in familiar<br />

convictions and examine evidence in a new and critical way (Edson 1988).<br />

Finding a focus is not something we consider as an afterthought, once we have<br />

embarked on our research and already produced our <strong>data</strong>. It is a process initiated in<br />

the very moment we first conceive of a research project. It is more or less explicit in<br />

the articulation of our research objectives, in the design of the project, in the kind of<br />

<strong>data</strong> we have decided to collect and what we anticipate doing with it. As we begin to<br />

analyse our <strong>data</strong>, we need to review (and perhaps revise) our analytic focus given the<br />

implications of earlier decisions for the development of our <strong>analysis</strong>.<br />

One way of finding a focus for our <strong>analysis</strong> is to reflect upon the <strong>data</strong> we have to<br />

analyse. What kind of <strong>data</strong> has the research produced? Sometimes, we don’t get what<br />

we expected. Even if the <strong>data</strong> does conform to our initial expectations, we have to<br />

be sure that our focus is in tune with the <strong>data</strong>. We need to know what we are going<br />

to analyse. At this stage, this is more a matter of forming some general impressions<br />

and intuitions, than making a detailed study of the <strong>data</strong>.<br />

Let us explore this through the example of humour. Suppose we have chosen as<br />

our subject the humour of a pre-eminent comedienne, Victoria Wood. Following<br />

up our interest in dating and mating, Illustration 5.1 is a sketch in which Sheila<br />

hopes to find a mate through video dating. Victoria is discussing with Sheila some<br />

of the (un)likely prospects they saw on her videotape.<br />

Looking at our example, what kind of <strong>data</strong> is this? The first point we may note is<br />

that we are dealing with text rather than video. Although this sketch is the basis for<br />

a performance, we have only the text before us. There are aspects of humour, to do<br />

with visual clues, timing, and setting, which we cannot analyse unless we have access<br />

to the complete performance. This immediately draws some boundaries around<br />

what we can achieve in our <strong>analysis</strong>.<br />

ILLUSTRATION 5.1<br />

‘THE LIBRARY’<br />

Victoria So who did you fancy?<br />

Sheila Oh I’m no judge of character, Victoria.<br />

Victoria Do you think I am? I’ve had my drive<br />

tarmacked eight times.<br />

Sheila Give me your views on Rodney.<br />

Victoria Well, Rodney had white towelling socks, didn’t<br />

he? Which in my book makes him unreliable,<br />

untrustworthy and prone to vaseline jokes.<br />

Mark…

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!